Anbumani lauds father during protest; Ramadoss sacks 3 MLAs
Anbumani Ramadoss
on Sunday in Villupuram.
Speaking amid PMK cadre who gathered from various districts, Anbumani said that ideally vanniyars should be given 18% reservation proportionate to their population. But the 10.5% quota was non–negotiable, he said.
Party founder S Ramadoss skipped the protest organized by Anbumani and cracked down on Anbumani supporters by announcing that three PMK MLAs who participated in the stir were being suspended from the party.
You Can Also Check:
Chennai AQI
|
Weather in Chennai
|
Bank Holidays in Chennai
|
Public Holidays in Chennai
Nevertheless, Anbumani praised his father Ramadoss during the protest which coincided with the 46th foundation day of Vanniyar Sangam.
Anbumani said the '45 year long protest' by Ramadoss for a separate reservation for vanniyars was longer than the independence struggle undertaken by Gandhi. "Gandhi came to India in 1915 and protested for India's independence until 1947. When compared to that protest, the protest by our ayya (Ramadoss) for a separate reservation for Vanniyars is even longer," Anbumani said.
Anbumani attacked the DMK govt for not providing reservation for vanniyars while using the community to get votes. "As many as 23 of the 133 DMK MLAs and 5 MPs are vanniyars, but the party is refusing to provide reservation for vanniyars. Even vanniyar MLAs in DMK are not demanding separate quota for the community," Anbumani said.
Earlier, Ramadoss hoisted the Vanniyar Sangam flag at his Thailapuram residence marking the foundation day.
Speaking to reporters, Ramadoss said he "wishes success for everyone who protests for the vanniyar cause."
However, after the protest, Ramadoss announced that three party MLAs, S Sadhasivam (Mettur), C Sivakumar (Mailam), and S P Venkateshwaran (Dharmapuri), and party spokesperson K Balu will be suspended from the party for "acting against the interest of the party."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Madras High Court restrains DMK from OTP verification for its ‘Oraniyil Tamil Nadu' campaign
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court, on Monday (July 21, 2025), by an interim order restrained the ruling DMK from sending OTP verification messages to mobile phones of people during its ongoing 'Oraniyil Tamil Nadu' membership drive. A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and A.D. Maria Clete said interim injunction was being granted to the limited extent (of OTP messages) till the issue of right to privacy and data protection were examined in detail, since fundamental rights of the people are at stake. The court noted during the door-to-door membership drive, personal information, including mobile phone numbers, were obtained and OTP verification messages were sent to the phone numbers. There is a concern of data breach. 'Data protection of the individuals is an essential element of Article 21 of the constitution. In the absence of accountability and transparency in the data collected from individuals across the State it is an issue which needs elaborate analysis,' the judges said. The data could potentially be used by third party companies, who are managing the data for political parties and serious concerns on privacy are at the forefront. The infrastructure available for collection and protection of individual data in the membership drive are not made clear. Data protection and voter data privacy are the essential facets of Article 21 of the Constitution and falls within the ambit of right to privacy, the court observed. The judges felt information about personal political affiliation can be used to disenfranchise voters through voter surveillance. 'Digital membership drives conducted by political parties in recent times are a new area of study whereby there is a clear departure from conventional modes of inducting party members,' it pointed out. A clarity is required as to the means and infrastructure adopted by the political parties to collect, process and store data from the public. How the data is stored and processed and the implications on the right to privacy of the voter including the right to privacy of the political affiliation ought to be examined. Noting valid and free consent is an essential part of such membership programmes, the court said no force or coercion should be employed and directed the DMK to provide details on the data privacy policy employed in the membership campaign and ensure the security of the data collected and whether 'informed consent' was obtained from the individuals. 