
Far-right conspiracy theories spread online in aftermath of the Texas floods
Some people, emerging from the same vectors associated with the longstanding QAnon conspiracy theory, which essentially holds that a shadowy 'deep state' is acting against president Donald Trump, spread on X that the devastating weather was being controlled by the government.
'I NEED SOMEONE TO LOOK INTO WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THIS,' posted Pete Chambers, a former special forces commander and frequent fixture on the far right who once organized an armed convoy to the Texas border, along with documents he claimed to show government weather operations. 'WHEN WAS THE LAST CLOUD SEEDING?'
The same chain of posts on the social media platform X singled out a California-based 'precipitation enhancement' company as a potential culprit.
It didn't take long for one of the most integral figures in the QAnon movement to repost Chambers, which received millions of views on the Elon Musk owned-app.
'Anyone able to answer this?' wrote retired general Mike Flynn, a former national security adviser in the Trump administration and who helped legitimize QAnon after pledging allegiance to the movement in 2020, reposting Chambers.
Conspiracists and grifters on other platforms joined in. One YouTuber with hundreds of thousands of subscribers posted breathless coverage of what he called: 'The TRUTH of WEATHER MANIPULATION' in a segment which earned him close to 200,000 views alone.
The halls of Congress echoed the sentiment, as Georgia congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene – a vaccine skeptic and GOP hardliner, who has espoused Jeffrey Epstein conspiracies – didn't waste the moment to say she was introducing a bill of her own after the floods.
'I am introducing a bill that prohibits the injection, release, or dispersion of chemicals or substances into the atmosphere for the express purpose of altering weather, temperature, climate, or sunlight intensity,' she wrote on X as the aftermath of the floods continued. 'It will be a felony offense.'
There were also amplifications of a false story that rescuers found two girls who were allegedly found alive near Comfort, Texas – something CNN's Brian Stelter pieced together. Laura Loomer, another far-right propagandist and one of Maga's biggest stars, retweeted a story that stemmed from a volunteer rescuer who had heard the rumor. Eventually, the tale was disproven.
Of course, there has been much debate online about who is to blame for the deadly floods, with many not just turning to outlandish weather manipulation allegations, but pointing the finger at the Trump administration's recent budget cuts in favor of things like the massive funding of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
In a viral post on Instagram, the Austin Firefighters Association blamed its chief for delaying the flood response in the hard hit Kerr County, because he was more interested in saving money rather than the lives of potential flood victims.
'Why would Fire Chief Joel G. Baker do this, you may ask?' the post read. 'It was a misguided attempt to save money.'
The National Weather Service has also faced scrutiny in the wake of the disaster after underestimating the amount of rainfall that was dumped upon central Texas. Late-night alerts about the dangerous floods were issued by the service but the timeliness of the response and coordination with local emergency services, will be reviewed by officials.
Texas senator Ted Cruz, who was again on vacation overseas during a natural disaster in his state that claimed the lives of his constituents, helped push the so-called 'big, beautiful bill' last week, which among other major cuts, ensured weather forecasting funding was slashed significantly nationwide.
Posts on the Telegram app, in the neo-Nazi and far-right circles that characteristically find racist inspirations behind every news event – yet still mostly supports the Trump administration – were highly critical of the flood response and blamed it on the government's stupidity.
'There is brewing resentment in Texas against their state government from both Democrats and Republicans for their lack of emergency management at the state level, and the incompetence in planning and building disaster mitigation projects,' posted one account.
Another post promoted the idea that the Trump administration had failed to protect 'White girls' lives', in reference to the death of 27 campers at Camp Mystic, and in general 'White Americans'.
Meme makers on the left have taken the opportunity to mock the right, with one popular image spreading online using the Simpson's character, Principal Skinner, shown wondering if Trump's cuts, perhaps, are to blame for the deaths in Texas.
'No, it must have been Democrats using a weather modification machine,' the caption concludes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
North Carolina residents can now seek state aid after Tropical Storm Chantal
Individuals in central North Carolina counties whose homes and belongings were damaged by massive rains last month from Tropical Storm Chantal can now seek state-funded financial grants for temporary assistance. The aid for residents in eight counties within or near the Raleigh-Durham- Chapel Hill area is available after Gov. Josh Stein issued a state disaster declaration on Tuesday. As much as 9 to 12 inches (22.9 to 30.5 centimeters) of rain fell in the region at the close of the July 4 weekend, sending some rivers to record-breaking levels, affecting public water systems and damaging homes and businesses. There were at least six storm-related deaths, law enforcement agencies said. Stein also wrote President Donald Trump and the Federal Emergency Management Agency on Tuesday asking them to issue a federal major disaster declaration that would accelerate federal aid to help local governments with the costs of rebuilding roads and utilities, and for removing debris. Public assistance damage estimates have already totaled more than $42 million, according to Stein's office. Stein's state-of-emergency declaration three weeks ago in 13 central counties was designed to jump-start the process to seek federal recovery assistance. Stein's letter on Tuesday to Trump and FEMA said that Chantal's rains at the time resulted in more than 100 roads in the region being impassable because of flooding, sinkholes and structural damage. Dozens of flood-related rescues were carried out in Durham and Orange counties. Water service was interrupted in Mebane, and Hillsborough 's water treatment plant was offline for several days. Many displaced residents ended up in hotels. Individual aid from the state for items such as rental housing assistance, personal property replacement and medical expenses can be sought at disaster recovery centers in Orange, Durham and Alamance counties. Home and business owners already can seek U.S. Small Business Administration loans.


