
‘I'm remembering Srebrenica while Srebrenica is happening in Gaza'
Two years before the slaughter led by Bosnian Serb general Ratko Mladic's troops, Srebrenica had been declared a United Nations safe haven, where Bosniak (Bosnian Muslim) civilians would be protected by international peacekeepers.
But Mladic was right to think the promise of protection was empty. As his forces shelled and overran the enclave, lightly armed Dutch soldiers in the area pleaded for air strikes. UN, Nato and western leaders dithered, and Serb troops simply expelled the peacekeepers and took control over tens of thousands of terrified Bosniaks.
'We were left to be murdered. Nobody cared,' says Jasmin Jusufovic, who as an eight-year-old in Srebrenica saw his father taken away to be executed by Serb soldiers who also killed all his other closest adult male relatives.
'We were put in a concentration camp under an open sky and then on July 11th ... you are trusting the Serbs – who have shown you for the past four years what they are capable of – to do something humane in Srebrenica,' he says.
'So as much as the culprits and responsibility for the genocide are Serb, it is also on the international community ... Because this is a genocide that was served on a plate to the Serbs.'
Jasmin Jusufovic, a Bosniak who was eight years old when he survived the Srebrenica genocide, in which Bosnian Serb troops killed his father and all his other closest adult male relatives. Photograph: Daniel McLaughlin
The Bosnian war was in its fourth year when the Serbs seized Srebrenica. Jusufovic and his parents had been driven from their home in the village of Drinjaca, 55km northwest of the town, when Serbs attacked the area in May 1992.
'We were having lunch for Eid. Everything my mother had prepared for the festival was left on the table. We just had to go.'
With his parents and members of his extended family, Jusufovic watched from the surrounding hills as Serb armour destroyed their house and the village mosque.
They joined waves of Bosniaks who were being put to flight by a Serb campaign of ethnic cleansing in eastern Bosnia. The desperate situation was compounded by a western arms embargo on Bosnia that put its military at a huge disadvantage to Serb forces that had access to large stockpiles of ex-Yugoslav army weapons.
In January 1994, the family had to flee again as Serb units bore down on the town of Konjevic Polje. They trekked through deep snow to reach Potocari – a village outside Srebrenica that is now the site of a burial ground for more than 6,700 victims of the genocide – and Jusufovic remembers being chilled to the bone when they arrived.
Srebrenica genocide: Why Bosnia is still divided 30 years on
Listen |
39:42
'A family friend in Srebrenica gave us a house to live in, because it was empty after his mother had been killed by the Serbs. Ten of us lived in two rooms. And I started to go to school in Srebrenica,' Jusufovic recalls.
'I always remember my family trying to live as normally as they could, no matter what the circumstances. Spring came and I remember everyone going out of the house and finding a bit of land to plant and grow something,' he says.
'I was getting this feeling of life functioning. My parents and other relatives were there, I was going to school, making friends. I could forget about the siege happening around us. As a kid you don't have big territory – just your house and your school.
Sporadic gunfire and shelling intensified as Serb advances in 1995 made a mockery of western declarations that Srebrenica should be a demilitarised zone.
'On July 8th, I was woken up early by a rumbling noise that I could feel in my bones, as if it was coming through the ground. The attack on Srebrenica had started,' says Jusufovic. 'We were so heavily bombarded that it felt like we were boiling in a pot. There would be a few minutes of respite, maybe when they were reloading, when we could run to check on my grandmother or uncles or cousins. It was all frantic running.'
By the morning of July 11th it was too dangerous to stay in Srebrenica. Jusufovic's parents again gathered up a few essentials and he wondered which books to stuff into his rucksack. He chose The Little Prince, a children's encyclopedia and Twenty Thousand Leagues Under the Sea: 'I remember looking out from our house, which overlooked the road, and seeing a sea of heads running,' he says.
Thousands of people sought protection at the Dutch peacekeepers' base at a former battery factory in Potocari, as Mladic's triumphant men roamed the area.
'Don't be afraid, no one will harm you,' Mladic told terrified Bosniaks, as he and his men threw chocolates and cigarettes to their new prisoners.
To his own people Mladic gave a different message, peppered with slurs that Serbs have used against Muslims since the days of Ottoman rule in the Balkans.
'Here we are, on July 11th, 1995, in Serb Srebrenica. We give this town to the Serb people as a gift,' Mladic said in an address filmed by a Serb cameraman. 'Finally ... the time has come to take revenge on the Turks in this region.'
