Buddhist gems return to India after 127 years
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Wednesday hailed the return of the collection, known as the Piprahwa Gems of the Historical Buddha.
"A joyous day for our cultural heritage!" Modi wrote in a post on X. "It would make every Indian proud."
The collection of more than 300 gems date from the Mauryan Empire, around 240-200 BCE.
The collection was originally scheduled to be auctioned by Sotheby's in Hong Kong in May but the sale was postponed after India's government threatened legal action and demanded the jewels be returned.
Sotheby's subsequently identified Indian conglomerate Godrej Industries Groupas buyer and secured a sale that saw the permanent return of the gems to India, where they would be placed on public display. "Sotheby's is delighted to have facilitated the return of the Piprahwa Gems to India," the auction house said in a statement late on Wednesday.
India's Ministry of Culture said it was an exemplary public-private partnership and the initiative aligned with Modi's broader mission to reclaim and celebrate India's ancient cultural and spiritual heritage from across the world.
The gems were unearthed in 1898 from an ancient stupa in Piprahwa, northern India, by English estate manager William Claxton Peppe, along with fragments of bone thought to belong to Buddha. Peppe was later allowed to keep more than 300 duplicate gems, which remained in his family.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Arabian Post
5 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Narendra Modi's Moment Of Truth Has Arrived After Eleven Years Of Rule
By Nitya Chakraborty It is not a cliché to say that our powerful Prime Minister Narendra Modi's moment truth has arrived after 11 years of ruling the country as the unchallenged leader. The 25 per cent tariff hike on Indian exports announced by the United States President Donald Trump on Wednesday and taking effect from Friday, August 1 is not just a trade decision, it has much more to do with the maverick President's fresh approach to his once good friend Modi, his tariff being used as the driver of the geopolitics and the establishment of the Trump doctrine that those who are not with us are against us. For Narendra Modi, the state of India- US relations has never been at such a lower level during his PM tenure beginning 2014. Trump, known for his feisty ways, continuous changing stands and always exaggerating his role, has hurled maximum insult to India and to his dear friend Narendra Modi who did everything to please Trump during his first term as also in the second non-consecutive term beginning January 20 this year. Trump was adamant in insulting Modi after the Prime Minister without naming Trump declared in Lok Sabha during Operation Sindoor debate on Tuesday that no foreign leader played any role in the ceasefire between India and Pakistan decided by the two countries on May 10. The next day, Trump again repeated that He took the main role in precipitating ceasefire between India and Pakistan. This was the 30th time, he repeated the same thing. Before Trump, other US leaders also worked from behind in organizing the end of hostilities between the two countries. For instance, the then President Clinton made serious efforts in ending the Kargil war in 1999, but he never claimed any credit for this. Trump is different, He thinks that nothing in global diplomacy moves without him. The decision on India regarding the high tariff was a result of his personal ego also vis a vis Narendra Modi. The US President was looking for total surrender in trade talks, but Narendra Modi could not afford that on the agricultural products sector, especially milk and dairy. Here Modi's state interests are highly involved. The dairy and milk industry is the key to the growth of Gujarat and lakhs of farmers form the supporting base of BJP. Prime Minister as a BJP leader could not afford to compromise the economic interest of his party's supporting base.. The trade talks are still dragging on. Now after this 25 per cent tariff hike on Indian exports, if Indian officials at the instance of the PM change their stand agreeing to the diktat of the US, there might be a deal facilitating the process of lowering the tariff rate from 25 per cent. Further, Trump's threat to impose penalty as high as 100 per cent on India for imports from Russia poses a real threat to the balance of payment state of the country since in the last two years, the cheap crude imports from Russia saved a huge amount of foreign exchange helping the government to tame inflation. Now, it is to be seen whether the Prime Minister musters enough courage to continue with the cheap Russian crude oil imports or starts the process of diversifying the imports though the price will be higher and more foreign exchange will be required. In this Russian oil context, Trump has used the undiplomatic language by saying that let both the dead Russian and Indian economies go down. This comes from a sort of hate syndrome because this is untrue. India is not a dead economy. The economy is growing but there are problems of distributive justice and unemployment. Some of the policies are flawed needing course correction, but in global context, India stands out. Rahul Gandhi through his support to Trump on this dead economy issue has only brought disrepute to the Congress Party. Somebody senior with knowledge of economics must properly guide the Leader of the Opposition. Otherwise, he will not only create problems for the Congress but also harm the cause of INDIA bloc. Narendra Modi is certainly on a backfoot but if he is compelled by circumstances to defy Trump and fight him, the opposition should support him. Narendra Modi is not India, so supporting Indian cause does not mean strengthening Modi What is most discomforting for India is that India the Prime Minister of which country is considered as the closest among the heads of South Asian nations to the US President, has been charged the maximum tariff rate