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Justice Department releases new list of so-called sanctuary jurisdictions
The Justice Department identified some three dozen states, cities and counties as so-called sanctuary jurisdictions on Tuesday, two months after the federal government quietly removed a much longer list that included many localities that support the Trump administration's hard-line immigration policies. The earlier, typo-riddled list was met with pushback from across the political spectrum, with officials often saying it wasn't clear why their jurisdictions were included. The new announcement doesn't appear to threaten consequences beyond what the federal government is already doing. Attorney General Pamela Bondi warned in the announcement that the department would 'continue bringing litigation against sanctuary jurisdictions and work closely with the Department of Homeland Security to eradicate these harmful policies around the country.' 'Sanctuary policies impede law enforcement and put American citizens at risk by design,' she said. The new list is composed overwhelmingly of Democratic jurisdictions, including states like New York, California and Connecticut, cities like Boston and New York City and a handful of counties, including Baltimore County, Maryland, and Cook County, Illinois. There's no clear definition of sanctuary jurisdictions, but the term is generally applied to state and local governments that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities. The administration never fully explained the errors in the first announcement, which included hundreds of jurisdictions, including places that had voted overwhelmingly for Trump and at least one that had declared itself a 'non-sanctuary city.' The list was published in late May on the Department of Homeland Security's website but within three days was replaced with a 'Page Not Found' error message. Trump officials have long warned that the federal government would go after jurisdictions that resist the president's plans for mass deportations. In April, Trump signed an executive order requiring Homeland Security and the attorney general to publish a list of jurisdictions they believe are obstructing federal immigration laws. The administration has filed a series of lawsuits targeting state or city policies it says are interfering with immigration enforcement, including those in Los Angeles, New York City, Denver and Rochester, New York. It sued four New Jersey cities in May. In late July, a judge in Illinois dismissed a Trump administration lawsuit that sought to disrupt limits Chicago imposes on cooperation between federal immigration agents and local police. In Connecticut, Democratic officials pushed back, arguing there's no reference to sanctuary jurisdictions in state law. Attorney General William Tong called the description of sanctuary states in the Department of Justice announcement 'a concocted fiction' of the Trump administration. Connecticut's Trust Act law has limited how police in the state can work with federal immigration since 2013. ___ Associated Press reporter Susan Haigh contributed from Hartford, Connecticut.


The Independent
23 minutes ago
- The Independent
Federal judge rules Trump administration cannot reallocate billions meant for disaster mitigation
A federal judge on Tuesday blocked the Trump administration from reallocating $4 billion meant to help communities protect against natural disasters. U.S. District Judge Richard G. Stearns in Boston granted a preliminary injunction sought by 20 Democrat-led states while their lawsuit over the funding moves ahead. A spokesperson for the Federal Emergency Management Agency did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The states argued FEMA lacked the authority to end the Building Resilient Infrastructure and Communities program and redirect more than $4 billion of its funding. The program aims to harden infrastructure around the country against potential storm damage. FEMA initially announced it was ending the program, but later said in a court filing that it was evaluating it. Noting money for the program was allocated by Congress, the states' lawsuit says any attempt to redirect it would run afoul of the Constitution. A lawyer for the government, Nicole O'Connor, argued at a hearing in July that the funds can be used both for disaster recovery and disaster prevention and that FEMA should have discretion to use the money how it sees fit. In his ruling, Stearns said he was not convinced Congress had given FEMA any discretion to redirect the funds. The states had also shown that the 'balance of hardship and public interest' was in their favor. 'There is an inherent public interest in ensuring that the government follows the law, and the potential hardship accruing to the States from the funds being repurposed is great,' Stearns wrote. 'The BRIC program is designed to protect against natural disasters and save lives.' The program has provided grants for a range of disaster management projects, including strengthening electrical grids, constructing levees for flood protection and relocating vulnerable water treatment facilities. Many of the projects are in rural communities. FEMA said in a news release in April that it was 'ending' the program, but the agency's acting chief, David Richardson, later said in a court filing that FEMA was merely evaluating whether to end or revise it. Stearns said it appeared FEMA had decided to end the program and was 'inching towards a fait accompli,' noting it had cancelled new funding opportunities and told stakeholders they shouldn't expect any unobligated funding. The states, including California, New York and Washington, argued that the threat of losing the funding alone had put numerous projects at risk of being cancelled, delayed or downsized. And they warned ending the program would be highly imprudent. 'By proactively fortifying our communities against disasters before they strike, rather than just responding afterward, we will reduce injuries, save lives, protect property, and, ultimately, save money that would otherwise be spent on post-disaster costs,' they wrote in the suit filed in July. FEMA said in a court filing that an injunction on its use of the funds could hamper its ability to respond to major disasters. But Stearns said the administration could come back to him to release funding should a disaster of 'unprecedented proportions' occur.