Gazans on 'desperately need more aid', says aid group
GAZA: A privately run aid organisation brought in to distribute food rations in war-hit Gaza last month with US and Israeli backing said that people in the Palestinian territory "desperately need more aid". The admission by the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) that it has been unable to meet demand came after severe criticism from other aid groups and near-daily deadly shootings near distribution points.
Gaza's civil defence agency reported that Israeli troops had killed scores of people, including those who were seeking food in the territory which is suffering from famine-like conditions due to Israeli restrictions, according to aid groups.
In a statement on Saturday, GHF interim executive director John Acree said that the organisation was "delivering aid at scale, securely and effectively... But we cannot meet the full scale of need while large parts of Gaza remain closed." He said the GHF was "working with the government of Israel to honour its commitment and open additional sites in northern Gaza". "The people of Gaza desperately need more aid and we are ready to partner with other humanitarian groups to expand our reach to those who need help the most," Acree said.
GHF's operations have been slammed as a "failure" by the United Nations, while other aid groups have raised concerns about the group's opaque structure and neutrality in the conflict that has been raging since October 2023.
According to figures issued on Saturday by the health ministry in the Gaza Strip, at least 450 people have been killed and nearly 3,500 injured by Israeli fire since GHF began distributing meal boxes in late May. GHF has denied responsibility for deaths near its aid points, contradicting statements from witnesses and Gaza rescue services. It has said deaths have occurred near UN food convoys.
The head of aid group Doctors Without Borders, Christopher Lockyear, said that the "imposed system of aid delivery" in Gaza was "not only a failure, but it is dehumanising and dangerous".
Israel's military has continued its operations in Gaza, even as attention has shifted to its ongoing war with Iran since June 13.
Israel's ban on foreign media entering the Gaza Strip and difficulties for local journalists to travel in the territory mean media is unable to independently verify the tolls and details provided by rescuers and authorities. The Israeli army said that it was "looking into" the deaths which the civil defence agency reported near GHF distribution centres.
In the past, the military has said that its troops have fired on crowds approaching them in a threatening fashion and only after warning shots. Witnesses have said that injuries caused by drones and tank rounds.
Civil defence spokesman Mahmud Bassal said that three people were killed by gunfire in the southern Gaza Strip, with another five killed in a central area known as the Netzarim corridor, where thousands of Palestinians have gathered daily in the hope of receiving rations from a GHF centre. Earlier this week, the UN's World Health Organization warned that Gaza's health system was at a "breaking point", pleading for fuel to be allowed into the territory to keep its remaining hospitals running. — AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
4 hours ago
- Observer
Supreme Leader says Iran would strike back if attacked again
DUBAI: Iran would respond to any future US attack by striking American military bases in the Middle East, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Thursday, in his first televised remarks since a ceasefire was reached between Iran and Israel. Khamenei, 86, claimed victory after 12 days of war, culminating in an Iranian attack on the largest US base in the region, located in Qatar, after Washington joined the Israeli strikes. In his pre-recorded remarks, aired on state television, Khamenei promised that Iran would not surrender despite US President Donald Trump's calls. "The US President Trump unveiled the truth and made it clear that Americans won't be satisfied with anything less than surrender... such an event will never happen," Khamenei said. "The fact that the Islamic Republic has access to important American centres in the region and can take action against them whenever it deems necessary is not a small incident, it is a major incident, and this incident can be repeated in the future if an attack is made," he added. Trump said "sure" on Wednesday when asked if the United States would strike again if Iran rebuilt its nuclear enrichment programme. Tehran has for decades denied accusations by Western leaders that it is seeking nuclear arms. Khamenei said the US "gained no achievement" after it attacked Iranian nuclear sites, but that it entered the war to "save" Israel after Tehran's missiles broke through Israel's multi-layered defence system. "The US directly entered the war as it felt that if it did not get involved, the Zionist regime (Israel) would be fully destroyed. It entered the war to save it," he said. "The US attacked our nuclear facilities, but couldn't do any important deed... The US president did abnormal showmanship and needed to do so," he added. Trump said over the weekend that the US deployment of 30,000-pound bombs had "obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme. However, this appeared to be contradicted by an initial assessment from one of his administration's intelligence agencies, according to three people familiar with the matter. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu also declared "a historic victory" on Tuesday, after the fragile ceasefire took effect, saying Israel had achieved its goal of removing Tehran's nuclear and ballistic missile threat. Shortly after Khamenei's speech, Netanyahu posted a message with a picture of himself and Trump holding hands with the message: "We will continue to work together to defeat our common enemies." Meanwhile, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth on Thursday said he was unaware of any intelligence suggesting Iran had moved any of its highly enriched uranium to shield it from US strikes on Iran's nuclear programme over the weekend. US military bombers carried out strikes against three Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend with more than a dozen 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs. The results of the strikes are being closely watched to see how far the strikes may have set back Iran's nuclear programme. "I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be, moved or otherwise," Hegseth said in an often fiery news conference. - Reuters
Observer
4 hours ago
- Observer
Why Israel must not be allowed to triumph?
