logo
Ontario ends legal battle to avoid covering surgery for non-binary resident who wants a vagina while keeping a penis

Ontario ends legal battle to avoid covering surgery for non-binary resident who wants a vagina while keeping a penis

Article content
A non-binary Ontario resident's years-long battle for a publicly funded, out-of-country surgery to have a vagina surgically created while maintaining a penis is over.
The Ontario government says it won't ask the Supreme Court of Canada to review a lower court's ruling in April declaring that the novel phallus-preserving surgery qualifies as an insured service under the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) — the latest win for the patient, identified only as K.S.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ontario awards licences for publicly funded, privately operated diagnostic centres
Ontario awards licences for publicly funded, privately operated diagnostic centres

Global News

time2 days ago

  • Global News

Ontario awards licences for publicly funded, privately operated diagnostic centres

The Ford government has announced that 57 new privately operated surgical and diagnostic centres will be brought online and integrated into the public health system as it tries to reduce wait times. On Friday, Ontario Premier Doug Ford unveiled the first new privately operated facility to be given an operating licence — a new building in Richmond Hill, Ont., which will be run as a non-profit. As part of the creation of 57 new privately run facilities — referred to by the government as community surgical and diagnostic centres — Ontario will chip in a total $155 million over two years. 'The 57 new centres we are rolling out across Ontario will make a huge difference for people in the province, helping them get the care they need, when they need it,' Ford said in a statement. Story continues below advertisement 'It's all part of our plan to protect and improve our health-care services, all while ensuring people always receive the care they need with their OHIP card.' Get weekly health news Receive the latest medical news and health information delivered to you every Sunday. Sign up for weekly health newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Thirty-five of the centres have been licensed to offer MRI and CT scans, while another 22 will deal with GI endoscopy procedures. Ontario NDP MPP France Gélinas said the announcement was a step in the wrong direction. 'That is public money going into private hands instead of our local hospitals, where help is desperately needed,' 'This model of private delivery with public dollars is alarming and unfair. Study after study shows that private clinics benefit the wealthiest, while leaving the rest of us behind. That is public money going into private hands instead of our local hospitals, where help is desperately needed. All of this has been made possible through Bill 60. 'This model of private delivery with public dollars is alarming and unfair. Study after study shows that private clinics benefit the wealthiest, while leaving the rest of us behind. Ford made Friday's announcement at the Schroeder Ambulatory Centre in Richmond Hill, which received the first such licence to operate a new centre. It will get $14 million from the province and provide MRIs, CT scans and endoscopy procedures to 115,000 patients over two years. Story continues below advertisement The Walter and Maria Schroeder Foundation committed $300 million for the new centre. Health Minister Sylvia Jones said no special favours were given to the new ambulatory centre, which was built without assurance it would be granted a licence if it applied. The new centres will help alleviate the strain on public hospitals, the provincial government said. The premier said that 'hospitals are at full capacity, but this will relieve them.' Announcing the licences marks a major checkpoint on a plan the government announced in 2023 to expand the role of privately delivered, publicly funded operators in the health-care system. The plan — titled Your Health — was announced at the beginning of 2023, with legislation to support it passed during the spring. In the year that has followed, the government has been working through details of how it will manage oversight of new private clinics. — with files from The Canadian Press

Ontario ends legal battle to avoid covering surgery for non-binary resident who wants a vagina while keeping a penis
Ontario ends legal battle to avoid covering surgery for non-binary resident who wants a vagina while keeping a penis

National Post

time2 days ago

  • National Post

Ontario ends legal battle to avoid covering surgery for non-binary resident who wants a vagina while keeping a penis

A non-binary Ontario resident's years-long battle for a publicly funded, out-of-country surgery to have a vagina surgically created while maintaining a penis is over. Article content The Ontario government says it won't ask the Supreme Court of Canada to review a lower court's ruling in April declaring that the novel phallus-preserving surgery qualifies as an insured service under the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) — the latest win for the patient, identified only as K.S. Article content Article content The province had until June 23 to seek leave to appeal the April court ruling to the country's highest court. In an email to National Post this week, a spokesperson for Ontario's Ministry of the Attorney General said the government won't pursue the case. Article content Article content The lengthy legal battle between K.S., who was born male, dates back to 2022. K.S. does not identify as either exclusively female or male, but is female dominant and uses feminine or neutral pronounces (she/her/they/them). Article content According to court records, K.S. 'has experienced significant gender dysphoria since her teenage years, as well as physical, mental and economic hardships to transition her gender expression to align with her gender identity.' Article content In 2022, her Ottawa doctor requested pre-approval from OHIP for a vaginoplasty — the surgical creation of a vaginal cavity — but without a penectomy, which is when the penis is removed. Article content Article content In a letter to OHIP, K.S.' doctor said that her patient 'identifies as trans feminine but not completely on the 'feminine' end of the spectrum and for this reason it's important for her to have a vagina while maintaining a penis.' Article content Article content A vaginoplasty without a penectomy isn't available in Canada and, therefore, the funding was to have the procedure done at the Crane Center for Transgender Surgery in Austin, Texas, which 'has an excellent reputation (for gender-affirming surgery) and especially with these more complicated procedures,' the doctor wrote to OHIP. Article content K.S. appealed OHIP's denial of coverage to a tribunal. K.S. testified to concerns about the risk of urinary incontinence if she went through with a penectomy, 'the risk of losing the ability to experience an orgasm and the concern that removing her penis would invalidate her non-binary identity,' according to court documents.

