
The 7/7 Bombings: 'It Was Hell – Nothing Can Prepare You'
The events triggered the most extensive criminal investigation in British history, as authorities rushed to prevent more killings. 'The politicians and police were concerned that this was the first of a wave of attacks that would wreck London,' says Adam Wishart, who, with James Nally, co-authored new book Three Weeks In July and co-directed 7/7: The London Bombings , a documentary on BBC iPlayer. 'They were dealing with a huge psychic shock. It was incredibly urgent to work out what had happened, and uncover the network surrounding the perpetrators.'
Many survivors suffered life-changing injuries. Martine Wiltshire lost both her legs on the Aldgate train; she recalls seeing one of her new shoes caught in tangled metal far away from her, and struggling to understand.
'Since then she has become a sitting volleyball player, a Paralympian and a motivational speaker – it's a central element of her life,' says Wishart. 'But there are some people, I imagine, who have put the experience in a box and buried it.'
An officer on the anti-terrorism squad, Dave Skiffins was one of those who went into the shell of the Tube carriage below Russell Square and collected the remains of more than 20 bodies. 'Individual people were sometimes blown into hundreds of pieces,' he told Wishart and Nally. 'It was hell. To see such devastation. No amount of training prepares you for that – the bodies, the bits, the blood. These people were taken in the prime of their lives. That's what got us more than anything. When they left home that morning to go to work, they didn't know that it was all going to end there.' Skiffins still regularly dreams about what he saw.
At the highest level, then-Prime Minister Tony Blair was responsible for protecting the country. Talking to him, says Wishart, it was clear that he found the event emotional and frightening. 'Above all, the purpose of Government is to keep citizens safe – and in that sense he had failed.'
Blair told the authors that he remembers, the following evening, watching his five-year-old son sleep. 'I'd spent all day just trying to do the job of being Prime Minister. But you are a human being... I remember going and seeing Leo sleeping and just thinking, 'What does it all mean for him, for his generation, for the country he's going to grow up in and for the future?''
The book makes it clear that there are no easy decisions or solutions in dealing with a terror threat – but intelligence services were criticised for what they'd missed. It emerged that one bomber, Mohammad Sidique Khan, had been flagged in previous investigations. 'There was a lot of chatter in the press about how MI5 could have acted sooner,' says Wishart. 'But it's a dilemma. You can stop every suicide bomber if you have a totalitarian state – but otherwise someone has to prioritise who we should follow and who we shouldn't.'
Two weeks after the bombings, the Met Police took a risk to stop a potential attack and got it horribly wrong. On 21 July 2005, four more bombs had been detonated in London but failed to explode, triggering a manhunt for those responsible. The next day, the innocent 27-year-old Jean Charles de Menezes was mistaken by police for suspect Hussain Osman, and was shot dead.
'It was a terrible tragedy following a series of awful mistakes,' says Wishart. 'The police then lied to try to cover up the incident, and that was something that did lasting damage to their reputation.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
26 minutes ago
- BBC News
7 July London bombings: Passenger safety recommendation dropped
A key recommendation made to improve passenger safety after the 7/7 London bombings has been dropped, BBC London has 2024, Transport for London's Emergency Response Unit (ERU) vehicles were driven by a British Transport Police (BTP) officer and could use blue light response capability to get specialist engineers to blue light status had been introduced in 2012 following the London Assembly Transport Committee's report into the 7/7 it was withdrawn in 2024. In a Transport for London (TfL) document, seen by BBC London, it says it was to minimise "collision risk". British Transport Police has been approached for comment. On 7 July 2005, a series of bombs was detonated on London's public transport system during the morning rush hour, killing 52 people and injuring more than committee carried out its own review to identify "lessons to be learnt". In its report, it recognised that the ERU played a "crucial role in the emergency response" to the 7/7 bombings and were "experts in dealing with emergencies on and around trains". At the time, however, the committee was "surprised" to learn the vehicles did not have blue lights, the automatic right to drive in bus lanes and had to pay the congestion recommended that TfL lobbied the government to obtain blue light status for ERU a blue light trial started in 2012 and became permanent until 2024. 'Do not meet national guidelines' The TfL document says blue lights were withdrawn last year following a says: "Blue light response capability was withdrawn to minimise collision risk. "BTP assessment confirmed incidents where our Emergency Response Units are deployed do not meet national guidelines on I grade dispatch."The ERU vehicles can still use bus lanes and do not have to pay the congestion charge, as per the recommendation made by the transport is yet to comment further. In the committee's report it was highlighted that the teams from the ERU were "experts in dealing with emergencies on and around trains, and have specialist equipment for supporting tunnels, dismantling trains, and helping to rescue people from damaged trains". The unit was regularly deployed to respond to people on the tracks, as well as other the blue lights trial was introduced in 2012, TfL said it aimed to halve the time taken to respond to incidents, and to reduce disruption and delays to 2012, Mike Brown, the then managing director for London Underground and London Rail, said: "Having the capability to travel with blue lights and sirens will mean that the specialist engineers of our Emergency Response Unit can cut