Norfolk hospitals merger spells better efficiency, says boss
7 minutes ago
Share
Save
Helen Burchell
BBC News, Norfolk
Share
Save
Paul Moseley/BBC
Lesley Dwyer heads up the newly merged hospitals group
The new head of Norfolk's three main NHS hospitals said their merger into one group could reduce waiting lists and the need to travel outside the county for treatment.
The Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH), The Queen Elizabeth Hospital (QEH) in King's Lynn and the James Paget University Hospital (JPH) in Gorleston operate under their own names but are now collectively called the Norfolk and Waveney University Hospitals Group.
The three hospital trusts are forecasting a £53m gap in their finances by 2029/30.
On her first day as chief executive of the group, Prof Lesley Dwyer said it was not about the money, but about working together more efficiently.
"The job is getting to understand what is important to those local hospitals and their population," Prof Dwyer said.
"The prime reason for coming together under the group formation was actually not about the money.
"It was very much about closer working together, and doing those things that matter such as tackling waiting lists, making sure people are treated quickly in an emergency - making sure though, that we do get better value for the money that we are given."
Getty Images
The NHS hopes the new hospitals group will save money and improve services
While each of the three hospitals will still have a managing director, Prof Dwyer said the "group structure is very much about trying to find those things that we can do at scale - things that we know perhaps are duplicated - but also making sure that we make some of those bigger decisions that despite our best intentions, perhaps over the last few years... that we just haven't done".
But she said it was "very much about making sure that we don't take away the identity of the things that really matter to those local hospitals".
Asked about lengthy waiting lists, Prof Dwyer said: "Currently we do have people who actually leave Norfolk to go and get treatment because we're not able to treat them.
"We're hoping by using the capacity of the three - particularly around elective waiting lists - will mean that the travel people have will actually be within the county.
"It's certainly our intention to use the capacity we have in the three hospitals, that we really do address those long waits."
PA Media
The NNUH is Norfolk's largest hospital
Peter Passingham, the Eastern regional organiser for the union, Unison, said the merger was causing "a lot of uncertainty among staff".
Asked what the point of the merger was, he said: "Well, I think it's the aspiration.
"We know that the NHS is struggling at the moment... and I think it is the hope to do something which is going to improve the situation, as opposed to something that may actually bring real changes."
Follow Norfolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Urgent RSPCA warning over imported dogs
An animal charity has urged the UK government to implement stricter regulations on the import of dogs, citing concerns over disease transmission and behavioural problems. The RSPCA highlighted government statistics that 320,000 pets entered the UK via travel schemes and 44,000 as commercial imports in 2023, warning of 'ticking time bombs' due to inadequate health testing. There is currently no licensing requirement for animal rescue organisations in England, Wales, or Northern Ireland, contributing to the unregulated import of animals. A new Animal Welfare (Import of Dogs, Cats and Ferrets) Bill, proposed by Liberal Democrat MP Dr Danny Chambers, has passed the Commons with cross-party support. The bill aims to reduce non-commercial animal entry, ban the import of puppies and kittens under six months old or heavily pregnant animals, and prohibit the import of mutilated dogs and cats, such as those with docked ears.