First, the Serb troops took away Bosniak men trapped outside the locked gates of the packed battery factory. Two days later, the Serbs ordered people inside the UN base to come out, and the peacekeepers just looked on.
Jusufovic and his mother climbed into a waiting truck with other women and children, as the Serbs separated out the men and some of the boys.
'I saw the Serbs pushing my father away. He was holding my red jacket. I remember watching him, voiceless but everything inside me was screaming. And he just put his finger to his lips to tell me to stay silent and keep going.'
He was shot dead in the village of Pilica, where Serb soldiers executed hundreds of prisoners in a cultural centre.
[
Srebrenica genocide: Why Bosnia is still divided 30 years on
Opens in new window
]
'Three of my mother's brothers were also murdered in Srebrenica, and a fourth in Drinjaca,' Jusufovic says. 'My father's brother was murdered in Srebrenica. The husbands of my father's sisters, four of them, were also murdered. The husband of my mother's sister was also murdered in Srebrenica, as was his father. The father of my aunt was also murdered, as were more distant relatives.'
A Bosnian Muslim woman visits gravestones during a funeral ceremony for 50 newly-identified Bosnian Muslim victims, at the Potocari Memorial Centre and Cemetery in Srebrenica, Bosnia-Herzegovina, in July 2022. Photograph: Jasmin Brutus/EPA
Jusufovic's father was buried in the memorial cemetery at Potocari only in 2012. Like many victims of Serb killings, his remains were found in multiple graves after Serbs moved bodies using mechanical diggers and dump trucks to try to hide war crimes. Seven victims recently identified through DNA analysis will be buried there on Friday.
International courts ruled that the Srebrenica massacre was genocide and, after 14 years on the run, Mladic was found guilty of genocide along with Radovan Karadzic, wartime political leader of the Bosnian Serbs.
Serbia and Republika Srpska – an autonomous Serb entity in Bosnia-Herzegovina – acknowledge that grave crimes were committed at Srebrenica but deny it was genocide, and glorification of war criminals is not uncommon in Serb society, making reconciliation with Bosniaks a remote prospect.
Emir Suljagic, head of the Srebrenica Memorial Centre. Photograph: Daniel McLaughlin
'The facts of this case have been established so many times over and are readily available,' says Emir Suljagic, head of the Srebrenica Memorial Centre that is housed in the former battery factory that became the doomed base for UN peacekeepers.
'We're not going to debate facts. When facts are not debated, then we can sit down and have any kind of conversation. This is the most researched and investigated mass atrocity in the 20th century. DNA techniques, satellite technology and all other types of electronic technology were used. So join reality, then we can talk.'
[
'It's an honour to be able to send a warning': Defiant Sarajevo a scarred survivor of Bosnia's war
Opens in new window
]
In advance of Friday's commemoration events, UN secretary general
António Guterres
acknowledged that 'the United Nations and the world failed the people of Srebrenica. This collective failure was not an accident of history. It was the result of policies, propaganda and international indifference.'
Yet such statements sound false to many Bosniaks when the West cannot find the conviction to stop current conflicts, such as
Russia's invasion of Ukraine
or Israel's onslaught against
Gaza
.
'Today what hurts me, and I'm having serious trouble grasping, is that I'm remembering Srebrenica while Srebrenica is happening in Gaza,' Jusufovic says.
'What have we learned from Srebrenica if we are allowing all of this to happen again now? Every kid I see ... their soul being ripped from their body with shock and tragedy, shaking with starvation – was me 30 years ago,' he adds.