Could we imagine a Middle East without Iran — not merely without its current government, but stripped of its strategic presence, historical depth and deterrent capacity? And who would fill such a void? This question invites a cascade of potential chaos were Israel (or the West supporting it) to emerge victorious in the ongoing conflict with Iran. The reality is that Arab states cannot escape their responsibility for what follows if Israel achieves its aims. Regret by then would be too late, meaningless in a region fully dominated and unquestioningly obedient to Israel. The heart of the matter isn't Israel's military might — it has Western backing and near-global silence bordering on complicity — but whether the Middle East could survive the consequences of an Israeli victory. The answer is unambiguous: it cannot. Such a defeat would usher in the greatest danger the Arab world has faced in recent times. Arab perceptions of Iran have long been flawed, often narrowed to sectarian tropes. Yet Iran — both under the Shah and after 1979 — is an ancient civilisation, a state with deep historical roots, a regional vision and jurisdictional sway that cannot simply be erased. The 1979 revolution was not just a religious export — it was a profound internal upheaval, rooted in political, social and economic transformation. Arab states would have done better to engage Iran as a regional partner rather than heed Western calls to isolate and dismantle it. Many policymakers in the Middle East have persisted in the belief that a weakened Iran would bring stability. This notion, fuelled by Western think‑tanks, treats the revolution as an ideological aberration and fails to grasp that dismantling Iran would leave a tremendous geopolitical vacuum. It risks turning Gulf states into mere satellites of a new regime — and could even fracture the Arab world, repeating patterns seen after Baghdad fell in 2003. Israel isn't just aiming to disarm Iran; its Western backers envision full dominance — military, ideological and economic. This would enable Israel to reshape regional dynamics to serve its own long-held interests. In this scenario, normalisation agreements become superficial at best. Israel would define the cultural and geopolitical order. Those who resist would find themselves in the grip of widespread chaos. Alarmingly, current Middle East dynamics could perfectly set this scenario in motion. It is among the darkest moments in Arab history — marked by disunity, ideological extremism and a lack of political coherence. A victorious Israel would also have global consequences. It would convey that diplomacy is obsolete and that military dominance is the only arbiter of power. What may appear as a strategic void — an emerging Israeli hegemony — would instead become a regional vacuum filled by Israeli influence across security, economics and technology. Such dominance cannot yield lasting stability. History shows that it breeds violent resistance — from Lebanon to Gaza to Iraq. The collapse of central authority could ignite decentralised extremist movements, unleashing violence that cannot be contained. This would be worsened by a profound sense of injustice as Iran is punished for its support of Gaza and Palestine. Preventing an Israeli win is not about endorsing Iran's military ambitions but about preserving regional diversity. The Middle East has always balanced on a knife-edge; allowing one power to dominate entirely would undermine that balance. Arab and Gulf states must deploy all their influence to block an Israeli victory — publicly and privately — and forge new regional equations based on partnership, deterrence and dialogue instead of military supremacy. Otherwise, the Arab world will deeply regret dismantling Iran, just as it has regretted Iraq's downfall — and this time, the consequences could be far more catastrophic. At this historic crossroads, the region needs clear-sighted leadership, wisdom and balanced thinking to maintain equilibrium and stability. Allowing Israel to win this war would imperil the Middle East's collective identity, culture and security. Translated by Badr al Dhafri. The original version of this article was published in Oman Arabic newspaper on June 23.
Observer
4 hours ago
- Observer
Russian missile attack kills five in Ukraine's southeast
KYIV: A Russian missile attack on Friday killed at least five people and wounded more than 20 in the industrial city of Samar in Ukraine's southeast, officials said, the second strike on the city in three days. At least four of the wounded were in severe condition and were taken to hospital, regional governor Serhiy Lysak said on the Telegram messaging app. Officials gave no immediate details on damage in the city, where an attack on an unidentified infrastructure facility on Tuesday killed two people. Hundreds of kilometres to the south, in the Kherson region, authorities urged residents on Friday to prepare for extended periods without power after a Russian attack hit a key energy facility. Governor Oleksandr Prokudin said on Telegram that "Russians decided to plunge the region into darkness". In recent weeks Russia has stepped up attacks on Ukrainian cities, particularly its capital Kyiv, more than three years into the war that followed its full-scale attack. The Ukrainian air force said Russia had launched 363 long-range drones and eight missiles overnight into Friday, targeting a small western city of Starokostiantyniv, home to an important air base. There were no details on damage. Russia's drone production jumped by 16.9% in May compared to the previous month, data from a think tank close to the government showed on Friday, after President Vladimir Putin called for output to be stepped up. Putin in April said that more than 1.5 million drones of various types had been produced last year, including about 4,000 first-person view (FPV) drones — lightweight models designed for precision targeting, but said that troops fighting on the front line in Ukraine needed more. Both sides have deployed drones on a huge scale, using them to spot and hit targets not only on the battlefield but way beyond the front lines. Drone production growth of 16.9% in May was significantly higher than previous months, according to the Centre for Macroeconomic Analysis and Short-Term Forecasting, an economic think tank close to the government. The average monthly increase in the previous five months was 3.7%, the report said and the level in May was 1.6 times higher than average monthly output in 2024. Moscow has been developing a new laser-based system to defend against drones, especially important as Ukrainian drones frequently strike sites deep inside Russia such as oil depots, refineries and airfields. A Russian attack damaged energy infrastructure in Ukraine's southern Kherson region, its governor Oleksandr Prokudin said on the Telegram messaging app on Friday. He said the attack on an "important power facility" caused power cuts in some settlements in the region, which is close to front lines with Russian forces. A Ukrainian drone attack on Russia's Kursk region on the border with Ukraine injured a war correspondent from the Chinese news outlet Phoenix TV, Russian authorities said late on Thursday, urging the United Nations to respond to the incident. "A Ukrainian drone today struck the village of Korenevo in the Korenevsky district," acting governor of the Kursk region, Alexander Khinshtein, said on the Telegram messaging app. "A 63-year-old correspondent, Lu Yuguang, who went to the border area on his own, was injured." Khinshtein said in a later post that the journalist had skin cuts to his head and after treatment, refused hospitalisation. Russia's foreign ministry called on the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and other international organisations to "promptly respond and give a proper assessment" of the incident. "The targeted attack... indicates the intention of the Kyiv regime to silence and de facto destroy representatives of any media that seek to convey objective information," Maria Zakharova, the foreign ministry's spokeswoman, said. — Reuters