Ontario ends legal battle to avoid covering surgery for non-binary resident who wants a vagina while keeping a penis
Ontario ends legal battle to avoid covering surgery for non-binary resident who wants a vagina while keeping a penis

Vancouver Sun

time2 days ago

  • Vancouver Sun

Ontario ends legal battle to avoid covering surgery for non-binary resident who wants a vagina while keeping a penis

A non-binary Ontario resident's years-long battle for a publicly funded, out-of-country surgery to have a vagina surgically created while maintaining a penis is over. The Ontario government says it won't ask the Supreme Court of Canada to review a lower court's ruling in April declaring that the novel phallus-preserving surgery qualifies as an insured service under the Ontario Health Insurance Plan (OHIP) — the latest win for the patient, identified only as K.S. The province had until June 23 to seek leave to appeal the April court ruling to the country's highest court. In an email to National Post this week, a spokesperson for Ontario's Ministry of the Attorney General said the government won't pursue the case. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. It's not clear how requests for similar niche gender surgeries will be decided or adjudicated in the future. The lengthy legal battle between K.S., who was born male, dates back to 2022. K.S. does not identify as either exclusively female or male, but is female dominant and uses feminine or neutral pronounces (she/her/they/them). According to court records, K.S. 'has experienced significant gender dysphoria since her teenage years, as well as physical, mental and economic hardships to transition her gender expression to align with her gender identity.' In 2022, her Ottawa doctor requested pre-approval from OHIP for a vaginoplasty — the surgical creation of a vaginal cavity — but without a penectomy, which is when the penis is removed. In a letter to OHIP, K.S.' doctor said that her patient 'identifies as trans feminine but not completely on the 'feminine' end of the spectrum and for this reason it's important for her to have a vagina while maintaining a penis.' A vaginoplasty without a penectomy isn't available in Canada and, therefore, the funding was to have the procedure done at the Crane Center for Transgender Surgery in Austin, Texas, which 'has an excellent reputation (for gender-affirming surgery) and especially with these more complicated procedures,' the doctor wrote to OHIP. OHIP denied the coverage, arguing a vaginoplasty without removal of the penis isn't listed as a separate, specific procedure under its schedule of benefits, and therefore didn't qualify for coverage. K.S. appealed OHIP's denial of coverage to a tribunal. K.S. testified to concerns about the risk of urinary incontinence if she went through with a penectomy, 'the risk of losing the ability to experience an orgasm and the concern that removing her penis would invalidate her non-binary identity,' according to court documents. The review board overturned OHIP's refusal, arguing that vaginoplasty and penectomy are listed as separate, sex reassignment procedures covered by OHIP, and that a vaginoplasty need not inherently include removal of the penis. OHIP appealed to the Ontario Divisional Court, but lost again when a three-member panel of judges unanimously backed the tribunal's position. That court also said that denying the procedure would infringe on K.S.' Charter-protected rights. The court concluded that insisting that a transgender or non-binary person born a biological male 'remove their penis to receive state funding for a vaginoplasty would be inconsistent with the values of equality and security of the person.' OHIP appealed again, losing a third time to the Ontario Court of Appeal which, in another unanimous decision released in April, dismissed OHIP's appeal and confirmed the lower court's ruling. The three-member panel of judges for the appeal court said a penectomy was 'neither recommended by K.S.' health professionals nor desired by K.S.' and that it was up to the drafters of OHIP's list of insured services to describe each sex reassignment procedure 'in broad or narrow terms. 'Here, the description chosen, 'vaginoplasty,' is broad enough to encompass different techniques,' the appeal court said. 'There is no suggestion that the existence of different techniques of performing a vaginoplasty detract from the more basic notion that the procedure recommended for K.S. is still vaginoplasty.' Egale Canada, which appeared as an intervener for K.S., has described the surgical care K.S. sought as one that 'challenges expectations and stereotypes of gender and surgical transition.' 'An interpretation of the eligibility criteria for gender-affirming surgeries that relies on binary stereotypes is discriminatory and denies equal dignity and autonomy to nonbinary people,' the LGBTQ rights group has said. K.S.'s lawyer, reached Friday, referred National Post to previous comments, made after a prior victory in the courts. 'K.S. is pleased with the Court of Appeal's decision, which is now the third unanimous ruling confirming that her gender affirming surgery is covered under Ontario's Health Insurance Act and its regulations,' John McIntyre said. National Post Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store