logo
Judge gives Regina chiropractor 15-month community sentence for sexually assaulting patient

Judge gives Regina chiropractor 15-month community sentence for sexually assaulting patient

CBC23-06-2025
Social Sharing
A Regina chiropractor was sentenced Monday to 15 months in the community for sexually assaulting a patient.
Court of King's Bench Justice Janet McMurtry said a prison sentence would have made it difficult for Ruben Manz to support his family.
"Incarceration, in my view, would overemphasize the gravity of the offence," said McMurtry.
"I'm satisfied a conditional sentence properly denounces Dr. Manz's conduct and will serve to deter him and others in the health care field who are in a similar position of trust towards their patients."
Manz was accused of touching or pulling the breasts of seven female patients while stretching their necks between 2010 and 2020.
A jury found him guilty on one count of sexual assault, not guilty on five other counts and a mistrial was determined on the remaining count.
The Crown argued Manz sexually touched the women for no legitimate medical purpose, betraying their trust in him as a medical caregiver.
Manz testified that he got his patients to fill out forms and asked for their consent before working on sensitive areas of the body, including the chest and buttocks.
If patients told him they were uncomfortable, he said, he stopped.
'A just and appropriate outcome'
The judge said Manz must follow a curfew and have no contact with the victim, as well as keep the peace and be on good behaviour.
The chiropractor hugged his wife and children in the courtroom after receiving the sentence.
"I think he's feeling relieved he's going home with his family tonight," defence lawyer Blaine Beaven later told reporters outside court.
"He knows there's going to be a lot of work for him to do on the (conditional sentence order), though he's happy he's not going to jail tonight."
Manz's other lawyer, Kathy Hodgson-Smith, added she was pleased with the outcome, as the defence had sought a conditional sentence.
Prosecutor Carmody Hallamore said outside court it's not a decision the Crown had wanted. She had argued for prison time.
"I think the Crown is certainly disappointed, but there's room to say it was a just and appropriate outcome."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cyclist rushed to the hospital after being injured in Mississauga hit-and-run: police
Cyclist rushed to the hospital after being injured in Mississauga hit-and-run: police

CTV News

time41 minutes ago

  • CTV News

Cyclist rushed to the hospital after being injured in Mississauga hit-and-run: police

A male cyclist was injured in a hit-and-run in Mississauga on Aug. 2. (Jacob Estrin/CTV News Toronto) A cyclist was rushed to the hospital after being struck by the driver of a vehicle in Mississauga over the weekend. The crash happened on Saturday night near Matheson Boulevard and Shuttle Drive, which is east of Dixie Road and north of Eglinton Avenue West. Peel Regional Police along with local paramedics were called to that area at 9:42 p.m. for reports of a collision involving a bicycle and a vehicle. At the scene, they said they found an adult male cyclist with injuries. The cyclist was taken to a trauma center where he was treated for his non-life- threatening injuries, said police. Paramedics, meanwhile, said they transported a patient to the hospital with serious injuries. The driver of the vehicle fled the scene. This investigation is on going and anyone with further information is asked to contact Peel Regional Police's 12 Division Criminal Investigation Bureau at 905-453-2121, ext. 1233, or Crime Stoppers anonymously.

Canadian hockey brand pulls product line that faced criticism for demeaning women
Canadian hockey brand pulls product line that faced criticism for demeaning women

Globe and Mail

timean hour ago

  • Globe and Mail

Canadian hockey brand pulls product line that faced criticism for demeaning women