through heavy traffic and respond to incidents more quickly and so restore services more swiftly for our customers." In 2012, Alan Pacey, the then BTP Assistant Chief Constable, said of the scheme: "Passenger safety will be improved by using 'blue lights' to get engineers and equipment to the scene of incidents as quickly as possible."Stuck trains will be freed from tunnels more quickly, enhancing passenger safety. "By getting the line moving sooner there will also be fewer crowd safety issues in and around stations."Once at the scene the officer driving the ERU vehicle will perform regular policing duties and work alongside colleagues to resolve any crime or safety issues and help get the system moving." Most of the other recommendations in the report and a report made by a coroner have been implemented including the introduction of new radio systems and new pre-agreed meeting points at incidents for the emergency services.


Daily Mirror
41 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
DWP to start 'monitoring' bank accounts in 2026 to combat benefit fraud
The Department for Work and Pensions is set to introduce new fraud-combatting measures - here's what you need to know This year, the UK Government announced what it calls 'the biggest fraud crackdown in a generation', aiming to significantly reduce the misuse of funds within the welfare system. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) believes that the new Public Authorities (Fraud, Error and Recovery) Bill will be instrumental in saving taxpayers a hefty £1.5 billion over the coming five years. The bill introduces tough penalties, including driving bans of up to two years for persistent benefit fraudsters, as well as granting the DWP powers to directly seize funds from the bank accounts of those guilty of fraud. Additionally, the Eligibility Verification system will allow third parties, such as banks, to highlight suspicious benefit claims. The DWP has published 11 new factsheets to clarify how these measures will be safely implemented and monitored. These documents outline that the UK Government plans to start implementing the proposed measures in 2026. The factsheets also elaborate on the checks and balances, including reporting requirements and oversight mechanisms, designed to ensure that the new powers are used in a manner that is 'appropriate, proportionate, and effective'. According to the Daily Record, advice from states: "The Government will begin implementing the Bill measures from 2026. "For the Eligibility Verification Measure, the Government will implement a 'test and learn' approach to ensure the new powers to tackle public sector fraud are being used proportionally and effectively. DWP and the Cabinet Office will continue to work with industry to implement the new measures, consult stakeholders on Codes of Practice and publish guidance." The DWP will also gain the ability to gather data from additional third-party organisations, such as airlines, to confirm whether people are claiming benefits from abroad, potentially violating eligibility rules. Eligibility Verification Measure explained It's vital to note that the DWP won't have direct access to the bank accounts of millions of people receiving means-tested benefits like Universal Credit, Pension Credit and Employment and Support Allowance. The DWP will work alongside banks to identify people who may have surpassed the eligibility criteria for means-tested benefits, such as the £16,000 income limit for Universal Credit. Using this information, the DWP will scrutinise the claimant to prevent potential overpayments and possible fraud cases. The legislation only allows banks and other financial institutions to share limited data and forbids the sharing of transaction data, meaning the DWP won't be able to see how benefit recipients spend their money. Indeed, the factsheet makes it clear that banks and other financial institutions could face penalties for oversharing information, including transaction details. It adds: "Any information shared through the Eligibility Verification Measure will not be shared on the presumption or suspicion that anyone is guilty of any offence." New DWP steps to combat fraud The upcoming Bill will uphold the UK Government's manifesto promise to safeguard taxpayers' money, ensuring every pound is spent wisely and effectively: New powers of search and seizure - so DWP can control investigations into criminal gangs defrauding the taxpayer. Allowing DWP to recover debts from individuals no longer on benefits and not in PAYE employment who can pay money back but have avoided doing so. New requirements for banks and building societies to flag where there is an indication there may be a breach of eligibility rules for benefits - preventing debts accruing. All the powers will include strong safeguards to ensure they are only used appropriately and proportionately - including new inspection and reporting mechanisms. DWP will have a clearly defined scope and clear limitations for the use of all the powers it is introducing, and staff will be trained to the highest possible standards. This Bill will empower the Public Sector Fraud Authority to: Improve fraud management in future emergencies by creating specialist time-limited powers to be used in crisis management situations - building on lessons learned during COVID-19. Reduce fraud against the public sector by using its expertise to take action on behalf of other departments, against those who attack the public sector. Improve the government's ability to recover public money, through new debt recovery and enforcement powers. Use new powers of entry, search and seizure to reduce the burdens on the police in the most serious criminal investigations. Better detect and prevent incorrect payments across the public sector through new information gathering and sharing powers. Use strong non-criminal sanctions and civil penalties to provide an alternative to criminal prosecution and to deter fraud. The Public Sector Fraud Authority will adopt a 'test and learn' strategy when using these powers, trialling various methods and expertise to discover the most effective way to combat public sector fraud.


