Letters to the Editor: parties on right, bulldog art, rugby
The old cliche that the right hand doesn't know what the left hand's doing, to describe incompetent management, needs a tweak with this coalition government. The right hand doesn't know what the other right hand is doing, or maybe the other.
On the National hand we have Minister for Tourism, Louise Upston, touting growth targets of 5 million international visitors a year by 2034, with a majority of those visiting the Queenstown-Lakes District. On the NZ First hand we have Minister for Regional Economic Development, Shane Jones, touting growth targets that involve cratering the landscapes that those visitors come to see and actively enjoy.
There is absolutely no sense that this government knows anything about cause and effect, conflicting values, limits to growth, and environmental risk assessment for the future of New Zealanders. Ms Upston and Mr Jones have 10 children between them and several mokopuna. Their future and those of mine depend, not on the bottom line of Australian mining companies or traffic-jamming and sewage drowning in Queenstown, but on caring for our priceless environment whose only bottom line is preservation.
Philip Temple
Dunedin Thanks, but
You were gracious enough to publish my letter regarding this mining venture (18.7.25), where I rebutted two opinions I considered emotive and poorly considered.
However, I object to your heading ''Mining is great'' which suggests I am an advocate for this activity at any cost. Mining is never great for any environment. My letter was an attempt to put another view in front of people who do not look at both sides of an argument before committing themselves to a cause.
Gavin Dann
Alexandra Responsible behaviour
Comments by Damian Spring, Santana CEO (ODT 15.7.25), are telling.
Mr Spring confirms that they have run an industrial processing plant in ''temporary buildings'' for four or so years without ever applying for consent. The works he now proposes will involve major earthworks, visual amenity impacts, and facilitate traffic volumes for his entire mining workforce of well over 250 people. The non-consented approval path he seeks is a choice to fly under the radar. Not answering the many questions we have posed and lack of any meaningful engagement with the community just confirms this further.
It is worth reminding your readers that Santana is a tiny Australian company that has never built an open-cast hard rock mine, and almost entirely relies on external consultants in their development of this project.
Questioning its plans and behaviour to date is not only justified, it would be irresponsible not to.
Rob van der Mark
Sustainable Tarras Community housing
Thanks to G. Nicol (Letters ODT 17.7.25) for raising the issue. Those who supported the proposed new community housing build were: Walker, Laufiso, Garey, Benson-Pope, Mayhem and O'Malley.
David Benson-Pope
Dunedin Dogged opposition
I am appalled by the decision to have a mural of a British bulldog. They are badly designed brachiocephalic dogs. They have trouble breathing during exercise because of enlarged uvula and small nostrils. They suffer from heat stress. Many need caesareans to give birth due to the puppies' big heads.
Popularising this breed of dog is not in the interests of animal welfare.
Sheenagh Tinkler
Palmerston North The modern game day is a load of rubbish
How to spoil a test match. Let the Sky showbiz frenzy team organise it.
First, a man with a booming voice and a mic that can be heard all over Hamilton.
A music device that drowns out the slightest sign of crowd spontaneity with explosions of music and instructions what to think.
Smother the referee's instructions, spectator conversation and, in case attention is diverted from the razzmatazz, the game in play.
Orchestrate, orchestrate, control, control. Abandon class. Aim for crass.
Christopher Horan
Lake Hawea Lights out
I have noticed that the latest subdivision in Tomahawk, 45 sections of 'prime' real estate, has turned on the streetlights, of which there are 22. That is 22 new lights burning bright in a subdivision where 15 sections appear to have been sold but not a sod has turned a sod yet.
For whom do these lights glow in the gloom of our night? Perhaps a solitary dog walker who otherwise may stumble off the sidewalk? For this subdivision is empty of life yet it is burning power, to what purpose I ask?
Owen Kreft
Dunedin No to plonkers on the council
I have always been fascinated by the argument that politics have no place in local politics (John le Brun, Letters 15.7.25).
Dunedin is unusual in having minimal participation by people who name their political affiliation. Personally I'm grateful to those who do - whether I support that affiliation or not. They are prepared to tell me straight up, simply by saying Green, Labour - and now Act New Zealand - the values they hold and will demonstrate around the council table. Some candidates I then easily dismiss from my potential list and others I will put to the top.