of 25 per cent. As against India, Pakistan has been charged 19 per cent, Sri Lanka 20 per cent, Bangladesh 20 per cent and Afghanistan 15 per cent. Bangladesh was originally charged 37 per cent, but in the final list, it was charged 20 per cent-17 per cent less. Similarly Pakistan's original rate was much higher compared to the present 20 percent. Another important development is to be noted. Trump concluded a deal with Pakistan in a hurry on oil exploration just to spite India. In Pak media, there was no indication of this, nobody knows where are such big reserves and whether those are really worthy of exploration and development. But Trump quipped by saying that perhaps Pakistan would one day sell oil to India. To be frank, India has not much leverage in the present trade negotiations with the US. US is very adamant on their access to Indian market in agri products, especially dairy. There are historical reasons. US farmers have a strong lobby in the Congress and the White House. The farmer organization leaders decide the fate of the government. This writer was present at the World Trade Organisation ministerial meeting in December 1999 at Seattle in US President was then Bill Clinton. The meeting collapsed without any declaration as the US and the European Union fought over farmers subsidy issue and no side was ready for a compromise. Clinton was virtually mobbed by the EU negotiators after his address to persuade the US team members to compromise. But Clinton did not listen. American journalists covering the WTO meeting told me at that time that no US President can win elections by antagonizing the farmers who are most subsidized in US through different schemes though the US government officially denies that in WTO which was active then. The US media people told me after the collapse that the US failed to get its proposal favouring the farmers passed. This will have big impact in the elections next year against the Democrats. Actually, in 2020 presidential elections, the Republican George Bush won and the Democratic Party lost. So Trump also is committed to help his supporting base among the farmers by getting them bigger access to the Indian market of agri products. Narendra Modi must have taken note of this but he has also the same stake in defending his own party base. Now, what is the emerging scenario? There are two possibilities.. First, through back channel discussions at the level of our PMO and the Trump office, a sort of compromise trade deal is concluded meeting a part of demands of the US side and the PM camp projecting it as a big victory. If that is not possible and the talks collapse, Prime Minister will be facing big choice. He will be attending the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting in China on August 31 and September 1.. President Xi Jinping and President Putin will be attending. PM can calibrate his foreign policy and take a more independent stand vis a vis USA. For the second option, Prime Minister will have to decide immediately on India's stand on QUAD which has four members USA, India, Australia and Japan. India is the host of the summit in 2025. Trump is scheduled to visit India during the summit later this year. If the India-US relations continue this way and Trump's hostile attitude remains, what will be the impact of this on Narendra Modi and his tackling of QUAD summit?- That is a major issue.. Trump has attacked BRICS members. India is a member of BRICS. How is our Prime Minister going to react to that? All these are relevant issues which the PM will have to deal with. For Narendra Modi and the BJP, the best possible scenario will be the first one. If back channel negotiations lead to an understanding between Trump and Modi, Indian Prime Minister will be back again trying to get back his old form and talking of strategic autonomy. Then they will cohabit again for some time at least. (IPA Service)
Arabian Post
17 hours ago
- Arabian Post
Guests of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Media and Think Tank Summit Visit Luoyang: Embracing the Dynamic Pulse of a Millennia-Old Ancient Capital
Site Museum of Dingding Gate LUOYANG, CHINA – Media OutReach Newswire – 1 August 2025From July 23 to 27, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Media and Think Tank Summit was held in Zhengzhou, Henan Province. On July 26, over 100 guests embarked on a field visit to Luoyang, immersing themselves in the vitality and pulse of this millennium-old ancient capital. As a pivotal cradle of Chinese civilization, an ancient capital of thirteen dynasties, one of the Eastern starting points of the Silk Road, and a central city along the the Grand Canal of Sui and Tang Dynasties, Luoyang boasts over 5,000 years of civilization, nearly 4,000 years of urban history, and more than 1,500 years as a capital. Additionally, it serves as an important traditional industrial base prioritized by the People's Republic of China. During the first Five-Year Plan (1953-1957), seven of 156 key national projects were launched here. In the new era, Luoyang is forging deep integration into the Belt and Road Initiative, as China-Europe and China-Central Asia freight trains operate around the clock. Guests of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Media and Think Tank Summit Visit Luoyang The Silk Road's ancient portal endures, while the radiance of the Tang Dynasty's heyday blooms anew. ADVERTISEMENT Dingding Gate stands majestic, having witnessed the distant years when camel bells echoed along the Silk Road and greeted the flourishing glory of the Sui and Tang Dynasties. Stepping into the Site Museum of Dingding Gate, a magnificent reenactment of the 'city entrance ceremony' instantly transported them through history. As performers bowed deeply, their Hanfu robes swirling, the guests marveled at the millennia-old elegance of the cross-handed salute, remarking they had never witnessed such graceful etiquette. Moving to the dazzling 'Wuhuang Shengyan (a Tang-style Cultural Restaurant)', guests embarked on a multisensory journey through the Tang Dynasty's golden age. Amid carved railings and jade-inlaid structures, they savored exquisite delicacies amid resounding music and dance, overwhelmed by the grandeur of Tang majesty. In joyous spirit, guests spontaneously joined performers onstage. Long after the feast, its melodies lingered as the guests remained in awe, exclaiming, 'Stunning! Magnificent! Breathtaking!' They vowed to tell friends and family that they must come and experience it. Dongfanghong composes new stories, while the Buddha's light of Longmen shines upon the world. Entering the Dongfanghong Innovation Hub of YTO Group Corporation, guests felt the surging pulse of Luoyang's equipment manufacturing and industrial development. Interested foreign guests boarded the vehicles to experience the new tractors on display. The accessible advanced manufacturing deeply touched them. 