
STEPHEN DAISLEY: Forbes was the voice of moderate SNP politics...but they treated her like an embarrassment
But it also marks the final nail in the coffin of SNP centrism. The Deputy First Minister was the last woman standing for anyone who hoped the Nationalists could cut a more moderate path on the economy, social issues and the constitution.
Forbes entered the Scottish Parliament just nine years ago, young and idealistic about independence. Yet she brought a maturity that many political old-timers in the SNP could not match.
When she spoke, she understood that her audience was not the flag-waving faithful but the electorate at large, with its doubters and undecideds and people far too busy to have given much consideration to the great issues of the day.
Nothing demonstrated that maturity like her handling of the 2020 Budget.
With just hours to go before the annual costs were placed before Holyrood, finance secretary Derek Mackay abruptly resigned over text messages to a 16 year old.
Forbes, his deputy, stepped up instantly and won plaudits for the aplomb with which she delivered a speech she had barely had a chance to read.
Taking over for Mackay, she proved herself to be disciplined, rigorous and determined to strike a balance between growing the economy and redistributing resources to alleviate poverty.
For this sensible, middle-ground approach to politics, she was branded a right-winger, an indication of just how out of touch the Scottish parliament is with the nation it theoretically represents.
But what truly put Forbes beyond the pale were her devoutly held Christian beliefs. In an age in which tolerance is on everyone's lips, there was little shown for Forbes's Free Presbyterian faith. When she contested the leadership in 2023, following the abrupt resignation of Nicola Sturgeon, there was a concerted effort to make the entire contest about her suitability for office given her Christian principles.
It was an outrageous exercise in bias and prejudice that, had it been applied to any other religion, would have been readily acknowledged as such. Christians, however, are fair game, especially if they believe in such heresies as biological sex.
The Deputy First Minister signalled early on that she disbelieved in the gender identity ideology, and even though she was on maternity leave when Holyrood was voting through the Gender Recognition Reform Bill, she made clear during her joust with Humza Yousaf for the Nationalist crown that she rejected the notion that a man could 'self-identify' himself as a woman and that the law should change to reflect this.
She was right, as a series of legal cases, culminating in the Supreme Court judgment in For Women Scotland, would go on to verify.
Had Sturgeon and Yousaf listened to her, a great deal of division could have been avoided, not to mention costly legal fees.
As well as canny discernment, she earned a reputation for cutting putdowns that lingered on opponents. She branded Yousaf the 'continuity candidate' and told him during one TV debate: 'You were a transport minister and the trains were never on time, when you were justice secretary the police were stretched to breaking point, and now as health minister we've got record high waiting times.'
Yousaf may have defeated her for the leadership, but he wasn't able to emerge from the shadow of those barbs.
That John Swinney chose her as his deputy first minister speaks volumes about her significance as a voice of moderate SNP politics.
She stressed that wealth redistribution was only possible if first there was wealth generation. She urged fellow Nationalists to stop hectoring the public on independence and try to persuade them instead.
Neither counsel was taken on board and the SNP remains distant from the aspirational, sceptical voters it would need to secure and make a success of independence.
For advocating for Scotland in Europe and for Scotland to be in Europe, Winnie Ewing, an earlier figure on the mainstream wing of the SNP, was dubbed 'Madame Ecosse'.
Forbes, who advocated for the Nationalists among the Don't Knows, the Unionists and even the Tories, is the SNP's Ms Middle Scotland.
An opportunity to bring in voters who would never before have considered a vote for the Nationalists. Voters who might even be willing to listen on independence. And they treated her as an embarrassment, that is when some weren't trying to push her out of the party altogether. Sometimes — oftentimes — politicians are the most clueless practitioners of politics.
Forbes's exit clears the way for Stephen Flynn, the SNP's Westminster leader, to become John Swinney's heir apparent.
A blokey, lefty, loudmouth who would drag Scotland back to rancorous divisions over independence. With Forbes going, he will be the future now.
She would have made the better first minister for Scotland, he would push all the right buttons to get the party faithful cheering. Was there ever any doubt which would prosper in the SNP?
Forbes says she is standing down because she wants to see her children grow up. We should also think about that.
If our politics makes it impossible to be a parent and a parliamentarian, then our politics are broken.
Do we want a Holyrood stuffed with MSPs who have no first-hand knowledge of raising children?
