Health, learning, community spending scaled back
'When you do fiscal consolidation, you are doing it in conditions not of your own choosing. Even looking at your own party ... it's contested, because it is a painful exercise. That's why you need political buy-in.'
He said as soon as the division of revenue bill is passed by both houses of parliament, the money goes to the provinces. On whether there would be fallout due to the scaled back expenditure figures, the minister acknowledged that some state priorities could come under pressure.
Godongwana said spending adjustments were limited to a few departments and the social wage remained at 61% of consolidated non-interest spending over the 2025 medium-term expenditure framework (MTEF).
'Total consolidated spending is expected to grow at an average annual rate of 5.4%, from R2.4-trillion in 2024/25 to R2.81-trillion in 2027/28. Economic development is the fastest-growing function over the MTEF period, with an average growth rate of 8.2%.'
The overview said total functional allocations amounted to R6.69-trillion over the MTEF, with proposed additional spending reduced from R232.6bn to R180.1bn over the MTEF to align spending with revenue proposals while protecting frontline services. By the numbers
The total social services spending programme went from R1.52-trillion in the February budget to R1.50-trillion in the latest version tabled this week. Importantly, these are rand and cents expenditure estimates where inflation is not taken into account.
Expenditure targeted towards learning and culture went from R508.7bn in the February budget to R505.6bn in the May version. Basic education bore the brunt of cuts in the category, going from R332.3bn in February to R329.2bn in the May version. Spending in the remaining items under learning and culture stayed the same, in terms of rand and cents.
In health, expenditure went from R298.9bn to R296.1bn, with district health services going from R131.1bn to R130.9bn, central hospital services declining from R58.3bn to R57.8bn, provincial hospital services going from R49bn to R48.5bn, and other health services decreasing from R47.5bn to R47.1bn. Only facilities and management maintenance stayed at R11.9bn in this category.
In the community development category, expenditure goes from R286.6bn in the February budget to R280.4bn. While the municipal equitable share stay the same at R106.1bn and human settlement water and electrification stays at R58bn, public transport goes from R67.7bn to R63.8bn, and 'other human settlements municipal infrastructure' drops from R54.8bn to R52.6bn.
Social development spending goes down from R427bn in the February budget to R420.1bn in the May version. This sees old age grant spending go from R118.8bn in February to R117.4bn, while child support grant spending declines from R93.5bn to R90.4bn.
Social security funds and provincial social development spending remain unchanged at R99.5bn and R23.3bn. Spending on 'other grants' goes from R77.1bn to R77bn. The total public services expenditure goes from R78.7bn in February to R80.7bn in this week's budget overview.
These reductions essentially mean the minister is reversing the provisions that the he announced in the March iteration of the budget.
Public administration and fiscal affairs is the sole beneficiary of this bump in expenditure, with expenditure to go from R51.7bn as outlined in the February budget to R53.7bn in the latest overview.
Peace and security go from R267.6bn in the February budget to R263.2bn, with defence and state security going from R60.8bn to R59.7bn. Law courts and prisons go from R58.1bn to R57.2bn while expenditure on home affairs drops from R15.4bn to R12.9bn.
Conversely, spending on the economic development front remains at R289.8bn while spending on economic regulation, infrastructure, industrialisation, exports, agriculture, job creation and innovation all stay the same.
Debt service costs go from R424.2bn in the February budget literature to R426.3bn in this week's budget overview. The contingency reserve goes from R8bn to R5bn.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
2 hours ago
- Mail & Guardian
Award-winning exploitation: South Africa's sustainability façade unmasked
Rural people are dispossessed and displaced by companies that collect awards for ESG credentials, corporate social investment and sector excellence. (Delwyn Verasamy/M&G) In October 2022, I attended a three-day retreat with professionals responsible for environmental, social and governance (ESG) practices from South Africa's leading mining, banking and agribusiness companies at a luxury venue. They were candid, even embarrassed. They admitted ESG had become a game, a box-ticking, scorecard-manipulating charade. 'We give our best advice, but it's never acted on because ESG professionals are not core to the business,' one said. That moment haunts me. It showed how polished corporate reports and PR hide uncomfortable truths beneath a veneer of responsibility. This year, I heard those harsh truths firsthand. In Citrusdal in the Cederberg and across the Matzikama municipality, families are illegally evicted after decades of working the land. In Grabouw, I walked through Lebanon, a forgotten plantation village where forestry dwellers live with raw sewage running down streets, no title deeds or tenure security. Companies profit from the land while people suffer. In Riebeek Valley in the Swartland municipality, farm workers and dwellers lack running water and legal protection. Those who speak up risk being targeted, fired and evicted. These stories expose the harsh reality behind the veneer of corporate 'responsibility'. This system sacrifices people for profit. These are not exceptions and they reveal the hollow meaning of responsibility when profit comes first. At the Surplus People Project, we work with rural communities dispossessed and displaced by companies that collect awards for ESG credentials, corporate social investment (CSI) and sector excellence. This gap between public praise and lived experience shows a profound failure. Corporate South Africa has cycled through corporate social responsibility, corporate social investment, stakeholder engagement and now ESG reporting. Each rebrand promises ethical business and social progress, yet behind the labels lies the same extractive behaviour. It is polished and packaged, but it exploits rural people all the same. Across corporate, civil society and state institutions, CSI, ESG and related frameworks often serve as reputational shields rather than tools for real change. They manage reputations instead of transforming