That does leave a whole lot where I'm reading between the lines to find out more and hoping I don't either help elect a plonker by mistake or, worse, someone who is covertly aligned to a party whose values I don't support.
Gio Angelo
Belleknowes Well, yes, but
In other times I might agree with V. H. Markham (Letters 17.7.25) that a city council should confine itself to local matters.
Unfortunately, in this time - now - a genocide is happening. Thousands of unarmed civilians have been killed. Those remaining are at risk of detention and incarceration in a concentration camp.
When very similar things happened in my parents' time, 80 years ago, the world eventually stood against it.
Three common sayings come to mind: 'We didn't know'' and ''Never again.''
The third is the legal and philosophical adage ''Qui tacet consentire'' implying that ''He who is silent gives consent.''
I wish to speak out against the genocide of the Palestinian people. I am pleased that my city council has seen fit to speak out.
I would dearly love my government to speak out - but they are silent.
What will we say in five, 10, 80 years time? ''We didn't know''?
Dorothy Browne
North East Valley
Address Letters to the Editor to: Otago Daily Times, PO Box 517, 52-56 Lower Stuart St, Dunedin. Email: editor@odt.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Almost A Third Of NZ Households Face Energy Hardship – Reform Has To Go Beyond Cheaper Off-Peak Power
The spotlight is again on New Zealand's energy sector, with a group of industry bodies and independent retailers pushing for a market overhaul, saying the sector was 'broken' and 'driving up the cost of living'. The Commerce Commission and the Electricity Authority has already established a joint task force, after prices peaked in 2024, to investigate ways to improve the performance of the electricity market. The Authority recently announced new rules requiring larger electricity retailers to offer lower off-peak power prices from next year. The government is also expected to make further announcements on the sector. But the question is whether these changes will do enough to help New Zealanders live affordably in dry and warm homes. Some 30% of households face energy hardship. This means they struggle to afford or access sufficient energy to meet their daily needs. Caused by a combination of poor housing quality, high energy costs and the specific needs of vulnerable residents, energy hardship can lead to serious health issues and high hospital admission costs. We know from our own research over the past 18 years that having power disconnected can negatively affect health and wellbeing. People have told us that not being able to afford enough power to keep warm made them more likely to get sick and exacerbated existing health conditions. They described mental distress from unaffordable electricity and the threat of disconnection. Research participants used words such as 'stressed', 'anxious' or 'depressed'. They also spoke about having to choose between food and power bills. If power is disconnected, there can be additional costs from losing food in the fridge and freezer, as well as the problem of paying disconnection and reconnection fees when people already can't afford the bill. What's driving up power bills? In 2024, a 'dry year' that increased the value of hydro generation, combined with lower-than-usual wind and declining supply of gas, resulted in wholesale electricity price spikes. But these winter shortages aren't the only factor pushing up power bills. Electricity bills reflect several costs along the supply chain from generation to getting the electricity to the sockets in our homes. A new regulatory period for lines charges from April 2025 increased bills by $10 to $25 per month, depending on where you live. At the same time, low fixed daily charges are being phased out. This means the cost of being connected to the grid is the same no matter how much power is used. It is the poorest New Zealanders who are being hardest hit. The lowest income households spend a bigger proportion of their income on power compared to higher income households. Having electricity prices increase faster than inflation will put even more families at risk. The average household electricity bill was up 8.7% in May 2025 compared to June 2024. According to a recent Consumer NZ survey, 20% of respondents said they struggled to pay their power bill in the past year. Tackling hardship The new Consumer Care Obligations might help reduce some of the risks. Power companies must now comply with these obligations when working with households struggling to pay their bills, are facing disconnection or have someone in the home who is medically dependent on electricity. If households feel their power company is not meeting these obligations, they can contact Utilities Disputes, a free independent electricity and gas complaint resolution service, or the Electricity Authority. But multiple changes are needed to address the different parts of the energy hardship problem. Improving home energy efficiency through schemes like Warmer Kiwi Homes is crucial. Introducing an Energy Performance Rating for houses would make it easier for home buyers and renters to know how much it will cost to power a home before they move in. This would also help target energy hardship support. The government can also make electricity more affordable by supporting not-for-profit power companies. Another good move would be to help more households to install rooftop solar by providing access to long-term low-interest finance. Lower prices during off-peak hours are a good start. But it is clear the sheer size and complexity of the problems mean government action, with community and industry collaboration, needs to go beyond slightly cheaper electricity when there is less demand. Disclosure statement Kimberley O'Sullivan receives funding from a Rutherford Discovery Fellowship administered by the Royal Society Te Apārangi, the Health Research Council, the Ministry of Business, Employment, and Innovation, and Lotteries Health Research.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
FIANZ Calls For ‘Hate Speech' Laws Again; Is Their Harmony Accord Commitment Real?