Because that's the way we're heading unless things change. Kate Forbes's choice should be a wake-up call for the SNP, but not only the SNP.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Oxford controversial bridge scheme cost rises by £3.7m
A controversial bridge will cost an extra £3.7m to build because of delays caused by a recent judicial review, a local authority has Oxpens River Bridge, which would link Oxpens Meadow to Grandpont Nature Park in Oxford, was approved last year and was supposed to have been built by against the bridge launched a judicial review into the decision earlier this year, which was dismissed by the High Court on all five counts in bridge was initially expected to cost £10.3m, but the city council now estimates it will cost £14m. Oxford City Council said the increase in cost was due to the inflation of construction costs, caused by the delay from the judicial a report prepared ahead of a scrutiny committee meeting on Tuesday, the council said it was working with potential benefactors, including Homes England and the University of Oxford, to bridge the funding gaps. Construction work on the bridge is set to begin in early 2026, with a view to be completed by February Friends of Grandpont Nature Park, who brought the judicial review, said it "hopes to save [the taxpayer] millions by scrapping the project altogether".The group has submitted an appeal against the high court decision, and is waiting to hear whether it can city council previously said the bridge would provide a walking route between Osney Mead and Oxpens - with both areas set for regeneration with new homes and for the bridge currently consists of £8.8m from the Oxfordshire Housing and Growth Deal, and £1.5m from the Housing and Infrastructure Fund from Homes opposed to the development argue locals would lose a cherished nature park, emphasising that there is already a bridge a short distance away that could be fixed instead. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.


The Independent
26 minutes ago
- The Independent
Why will Heathrow's third runway be such a long haul?
Q On Heathrow: why will it take 10 years to build what is basically a small road? Aaron M A Heathrow airport has just published its long-awaited plans for a third runway. They are basically the same as those recommended by the Davies Commission a decade ago after years of consultation: a 3,500m runway to the northwest of the present airport. In one sense, this is a road a couple of miles long. So why indeed should it take 10 years to build and cost £21bn (plus an additional £12bn for terminal capacity)? First, because even after years of discussion that have led to these 'shovel-ready' proposals, the planning process will drag on for several more years. The Department for Transport is now considering Heathrow's proposals as well as cheaper competing options. When the choice is made, the next process involves work on a Development Consent Order (DCO). That will involve yet another public consultation on Heathrow's expansion and is likely to take around 18 months. The Planning Inspectorate will consider the application and make a recommendation to the transport secretary, who will decide whether to grant the DCO. Assuming the scheme is approved, in line with Labour's commitment to growth, opponents of expansion are certain to launch legal challenges to the minister's decision. Heathrow cannot begin construction until that process is completed. At present, the best hope among proponents of the third runway is that work will begin by July 2029, ie within the lifetime of the present parliament. That leaves six years before the 2035 vow for planes to be taking off and landing. It still looks like a long time for this strip of concrete. But it is rather more complicated than the average road. Hundreds of homes must be demolished first. The third runway is intended to stretch across the current route of the M25, which will be relocated into a tunnel. Vast amounts of work will need to be carried out to connect the new facility to the existing airport, which itself will be extensively remodelled – all the while remaining open to air traffic for 19 hours a day. Accordingly, 2035 begins to look optimistic. Ryanair's chief executive, Michael O'Leary, says the new runway will not open until 2040 at the earliest – not that he has any intention of using the expanded Heathrow, unlike rival easyJet. Q Have you ever been to a destination that you'd never go back to? Lou Gray A Plenty. In almost every case, though, I will not return even though I greatly enjoyed the place on one or more previous visits. It's just because there are so many more places to see. For example, I regard Orkney and Shetland, the Northern Isles of Scotland, as among the most beautiful, intriguing and rewarding destinations in the world. But I have visited each archipelago twice, explored thoroughly, met some lovely people and enjoyed some superb food. With other Scottish islands unvisited, such as Jura and Colonsay in the west, I have no plans to return to the north. The same applies to many other destinations I have been fortunate enough to visit: I thoroughly enjoyed a week in Missouri last year, but don't feel the US state has many secrets left to reveal. And just last week I was in the Greek island of Paros; I don't expect ever to return to its simplicity and beauty since there are dozens of other islands in the Aegean I want to see. If, though, you meant where have I found underwhelming, thankfully, there are very few. On a cruise taking in Greenland and Arctic Canada, I found the ports of call mostly sad places, reflecting the deep social problems faced by these locations – though my view may have been coloured by the shambolic running of the operation by the Canadian travel firm. Conversely, there are some locations to which I will return repeatedly. They are mainly 'world cities' with many dimensions and are constantly reinventing themselves. These include Paris, Istanbul, Mumbai, Shanghai, Hong