&w=3840&q=100)
US won't publish major climate change report on Nasa website as promised
Earlier this month, the official government websites that hosted the authoritative, peer-reviewed national climate assessments went dark. Such sites tell state and local governments and the public what to expect in their backyards from a warming world and how best to adapt to it. At the time, the White House said NASA would house the reports to comply with a 1990 law that requires the reports, which the space agency said it planned to do.
But on Monday, NASA announced that it aborted those plans.
"The USGCRP (the government agency that oversees and used to host the report) met its statutory requirements by presenting its reports to Congress. NASA has no legal obligations to host globalchange.gov's data," NASA Press Secretary Bethany Stevens said in an email. That means no data from the assessment or the government science office that coordinated the work will be on NASA, she said.
On July 3, NASA put out a statement that said: "All preexisting reports will be hosted on the NASA website, ensuring continuity of reporting.
"This document was written for the American people, paid for by the taxpayers, and it contains vital information we need to keep ourselves safe in a changing climate, as the disasters that continue to mount demonstrate so tragically and clearly," said Texas Tech climate scientist Katharine Hayhoe. She is chief scientist at The Nature Conservancy and co-author of several past national climate assessments.
Copies of past reports are still squirrelled away in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's library and the latest report and its interactive atlas can be seen here.
Former Obama White House science adviser and climate scientist John Holdren accused the administration of outright lying and long intended to censor or bury the reports.
"The new stance is classic Trump administration misdirection," Holdren said. "In this instance, the administration offers a modest consolation to quell initial outrage over the closure of the globalchange.gov site and the disappearance of the National Climate Assessments. Then, two weeks later, they snatch away the consolation with no apology." "They simply don't want the public to see the meticulously assembled and scientifically validated information about what climate change is already doing to our farms, forests, and fisheries, as well as to storms, floods, wildfires, and coast property and about how all those damages will grow in the absence of concerted remedial action," Holdren said in an email.
That's why it's important that state and local governments and every day people see these reports, Holdren said. He said they are written in a way that is "useful to people who need to understand what climate change is doing and will do to THEM, their loved ones, their property and their environment".
"Trump doesn't want people to know," Holdren wrote.
The most recent report, issued in 2023, found that climate change is affecting people's security, health and livelihoods in every corner of the country in different ways, with minority communities, particularly Native Americans, often disproportionately at risk.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scroll.in
14 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Rahul Gandhi gets bail in case over allegedly defamatory remarks about Army
A court in Uttar Pradesh's Lucknow on Tuesday granted bail to Congress MP Rahul Gandhi in a case pertaining to his allegedly defamatory remarks about the Army during the Bharat Jodo Yatra in 2022, Bar and Bench reported. Gandhi appeared in front of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Alok Verma after the Allahabad High Court dismissed his challenge in May against the summons issued in the case. The case pertains to comments made by Gandhi on December 16, 2022, about a clash between the Indian and Chinese armies along the Line of Actual Control in Arunachal Pradesh's Tawang. The two sides had confronted each other with melee weapons on December 9, 2022, leading to injuries on both sides. Gandhi was granted bail by Verma on the condition that he furnish a personal bond of Rs 20,000 along with two sureties of the same amount. The case will be heard again on August 13. The remarks made by the leader of Opposition about the violence were made during the Congress' Bharat Jodo Yatra, a march from Kanyakumari to Kashmir against the allegedly divisive policies of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party. A former director of the Border Roads Organisation, Uday Shankar Srivastava, filed a defamation complaint against Gandhi. His lawyer claimed that the Congress leader's statements were derogatory and defamed the Indian Army.


Time of India
16 minutes ago
- Time of India
Epstein files stay sealed — Republicans block move to force Trump admin to reveal details
An effort to open the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein investigation files to the public was blocked on Monday after Republican members of Congress rejected an amendment that would have required the Trump administration to release the sealed documents, as per a report. Epstein File Release Blocked by House Republicans The amendment proposed by California Congressman Ro Khanna was a Democratic amendment that would have allowed Congress to vote on whether the files should be made public or not, as reported by Newsweek. However, the GOP members of the House Rules Committee voted it down 5 to 7 on Monday evening, against the amendment, as per the report. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like They Are Unstoppable: The Most Beautiful and Talented Female Athletes ALSO READ: Trump's tariff threat could trigger recession as August 1 deadline looms, and he might not blink this time What the Amendment Aimed to Do Khanna's amendment was in effect a procedural measure that was tacked on to the GENIUS Act, which is related to digital assets like cryptocurrency, and if the amendment were to get passed, it would have forced Attorney General Pam Bondi to publish the Epstein documents on a "publicly accessible website," as reported by Newsweek. Live Events The Democratic Congressman wrote on social media X, saying, "Rules voted 5-7 to block the full House from voting on my amendment to have a FULL release of the Epstein file. People are fed up. They are fed up. Thanks Rep. Ralph Norman. Need to put the American people before party!," as quoted in the report. ALSO READ: Canada's job crisis? Student unemployment skyrockets to 14.2% — is a recession here already? Why the Epstein Files Still Matter The Epstein case has gained a lot of attention in US politics, and the issue has driven conspiracy theories and mistrust in various federal institutions in the last few years, according to Newsweek. The controversy came to the spotlight again after the Justice Department's recent memo said that there was no evidence of a client list or blackmail materials, which contradicted previous statements, as per the report. Epstein was accused of being a notorious child sex offender, but he died in his jail cell in 2019 while awaiting trial on further charges of sex trafficking minors, while FBI investigators concluded he killed himself, as reported by Newsweek. Elon Musk's Deleted Claim While Tesla CEO Elon Musk had also claimed in a now-deleted social media post that US president Donald Trump's name appeared in the Epstein files, and he called on Trump to release the files "as promised," as reported by Newsweek. Donald Trump Distances Himself from Epstein Controversy Trump, who does not stand accused of wrongdoing in connection with Epstein, has responded, saying he cannot understand why people are "still talking about [...] this creep," as quoted in the report. Democrats Keep Pushing for Public Disclosure This case has led Democrats to seek to release the files publicly, and the matter made its way into the political discourse as the House Rules Committee considered the issue after a failed attempt by the Democrats to force a vote in Congress on whether the Epstein files should be made public, as reported by Newsweek. FAQs Did the amendment pass? No. It was blocked in the House Rules Committee by a 7–5 vote, as per the Newsweek report. Is Trump involved in the Epstein case? There's no evidence he is named in the files or accused of wrongdoing.


The Hindu
17 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Kharge meets Rajya Sabha Chairman ahead of Monsoon Session
Ahead of the upcoming Monsoon Session of Parliament, Congress president Mallikarjun Kharge met Vice-President and Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar on Tuesday (July 15, 2025). Also Read | Ahead of Monsoon Session, Congress to hold strategy meet to discuss key issues The Opposition, he said, is keen on ensuring a productive session. The month-long session is scheduled to commence on July 21. 'The Opposition wants a productive Rajya Sabha session from July 21st. For that to happen, a number of strategic, political, foreign policy and socio-economic issues that are of great public concern need to be debated and discussed,' Mr. Kharge said in a post on social media platform X following the meeting.