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Third of young people want fat jabs as demand spirals
A third of young adults want to take fat jabs amid a surge in demand for the drugs, pharmacists have said. One in five people say they have tried to access a pharmacy weight-loss treatment in the past year but this figure is 35 per cent for those aged between 16 and 34. Pharmacists have raised the alarm that demand has far exceeded what can be clinically delivered. Concerns have also been raised that people could resort to looking for drugs such as Wegovy and Mounjaro from online sellers. Current guidelines state that patients being prescribed Mounjaro and Wegovy through pharmacies need a BMI of at least 35 and at least one weight-related comorbidity, such as diabetes, to be eligible. Wegovy can also be prescribed to patients with a BMI of 30–34 who meet the criteria for referral to specialist overweight and obesity management services. However, the NHS is only rolling out Mounjaro to patients with a BMI of over 40 and at least four co-morbidities. It spent £269million on fat jabs in 2024-2025 and prescriptions doubled to almost three million a year. Mounjaro, regarded as the strongest jab and known as King Kong, has driven the spike in prescriptions with 1.1million given out in a year compared with 3,300 in the previous 12 months. The National Pharmacy Association (NPA), which represents about 6,000 pharmacies, surveyed 2,000 Britons and found evidence of demand beyond what the NHS can offer. It is now seeking greater clarity on how pharmacies will be further involved in the distribution of weight-loss medication, something laid out in the Government's recent 10 Year Health Plan. Olivier Picard, chairman of the NPA, said: 'Weight-loss jabs are one of the biggest drug innovations this century but growing demand highlights the need to make sure this is appropriate for those who want it. 'It's clear from this polling that many more people are interested in getting weight-loss jabs than would actually be suitable for treatment. 'We want to make sure supplies are carefully managed so that those in most clinical need can benefit from medication. 'We're also urging the Government to bring forward plans to include pharmacies in the rollout of their NHS weight-management programme. 'Pharmacists are experts in medication and many have extensive experience delivering weight-loss injections as part of a package of care including lifestyle advice. 'Pharmacies are well placed to help roll this treatment out on the NHS and help people make the best use of these powerful medicines,' he added
Telegraph
28 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Mental health crisis is overblown, say public
The mental health crisis is overblown and people often exaggerate their problems, according to a poll of public beliefs. More than half (56 per cent) of the public believe mental health conditions are exaggerated, while three quarters (76 per cent) think some people mistake life's normal ups and downs for mental illness, according to the survey of more than 2,000 adults by Electoral Calculus. With the Government facing a backbench rebellion over its efforts to restrict welfare benefits, the survey also suggests that ministers – rather than their backbenchers – may have better judged the pulse of the nation. The poll showed more than half of voters (52 per cent) believed that it was too easy for people to claim benefits for mental health illnesses, against 35 per cent who thought it was too hard and 13 per cent who believed it was about right. Last month, Sir Keir Starmer was forced to back down on controversial plans to slash disability and sickness benefits after more than 120 of his MPs threatened to vote against the proposals. Although the public believe benefits are too readily available, they are evenly divided on whether it is too easy or too hard to prove a mental illness in the UK. Some 44 per cent said it was too easy, while 43 per cent said it was too hard. However, Tory and Reform supporters were more likely to believe it was too easy to be diagnosed as suffering from a mental health condition, with 74 per cent of Conservative voters and 55 per cent from Nigel Farage's party saying it was the case. It comes as the head of the Government's workplace review said that employees who have 'I hate my boss syndrome' should not be signed off sick with a mental health condition. Sir Charlie Mayfield said he was concerned some problems are being 'over-medicalised' when they could be solved in the office. The former John Lewis chairman has been appointed by Liz Kendall, the work and pensions secretary, to come up with plans to stop workers leaving their jobs because of poor health. His report is due this autumn. One in five people of working age have a health condition that affects their job and there are 2.8 million people inactive due to ill health – up from 2.1 million since before the Covid pandemic, although the numbers had been rising for several years. Sir Charlie told The Sunday Times: 'The last thing I wish to do is trivialise [mental health conditions] but I agree that things do get over-medicalised.' Half of those polled (49 per cent) agreed that society spends too much time talking about minor mental illnesses. This rose to 77 per cent of Conservatives and 62 per cent of Reform supporters compared with just 35 per cent of Labour voters. Three quarters (74 per cent) said that social media often led to people thinking they had a mental illness when they did not. However, despite the scepticism about 'over medicalisation' of mental ill health, the public believe by five to one majority (68 per cent to 14 per cent) that there were not enough services available to meet the needs of people suffering from mental health problems. Eight in 10 people believed that mental illness had been stigmatised for too long and that it was healthy for people to talk about it more. Seven in 10 also felt that people with serious mental illness are losing out because of the attention given to the growing numbers of people saying they have less serious mental illness. Martin Baxter, the chief executive of Electoral Calculus, said: 'The public shows strong support for tackling stigma and being open about mental health, yet many worry that everyday challenges are being labelled as mental illness, risking the needs of those with serious conditions being overlooked. 'Mental health policy looks set to become a key political battleground, and these findings suggest that politicians will need to tread carefully as they respond to growing public scepticism and a system that most feel isn't working.'
