![[Robert J. Fouser] Comparing Seoul and Tokyo](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwimg.heraldcorp.com%2Fnews%2Fcms%2F2025%2F05%2F15%2Fnews-p.v1.20250515.4d5ae30850fd4746a274e3030155457d_T1.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[Robert J. Fouser] Comparing Seoul and Tokyo
Both cities are not only the capital of their respective nations, but also the most dominant cities of their respective countries in nearly all areas of human activity. Despite this basic similarity, several significant differences emerge that affect the vibe of each.
City populations vary depending on how 'city' is defined. The most common definition is the 'city proper,' but this leaves out suburbs and nearby cities that make up the larger urban area. By city proper, the two cities are about the same, with Seoul having 9,605,000 people and Tokyo 9,878,000 people, according to 2024 estimates. The area of each city is also similar at 605 square kilometers for Seoul and 627 square kilometers for Tokyo.
Both cities sit at the center of a large urban area containing vast suburbs and other large cities. The population of the Seoul area is 25.5 million, whereas the Tokyo area is substantially larger at 37.3 million. Tokyo became the world's most populous urban area in 1955 and still holds the title. The Seoul area ranks fourth and contains just over 50 percent of the population of South Korea, whereas the Tokyo area has only 30 percent of the population of Japan.
Politicians and pundits in both countries have long complained about the dominance of the capital over the rest of the country. With about half of the national population, the Seoul area is far more dominant than the Tokyo area at under a third. Seoul is easily accessible from most major cities in the country, whereas Tokyo feels more remote to people living in Hokkaido, Kyushu, Shikoku and Okinawa.
The different histories of the cities helps explain the difference in dominance. Seoul was founded in 1394 as the new capital for the Joseon Kingdom, which was founded by Yi Seong-gye in 1392, and it has remained the center of political power and most dominant city ever since.
Founded in 1603 by Tokugawa Ieyasu, Tokyo is some two centuries younger than Seoul. During the Edo Period (1603-1868), the Tokugawa bakufu centered on what is now Tokyo held political power, but the emperor, who had lived in Kyoto since 794, retained symbolic power. Several regions in Japan retained substantial levels of autonomy and charted their own course. It was only after the Meiji Restoration in 1868 that the emperor moved to Tokyo as power was centralized in a state modeled on European powers of the time. Tokyo's dominance is thus more recent and has shallower historical roots than that of Seoul.
Another interesting difference is the topography. The historic center of Seoul sits between mountains, with Cheonggye Stream flowing through the center. The current city contains many mountains and hills as well as the wide Han River. This means that most neighborhoods in Seoul have slopes, some of which are quite steep. It also means the city has substantial greenery and natural landmarks that break up the concrete cityscape.
Tokyo, by contrast, sits on the southern edge of Kanto Plain, the largest expanse of flat space in Japan. The city has many hills but no mountains or other natural landmarks. Instead of natural landmarks, the city's constructed landmarks, such as Tokyo Tower, stand out. Compared to Seoul, the city feels like an endless stretch of concrete with a few green spots dotted around. Tokyo ranks ninth among world cities for skyscrapers, defined as buildings taller than 150 meters, whereas Seoul ranks 21st. This makes the city feel larger than Seoul.
Both cities have vast subway networks, but Tokyo has a much larger network of private railways that converge on commuter hubs in the western part of the city. Seoul, by contrast, lacks commuter hubs with people changing trains as at many busy subway stations instead. The busiest stations in Seoul are mainly for intercity travel by KTX. The commuter hubs and their commercial activity also help make Tokyo feel larger than Seoul.
Despite the differences, both cities are becoming increasingly multicultural as their foreign-born populations rise. Tokyo passed the 5 percent mark recently and Seoul looks to do so this year. Crossing the 5 percent mark meets the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development's definition of a multicultural society. This gives both cities the opportunity, if not the responsibility, to develop models to help other cities with the transition toward a multicultural society.
