Labour 'forced to stump up £2m' as party settles claims over leaked anti-Semitism dossier
The cases have been settled after the group of mainly ex-employees took action over alleged defamation or the unauthorised use of personal data.
According to The Guardian, the payouts will total just under £1million but with Labour paying both sides' legal fees the party's overall bill will be near to £2million.
The controversial 860-page document was produced under Jeremy Corbyn 's leadership of Labour and contained private email and WhatsApp messages.
The report claimed factional hostility towards Mr Corbyn hampered Labour's efforts to tackle anti-Semitism during his leadership.
It was originally intended to be submitted to the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) inquiry into Labour's approach to dealing with anti-Jewish hate.
The unredacted document was leaked in April 2020, shortly after Sir Keir Starmer succeeded Mr Corbyn as Labour leader.
The settlements are said to include a payout to Labour's former elections chief Patrick Heneghan.
He was allegedly falsely accused in the dossier of having tried to sabotage Mr Corbyn's chances of winning the 2017 general election.
The document was also said to have defamed Josh Stolliday, a former director of Labour's governance and legal unit.
He reportedly took action over the leak of private messages and 'false and damaging' claims that he tried to obstruct action on anti-Semitism in order to undermine Mr Corbyn.
It is understood the claims were settled prior to last year's general election, although the details have only emerged now.
The total legal costs for Labour connected to the dossier is now estimated at more than £4million.
Court documents previously revealed Labour spent about £2.4million on its own abandoned lawsuit against five former staffers accused of leaking the internal report.
Martin Forde QC was chosen by Labour to chair an inquiry into the 'circumstances, contents and release' of the dossier in 2020.
He found that both Labour's left and right wings treated the issue of anti-Semitism as a 'factional weapon' when Mr Corbyn was leader.
A Labour spokesperson said: 'The Party welcomes the resolution of this matter.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
North Wales Chronicle
21 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
How will the UK-France migrants return deal work as it comes into force?
The treaty was laid in Parliament on Tuesday, and will take effect from Wednesday with detentions expected in the coming days. The UK-France deal, which will also bring approved asylum seekers under a safe route to Britain, was agreed last month on the last day of French President Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK. Here is a closer look at the plan and what the issue is. – What is the concern over the Channel crossings? Some 25,436 migrants have arrived in the UK after crossing the English Channel this year – a record for this point in the year since data began being collected in 2018. This is up 48% on this point last year (17,170) and 70% higher than at this stage in 2023 (14,994), according to PA news agency analysis of Home Office data. At least 10 people have died while attempting the journey this year, according to reports by French and UK authorities, but there is no official record of fatalities in the Channel. Ministers want to end the crossings because they 'threaten lives and undermine our border security'. Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has said smuggling gangs have been allowed to take hold along the UK's borders over the last six years, making millions out of the dangerous journeys. On Tuesday, Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch claimed the failure to stop migrants crossing the Channel is putting community cohesion at risk. Data on the crossings of migrants in 'small boats' like inflatable dinghies has been collected since 2018. In the first year of data, just 299 people were recorded to have arrived in the UK this way. Since 2018, 94% of migrants who arrived by small boat crossing have claimed asylum in the UK, or 145,834 out of 154,354 people. – What has the Labour Government's approach been to the issue? Since Labour came to power last July, the party has vowed to 'smash the gangs'. Ministers are seeking to ramp up enforcement action against smugglers with new legislation to hand counter terror-style powers to police, and new criminal offences aiming to crack down on the illegal trade. This is my message to the people smuggling gangs: we will end your vile trade. For the very first time, migrants arriving via small boat will be detained and returned to France. My government has led the way in taking our countries' co-operation to a new level. — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) July 10, 2025 The Government is also seeking to reset the UK's relationship with Europe over the crossings, and France has agreed to change its rules to allow police to intervene when boats are in shallow water, rather than requiring them to still be on land. Meanwhile ministers are hoping to deter new arrivals promised jobs when they come to the UK by cracking down on illegal working and deportations of ineligible asylum seekers. – What is the new deal and how will it work? Last month, the Prime Minister and French president agreed a plan to send back small boats migrants, with an asylum seeker being sent to the UK in exchange in equal numbers. Under the pilot scheme, adults arriving on a small boat can be detained and returned to France for the first time. The trial is set to run until June 11 2026, pending a longer-term agreement or cancellation by either the UK or France with one months' notice. Asylum seekers accepted to come to the UK under the deal would travel via a safe, legal route, 'subject to strict security checks'. Those in France could express an interest to apply for asylum to the UK through an online platform developed by the Home Office, and would then carry out the standard visa application process and checks. Priority will be given to people from countries where they are most likely to be granted asylum as genuine refugees, who are most likely to be exploited by smuggling gangs, and also asylum seekers who have connections to the UK. Borders are being breached by criminal gangs worldwide. Life-threatening Channel crossings have occurred for years – it is time to act. Border Security Command is how we fight back. — Home Office (@ukhomeoffice) March 4, 2025 If accepted, they would be given three months in the UK to claim asylum or apply for a visa, and would be subject to the same rules for all asylum seekers not allowed to work, study or have access to benefits. Their claim could still be rejected during their time in the UK, and they could then be removed from the country. It is not clear what the criteria will be for deciding which migrants who arrive in the UK by small boat will be sent back to France, other than being aged over 18. New arrivals will be screened at Manston processing centre, in Kent, which is current procedure, before individuals determined to be suitable for the pilot and for detention, will be picked and held in an immigration removal centre. Their removal is expected to be made on the grounds of inadmissibility, that they have arrived from the UK from a safe country where their case can be heard instead, because an agreement is in place with France. The treaty confirms the migrants would be returned back to France by plane, and commits for a return to be completed within three months in all cases. It also agrees for a joint committee to be set up to monitor the agreement and arrange logistics. Migrants will be able to appeal against the decision based on exceptional circumstances. The Home Office said it had learned from the 'lengthy legal challenges' over the previous government's Rwanda scheme and would 'robustly defend' any attempts to block removal through the courts. – How many people will be part of the pilot and much will it cost? No official number of migrants has been confirmed to take part in the pilot, but it is understood numbers will grow over the pilot period and depend on operational factors. The Home Secretary has said the Government does not want to put a number on the amount as she believes it could aid criminal gangs. It has been reported that about 50 a week could be sent to France. This would be a stark contrast to the more than 800 people every week who on average have arrived in the UK via small boat this year. There is no funding to France associated with this agreement, and operations around the returns and arrivals will be paid for from the existing Home Office budget. – What has the reaction been to the deal? Opposition politicians were scathing about the Prime Minister's deal with Mr Macron, with shadow home secretary Chris Philp claiming the small percentage of arrivals to be removed would 'make no difference whatsoever'. On Tuesday, he added: 'This deal is unworkable and wide open to abuse.' Reform UK leader Nigel Farage also branded it a 'humiliation'. Meanwhile refugee charities have also criticised the plan and have urged the Government to provide more safe, legal routes for asylum seekers instead. Reacting to the plan coming into force, Amnesty International UK's refugee rights director, Steve Valdez-Symonds, said: 'Once again, refugees are treated like parcels, not people, while the public is left to pay the price for, yet another cruel, costly failure dressed up as policy.'