A Canadian hockey brand has pulled controversial clothing from its online store after a line of T-shirts and hoodies it sold was criticized for demeaning women and girls as sex objects. HockeyBenders, a company that has become popular in rinks across the country and boasts a large following of kids and teenagers online, sold $35 T-shirts with the slogan 'Barduzz, Gettin Huzz,' which it has pulled. Loosely translated from locker-room slang, it means, 'Scoring goals, getting hoes.' A hoodie version, available in children's sizes, was also taken down after a Globe and Mail article that examined misogynistic attitudes within the game, particularly at the teenage levels. The company, which tours arenas and shopping malls around Canada, attracting crowds of cheering kids and interviewing groups of teens in clips posted to the internet, came under fire for slogans on its clothing and in marketing videos. Katherine Henderson, the CEO of Hockey Canada, recently called the shirts 'disgusting,' while Andrea DeKeseredy, a former sexual-assault counsellor who studies gender violence, said the slogans point to a broader problem of misogynistic attitudes in minor hockey that are not being questioned. HockeyBenders founder Cole Lequier, 25, could not be reached for comment about the company's decision to drop the products from its website. Ms. DeKeseredy called the removal of the clothing from the HockeyBenders retail website a start to addressing what she sees as a bigger problem. 'I think taking the shirt down is a great first step, and I give them credit for doing so. I am hopeful this is due to some deep reflection on the influence they have over children as opposed to a decision made solely to protect their business interests, especially in relation to the large retail stores across Canada that carry their clothing,' Ms. DeKeseredy said. She is alarmed that a brand producing T-shirts and videos with messages that degrade women grew popular at the same time the Hockey Canada scandal and its allegations of group sexual assault by former world junior players loomed over the game. Two weeks ago, five players − Michael McLeod, Carter Hart, Alex Formenton, Dillon Dubé and Cal Foote − were found not guilty of sexual assault. Mr. McLeod was also found not guilty of a second charge of being party to sexual assault. The National Hockey League called the behaviour of the players 'unacceptable,' despite the judge's decision. 'For many Canadians, regardless of the outcome of the trial, this has become an opportunity to think about the ways hockey culture shapes the kids who play it,' Ms. DeKeseredy said. 'That extends to HockeyBenders who have a huge platform that could be used to help create some positive changes as we move forward. I hope they continue to sincerely listen.' Ms. Henderson, named Hockey Canada CEO in 2023, wants to confront such attitudes in the game. Cathal Kelly: NHL delivers a lesson after the Hockey Canada verdict: Be nice, or else 'While Hockey Canada continues our efforts to address issues in hockey culture, any merchandise targeted towards young hockey participants that promotes negative messages about girls and women reminds us that we all still have significant work ahead of us,' Ms. Henderson said. Mr. Lequier started the business from his parents' home in Barrie, Ont., trademarking it in 2023. In a recent Instagram post, he said the company has sold more than 100,000 hoodies (including versions with innocuous slogans that don't mention women). The brand is in 150 retail stores, and has more than two million followers on social media. HockeyBenders responded to previous inquiries from The Globe with an unsigned e-mail that said the men behind the company believe the humour is all in good fun: 'The boys are two hardworking young hockey entrepreneurs and make videos for people to enjoy and laugh that's it. And like to keep everything they do positive. They like to stay in their own lane with their fans and followers!' the e-mail said, verbatim. On Instagram, Mr. Lequier described the void he believes HockeyBenders fills in the game. 'I felt like, growing up, there wasn't many hockey clothing brands that had relatable slogans and sayings for hockey players,' Mr. Lequier said. 'So, I saw a huge, huge gap in the market.' HockeyBenders regularly interviews teen hockey players in rink lobbies about the game, and often about women, and posts those clips to TikTok and other online platforms, which drive popularity and profit for the brand. They are asked their preferences in girls, and 'how many blondes' and 'how many puck bunnies' they connect with on social media. Here's everything you need to know about the Hockey Canada sexual-assault trial In one video, a player claiming 100 such girls was dubbed 'lover boy.' Another player, with just a few, was praised as a 'quality over quantity guy.' Mr. Lequier did not respond to questions about whether HockeyBenders obtains parental consent before interviewing young players and posting clips online. The criticism of the HockeyBenders clothing and videos echoes a similar controversy in the early 2000s, when a website known as the Junior Hockey Bible, laced with misogynistic language, went viral in Canada. It offered a lengthy glossary of hockey terms for women, calling them 'swamp donkeys' and 'puck sluts.' It advocated team group sex and players letting their teammates watch, adding, 'Many true team players will let their girlfriends be watched.' The site, which was a marketing venture designed to promote a hockey clothing brand known as Gongshow Gear, gave tips on 'tag-teaming your local puck bunny' and advice for those girls: 'You have a job to do in the bedroom, concentrate your efforts on that role.' When Gongshow's founders were confronted about the site in 2004, they took it down and issued a public apology. The Junior Hockey Bible has since been scrubbed from the internet. Reached by The Globe recently, Gongshow Gear declined to comment.

The two ways Trump's tariffs on Canada could collapse — despite his fight to keep them
The two ways Trump's tariffs on Canada could collapse — despite his fight to keep them

The Province

timean hour ago

  • The Province

The two ways Trump's tariffs on Canada could collapse — despite his fight to keep them

