logo
Chief executive of miscarriage of justice review body resigns

Chief executive of miscarriage of justice review body resigns

Rhyl Journal12 hours ago
Karen Kneller, who had held the position since 2013, has left her job at the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), it was announced on Wednesday.
Last month former victims Commissioner Dame Vera Baird became the interim chairwoman of the CCRC, having been asked by the Lord Chancellor to carry out a review of the organisation.
The CCRC had been heavily criticised for its handling of the Andrew Malkinson case, one of the worst miscarriages of justice in British legal history.
Ms Kneller's resignation came after former chairwoman Helen Pitcher resigned in January, but claimed she had been scapegoated over the Malkinson case.
Dame Vera said: 'The CCRC has a vital role to play in the criminal justice system, but confidence in the organisation has been badly damaged. Confidence in our work must be restored.
'I thank Karen for her work at the CCRC over many years.'
Amanda Pearce, who is CCRC casework operations director, has been appointed interim chief executive.
Mr Malkinson served 17 years in prison for a rape he did not commit, and was knocked back twice by the CCRC until his legal team carried out crucial DNA testing that was then repeated by the commission and led to his release.
A review found that he could have been released 10 years earlier if the CCRC had obtained new DNA evidence as early as 2009, and thousands of cases are being reviewed in the wake of the bungled handling of the case.
In May, the Commons Justice Committee also warned that the position of the current chief executive of the CCRC, Karen Kneller, was no longer tenable.
MPs said in a report it followed 'unpersuasive' evidence from her on the CCRC's challenges and response to public criticisms in April, and concerns on the performance of the review body.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Farage is the pacesetter of British politics
Farage is the pacesetter of British politics

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

Farage is the pacesetter of British politics

For the past year, Nigel Farage has served as the great pace setter of British politics. Reform UK has shot to the top of the polls, as Labour and the Tories languish behind. On immigration, the economy and much else, it is his five-man band that sets the tune. It is the inverse of Norman Lamont's jibe about 'being in office but not in power'. From his new base on the 24th floor of Millbank Tower, Farage enjoys a commanding view of Westminster. The office, an explosion of teal decor, has a large press briefing room, which aides liken to the one in the White House. At a desk adorned with a porcelain Union Jack bulldog, Farage plots his next steps. He sees his role as 'a little bit more [like] the general – not in the front lines so much, but a little bit behind the lines, sort of trying to take some strategic oversight as to what the rest of the party's doing'. Election planning is to be handled by former Ukip leader Paul Nuttall, the party's new vice chairman. A six-week summer offensive will begin on 21 July. Such machinations matter because of their impact on the government. Keir Starmer says publicly that the next general election will be fought between his party and Reform. Under his chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, Labour is trying to pitch itself to patriotic, immigration-sceptic 'hero voters'. Yet many on Starmer's benches want him to switch to a more soft-left approach. Farage, who has never met McSweeney, says that 'probably politically, what he's advocating is right – but the Labour party can't swallow it'. He cites a surge in support for the Greens, arguing that there is a 'drag to the left that is going on in British politics' which only pulls 'the kind of undecideds on the Labour benches in one direction'. Reform's success often confounds opponents who try to place the party on a traditional left-right axis. Yet some within Reform think of it more like a business, hungry for market share, wherever available. Rather than ponder deep philosophical questions, or muse about how to interpret its political heritage, Reform pivots from lifting the two-child benefit cap one month to introducing a 'Britannia card' for the super-rich the next. Farage himself prefers to talk in post-ideological terms: 'I would like to think that people would look at me and look at us and say we're realistic and pragmatic. I think the benefits stuff that we said surprised a few people, but, you know, we're not finished on that. There's a lot more to come out on that agenda over time.' The debate in April over nationalising steel exemplified this approach. While the shadow cabinet were split over questions about state interventionism, Reform simply pledged nationalisation. For long-established political parties, history can be a bulwark, but it also brings baggage. Like any general, Farage likes having a free hand to respond to events nimbly. Critics jibe that this leaves Reform rudderless, constantly scrambling to board the next bandwagon. Allies argue that, in a world where a social media post by Donald Trump can blow up the markets, there is much merit in this approach. For them, the fact that much of Reform HQ has little Westminster hinterland beyond Farage is not a weakness but a positive. The staff are 'quite normal people', says one aide. Talks around strategy often reference sport, not politics. Wrestling is a shared love in the office and WWE-style razzmatazz has become a hallmark of the party's election rallies. Next May's regional elections represent the ultimate Wrestlemania for Reform. If Reform wins 30 seats in the new 96-strong Senedd, will Plaid Cymru and Labour cut a deal to keep them out? Six new mayoralties are also up for grabs and Reform is after local celebrities in the mould of Hull boxer Luke Campbell to stand as candidates. 'Essex is a slam dunk,' says one insider. There have even been talks about the prospect of attracting DUP grandees ahead of the Northern Ireland elections in 2027. The two main parties, though, will not go down without a fight. Some within Labour are putting their faith in the New Media Unit. This 28-strong, £1.3 million innovation sits in the Cabinet Office. It aims to help McSweeney 'take back control' of communications by targeting government messages at millions of voters online. The insights gleaned here could prove crucial to Labour strategists, as they try to reach key voters ahead of the 2029 general election. Labour's backbencher revolt over welfare, meanwhile, gave the Tories some reason to cheer this week. Conservative MPs allowed themselves an 'evening of fun' with Gyles Brandreth on Tuesday at the Albert pub in Victoria. Rishi Sunak, now a humble backbencher, enlivened things by debating with the compere about which of the many recent Tory chancellors was truly the 'shortest-serving'. At CCHQ there were several encouraging signs too. First, Mark McInnes, the former boss of the Scottish Conservatives, was named as the new Tory chief executive. Then longtime donor Lord Bamford, whom some speculated was about to switch to backing Farage, gave Kemi Badenoch £150,000. Both men are indicative of the arms race in personnel on the right of British politics, as the Tories and Reform battle it out for talent and donations. At present, there are plenty in the world of media and politics happy to keep a foot in both parties' camps. As the wine flows this summer, there will be much talk about the future of the right. Many Tories hope that Farage has peaked too early. 'This parliament is a marathon not a sprint,' says one MP. 'There are still four years left to go.' Such comments will not bother Farage, of course. He and his team believe they are exactly where they need to be: leading the pack, on course for both office and power come 2029.