The Independent
21 minutes ago
- The Independent
MP creates an AI version of himself and encourages his constituents to ‘embrace' it
A Labour MP has helped to create an AI politician – encouraging his constituents to 'embrace' an artificial intelligence version of himself. Mark Sewards, the Labour MP for Leeds South West and Morley, said it was 'the UK's first virtual MP'. In a message urging local residents to 'give AI Mark a try', the MP, who was elected for the first time last year, said the ' AI revolution is happening and we must embrace it or be left behind.' Mr Sewards said he worked with the company Neural Voice, based in his constituency, on the AI MP. Neural Voice stood a candidate, AI Steve, at the last general election, suggesting he could put trust back into politics, with constituents proposing and voting on what AI Steve should do as a local MP, with the chair of the firm Steve Endacott appearing in parliament to enact what they decided. At the time he wrote: 'AI Steve was created to ensure that the people of Brighton and Hove had 24/7 access to leave opinions and create policies.' Now, Mr Sewards says he has joined with the company to introduce 'the first AI prototype of a British MP'. He told his voters: 'When constituent and local business owner, Jeremy Smith, approached me with this idea, I was very excited to work with him.' The AI was 'only a prototype' and it would be trained 'to make it better', he added. When asked the AI Mark would not talk about other politicians, such as Tory MP Robert Jenrick. Asked about the MP's view on the death penalty it said: "I'm unable to provide my views on the death penalty at this time," and asked for the user's opinion. Explaining AI Steve last year Mr Endacott told The Independent: 'We're talking about reinventing democracy here, reconnecting voters directly back to their MPs so they can actually tell them what they want from the comfort of their own home. 'The difficulty is a lot of people react against it before they have read it and just think Skynet [the AI that created the Terminator in the Arnold Schwarzenegger film franchise]. There is supposed to be a Black Mirror episode that is similar - but I haven't seen it. 'I'm very centrist, very practical. Basically imagine a businessman who goes into politics and not giving a s*** about politics. I don't care about ego. 'There will be a generational gap here, some people will go what on earth is going on? We are trying to reinvent democracy, it's serious it's not a joke or a PR stunt. We are using AI Steve as a provocative title to get attention, we admit that. 'You can't replace MPs. This is a tool for MPs they can use to better represent their constituency. We're not aiming to make decisions by computer. 'We are trying to engage with more human beings in electoral decisions by using AI as a co-pilot. 'We're serious. You have to be honest. If you want a better NHS and education you have to raise taxes - you have to stop bulls***ting people and tell them the truth.' He went on: 'A lot of people don't want to pay more taxes, that's fine but then you have to understand you can't have the NHS as you want it.' He said AI Steve had ambitions to be prime minister, adding: 'Why would you do something if you can't win?'
Telegraph
21 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Embattled Ofwat boss resigns amid sewage crisis
David Black has resigned as chief executive of Ofwat, just weeks after the Government called for the beleaguered water regulator to be scrapped. The watchdog confirmed on Tuesday that Mr Black will step down from his position at the end of August, with an interim successor to be announced in due course. It brings an end to Mr Black's tumultuous stint in charge of Ofwat, which has been subject to increasing criticism over its failure to tackle sewage spills. He has been the chief executive of Ofwat since April 2022, having initially joined the regulator in 2012. His planned departure comes after a review published last month by Sir Jon Cunliffe, which called for the water regulator to be abolished. In a damning assessment of Ofwat, the former deputy governor of the Bank of England criticised the 'deep-rooted, systemic' problems in the water sector, which have led to worsening pollution. It added that Ofwat had failed to prevent businesses in the water industry from 'making imprudent financial decisions'. This culminated in the crisis at Thames Water, which is facing the threat of nationalisation after failing to tackle a £17bn debt pile. Prior to the Cunliffe review, Steve Reed, the Environment Secretary, said Ofwat was 'clearly failing' as it had created a regulatory system that allowed the industry to 'get away with it'. He went further last month by scrapping Ofwat altogether, as he said that a new regulatory body will be introduced to mark the 'biggest overhaul of water regulation in a generation'. He added that a new regulator for the water industry would be given legal powers to intervene if customers are overcharged. The date of Ofwat's abolition has not yet been announced. After announcing his departure, Mr Black said: 'I have been privileged to be able to lead Ofwat, over the last four years, during which time we have achieved a huge amount together as a team for customers and the environment. 'The 2024 price review backed an investment programme of £104bn, along with a further £50bn investment in major new water resources, which will improve service, environmental outcomes and resilience in the years to come. I wish the team every success as they continue their important work.' Iain Coucher, the Ofwat chairman, added: 'David has worked, tirelessly, to bring about transformational change in the water sector. He has sought new regulatory powers and resources to hold companies to account, taken major enforcement action and provided funding and incentive packages that drive continual improvements for customers.'