Robert J. Fouser, a former associate professor of Korean language education at Seoul National University, writes on Korea from Providence, Rhode Island. He can be reached at robertjfouser@gmail.com. The views expressed here are the writer's own. -- Ed.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Iranian negotiator doesn't rule out exiting nuclear treaty if sanctions are reimposed
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — A top Iranian official warned Wednesday that European threats to reimpose sanctions could lead Iran to withdraw from an international pact that limits the spread of nuclear weapons, one of the last remaining safeguards against the Islamic Republic's nuclear program. Iranian Deputy Foreign Minister Kazem Gharibabadi discussed with reporters his country's recourse against further financial punishment ahead of a critical meeting Friday with Britain, France and Germany. The talks between Iran and some of the remaining members of the 2015 nuclear deal, which the US withdrew from in President Donald Trump's first term, are expected to take place in Istanbul. The three European countries have suggested triggering a so-called snapback provision in that accord that would reimpose sanctions on Iran if there is no progress on a deal to limit its nuclear program by August. The 2015 deal had eased economic penalties on Iran in exchange for restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear program, which Iran has insisted is peaceful. Gharibabadi, who has been part of the nuclear negotiation team, said that despite domestic pressure to withdraw from the separate, older Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, especially in the aftermath of the recent Israeli and US strikes on its nuclear sites, Iran has remained compliant with the 1970 treaty. 'But, I'm quite confident that if the snapback is triggered, Iran will not show more restraint in this regard,' Gharibabadi said. If Iran does exit the treaty, it will be just the second country to do so, after North Korea in 2003, whose withdrawal has never been formally accepted. The warning from Iran comes as the Trump administration is once again seeking to reach a deal with Tehran on its nuclear program. The two sides had held several rounds of talks before Israel staged a surprise attack in June. Iran has indicated an openness to restart negotiations with the US, with Gharibabadi saying Wednesday that 'the sooner, the better.' But he issued a stern warning to the Americans before they engage in a sixth round of talks: Do not use the guise of diplomacy as cover for another military attack on Iran, referencing the scheduled plans for US-Iran talks days before Israel decided to issue its first airstrikes on Tehran. 'Shall we have confidence and trust in the United States again? They should gain the confidence of Iran and come with honesty to the table of negotiations in this regard,' Gharibabadi said. As for talks with the Europeans, Gharibabadi and Iran's foreign minister, Abbas Araghchi, have remained optimistic that the triggering of sanctions and withdrawal from the treaty can be avoided with 'diplomacy and negotiation.' Gharibabadi said Friday's meeting is very important, but that its success will depend on how the Europeans approach Iran this time around. 'We have always valued our meetings with the European countries. But there is an important issue: I think we have always told them that the policies of the European countries should be independent,' he said. 'They should not coordinate their positions with the Americans.' He added, 'If this is the case, why should we negotiate with the Europeans when we can negotiate with the Americans?' Iranian officials, including Gharibabadi, said they are open to proposals on how to prevent further sanctions and 'prevent a more complicated situation.' In another sign of Iran's willingness, Gharibabadi also shared that a delegation of IAEA technical inspectors is expected to arrive in a 'few weeks,' marking the first time any members of the international inspection team have been allowed back in since the Israel-Iran war. The delegation will not be allowed to visit the nuclear sites, he added, saying that this will be a meeting to discuss what access, if any, Iran will allow the IAEA after what it sees as a betrayal committed against them by the agency's leaders. The IAEA did not immediately respond to a request for comment.


Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
US, EU trade talks bolstered by Trump's agreement with Japan
BRUSSELS/WASHINGTON (Reuters) — The European Union and the US are moving toward a trade deal that could include a 15 percent US baseline tariff on EU goods and possible exemptions, two European diplomats said Wednesday, potentially moving President Donald Trump closer to another major trade agreement on the heels of the one he just unveiled with Japan. European negotiators were hoping to reach an agreement to dodge the 30 percent tariff rate Trump has said he would impose on imports from the 27-nation bloc on August 1. The rate, which could also extend to cars, would mirror the framework agreement the US has struck with Japan, which Trump announced late Tuesday. There could be concessions for sectors like aircraft and lumber as well as some medicines and agricultural products, which would not face tariffs, the diplomats said. Washington does not, however, appear willing to lower its current 50 percent tariff on steel, they said. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Trump trade adviser Peter Navarro told Bloomberg News the report from the EU should be taken with "a grain of salt." As talks continued, the European Commission said it would press on with potential counter-measures in case a deal was not reached. EU member states were set to vote on 93 billion euros of counter-tariffs on US goods on Thursday, European diplomats said. A broad majority of members support using anti-coercion instruments if there is no deal, they said. Trump was aiming to secure an agreement on the heels of a complicated deal reached with Japan, the largest foreign investor in the US That deal included a $550 investment and loan pledges from Japan and its commitment to buy 100 Boeing airplanes and boost purchases of US agricultural products. That investment — to be spent at Trump's discretion — would focus on key industries like energy, semiconductors, critical minerals, pharmaceuticals and shipbuilding, the White