Mexico City Officially off NASCAR's 2026 Schedule, but Replacement Rumor Emerges
'NASCAR's premier Cup Series will not return to Mexico City next year,' according to sources that spoke with Jordan Bianchi of The Athletic.
Last month, the top racing league in the United States headed south of the border for its first international points event since 1958. Despite mixed reviews for the event from drivers, teams, and fans, NASCAR was still very interested in returning to Mexico's capital next year. However, the 2026 World Cup has forced the city off the schedule for 2026.
Five matches in the FIFA Men's World Cup soccer tournament are scheduled from June 11 to July 5 in Mexico City. The racing insider claims the two sides looked at potentially doing a race in the spring, closer to Easter. And even contemplated the idea of a NASCAR-IndyCar doubleheader that weekend. However, the league and city officials could not agree on dates.
NASCAR finalizing Chicagoland return in 2026?
So what will NASCAR do to fill that race on next year's schedule? 'Needing a replacement for Mexico City on its 38-race schedule (36 points races plus two exhibitions), NASCAR is now solidifying plans to return to Chicagoland,' Bianchi wrote. 'The 1.5-mile oval in Joliet, Ill., about 50 miles from downtown Chicago, is owned by NASCAR.'
There have been rumors for quite some time about the circuit returning to Chicagoland. The track was a stop on the NASCAR Cup, Xfinity, and Trucks series for close to two decades from 2001 to 2019. At the start of the 2020s, the league pivoted away from Chicagoland. And to races in Northern Wisconsin and then street races in Chicago and Grant Park.
NASCAR announced that despite three lucrative races in Illinois over the last three years, it won't return in 2026. However, they could be back in two years.
Also Read:: NASCAR standings: Cup Series points leaders 2025, Truck and Xfinity Series standings right now
Related Headlines
San Diego Padres Game Today: Includes Full 2025 Padres Schedule
Texas Rangers Game Today: Includes Full 2025 TV Schedule
Baltimore Orioles Game Today: TV Details and Start Times for Upcoming 2025 Orioles Schedule
Atlanta Braves Game Today: Includes Full 2025 TV Schedule
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
7 minutes ago
- New York Post
MLB Speedway Classic Braves-Reds matchup suspended due to drenching rain
BRISTOL, Tenn. — It was a red flag for Major League Baseball at Bristol Motor Speedway on Saturday night. The Speedway Classic between the Atlanta Braves and Cincinnati Reds was suspended in the first inning because of rain, soaking a record-breaking crowd for the first regular-season game in Tennessee. The plan is to resume the game on Sunday afternoon. The first delay at the historic bullring of a racetrack came after the ceremonial first pitch featuring a pair of Hall of Famers in Johnny Bench and Chipper Jones, joined by NASCAR drivers Kyle Busch and Chase Elliott. The second with one out in the bottom of the first led to the game being pushed back a day, much like a red flag in motorsports. 8 A tarp covers the field, a sign announces the postponement of the game and fireworks explode at the MLB Speedway Classic between the Atlanta Braves and the Cincinnati Reds at Bristol Motor Speedway on August 02, 2025. Getty Images 8 Matt McLain #9 of the Cincinnati Reds leads off second base as shortstop Nick Allen #9 of the Atlanta Braves waits for the pitch during the MLB Speedway Classic. Getty Images Fans who stuck out the first delay of 2 hours, 17 minutes started heading toward the exits before the game was postponed with the Reds holding a 1-0 lead. It was an unwelcome detour for the long-planned event mixing baseball and NASCAR. 'We're going to suspend tonight's game. … We are optimistic for a better weather forecast for tomorrow,' Michael Hill, MLB's senior vice president of on-field operations, told Fox. The rain made life difficult on the players before the suspension. A bat flew out of TJ Friedl's hands as he led off for the Reds. A pitcher seemed to catch his footing going to cover first base. 8 A member of the grounds crew rakes the infield dirt during the first inning. Randy Sartin-Imagn Images The MLB Speedway Classic was first announced nearly a year ago as part of Commissioner Rob Manfred's push to take MLB to places where baseball isn't played every day live. MLB played a game at the 'Field of Dreams' movie site in Iowa in both 2021 and 2022. Alabama and North Carolina, too. Reds pitcher Andrew Abbott showed up Saturday afternoon at Bristol wearing a cut-off version of a NASCAR race suit. Born in Lynchburg, Virginia, Abbott said he wanted something to wear in for a special game. 'I grew up around NASCAR,' Abbott said. 'Just went on eBay and found a couple options, and luckily that was the one that arrived in time. I had a couple of backups. I know who Rusty Wallace is too, so I actually do know the backstory behind it.' 8 Braves pitcher Austin Cox prepares to throw against the Reds during the first inning of the Speedway Classic game at Bristol Motor Speedway. Randy Sartin-Imagn Images 8 Fans watch as rain falls during the first inning of the Speedway Classic game between the Reds and the Braves at Bristol Motor Speedway. Randy Sartin-Imagn Images Long before the fans departed in the rain, they were entertained by a 110-foot Ferris wheel, to go along with food trucks, live music, pitching tunnels and batting cages. Fans also had a chance for photos with the Commissioner's Trophy, and Clydesdales outside the historic racetrack. Inside, star Tim McGraw performed and was joined by Pitbull. Before the weather moved over the area, players stood in the back of pickup trucks with their numbers emblazoned on the side and rode around the half-mile racetrack. Some used their phones to document the moment. For introductions, the Braves and Reds walked between a pair of cars decked out in Atlanta and Cincinnati colors. 