The courts are considering whether they're even legal under U.S. law, and the American economy has yet to feel the pain of higher prices Dubbing it "Liberation Day," U.S. President Donald Trump announces his plan to enact sweeping new reciprocal tariffs worldwide, on April 2, 2025. Photo by Brendan Smialowski/AFP via Getty Images/File WASHINGTON, D.C. — Time's up. On Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump raised the tariff rate on Canadian goods not covered under the Canada-United States-Mexico Agreement (CUSMA) from 25 to 35 per cent, saying they 'have to pay a fair rate.' The White House claims it's because of Canada's failure to curb the 'ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs.' U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) data, however, show that fentanyl seizures from Canada make up less than 0.1 per cent of total U.S. seizures of the drug; most smuggling comes across the Mexican border. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Exclusive articles by top sports columnists Patrick Johnston, Ben Kuzma, J.J. Abrams and others. Plus, Canucks Report, Sports and Headline News newsletters and events. Unlimited online access to The Province and 15 news sites with one account. The Province ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles and comics, including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors But the future of Trump's policy also rests on shaky ground, and the tariffs could come crashing down even if Canada can't reach a deal at some point. Imposed through a controversially declared 'national emergency' under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), the tariffs come with essentially three paths for relief to Canadian exporters and their American customers: the courts and the economy. And there's always the wildcard: that the president changes his mind. Without relying on that, National Post looks at two very possible ways out of all this: The courts: There is a big question hanging over whether Trump's tariffs are even legal under the U.S. Constitution, which gives Congress powers over trade. Trump has bypassed that by claiming he's using presidential IEEPA emergency powers. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. On Thursday, the Washington, D.C.-based Federal Circuit Court of Appeals convened an en banc hearing for oral arguments in challenges to Trump's use of IEEPA. The 11 judges questioned whether the law meant for sanctioning adversaries or freezing assets during emergencies grants Trump the power to impose tariffs, with one judge noting, 'IEEPA doesn't even mention the word 'tariffs.'' The White House, meanwhile, says the law grants the president 'broad and flexible' emergency powers, including the ability to regulate imports. 'Based on the tenor and questions of the arguments, it appears that the challengers have the better odds of prevailing,' Thomas Berry, the CATO Institute's director of the Robert A. Levy Center for Constitutional Studies, said in a statement. 'Several judges peppered the government's attorney with skeptical questions about why a broad term in IEEPA like 'regulate importation' should be read to allow the president to unilaterally impose tariffs.' Essential reading for hockey fans who eat, sleep, Canucks, repeat. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Trump's lawyers claim his executive order provides the justifications for the tariffs — in Canada's case, fentanyl. But Berry said 'those justifications would not matter if IEEPA simply does not authorize tariffs in the first place. That is the cleanest and simplest way to resolve this case, and it appears that the Federal Circuit may be leaning toward that result.' A decision is expected this month, and if it's a resounding push back from the judges' panel, said Andrew Hale, a senior policy analyst at Heritage Foundation, the Supreme Court may not even take up the case. If so, he says, 'these Liberation Day tariffs and everything that's been imposed under emergency legislation, IEEPA, that all evaporates.' At that point, the White House would not be able to declare across-the-board tariffs against countries. Instead, it would have to rely on laws allowing tariffs to be imposed on specific products that are found to threaten U.S. national security, like those currently imposed on Canadian steel and lumber. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The economy: The other path to tariff relief is through economic pressure. If Americans start to see higher prices and economic uncertainty, and push back at the ballot box — or threaten to do so — it could force Trump to reverse course. The most recent figures show that U.S. inflation, based on the Consumer Price Index, hit around 2.7 per cent in July. That's a slight rise, fuelled by rising prices for food, transportation and used cars. But it's still close to the Federal Reserve target of two per cent. U.S. unemployment rose slightly to 4.2 per cent in July, while far fewer jobs were created than expected, and consumer confidence rose two points but is still several points lower than it was in January. Overall, most economists agree that risks of a U.S. recession over the next 12 months are relatively low, but skepticism over growth remains high. 'Our outlook is for slower growth in the U.S., but no recession,' said Gus Faucher, chief economist of The PNC Financial Services Group. He notes that the 'tariffs are going to be a drag' because they are a tax increase on imports. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Economists have said price inflation from tariffs is not yet being felt in the U.S. but believe it's inevitable. 'Trump's tariff madness adds a great deal to the risks of a recession,' said Steven Hanke, professor of applied economics at Johns Hopkins University who served on President Ronald Reagan's Council of Economic Advisors. 'With tariffs, Americans are going to be paying a big new beautiful sales tax on goods and services imported into the U.S., and taxes slow things down. Taxes don't stimulate.' It is surprising that higher U.S. prices haven't happened yet, said Jonathan Gruber, chairman of the economics department at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. But he explained that it's likely a reflection of the duration of contracts and the fact that import sellers haven't yet put up prices — 'because they were hoping it wouldn't be real, like they'd wake up from this nightmare.' This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'I think we start to see the effect on prices by the end of the year,' said Gruber. The trouble for Canada, however, is that the Canadian economy is starting from a much weaker position, with higher unemployment, lower consumer confidence, and a slowing GDP, on top of the trade tensions. So, trying to wait things out for the U.S. to feel the pinch will be even more painful for Canadians. And any American downturn will also reverberate north. 'As Uncle Sam goes, so goes Canada,' said Hanke. Gruber agrees with that, but with a caveat. 'It's all bad in the short run and good in the long run,' he says. He believes the U.S. is 'weak and getting weaker' and that Canada should start taking advantage of how the U.S. is making opportunities for other countries to invest in themselves. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. 'We're not investing in our future. We're killing our education. We're killing our research. We're not allowing in immigrants,' he said, explaining the weakening of the U.S. economy. 'We're basically setting the stage for long-run economic slower growth.' Meanwhile, China is doubling down on investment, research and other longer-term policies. 'Canada and other countries need to do the same,' Gruber said. And as for when a backlash could lead to a reversal in the U.S., Gruber points to two factors. 'It's got to be high inflation, and Trump's opponents need to make sure that the voters understand that's Trump's fault.' National Post tmoran@ Read More Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our newsletters here. News News Tennis Columnists Vancouver Canucks

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store