House said Wednesday. Tariffs on Japan's auto sector will drop from 27.5 percent to 15 percent as part of the agreement, reviving hopes for similar treatment for European cars. Asian and European stock markets rallied as investors cheered the US-Japan agreement, but US stocks showed a more modest rise and earnings reports were gloomy. American businesses making everything from chips to steel reported downbeat results Wednesday, revealing how the Trump administration's chaotic trade policy has hurt profits, added to costs, upended supply chains and weighed on consumer confidence. US automakers signaled their unhappiness with the Japan deal, raising concerns about a trade regime that cuts tariffs on Japanese auto imports while leaving 25 percent tariffs on imports from their plants and suppliers in Canada and Mexico. "Any deal that charges a lower tariff for Japanese imports with virtually no US content than the tariff imposed on North American-built vehicles with high US content is a bad deal for US industry and US auto workers," said Matt Blunt, the president of the American Automotive Policy Council, which represents General Motors, Ford and Chrysler parent Stellantis. Automobile stocks led the climb of European shares after the Japan deal spurred hopes that the US was budging over tariffs on EU cars. EU officials have previously said Washington has shown little sign of doing so. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in an interview with Bloomberg Television that Japan received the 15 percent rate on auto tariffs "because they were willing to provide this innovative financing mechanism" that he did not think other countries could replicate. Trump, however, has appeared open to a range of options as the US negotiates trade deals. "I will only lower tariffs if a country agrees to open its market," Trump wrote in a social media post Wednesday. The Republican president said late Tuesday that other countries would be coming to Washington for talks this week. Governments were scrambling to close trade deals before next week's deadline that the White House has repeatedly pushed back under pressure from markets and intense lobbying by industry. US and Chinese officials plan to meet in Stockholm next week to discuss extending an August 12 deadline for negotiating a trade deal. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt on Wednesday would not discuss expectations for the meeting, but said Bessent "looks forward to continuing discussions with his Chinese counterparts."


Korea Herald
2 days ago
- Korea Herald
Ukraine curbs anti-corruption agencies, sparking rare protests
KYIV, Ukraine (AFP) -- Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy signed a bill on Tuesday revoking the autonomy of two anti-corruption agencies, a proposal that has sparked rare street protests in Kyiv and alarm among the country's international backers. Critics say the legislation consolidates power in Zelenskyy's hands and will allow government meddling in high-profile graft cases. The European Union called the decision a "serious step back," while hundreds gathered in central Kyiv to oppose the measure -- a show of anti-government anger rarely seen since Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Lawmakers in Ukraine's parliament voted 263 to 13 to approve the bill, the majority of those in favour being from Zelenskyy's ruling party. Zelenskyy later signed the bill into law, a senior official told Agence France-Presse. The bill would place the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office under the direct authority of the prosecutor general, who is appointed by the president. The NABU investigates instances of corruption among state institutions, while the SAPO prosecutes other corruption. In an address early Wednesday, Zelenskyy said the NABU and SAPO would "work" regardless of the changes, adding that Ukraine's anti-corruption infrastructure needed to be cleared of "Russian influences." "The prosecutor general is determined to ensure that punishment is inevitable in Ukraine," he said. But the Anti-Corruption Action Center, a nongovernmental organization, said the law would render the agencies meaningless as Zelenskyy's prosecutor general would "stop investigations into all of the president's friends." Protesters in the capital expressed anger at the measure. Some chanted "veto the law." "The bill is being rushed through," said 26-year-old game designer Anastasia. "It is clear that this is a targeted effort," she added. The protesters jeered and booed after Zelenskyy signed the bill into law, an AFP reporter saw. NABU began work in 2015, as Kyiv sought to bring the country closer to Europe after a 2014 pro-European revolution. Since its inception, the agency has uncovered widespread graft, including among figures in Zelenskyy's administration. Many opponents of the law voiced concern that Ukraine was reversing course after a decade of democratisation. Ukraine has taken a tough stance on corruption in recent years, both as a prerequisite to joining the EU and to reassure allies who have sent wartime aid, but investigators say it remains a serious problem. EU Enlargement Commissioner Marta Kos slammed the vote and said anti-graft institutions were "essential for Ukraine's EU path." "Seriously concerned over today's vote," Kos wrote on X. "The dismantling of key safeguards protecting NABU's independence is a serious step back." The chair of the Ukrainian parliament's anti-corruption committee, Anastasia Radina, said the bill ran counter to Ukraine's EU accession process. One European diplomat speaking on the condition of anonymity described the move as "unfortunate." "Is it a setback? Yes. Is this a point of non-return? No," the official told a small group of reporters, including AFP. Ukraine's former foreign minister Dmytro Kuleba, who resigned from the government in 2024, said the measures marked a "bad day for Ukraine." "Now the president has a choice -- to stand on the side of the people or not," he said. On Monday, law enforcement conducted large-scale raids at the NABU, detaining one employee on suspicion of spying for Russia. Transparency International's Ukraine office called the raids an "attempt by the authorities to undermine the independence of Ukraine's post-Revolution of Dignity anti-corruption institutions." Transparency International ranked Ukraine 105th out of 180 countries in its "corruption perceptions index" in 2024, up from 144 in 2013.