8 Tim McGraw performs prior to the MLB Speedway Classic between the Braves and the Reds at Bristol Motor Speedway on Aug. 2, 2025 in Bristol, Tennessee. Getty Images Then the tarp came out as rain that had been falling around Bristol much of Saturday turned heavy and delayed the start. The first delay led to the Braves switching starting pitchers. Spencer Strider, who grew up in nearby Knoxville, got a bigger ovation than Reds starter Chase Burns, who is from Hendersonville and played at the University of Tennessee. The Reds stuck with Burns despite the delay. Strider warmed up. The Braves chose not to risk his third start in this situation coming off a second elbow surgery. The rain stopped long enough to take off the tarp and start the game. 8 Players are introduced before the MLB Speedway Classic baseball game between the Braves and the Reds at Bristol Motor Speedway in Bristol, Tenn. AP Michael Waltrip, who raced plenty at Bristol, restarted the festivities by quoting his brother Darrell: 'Boogity, boogity, boogity. Let's play baseball boys!' Atlanta went down in order in the top of the first inning. But there was another rain delay after Austin Hays hit an RBI single for Cincinnati in the bottom half. MLB didn't try to sell every ticket inside the speedway that drew 156,990 for the Battle of Bristol college football game in 2016. The track with a racing capacity of 146,000 could host 90,000 or more even with sections blocked off. Officials announced Monday more than 85,000 tickets had been sold — topping the previous paid attendance of 84,587 set Sept. 12, 1954, when Cleveland Stadium hosted the New York Yankees. 8 The field is covered up during a rain delay at the MLB Speedway Classic baseball game. AP A batter has to clear 400 feet to hit anything out of center field, 375 in the alleys and 330 down each base line. Pulling a ball down the line raises the prospect of a ball bouncing off the racetrack beyond the outfield wall. 'Honestly, my first thought I can't believe they did all this for one game,' Braves first baseman Matt Olson said of his first visit to Bristol. 'To be able to set all this up, get a playing surface ready, set the stands up in order to have the proper viewing, it's pretty incredible.'
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Connections: Sports Edition hints for Aug. 3, 2025, puzzle No. 314
Need help with today's Connections: Sports Edition puzzle? You've come to the right place. Welcome to Connections: Sports Edition Coach — a spot to gather clues and discuss (and share) scores. A quick public service announcement before we continue: The bottom of this article includes one answer in each of the four categories. So if you want to solve the board hint-free, we recommend you play before continuing. Advertisement You can access Sunday's game here. Game No. 314's difficulty: 4 out of 5 Scroll below for one answer in each of the four categories. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yellow: NOSE Green: WHEEL Blue: GORE Purple: CHAPARRAL The next puzzle will be available at midnight in your time zone. Thanks for playing — and share your scores in the comments! (Illustration: John Bradford / The Athletic)
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
How England won the 1966 World Cup: A proper manager, no wingers, and Bobby Charlton in his pomp
This is the eighth in a series by The Athletic looking back at the winners of each men's World Cup. The previous articles have looked at Uruguay in 1930, Italy in 1934 and again in 1938, Uruguay in 1950, West Germany in 1954, before a Brazilian double in 1958 and 1962. This time, it's the turn of England in 1966. The codifiers of association football had a mediocre record at the World Cup until hosting it. England hadn't entered the first three tournaments because the FA were still refusing to be a part of FIFA. In their four attempts since deciding to take part, England had twice reached the quarter-finals, but had twice been eliminated at the group stage. Advertisement Yet England still enjoyed great reverence across the footballing world. In 1963, the FA celebrated its centenary by hosting a game between England and a Rest of the World XI, a genuine collection of the best footballers from every other nation. England won 2-1. Even accounting for home advantage and the unfamiliarity of the opposition players with one another, it's clear England had outstanding individuals. The spine of Gordon Banks, Bobby Moore and Bobby Charlton were all arguably the best in the world in their position. But they needed home advantage to become the world champions. And while hosting the tournament has always increased the chances of success, particularly in the early days of the World Cup, this was the first time since the opening two editions — Uruguay and Italy — that the hosts actually won it. Upon taking charge of England in October 1962, Alf Ramsey declared that England would win the World Cup. It was a bold claim. But this was a manager who had recently completed something even more unlikely than winning the World Cup with the host nation. In 1955, aged 35, he'd taken charge of Ipswich Town, in the third tier of English football. Two years later, he won promotion to the second tier. Four years after that, he won promotion to the First Division. And then he promptly won the title at his first attempt. Even when considering that the gap between the