'Whenever I see international officials empathising about Srebrenica while staying silent on
Palestine
– excuse me, I don't believe a word of what you are saying. If you really mean it, then do something. The whole point of Srebrenica is never again – anywhere.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Sharp exchanges follow Alan Shatter's comparison of occupied territories trade ban with 1930s Germany
Former minister for justice Alan Shatter has claimed that the proposed ban on trade with the occupied Palestinian territories is a 'boycott Jews Bill' reminiscent of policies from 1930s Germany . There were appeals for respect at the Oireachtas foreign affairs committee on Tuesday amid terse exchanges between politicians and Mr Shatter, who compared the Bill to something from Father Ted . The proposed legislation, which has become known as the Occupied Territories Bill, would prohibit trade in goods with Israeli companies operating in the illegally occupied Palestinian territories. Mr Shatter told TDs and Senators that the Irish Government was producing legislation that was 'anti-Semitic'. Could Mary Lou McDonald be about to enter the presidential race? Listen | 41:13 'It is the first boycott Jews Bill published by any European government since 1945. And it replicates the type of legislation that was initiated in 1930s Germany,' said Mr Shatter, who was appearing before the committee in his capacity as a board member of the Israel Council on Foreign Relations . READ MORE Foreign affairs committee chairman John Lahart said it was 'hurtful', 'offensive and slanderous' for it to be suggested that the motivation behind the Bill was anti-Semitism. Mr Shatter also claimed that the legislation, which focused on limited imports of 'olives and avocados', resembled the 'Father Ted-like provisions' of a 1980 family planning law that sought to license the importation of condoms. Mr Shatter was challenged by Fine Gael TD Brian Brennan , who told the committee that he had travelled to Cairo in a personal capacity last weekend and met injured and orphaned Palestinian children. 'I held the hand of a two-year-old child who had bullet holes because of what's happening in Gaza. So when you say to me, and you say to this committee, that is a 'token gesture, this is fantasy politics, this is performance politics', I totally reject [that],' said Mr Brennan. 'How dare you come in here and make such statements? A 'Father Ted Bill'! You speak to the people on the ground that matter, listen to what they've got to say about this Bill ... I just think the humanity coming from yourself, with all due respect, is just simply lax.' [ More than 300 sportspeople sign letter urging Central Bank to change stance on approving Israel bonds Opens in new window ] In terse exchanges, Mr Shatter said: 'I don't think a single visit, deputy, to Egypt is the be-all and end-all to resolving the conflict. And this Bill certainly won't resolve the conflict.' In response to Mr Brennan's remarks, Natasha Hausdorff of the Ireland Israel Alliance said that he had spoken 'very powerfully' about Palestinian suffering. 'But it is important that the cause of that suffering is correctly identified, and that is not as a result of Israel's policy here, that is squarely on the shoulders of Hamas and other Palestinian terrorist groups who continue to abuse and subjugate and terrorise their own civilians,' she said. All of the Israeli and Jewish witnesses appearing before the committee declined to agree that the occupied territories in the West Bank were illegally occupied land. Mr Shatter said he 'does not accept' that the Israeli-occupied territories in the West Bank are illegally occupied land. Ms Hausdorff said that 'one cannot occupy what is one's own sovereign territory'. Maurice Cohen, chairman of the Jewish Representative Council of Ireland, said that anti-Semitism would be the result of the Bill. 'I'm not necessarily certain that that is the motivation behind it,' he said. In a separate session shortly afterwards, the same committee heard from the Ireland Palestine Solidarity Campaign and Sadaka - the Ireland Palestine Alliance, who support the Bill. Sadaka chairman Éamonn Meehan said the same arguments against the Bill had been made against the anti-apartheid campaign in the 1980s and 1990s, but that legislation had been 'highly effective'.


Irish Times
2 hours ago
- Irish Times
Michael Flatley refused access to documents in row over legal fees and receiver costs
Lord of the Dance star Michael Flatley has suffered a setback in his legal row over a €1.4 million disputed costs bill associated with his recent battle to keep a receiver from the door of his Cork mansion, Castlehyde. The entertainer, in an affidavit opened last May before the Commercial Court where he is disputing legal and receiver fees, claimed he was shocked at what he called the 'blatant' level of alleged 'overcharging'. Referring to a receiver costs bill of €86,000 plus legal costs of €186,000, Mr Flatley alleged he may be seen 'as an easy mark for inflated costs'. Also in dispute are €793,000 in legal fees from the opposing side in the Castlehyde receiver battle. But Mr Justice Mark Sanfey on Tuesday refused the Flatley side's application for key documentation from Novellus Finance Ltd and the receivers who were appointed over Castlehyde. Mr Flatley's legal team want the documentation as part of their bid to have all of part of the €1.4 million disputed costs lodged in court returned. READ MORE In his judgment, Mr Justice Sanfey said the Flatley side have 'to use a colloquial expression put the cart before the horse'. The allegations of overcharging are very serious, the judge said, and required to be pleaded appropriately before any question of the adequacy of documents furnished or the need for discovery of further documentation