North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Channel crossing migrants should face prosecution if child dies
Yvette Cooper told BBC Radio 4's Today programme it was 'totally appalling' that children were being 'crushed to death on these overcrowded boats, and yet the boat still continues to the UK'. She added: 'Everybody who is arriving on a boat where a child's life has been lost, frankly, should be facing prosecution, either in the UK or in France.' The Government has already included a new offence of 'endangering life at sea' in the Border Security, Asylum and Immigration Bill currently making its way through Parliament. Ms Cooper has previously said this would allow the authorities to act against people 'involved in behaviour that puts others at risk of serious injury or death, such as physical aggression, intimidation, or rejecting rescue attempts'. But on Friday, she appeared to go further by suggesting even getting on an overcrowded boat could result in prosecution. She said: 'If you've got a boat where we've seen all of those people all climb on board that boat, they are putting everybody else's lives at risk.' Crossings have increased in the past year, reaching 20,600 by July 2, a rise of 52% compared with the same period in 2024. Some 15 children died trying to cross the Channel last year, prompting charity Project Play to warn that conditions were becoming 'more dangerous' for young people. Advocacy co-ordinator Kate O'Neill, based in northern France, blamed policies aimed at preventing crossings for the increasing risk. She told the PA news agency: 'Ultimately the children we're meeting every day are not safe. 'They're exposed to a level of violence, whether it's they are directly victims of it or the witness. 'We're ultimately at all times putting out fires… the underlying issue is these policies of border securitisation… that are creating more and more barriers to child safety and child protection.' She said there was hope when the Labour Government took office a year ago that there would be some improvement, adding: 'This is not at all what we've seen. 'They continued to make conditions more difficult and more dangerous.' She said: 'The smash-the-gangs narrative is not effective and it's harmful because ultimately the only way to put the gangs out of business is to cut the need for them.' Meanwhile, Ms O'Neill said French police were already intervening in crossing attempts in shallow waters despite the changes to the rules to allow this having not yet come into force. She said: 'This is not a new tactic… it's something that has been happening for a long time in Calais and surrounding areas. 'My feeling is that this is increasing based on the number of testimonies we're receiving from children and their families recently. 'It's really dangerous because the children often are in the middle of the boats.' On Friday, the Home Secretary welcomed reports that French police were intervening in French waters to prevent crossings, and said she had been 'working very closely with the French interior minister' to ensure the rules were changed 'as swiftly a possible'. Ms Cooper also declined to confirm reports the UK was looking at a 'one in, one out' policy that would see people who had crossed the Channel returned to Europe in exchange for asylum seekers with connections to Britain. Asked about the policy, she would only tell Sky News that ministers were 'looking at a range of different issues' and 'different ways of doing returns'. A boat carrying migrants could be seen off the coast of Gravelines in northern France on Friday morning as a family and dog walkers enjoyed the sunny weather on the beach. A French authority boat followed the dinghy closely as it travelled along the coast passing big ships such as a DFDS ferry, and a French border control helicopter flew overhead.