logo
Most Irish J1 students unaffected by US move to halt interviews for visas

Most Irish J1 students unaffected by US move to halt interviews for visas

Irish Times28-05-2025
Most Irish students who have applied for J1 visas to work in the United States this summer will be unaffected by the US government's suspension of visa interviews for foreign students, according to travel experts.
Embassies and consulates have been
ordered to stop scheduling new appointments
for student and exchange visitor visa applicants as the US State Department prepares to expand social media vetting of foreign students.
Travel firms who help to administer J1 visas for Irish students said the vast majority of students have had their applications processed, while those with scheduled interviews at the US embassy are exempt from the pause.
About 5,000 Irish students are expected to travel on J1 visas this summer, a similar number to last year.
READ MORE
A cable from the US State Department to embassies – reported by Reuters – states that it is 'conducting a review of existing operations and processes for screening and vetting of student and exchange visitor (F, M, J) visa applicants, and, based on that review, plans to issue guidance on expanded social media vetting for all such applicants'.
Michael Doorley, owner of SayIt Travel, who has been organising J1 visa applications for more than 20 years, said the vast majority of summer workers can breathe a sigh of relief.
'J1 students are pretty much done and dusted by this stage,' said. 'If you're on the record as having applied – our understanding is that applicants with existing interview appointments should still be able to attend those.'
Sheelagh Daly, director of sales for the Council on International Educational Exchange, agreed that only a very small number of J1 students who have not yet applied may be affected.
'It is an evolving situation. We expect to get update guidance [on student visa applications] over the coming days, so we'll be monitoring that closely, but we're confident that almost all J1 students are on track.'
[
Irish students' J1 plans in the Trump era: 'We said we wouldn't go ahead. It just isn't safe'
Opens in new window
]
Aontas na Mac Léinn in Éirinn (AMLÉ), the national representative body for students, acknowledged 'growing concerns around political expression, social media monitoring, and student safety'.
It called on both US and Irish authorities to provide 'clear, consistent information to protect students' rights and ensure their safety while abroad'.
Chris Clifford, AMLÉ's president, said Irish students should not be discouraged from pursuing cultural exchange programmes.
'Those who have already applied can proceed with confidence. For those intending to apply, we recommend acting quickly and maintaining contact with your provider. AMLÉ will continue to support and advocate for all students involved in the J1 programme,' he said.
Last March, consular officers were first told to scrutinise the social media content of some applicants for student and other types of visas. That directive said that officers need to refer certain student and exchange visitor visa applicants to the 'fraud prevention unit' for a 'mandatory social media check'.
[
Irish J1 visa students urged to be informed of potential risks of 'activism' in US
Opens in new window
]
In recent months, US president
Donald Trump
's administration has spoken about cancelling student visas, revoking green cards and scrutinising the social media history of foreign visitors, mainly in the context of outrage around Israel's war in Gaza.
Mr Doorley of SayIt Travel said it has advised J1 students to be 'careful' about their use of social media. Despite the political atmosphere in the US, he said demand was as strong as ever for J1 visas.
'It's still a rite of passage for students,' he said. 'We filled our quota and still had a waiting list of about 150 students.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

International protection applicants from Pakistan added to accelerated processing list
International protection applicants from Pakistan added to accelerated processing list

Irish Times

time5 hours ago

  • Irish Times

International protection applicants from Pakistan added to accelerated processing list

Asylum seekers from Pakistan will have their applications fast-tracked under plans introduced on Tuesday. The Department of Justice said applications from Pakistan have grown 'considerably' in recent years. In each of the last two quarters, Pakistani nationals ranked as the second-highest nationality for international protection applications. As of July 24th, 905 people from Pakistan sought international protection in Ireland this year. This compares to 1,391 for the whole of 2024, 624 in 2023, 242 in 2022 and 68 in 2021. Since November 2022, international protection applicants from certain countries receive a decision on their application in about four months. This timeline is expected to further reduce in the coming months, said a department spokesperson. READ MORE Accelerated processing for certain international protection applications previously focused on people from 15 'safe countries of origin': Albania, Algeria, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Botswana, Brazil, Egypt, Georgia, India, Kosovo, Malawi, Morocco, Macedonia, Montenegro, Serbia and South Africa. The process was more recently widened to include countries from where there has been a surge in the numbers seeking asylum, such as Nigeria and Jordan. Commenting on the addition of Pakistan to the accelerated processing list, Mr O'Callaghan said he is 'committed to ensuring that the protection system works for those who genuinely need our help'. One of the ways this is done is by prioritising applications for people from safe countries or countries with a large number of applications, he said. 'This approach allows us to adapt to the changing patterns of international protection and is a critical element of our firm but fair approach.' Mr O'Callaghan said this approach is 'working'. He noted there has been a 43 per cent reduction in application numbers compared to this time last year. A third of asylum seekers entering the State this year have had their applications considered under the fast-track decision-making process, according to figures from earlier this month . Figures shared at a meeting of the Cabinet subcommittee on migration showed 32 per cent of applications are being accelerated.