systems that respect humanity and protect our ecological heritage. The myth of responsible business is not only misleading, it is dangerous. It cloaks structural harm in the language of progress, keeping those most affected invisible. Most ESG reporting focuses on easy-to-measure metrics such as carbon emissions, board diversity and community donations. These numbers, although important, are limited and have become proxies allowing businesses to tick boxes without confronting systemic change. Meanwhile, the state routinely fails to enforce laws. The departments looking after agriculture, land reform and rural development and the employment and labour department allow illegal evictions to continue unchecked. Equity schemes collapse. Laws such as the Extension of Security of Tenure Act exist only on paper. This failure exposes a state unwilling to challenge entrenched economic interests maintaining inequality. For many middle-class urban South Africans, these rural realities are invisible. Yet our food systems, wine and fruit exports, pension funds and shopping habits are tangled in supply chains sustaining rural worker exploitation. If you have bought a bottle of wine, eaten supermarket fruit or invested in a 'responsible' fund, your money is part of this story. You are complicit in exploitation. Corporate social responsibility, corporate social investment and ESG are not enough unless they become frameworks for justice, redress, dignity and genuine stakes in the benefits of workers' labour. Anything less reproduces slave-like conditions. Corporate South Africa will not fix this with statistics or awards. Empty gestures, hashtags and glossy reports won't cut it. We need a decisive break from extractive practices and an end to symbolic benevolence that conceals exploitation. We do not need charity disguised as innovation. We need justice rooted in policy, practice and governance that honours dignity, equity and meaningful participation by those affected. The state already has legal frameworks, albeit limited and skewed towards business interests, and the budget to act. Laws protecting farm workers and dwellers exist, as do policies for land reform and labour rights. What is missing is the political will to enforce these protections. The deliberate refusal to uphold the law in rural areas is a conscious choice that serves corporate interests over vulnerable people. We are told progress takes time. That may be true, but it is easy to say from boardrooms far removed from fields where workers face harmful pesticides, where women labour long hours without toilets and many live in legal limbo and are denied unemployment benefits. For these people, progress is decades too late. Without genuine enforcement to uphold laws and policies that should protect workers and ensure accountability, ESG's promises of accountability ring hollow. It does not heal; it deepens the wounds corporates pretend to address. Charity soothes the wound. Justice closes it. Don't just do good. Dismantle what causes harm. Brian Adams is the chief executive of Surplus People Project.
TimesLIVE
2 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
US hits Iranian shipping network with major new sanctions
The US Treasury department announced fresh sanctions on Wednesday against more than 115 Iran-linked individuals, entities and vessels, in a sign the Trump administration is doubling down on its 'maximum pressure' campaign after bombing Tehran's key nuclear sites in June. The sanctions broadly target the shipping interests of Mohammad Hossein Shamkhani, the son of Ali Shamkhani, who is an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. The US Treasury said it was the most significant Iran-related sanctions action since 2018, during President Donald Trump's first administration. According to the Treasury, Shamkhani controls a vast network of container ships and tankers through a complex web of intermediaries that sell Iranian and Russian oil and other goods throughout the world. Treasury accused Shamkhani of using personal connections and corruption in Tehran to generate tens of billions of dollars in profits, much of which is used to prop up the Iranian regime. Overall, the new sanctions target 15 shipping firms, 52 vessels, 12 individuals and 53 entities involved in sanctions evasion in 17 countries, ranging from Panama to Italy to Hong Kong. A US official said the new sanctions would make it 'much more difficult' for Iran to sell its oil, but added that the administration did not anticipate any sustained disruption to global oil markets.
The Herald
5 hours ago
- The Herald
SA media must report GBV with context, compassion: NWU graduate
South African media need to move away from event-based coverage of gender-based violence (GBV) and report stories with context, compassion and survivor-centred ethics. This is the message from North West University (NWU) master's graduate Elsje-Marié Language-Jordaan, who recently completed a study analysing how GBV was reported in the media during the 16 Days of Activism campaign, from October 14 2023 to January 21 2024. Speaking to TimesLIVE, Language-Jordaan said her research stemmed from a desire to raise awareness about GBV. 'I wanted to focus on crime reporting and specifically the ethics of crime reporting,' she said. 'I realised I had a particular crime in mind, gender-based violence, because it's something I'm passionate about.' Her dissertation combined social responsibility theory and postcolonial media theory to propose a new ethical framework for reporting GBV. 'At first I didn't intend creating a framework. But after a while I realised it was what the study needed and what I feel journalism needs regarding GBV reporting.' Language-Jordaan found GBV is often misrepresented as isolated incidents, with little effort to link these crimes to broader systemic issues. 'Gender-based violence is not something that stands on its own. Our background influences it, how we were raised and how our country was shaped.' She believes media outlets need to shift from incident-based to context-informed reporting. 'If we keep on pretending it's just a thing that happens, the audience may never fully understand the seriousness of GBV or what can be done about it.' Language-Jordaan's framework emphasises ethical accountability, contextual depth and survivor and community inclusion. She said while media ethics guidelines exist, they don't go far enough. 'There needs to be some sort of bigger ethical framework to guide journalists, especially young journalists, so they know what to do and they don't do weird stuff to re-traumatise people.'
