Jeffrey Epstein's former lawyer rejects idea of a ‘client list'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Jeffrey Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell set to meet today with DOJ
WASHINGTON − Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche plans to meet with convicted sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell on July 24 to find out what more she can say about her dealings with disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein, according to news reports. CNN, ABC and NBC News reported the expected meeting with the former British socialite, who is serving a 20-year prison sentence for trafficking a minor to Epstein for sexual abuse. News of the meeting date comes as President Donald Trump continues to try and contain the growing backlash over the Epstein saga and his administration's recent decision not to release Epstein investigative files in the custody of the Justice Department. DOJ officials had no comment on whether Blanche was meeting with Maxwell. Who is Ghislaine Maxwell? DOJ turns to Jeffrey Epstein's ex-partner The meeting comes as many Trump supporters, Democratic lawmakers and even some Republicans demand the release of more information about the accused sex trafficker, who died in prison in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. Maxwell is also reportedly set to meet on Aug 11. with congressional lawmakers after the House Oversight Committee subpoenaed her on July 23. In a social media post Tuesday, Blanche – who is Trump's former personal defense lawyer – said that if 'Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.' This is a developing story and will be updated. This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: DOJ meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell set for today over Epstein saga Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Why Tulsi Gabbard's 'treasonous conspiracy' case against Obama is absurd
As President Donald Trump tries to quiet a rebellion from his own base over his administration's decision to withhold the release of the complete Jeffrey Epstein files, his director of national intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, is going on offense. Through memos and documents released both last week and this week, Gabbard is attempting to advance the evidence-free claim that officials in former President Barack Obama's administration engaged in a 'treasonous conspiracy' and 'coup' attempt in 2016. Gabbard alleges the Obama administration manipulated intelligence assessments that found that Russia sought to tip the election in favor of Trump, with the purported goal of destroying Trump politically. Gabbard has recommended criminal charges, including against Obama himself, while pushing this nonsensical narrative. While the reports bring a bit of new information to light about U.S. intelligence operations, they don't dislodge the many well-substantiated assessments indicating Russia intervened in 2016 to hurt Hillary Clinton and boost Trump. The timing of the release does suggest, however, that Gabbard is scrambling to find some way to satisfy people in the MAGA base hungry for a new conspiracy theory as the administration tries to leave the Epstein story behind. Gabbard's maneuvering appears to be an attempt to put meat on the bones of Trump's longtime narrative that all the investigations showing Russia tried to help Donald Trump win the 2016 election were a 'hoax.' On Friday, she released a memo, emails and intelligence documents that she effectively claimed were proof that Russia didn't try to interfere in the 2016 election. But as CNN points out, her main argument rested on a sleight of hand: She cited an intelligence document that purportedly said Russia 'did not attempt to affect the outcome of the election.' In fact, that document — a President's Daily Brief, or his daily intelligence report — merely said Russia hadn't impacted the election results 'by conducting malicious cyber activities against election infrastructure.' 'It was referring narrowly to a very specific (and severe) type of potential election interference. The Obama administration never alleged such interference took place or that Russia manipulated actual votes that were cast.' In other words, Gabbard used a cherry-picked quote to conflate the idea that Russia didn't actually target election infrastructure and attempt to alter vote counts with the idea that Russia didn't interfere at all. On Wednesday, Gabbard announced a new document release, which included a declassified report put together by Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee in 2020 about the 2017 intelligence community assessment of Russian interference. As NBC News reports, 'The Republican report was emphatically rejected at the time by Democratic lawmakers on the panel who played no role in its creation.' NBC News explains that the report found that even the deeply partisan Republican report found most of the 2017 intelligence community assessment on Russian interference in the election 'sound,' but it took issue with the reliability of the sources it depended on to come to the conclusion that Russian President Vladimir Putin 'aspired' to help Trump. That's fine to document for the historical record, but it's hardly some kind of smoking gun of a conspiracy. And Gabbard conveniently skips over the fact that an incredibly rigorous bipartisan Senate investigation released the same year landed somewhere different. As NBC News summarizes it: The 2020 Senate investigation, which spanned three years, involved more than 200 witnesses and reviewed more than a million documents, endorsed the intelligence agencies' assessment that Russia had spread disinformation online and leaked stolen emails from the Democratic National Committee to undermine Clinton's candidacy and bolster Trump's prospects. Trump's current secretary of state, Marco Rubio, was the acting chair of the Intelligence Committee at the time. He and every other member of the committee, both Republicans and Democrats, endorsed the report's findings.' The Obama administration and intelligence community's approach to the matter was also covered extensively through a Justice Department report in 2019, special counsel Robert Mueller's report in 2019 and a report by special counsel John Durham in 2023. If there was some grand conspiracy by Obama officials to mess with the intelligence assessment and destroy Trump, both Republicans and Democrats had plenty of opportunity to find it. The sloppiness of what Gabbard is presenting only confirms what has been widely suspected about her actions: that it's a weapon of distraction. And it doesn't seem like a coincidence that she claims to have uncovered evidence of a shadowy 'conspiracy' at the exact moment that Trump is being accused by both Democrats and Republicans of covering one up. It all looks like an attempt to find some red meat for the base. Fox News appears to be taking the bait, pushing the unsubstantiated Obama conspiracy theory on its shows at a far greater rate than the Epstein story. The appetite of Trump's base, however, is less predictable on this story. At the same time, Gabbard's new anti-Obama offensive also functions as an opportunity for her to move to the center of things in the White House, particularly after she clashed with Trump over Iran. As my colleague Steve Benen noted, 'If the DNI were looking for a way to return to the president's good graces, she apparently found one.' What better way to excite her boss than with a brand-new conspiracy theory? This article was originally published on
CNN
an hour ago
- CNN
Video shows dire starvation crisis in Gaza
Distressing video shows the dire effects of the starvation crisis gripping Gaza. Humanitarian aid organizations blame Israeli policies for the crisis and urge Israel to end its blockade of the enclave. Israel says Hamas is at fault. CNN's Jeremy Diamond reports.