Kong, Singapore, Sydney, Buenos Aires, Mexico City, Chicago and New York. (In different times, I would add Moscow and St Petersburg to that list.) And also great mountain ranges: the Alps, Pyrenees and Himalayas have so many facets and endless beauty. Q I am travelling to New Zealand in December with my partner. We have an eight-hour stop at Hong Kong. Is it straightforward to leave the airport and see the place for a few hours before returning for our next flight? Degsy M A Yes. Your baggage will be checked through to New Zealand, allowing you to explore unencumbered, and you will have your boarding pass for the onward flight. Thankfully, immigration into Hong Kong is invariably swift, and the Airport Express train takes only 24 minutes to reach Hong Kong Island, for a fare of HK$130 (about £10) each way. The final stop locates you perfectly for exploring Hong Kong Central – probably the most exciting part of this hyperactive territory. Head for Man Mo Temple, a Taoist place of worship dedicated to the gods of literature (Man) and war (Mo). Wander through the interior as colourful as it is reverential, with smouldering coils of incense providing a heavenly aroma. A short walk away, explore PMQ: the 'Police Married Quarters' dormitory complex built in 1951. The police officers and their spouses have moved out to cosier accommodation. Bright young sparks have moved in, filling the mid-century architectural masterpiece with workshops, galleries and boutiques. And along at Tai Kwun, you find evidence of the British colonial one-stop shop of crime prevention, comprising Central Police Station, the Central Magistracy (now a restaurant) and Victoria Prison – where, once upon a time, Vietnamese leader Ho Chi Minh was on trial. Today, the complex is a venue for enlightenment. Begin your journey back to the airport by taking the iconic Star Ferry across the harbour to Kowloon, on the mainland. Make your way to West Kowloon Cultural District, a creative hub appropriately created on reclaimed land. The key attraction: M+, a vast new museum that celebrates Hong Kong's visual culture of the 20th and 21st centuries. Like Tate Modern in London and the Guggenheim in Bilbao, the structure itself is as compelling as the contents. Kowloon station is a five-minute walk away – and in just 22 minutes the Airport Express will whisk you back to the space-age terminal for your onward flight. Security is swift, so plan to be back at the airport just an hour or so before departure.


BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
Preston City Council helped cover soaring cost of museum revamp
A £3m increase in the bill for refurbishing a historic Lancashire museum was partially subsidised by a city council, despite earlier reassurances rising costs would not be met by taxpayers, it has been Grade I-listed Harris building is due to reopen on 28 September after four years and what has turned out to be a £19.2m final cost was 17% more than the £16.2m budget set out for the project, which Preston City Council councillors ascribed to "hyper-inflation" and the cost of materials rising "enormously".The additional required funding was split between the city council and the National Lottery, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS). The LDRS understands Preston City Council contributed a further £1.41m for the revamp, while the National Lottery Heritage Fund contributed £1.5m, with £62k coming from other unidentified sources. 'Hyper-inflation' Details of the authority's additional contribution have emerged almost 12 months after councillors were told the money would not come from local taxpayers.A meeting of the council's overview and scrutiny committee last year heard from deputy chief executive Sarah Threlfall that the ballooning bill was the result of "hyper-inflation" and the cost of materials soaring "over the lifetime of the project".The extent of the rise was not made public at the time, but when asked by committee chair John Potter about how the shortfall would be bridged, Ms Threlfall said "the vast majority is not being met by…taxpayers, because there is external funding being put in place". The meeting was told an application had been made to the National Lottery Heritage figures obtained by the LDRS show a significant cash injection did ultimately come from the council – suggesting either less was received from the lottery funding pot than was required, or that costs continued to rise.A Preston City Council spokesperson said: "The additional costs reflect the programme impact of extending the scope of the project, funded through additional external funding, and the results of the previous fit-out contractor going into administration."The council's [extra] contribution accounts for less than 10 percent of the total project costs, demonstrating value for money in preserving the Grade I-listed building and establishing a cultural hub for Preston and Lancashire."It brings the total contributed directly by Preston City Council to more than £3.5m, while Lancashire County Council – which leases 40% of the Harris from the city authority to house the largest of Lancashire's libraries – has contributed around £1.4m. The National Lottery Heritage Fund provided an initial £4.5m grant, with £1.9m sourced from Preston's share of the last government's Towns in 2018, the overhaul was originally envisioned as a £10.7m scheme to create the country's first "blended" museum, art gallery and library. But the ambition for the building was subsequently expanded, leading to a rise in pre-planned addition, more asbestos was discovered after refurbishment began, leading to extra spending on its is hoped, The Harris will attract about 500,000 visitors a reopening, in September, will be marked with a special Wallace and Gromit-themed exhibition, entitled 'A Case at the Museum'. Listen to the best of BBC Radio Lancashire on Sounds and follow BBC Lancashire on Facebook, X and Instagram. You can also send story ideas via Whatsapp to 0808 100 2230.