Who's deceiving whom?: The Art of the Lie, by Laura Shepherd-Robinson, reviewed
Who's deceiving whom?: The Art of the Lie, by Laura Shepherd-Robinson, reviewed

Spectator

timean hour ago

  • Spectator

Who's deceiving whom?: The Art of the Lie, by Laura Shepherd-Robinson, reviewed

In this age of lies and delusions, the trickster may seem to be a peculiarly modern creature, but he or she is almost as old as literature itself. Long before phishing or fake news, stories about cunning foxes, Loki, Anansi the Spider-Man and Odysseus brought delight; Puck, Tom Ripley and Sarah Waters's fingersmith Sue Trinder are some of their descendants. Encountering such a figure is always a joy, and in Laura Shepherd-Robinson's latest novel, The Art of a Lie, there are two. Hannah Cole is a shopkeeper in 18th-century London, struggling to keep her confectionary business open. Her husband Jonas has been murdered, and we soon learn that not only is the celebrated author and magistrate Henry Fielding investigating Mr Cole's death but that Hannah is, in fact, his killer. What may save her fortunes, and possibly her neck, is William Devereux, a friend of her late husband. He suggests that she try her luck at making a new delicacy for the gentry: 'iced cream'. And he is enlisted by Hannah to try to misdirect Fielding as to her husband's killer. Only William, too, is not what he seems. A serial confidence trickster, he seduces rich widows and leaves them broken-hearted and empty-pursed. The stage is set for a novel of suspense whose artfulness echoes the elegance, imagination, wit and ruthlessness that Georgian craftsmen (and women) excelled in. Each of Shepherd-Robinson's previous novels, beginning with Blood & Sugar in 2019, has plumbed the social and criminal depths of an era which many regard as the apogee of British life. She interweaves its beauties and its villainies (the slave trade, prostitution, gambling) in a way that pricks the conscience even as it entertains. The Art of a Lie is about an era in which men and women of every class practised to deceive each other for pecuniary gain, either through marriage or manipulation – something that is less remote from us than we like to think. The novel is narrated by Hannah and William in turn, each deftly depicted and neither entirely reliable. Hannah has no weapon but her little pastry knife, concealed in her bodice, her wits, her looks and the assumption that a woman must be weak and helpless. She has killed her treacherous husband in self-defence, and is clever enough to make it look like a robbery: but will Fielding's strange mix of reforming zeal, honesty and insight prove her undoing? William seems to be the perfect gentleman of means, and he does indeed help Hannah turn her business around with a recipe for peach ice cream before bedazzling her with his supposed fortune. His true character is shockingly different. 'Did you ever see a bigger cunt than Henry Fielding?' is how he introduces himself to us; and believing the novelist and tenacious inquisitor to be his only problem is the first of many mistakes. With a crew of criminals to back up his deceptions, he also has his own demons, in the shape of a violent crook to whom he owes a lot of money. But he is confident that his four-part technique with widows (which he calls the Mirror, the Dance, the Rope and the Drop) will carry him through to another success. This is a pleasingly sophisticated and twisty novel. Hannah is intelligent, brave and sharply observant about human psychology, but insufficiently wary about what she is being led to believe. William's insouciant voice, misogyny, lies and self-delusion are skewered in a way that 21st-century readers may find sadly contemporary, even as you also feel his charm. 'Contrary to what you might think, I don't hate women. I couldn't do this job if I did,' he says. He claims he's not 'the worst kind of villain' – because he refrains from taking everything, leaving his victims 'with their pride intact and their fortunes only somewhat diminished'. For guiding widows out of grieving for their husbands and lost youth into a new world, he argues that he deserves payment – and only one furious, broken former conquest from Bath is hot on his trail, seeking vengeance. He has more feelings than he likes to admit, just as Hannah has more sense and resilience. Falling genuinely in love with your victim is fatal for the trickster, but who will be the less deceived? Unusually, The Art of a Lie is also a celebration of the early days of trade, with the dawn of businesses– such as Fortnum & Mason, Floris and Berry Bros – which still carry lustre to this day. The author tells us in an afterword that there were a surprising number of businesses owned by women in this period, and Hannah stands for those who did not need rescuing by a Mr Darcy or, for that matter, Fielding's Tom Jones. She is an intriguing character, and I hope we meet her again. Too much literary fiction falls into a softened version of the past, but the best historical crime novels are sharply corrective of this. Like C.J. Sansom, Abir Mukherjee, Tim Pears and S.J. Parris, Laura Shepherd-Robinson has taken a moral microscope to her chosen period and shown us the truth about its lies – and our own.