divisions was less substantial than in the modern age, this was an unprecedented transformation of a club. Sensing things couldn't get much better, he left Suffolk for the England job. Ramsey had been a no-nonsense England full-back in his playing days, including at World Cup 1950. He also scored the final goal in England's most famous defeat, the 6-3 loss to Hungary at Wembley in 1953. He was never overwhelmingly popular with the press or supporters, but he never tried to be. Advertisement He remained in charge of England for another eight years after this World Cup success, before being sacked when he failed to qualify for World Cup 1974. He was barely seen afterwards, aside from a brief stint in charge of Birmingham City, when he'd originally joined to serve on the board. But Ramsey really only had two major jobs in his coaching career, and he won the First Division and then won the World Cup. Ramsey was, in a sense, the first proper England manager. Until the Second World War, there had been no official position of head coach, and the squad was selected by a selection committee. This seems bizarre today, but in a world before matches were widely televised, and when all weekend matches kicked off at the same time, it was thought that keeping across the entire First Division (and beyond) was impossible. England merely had a 'trainer' in charge of tactics. Walter Winterbottom is generally considered England's first official head coach, but he was also the FA's first director of coaching, and used to joke — maybe half-joke — that 'the job had a sideline to it: manager of the England teams'. The plural reflects that he was in charge of both the main England team and the amateur equivalent, and genuinely seemed to consider this of less overall importance than his other role. Besides, he also had his squad picked by an eight-man selection committee. Ramsey, almost routinely described as 'not an establishment figure', wasn't going to stand for any of that and was given full control of picking the England squad and starting XI. 'It's a new position,' he said upon his appointment. 'This sort of thing has never been done before and I think we'll have to find out what we can do. It's something that has to be established and something that one has to find out about.' Ramsey was considered unusual for picking a full 22-man squad for every international break; in the days before substitutes, it was previously considered enough to pick a much smaller group. Advertisement England's success didn't convince everyone that the position of England manager was necessary. In the early 1980s, Brian Glanville, the most revered 20th-century English football writer in English football, wrote a World Soccer column claiming that England had generally coped fine without one, although this was partly a dig at the poor performance of Ramsey's successors, Don Revie and Ron Greenwood. Surprisingly, for a country not renowned for being overly interested in tactics, England are unique in that their World Cup-winning side had a nickname describing their tactical approach: these were 'Ramsey's wingless wonders'. A telling sign of this approach is that England's centre-forwards can be seen taking throw-ins in the final. The idea of playing without wingers was almost unthinkable before World Cup 1966. English football's most adored players were wingers — in the previous decade, they'd fielded Stanley Matthews and Tom Finney in the same side. And in Ramsey's early days in charge, he put great emphasis upon the importance of wingers. But his sides became increasingly narrow. He started the tournament with Manchester United's outside forward John Connelly, something of a forgotten figure, in the side. But by the end of the tournament, England barely had any width at all. The eventual starting XI was difficult to describe in terms of system, but players had very clear characteristics. Moore was the refined ball-playing defender, while Jack Charlton was more old-school. Both full-backs pushed forward. Nobby Stiles was a combative defensive midfielder who came under fire for his tackling during this tournament, and his presence allowed Martin Peters to roam. On the right, Alan Ball was something between a box-to-box player and a wide man, and notable for his sheer energy in the final, while Charlton very vaguely played from the left but was more of a No 10. Up front was the biggest talking point. Jimmy Greaves, the greatest goalscorer in English top-flight history, dropped out of the starting XI through injury midway through the tournament and never regained his place. Hurst, who had only made his debut earlier in the year but had headed the quarter-final winner against an infamously physical Argentina side, remained in the team. Ramsey also stuck with Roger Hunt, who lacked Greaves' natural talent but had a reputation as a hard worker. That, for many, symbolised Ramsey — an admirer of disciplined workers rather than talented individualists. You can make a case for various players. Hurst scored a hat-trick in the final. Moore was the captain and became the symbol of England's victory. Banks was a truly legendary goalkeeper. Ball was the best performer in the final. But ultimately England's true star was Bobby Charlton, a player who won that year's Ballon d'Or and finished second in the subsequent two years. A rampaging attacking midfielder who was the all-time top goalscorer for both Manchester United and England until Wayne Rooney surpassed him in both respects (Harry Kane since surpassed Charlton and Rooney for England goals), he produced the best individual moment of England's campaign with a brilliant goal in the group stage win over Mexico, running from the halfway line, feinting to go on his left foot, before chopping onto his right and firing into the top corner from 30 yards. Advertisement 'He was one of the greatest players I have ever seen,' Ramsey later said. 