'It is also to be seen if other smaller or economically challenged political parties will be put in a disadvantageous position and will it disturb the level playing field in the election thereby impacting Article 14 of the Constitution,' the court observed while hearing the public interest litigation petition filed by S. Rajkumar of Sivaganga district. The court ordered notice to the Centre and the State government and DMK and posted the matter for hearing after two weeks. In her separate order to the one authored by Justice Subramaniam, Justice Maria Clete observed she agreed to grant interim order in light of the serious concern relating to personal data protection and digital privacy. However, she made it clear such relief was extended with circumspection, particularly in the absence of a counter affidavit and without full knowledge of the programme's operational framework. Justice Clete associated herself with the operative interim direction. However, she expressed 'respectful reservation' with regard to that paragraph of the order on smaller or economically challenged political parties as it contained certain broader observations which in her view were not immediately germane to the legal and factual matrix present before the court. The judge directed the matter may be listed for further hearing on the filing of the counter affidavit and production of relevant materials by the respondents.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Nainar Nagenthran accuses DMK government of ignoring concerns of T.N. tapioca farmers
Tamil Nadu BJP president Nainar Nagenthran on Tuesday (July 22, 2025) accused the DMK government of ignoring the concerns of farmers cultivating tapioca in the State and failing to take steps to provide Minimum Support Price (MSP) for the crop as promised by the ruling party in its manifesto in the run-up to the 2021 Assembly polls. In a statement, Mr. Nagenthran said tapioca farmers in Tamil Nadu have been repeatedly demanding that the State government extend MSP for the crop. However, the DMK government has been neglecting the concerns of the farmers. 'The tapioca farmers have been suffering due to the fall in prices. The State government has not taken any steps to provide adequate irrigation facilities for the farmers. It has also failed to ensure that the farmers get fair price for their produce,' he said. Mr. Nagenthran urged the immediate intervention of Chief Minister M.K. Stalin and sought steps to ensure that the farmers get reasonable a price for their tapioca produce.
NDTV
2 hours ago
- NDTV
"False, Misleading": DMK Denies Collecting Aadhaar For Membership Drive
Chennai: A day after the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court restrained the ruling DMK from collecting Aadhaar details and OTPs from the public during its membership drive, the party has strongly denied the allegations in court, calling them "false and misleading." Appearing before the bench on Tuesday, the DMK submitted that it does not collect Aadhaar numbers or any other personal documents for its membership campaign. The party clarified that the OTP system is used solely to record voluntary consent from individuals seeking to enrol, and not for any Aadhaar-based authentication. The submission comes in response to a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by an AIADMK advocate, who alleged that the DMK's ambitious membership drive - aimed at enrolling at least 30% of the state's voters ahead of the 2026 Assembly elections - was in violation of the Aadhaar Act and individual privacy rights. The petitioner had accused the DMK of coercing citizens, especially women, into sharing Aadhaar numbers, ration cards, voter IDs, and bank passbook details. It was also claimed that mobile numbers were being collected, followed by an OTP-based verification allegedly linked to Aadhaar, creating a politically motivated voter database. However, the DMK, in its counter, told the court, "No Aadhaar-based OTPs are being sought." "Members are being enrolled purely on the basis of the Electoral Roll released by the Election Commission. No documents like Aadhaar, ration card, or passbook are being collected. The PIL is based on misinformation spread by AIADMK," it said. Though the court did not stop the party's enrolment drive, DMK's counsel informed that the enrolment drive has been paused in light of the court's interim order and urged the bench to treat the case as an urgent matter, allowing the party to clarify its position in fairness. The court has now directed the DMK to file a formal impleading petition, giving it an opportunity to be heard officially in the matter. Yesterday, one of the judges also noted that during Tuesday's proceedings, natural justice required the respondents (including DMK) to be given a chance to respond before any adverse findings are recorded. The high court had on Monday restrained the DMK from collecting Aadhaar and OTP details based on the PIL's claims. The order had also tagged the Election Commission and UIDAI for their response, given the implications for voter data protection and political data usage. The case is expected to be taken up later this week, with the court likely to hear detailed arguments from all sides. The outcome could set a precedent on the boundaries of political data collection and the use of digital verification in party enrolment campaigns.