MPs back foreign investors owning minority stakes in UK newspapers
MPs back foreign investors owning minority stakes in UK newspapers

Leader Live

time5 hours ago

  • Leader Live

MPs back foreign investors owning minority stakes in UK newspapers

The Commons voted overwhelmingly in favour of a change to the law by Labour which would allow foreign firms to buy minority stakes. It is the latest turn in a tumultuous two-year takeover process for the 170-year-old newspaper business. It comes after the previous Conservative government put a block in place amid fears the Telegraph could be bought by a majority-owned UAE company, RedBird IMI. The investment vehicle is a joint venture with US financiers. The regulation was approved by 338 votes to 79, majority 259. Labour was boosted in the voting lobbies by four Reform UK MPs, including its leader Nigel Farage (Clacton), and seven Independent MPs. Meanwhile former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith, a vocal critic of China, was among those to vote against it. The Liberal Democrats, who forced the vote over fears foreign ownership would compromise editorial independence, also opposed it. The result will give the green light to RedBird IMI, with the cap in place now being supported by MPs. RedBird Capital, the US junior partner in RedBird IMI, agreed a deal in May to buy a majority stake in the newspaper for £500 million. Abu-Dhabi's IMI will look to buy a minority stake as part of the consortium. RedBird has investments in AC Milan, film production giant Skydance and Liverpool FC owner Fenway Sports Group. It is also understood that the Daily Mail and General Trust (DMGT) – which owns the Daily Mail, Mail on Sunday, the i, and the Metro – is also looking to buy a stake. This is in addition to Sir Len Blavatnik, who owns the Theatre Royal Haymarket in the West End, who is considering a minority stake, according to Sky News reports. The rules were introduced after RedBird IMI looked to buy the Telegraph Media Group (TMG) from the Barclay Brothers. Then-Conservative culture secretary Lucy Frazer told a Society of Editors Conference in April 2024: 'I had concerns about the potential impacts of this deal on free expression and accurate presentation of news and that's why I issued a public interest intervention.' Culture minister Stephanie Peacock told MPs last month that appropriate safeguards had been introduced. She said: 'Government need to balance the importance of creating certainty and sustainability for our newspaper industry with the need to protect against the risk of foreign state influence by setting a clear threshold for exceptions within the regime at 15%. We believe that we have done that effectively.' Speaking after the vote, the Liberal Democrats' spokesman on media Max Wilkinson said: 'Freedom of the press is an historic and inviolable cornerstone of our democracy. That the Government is pushing to sell off stakes in our British papers to foreign governments is astonishing. 'It's outrageous that Labour and the Conservative MPs failed to stand up, do their patriotic duty and block this legislation. The leader of the opposition sponsored the Bill that restricted foreign states owning British newspapers last year – yet even she failed to vote against the measure. 'Liberal Democrats have already successfully forced the Government to backtrack on their senseless plan to let multiple states club together to buy whatever sized stake in a British outlet they fancied. Now my colleagues in the Lords and I will deliver a showdown to overturn this Bill entirely – rallying Conservative and crossbench peers to defeat the Government on this misguided policy.' The Department for Culture, Media and Sport has been approached for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store