could be considered. He said the Flatley application was 'premature and inappropriate'. To accede to it 'would be to permit a trawl through sensitive and confidential documentation in circumstances where the Flatley allegations have not been formally articulated in pleadings'. The other side, the judge said, must be given an opportunity to meet the allegations made against them and respond as they see fit before the question of whether they must provide supporting documentation for their claims, arises. Mr Justice Sanfey commented that an application to court as was contemplated by the Flatley side did not seem appropriate in relation to the question of legal or receivers costs 'in circumstances where there are statutory mechanisms for appropriate interrogation of such claims and production of documentation relevant to them'. Mr Flatley paid off a €6.9 million loan on his Castlehyde mansion last March to save it from the receiver. The original legal battle related to a loan made to Mr Flatley's Blackbird Film Productions Ltd by Novellus Finance Ltd, with registered offices at St Stephen's Green, Dublin, in 2023 with repayments of €67,000 per month over two years. Novellus claimed there had been default on repayment, which Mr Flatley denied. Mr Flatley had provided a guarantee for the loan on the strength of the value of his Castlehyde mansion. As a result of the alleged default, Novellus appointed a receiver over the property. An interim injunction was granted to the Flatley side to prevent the receiver from taking further measures in relation to Castlehyde and a judge conducted a two-day hearing on the matter. The Flatley side asked the court to hold off on giving judgment on whether to set aside the interim injunction stopping the receiver taking steps or grant an interlocutory injunction to the Flatley side and said Mr Flatley was flying into Dublin to pay off the loan. The €6.9 million loan was finally paid off but the issue of certain disputed costs remained. In his judgment, Mr Justice Sanfey said Mr Flatley had refinanced the loan from Novellus and redeemed the mortgage and had 'effectively withdrawn the proceedings' and consented to an order that he pay the costs of the proceedings to the defendants. As such, the judge said the issues between the parties as set out in the proceedings have been resolved and the various allegations by Mr Flatley against the defendants must be regarded as withdrawn. 'Notwithstanding this, Mr Flatley now seeks to make a new range of allegations against the defendants in relation to alleged overcharging in respect of legal and receivers costs and in relation to interest.' The judge said allegations of this nature are extremely serious, particularly for professional defendants such as the receivers. The allegations were not part of the original proceedings, he said, and do not find expression anywhere other than in Mr Flatley's affidavit. The defendants, he said, strenuously deny that there has been any overcharge. The judge said pleadings are absolutely necessary to bring definition and clarity to the allegations made by Mr Flatley.


Irish Times
3 hours ago
- Irish Times
Woman (80) awarded €60,000 after social life impacted by trip on footpath
An 80-year-old woman has been awarded just short of €60,000 damages by a judge who said her social life had been greatly impacted by injuries she suffered when she tripped and fell on a hazardous footpath. Judge Terence O'Sullivan said Anita Bryan, a keen golfer, of Somerton, Rochestown Avenue, Dún Laoghaire , had suffered bad injuries to her left wrist and right knee, causing her to abandon golf at her club, Woodenbridge in Arklow, Co Wicklow. 'I haven't played golf for five years because I am unable to walk for the four hours plus that it would take to complete a round,' Ms Bryan told the Circuit Civil Court on Tuesday. Barrister Damian Sheridan, who appeared with Murphy McElligott Solicitors for Ms Bryan, told the court she had tripped on the raised edge of a pavement slab outside Cavistons Food Emporium on the Glasthule Road, Sandycove, Co Dublin , on the day before Christmas Eve, 2019. READ MORE Ms Bryan said she had been walking arm-in-arm with her husband when her shoe caught on the slab, catapulting her forward. She had fallen and broken her left wrist and suffered a displaced fracture of the right patella of her right knee. 'The pain was dreadful and my wrist and leg were put in casts at the hospital. I was in a wheelchair for six weeks,' she told the judge. Ms Bryan said she had received eight cortisone injections and was awaiting more for her knee injury. 'I cannot kneel properly any more and one of my favourite hobbies, apart from golf, was gardening,' she said. She sued Dún Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council and Cavistons Food Emporium, which the local authority let out of the proceeding without blame. The judge told barrister Kevin Callan, counsel for Northstone Construction, Blackrock, Co Dublin, that his client was not liable for the incident. Forensic engineer Alan Conlan said he had examined the footpath shortly after the incident and found one of the slabs loose and rocking. The edge of the slab was raised above the level of other pavement slabs that had later been repaired. 'The loose slab was a potential trip hazard,' he said. Awarding Ms Bryan €59,250, barely short of the €60,000 maximum jurisdiction of the court, against the local authority, Judge O'Sullivan said she had suffered bad injuries and had not overstated her claim in any way. 'I feel that on the balance of probability that works to the footpath had to have been carried out by the local authority and nobody else,' the judge said. 'Ms Bryan was a truthful witness and her life has been severely impacted by the accident. There is no question of contributory negligence.'