'Luoyang is not only beautiful, but also possesses the crafting might of modern farm machinery, which is truly remarkable!' Many foreign guests noted that China's generous support in professional technologies and equipment had boosted agricultural development in their countries, bolstering the foundations of sustainable growth and safeguarding precious food security. They expressed hope for deeper cooperation ahead. At Longmen Grottoes, guests explored China's treasury of stone carving art. Foreign guests paused before the Giant Vairocana Buddha, remarking that Luoyang is an extraordinarily unique place, rich in culture and civilization. They expressed hope for linking their countries with China through tourism to foster deeper exchanges and mutual learning between civilizations. Millennium-old Luoyang retains its timeless charm. Through this in-depth visit, guests of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization Media and Think Tank Summit not only heard the echoes of history but also felt the city's powerful pulse of the times. They etched deeply in their hearts a 'stunning, magnificent, and breathtaking' magical Luoyang, a city they would share far and wide across the world. Hashtag: #Luoyang The issuer is solely responsible for the content of this announcement.
Al Etihad
19 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Why has India vowed to protect its farmers in the face of tariff threats?
1 Aug 2025 14:13 MUMBAI (REUTERS)US President Donald Trump on Thursday slapped a 25% tariff on Indian goods after prolonged talks that got bogged down over access to India's labour-intensive agricultural sector, which New Delhi has pledged to protect. Why is India opposing the products the US is lobbying for? The United States is pressing India to open its markets to a wide range of American products, including dairy, poultry, corn, soybeans, rice, wheat, ethanol, fruits and nuts. While India is willing to provide greater access for US dry fruits and apples, it is holding back on corn, soybeans, wheat, and dairy products.A key reason for this resistance is that most US corn and soybeans are genetically modified (GM), and India does not permit the import of GM food crops are widely perceived in India as harmful to human health and the environment, and several groups affiliated with Prime Minister Narendra Modi's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) are opposing their introduction. The commercial cultivation of a high-yielding GM mustard variety that India developed itself is currently not allowed due to an ongoing legal GM crops, dairy is also a highly sensitive issue, as it provides a livelihood for millions of farmers, including many who are landless or smallholders. The dairy industry helps sustain farmers even during erratic monsoon seasons, which can cause significant fluctuations in crop India, where a large proportion of the population is vegetarian, food choices are strongly influenced by cultural and dietary preferences. Indian consumers are particularly concerned that cattle in the U.S. are often fed animal by-products - a practice that conflicts with Indian food is self-sufficient in most farm goods, with the exception of vegetable oils. After liberalising cooking oil imports over three decades ago, the country now has to import nearly two-thirds of its supply to meet demand. India does not want to repeat this mistake with other basic foods, which account for nearly half of its consumer price agriculture makes up just 16% of India's nearly $3.9 trillion economy, it is the lifeblood for nearly half the country's 1.4 billion people. Four years ago, this powerful voting bloc forced Modi's government into a rare retreat on a set of controversial farm in power fear a flood of cheaper US imports would bring down local prices. New Delhi is also worried that a trade deal with the US could force it to open its agricultural sector to other countries. How does farming in India and the US differ? The vast disparity in the scale of farming makes it difficult for Indian farmers to compete with their US average Indian farm is 1.08 hectares (2.67 acres), compared to 187 hectares in the US. For dairy farmers, the difference is even more dramatic - a small herd of two or three animals versus hundreds or more in the Indian farmers also rely on traditional, unmechanised techniques, while American agriculture has developed into a highly efficient, tech-driven industry. Why is India hesitant to use US ethanol in its biofuel programmeOne of India's key goals with its Ethanol Blended Petrol (EBP) programme is to reduce energy imports and support domestic farmers by using sugarcane and corn for biofuel production. Indian companies have invested heavily in new distilleries, and farmers have expanded corn cultivation to meet the rising demand. India recently achieved its ambitious target of a 20% ethanol blend in petrol. With state assembly elections approaching in Bihar - a major corn-producing state in the east - allowing US ethanol imports would lower local corn prices. This would probably anger farmers and also undermine the growing distillery sector.