Somali diplomat challenges detention in Dublin jail over alleged people smuggling
Somali diplomat challenges detention in Dublin jail over alleged people smuggling

Irish Times

time9 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Somali diplomat challenges detention in Dublin jail over alleged people smuggling

A Somali diplomat arrested at Dublin Airport and charged with people-smuggling offences has launched a High Court challenge against his detention in an Irish prison, claiming diplomatic immunity. Mohamed Abdallatif Hussein, who is attached to the Federal Republic of Somalia embassy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, was arrested by gardaí at Dublin Airport on November 26th last year. He was brought before Dublin District Court later that day accused of two counts of alleged people smuggling under the Criminal Justice (Smuggling of Persons) Act, 2021, at Dublin Airport's terminal one. On the same date, he was also charged with two further offences under the Act. READ MORE Last January at Cloverhill District Court he was further charged with four counts of alleged people smuggling under the Act at terminal two, Dublin Airport, on November 6th and September 30th last year. He has not yet entered a plea on any of the eight charges. Barry Ward SC, for Mr Hussein, told the High Court on Monday his client has been held here 'unlawfully' since November and was entitled to diplomatic immunity. While only Mr Hussein's side was represented in court, Mr Ward told Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger his client was travelling under a diplomatic passport at the time of his arrest last November. Mr Ward is bringing the High Court application to have his client released from Cloverhill Prison. On Friday, Faisal Sadiq Khan of FSK Solicitors wrote to the prison governor, requesting his client's 'immediate' release under the Constitution's Article 40.4.2, which concerns the lawfulness of a person's detention. The request was refused by the prison, which said the release of Mr Hussein required a High Court order. Mr Hussein's lawyers say he is entitled to diplomatic immunity under the Vienna Convention. In a sworn statement to the court, Mr Khan said his client was a diplomatic agent 'within' the meaning ... the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, 1961, transposed into Irish law'. Mr Hussein is bringing the High Court application against the Director of Public Prosecutions and the governor of Cloverhill Prison. The matter is back before the High Court later this week.

High Court blocks residents' bid to challenge use of hotel for housing asylum seekers
High Court blocks residents' bid to challenge use of hotel for housing asylum seekers

Irish Times

time9 hours ago

  • Irish Times

High Court blocks residents' bid to challenge use of hotel for housing asylum seekers

The High Court has refused to allow several Co Galway residents to mount a challenge to the Government's decision to house international protection applicants at a hotel. Kinvara residents Ruth Sexton, Mary Boyce, Chris Hartnett Dalton and Paul Collins had asked the court for permission to challenge the decision from March to place up to 98 people in the village's Merriman Hotel, which is home at present to about 50 Ukrainians. The Merriman Hotel has accommodated international protection applicants since 2019, but, the residents said, the Government's decision in March constituted a fresh designation of the building as international protection accommodation. In designating a place as an accommodation centre, the Minister for Integration was obliged to consider the public interest under a statutory instrument provided for in the European Communities (Reception Conditions) Regulations 2018. READ MORE The residents said the Minister breached this obligation in his alleged designation of the building in March. In a ruling, Ms Justice Marguerite Bolger said the decision was not a fresh designation of the premises, so the statutory instrument did not apply. The hotel was clearly designated in 2019 when international protection applicants were first accommodated there, she said. The judge said she was not satisfied the residents had presented arguable grounds on which their case would succeed. She said the Minister was not legally obliged to consult residents or prepare an assessment of how his decision might affect local businesses, the availability of a local venue for family events or the availability of social services where a premises has already been designated as international protection accommodation. Ms Justice Bolger said the Government's decision was mainly grounded on the State's obligation to provide accommodation to those seeking asylum. 'The [residents] accept that the State has a legal obligation to provide accommodation for applicants for international protection, but seem to ask the court to prioritise their personal interest in having a hotel in their locality to accommodate tourists and provide a local venue for their family events over the State's attempt to comply with those national, European and international obligations,' she said. Ms Sexton, of Sexton's Bar, Main Street; Ms Boyce, of Cathercon; Mr Hartnett Dalton, of Northampton; and Mr Collins, of Crushoa, all Kinvara, had sought to bring proceedings against the Minister for Integration and the Minister for Justice, Home Affairs and Migration.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store