The Federation of Islamic Associations of New Zealand (FIANZ) once again is calling for 'hate speech' laws against their critics in the name of social cohesion. This undermines the spirit of the Harmony Accord, which is a promising document to foster mutual understanding through dialogue, says Stephen Franks, Chairperson of the Free Speech Union. 'The Accord expressly commits the parties to respecting freedom of speech. If FIANZ has immediately reneged, their commitment is suspect. Defining and seeking punishment for 'Islamophobia' has been the Trojan horse for resuscitating blasphemy laws in other free societies. Leading politicians in the UK are currently fighting against such an attempt. 'Censorship is poison to social cohesion. People charged or jailed for expressing fears about a religion will rationally resent the groups asking the Police to silence their fears. We're seeing the results right now in the UK, in the disorder fueled by long suppression of the truth about the rape grooming gangs, and the gags on questioning illegal immigration. 'Proposals to criminalise criticism of religion, even under the banner of combating 'hate', would grant religious beliefs legal privileges that conflict with liberal democratic values. New Zealanders must remain free to challenge and debate religious doctrines without the threat of prosecution. 'Censorship is counterproductive. It does nothing to change views. It often draws more attention to the very opinions it's trying to ban. Counter-speech is more constructive. It allows bad ideas to be challenged, not buried. The Government has already rightly rejected 'hate speech' laws after tens of thousands of Kiwis pushed back. 'We should not risk turning an Accord that shows tolerance and mutual respect into scheming to undermine core democratic freedoms. A forced silence is not social cohesion.'
Scoop
3 hours ago
- Scoop
All Aboard For Passenger Rail In The Golden Triangle
New Zealand's national passenger rail advocacy group, The Future is Rail, has announced its strong support for the Green Party's proposal to establish a new passenger rail service connecting Auckland and Tauranga. The group is calling the service a vital link that would serve nearly half of the nation's population and build on the proven success of inter-regional rail. 'This service is a logical and vital next step for New Zealand's transport network,' said Dr. Roger Blakeley, Chair of The Future is Rail. 'By linking Auckland, Hamilton, and Tauranga via the existing rail corridor, the train would serve up to 2.5 million people. It's time to connect our country's most significant economic and population centres with modern, efficient transport.' The proposed service would complement and extend the existing Te Huia train, which connects Hamilton and Auckland seven days a week. 'Te Huia's ahead-of-schedule ridership growth is evidence that Kiwis will embrace inter-regional rail when it's provided,' Spokesperson, Lindsey Horne, said. 'We see this as completing a critical missing link in our national transport system.' The Future is Rail highlighted the significant advantages passenger rail has over current travel options between the two cities. 'Currently, the 225km journey between Tauranga and Auckland forces people onto roads or into expensive flights,' Ms Horne stated. 'Passenger rail offers a better alternative that is safer, greener, more affordable, and more comfortable. It allows for a productive journey with significantly lower carbon emissions, where passengers can work or relax instead of facing the stress of driving.' South Island Spokesperson, Dave Macpherson, noted that the project aligns with a growing 'passenger rail renaissance' in New Zealand, citing broad public and political support. 'There is a growing public demand for passenger rail, from campaigns to re-establish the Southerner train between Christchurch and Invercargill to upgrades for the Capital Connection and Wairarapa rail services. Investing in passenger rail has wide and growing support from across the political spectrum, and this project is a perfect opportunity to deliver what New Zealanders are asking for.' About The Future is Rail: The Future is Rail is a national advocacy group dedicated to promoting the benefits and expansion of passenger and freight rail services throughout New Zealand.