'He was very much the linchpin of the 1966 team. Early in my management, I knew I had to find a role suitable to Bobby's unique talents.' That was a particular compliment from a manager who hadn't appreciated the talents of other big-name attackers. Charlton, unusually considering he was England's third-most advanced player, wore No 9 in the tournament, partly a reflection of the fact that Ramsey had previously used him as a centre-forward. Charlton's best display for England came in the semi-final win over Portugal, where he lit up the game with his passing — sometimes considered a relative weakness compared to other greats in his role — and also scored both goals in a 2-1 win. The quality of that display led to him being quieter in the final, however. West Germany manager Helmut Schon was so scared of Charlton's goalscoring threat that he instructed Franz Beckenbauer, at this point renowned as an exciting attacking midfielder, to man-mark Charlton out of the game. Broadly speaking, Beckenbauer managed that, but possibly at the expense of West Germany's own attacking threat. Overall, a really good game between two sides — Beckenbauer's role aside — focused on pushing forward and attacking. Helmut Haller put West Germany ahead after a rare mistake from Ray Wilson, before Hurst headed home unmarked from Moore's flighted free kick. Goalkeeper Hans Tilkowski was often criticised for not coming to claim this cross — and the way he stood behind his line and simply pointed at Hurst did look rather odd — but he'd previously taken a bad knock when coming for another cross and was therefore hesitant to leave his line again. Peters seemed to have won the game with a simple volley at a corner, after Hurst's effort had been blocked and looped up into the air, but then defender Wolfgang Weber scored an even scrappier goal to equalise in the penultimate minute. That meant extra time. Ramsey famously told his players that they'd won the game once, and now they had to do so again. There are two options from extra time. You can argue that England's goal to go 3-2 ahead is the most famous moment — on the turn, Hurst smashed the ball against the bar. It bounced down onto the line and then out. The goal was given by linesman Tofiq Bahramov, who became referred to as 'the Russian linesman' in England, although he hailed from present-day Azerbaijan. In fact, he's such a hero in the otherwise unremarkable footballing nation of Azerbaijan that the country's former national stadium was named after him. Advertisement Without wanting to go over the nuances of a 59-year debate and the various modern technological attempts to prove it one way or another, it seems unlikely the ball actually crossed the line. The common argument from Hurst is that it must have been over because England striker Hunt turned away to appeal for the goal rather than heading in the rebound. This is somewhat disingenuous; Hunt wasn't at the right angle to tell, and the ball was bouncing slightly past him anyway. England at least scored a fourth, although there was further confusion here. Referee Gottfried Dienst had put his whistle to his lips, seemingly about to blow for full time, before waving on the play. This meant some England supporters had started their pitch invasion with the play still going on, with Hurst sent in behind by a long ball. This prompted the most famous commentary line in British sporting history, courtesy of the BBC's Kenneth Wolstenholme. 'Some people are on the pitch! They think it's all over,' and then, as Hurst slammed home another goal, 'It is now.' It was Moore's second assist of the final, and more significantly, Hurst's third goal — his hat-trick is analysed in more detail here. He remained the only hat-trick scorer in a World Cup final until Kylian Mbappe's for France in 2022. Hurst now proudly declares that he's the only hat-trick scorer in a World Cup final to finish on the winning side. England were hardly hailed as spectacular winners across the world, especially in an era when Brazil were regularly winning the tournament with wonderful football, but this was a tournament of few genuine contenders. Caution and discipline in their first four matches, when they were underwhelming but kept four clean sheets, gave way to more impressive displays in their last two matches. They were the better side in open, entertaining games against both Portugal and West Germany. It's difficult to identify who else should have won it. Hungary started promisingly before fading. The most praise was generally reserved for two first-time qualifiers: North Korea, who famously defeated Italy and then went 3-0 up against Portugal before losing 5-3. Portugal, the other key debutants, had the most revered player at the tournament, Eusebio. But they lost to England fair and square in the semi. The majority of matches were considered somewhat drab and overly aggressive at a time when a more defensive approach to football seemed to be on the rise. The 1966 success is sometimes retrospectively framed as 'the worst thing that could have happened to English football', as it convinced them to knuckle down and focus on hard running over talent. That always seems overly contrary, and besides, that wasn't Ramsey's fault — unlike Winterbottom, he wasn't the FA's director of coaching, too. His task was to win the World Cup, and he did. (Top photos: Daily Mirror/Mirrorpix/Mirrorpix via Getty Images; design: Eamonn Dalton)
