logo
Millions of workers could lose £18,000 in state pension if they have to wait until 68

Millions of workers could lose £18,000 in state pension if they have to wait until 68

Daily Mail​4 days ago
Millions of people in their early 50s could miss out on up to £18,000 if the state pension age is hiked to 68 faster than expected, new research reveals.
A new Government review of the state pension qualifying age has triggered speculation it might have to rise substantially to contain rapidly rising costs.
The state pension is currently worth £230.25 a week or nearly £12,000 a year if you have paid enough National Insurance years to receive the full amount, and it starts at age 66.
The qualifying age is already set to rise to 67 between 2026 and 2028, and then the next increase is technically not scheduled until the mid 2040s, which will affect those born from 6 April 1977.
The Government is expected to give at least 10 years' notice of a change in the timetable, but it could act straight after the current official review concludes in 2029, according to wealth manager Rathbones.
This could mean the rise to 68 is accelerated to 2039-41, which would affect workers now aged 51, 52 and 53, it says.
Rathbones has crunched the numbers for future rises under the state pension triple lock, and reckons the annual amount could hit £17,774 in the year someone who is 51 now turns 68.
When a 52-year-old is 68 - in 15 years' time - they could miss out on a year of state pension worth £17,340.
And someone who is 53 now could lose out on £16,918.
That is based on the state pension rising by at least 2.5 per cent a year, which is the minimum increase required under the triple lock pledge - so could easily be higher, unless politically difficult steps are taken to soften the popular guarantee.
The triple lock means the state pension increases every year by the highest of inflation, average earnings growth or 2.5 per cent.
The Government has promised to stick to the triple lock for the whole of this parliament.
Although questions have been raised about affordability the Government has effectively, if not in so many words, told the experts working on the next two state pension age reports to operate under the assumption the triple lock pledge will remain in place indefinitely.
How much does a comfortable retirement cost? What YOU will need
The Government is required by law to review the state pension age every six years, so it has ordered two reports which will look at when to hike to 68.
It will examine this in light of life expectancy, public spending and population trends.
But a recent report by independent think tank, the Institute for Fiscal Studies, warned that without reform of the state pension triple lock, the retirement age would have to rise to 74 by 2069.
Meanwhile, the Government has launched a new Pensions Commission to try to stop future retirees ending up poorer than older people today.
It says nearly half of working age adults are saving nothing at all into a pension - despite the success of auto enrolment into work schemes - and nearly 15million people are under-saving for retirement.
Rebecca Williams, a financial planning boss at Rathbones, says: 'With longevity increasing and population pressures mounting, future generations appear set to face a less generous state pension regime than that enjoyed by many of today's retirees.
'The situation appears particularly precarious for those in their early 50s who face a real prospect of missing out.'
She says people in their late 40s and early 50s have come to her firm asking for help getting their retirement finances on track, given the shifting goalposts when it comes to pensions.
'The state pension alone is not enough for a comfortable retirement,' cautions Williams.
'Individuals need a broad foundation built on workplace pensions, private savings, and the ongoing support of pension tax relief.
'Cracks are beginning to show in the system,' she warns.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Labour does not deserve to win next election without change, Reeves says
Labour does not deserve to win next election without change, Reeves says

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Labour does not deserve to win next election without change, Reeves says

Labour does not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not change the country, Rachel Reeves has said, as she acknowledged some voters were disappointed with the party's record since entering government. The chancellor said she understood the unhappiness felt by some voters towards a government that has U-turned on winter fuel allowance and welfare policies in recent months. Reeves claims she has had to grapple with financial challenges inherited from the Conservatives, while increasing spending to repair public services. Speaking to broadcaster Iain Dale at the Edinburgh festival fringe, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed. 'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change. 'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.' She told the audience at the Edinburgh International Conference Centre that Labour needed to enact the change that voters wanted. She added otherwise the party did not 'deserve' to win the next general election in 2029. Reeves said the government had the balance 'about right' on taxes, in a week where she faced renewed calls from Labour politicians for a wealth tax. Former Foreign Office minister Anneliese Dodds, who briefly held the shadow chancellor position for Labour in opposition, said ministers should consider evidence set out by the Wealth Tax Commission, which she said had 'changed the debate' on the policy. Reeves said: 'Of course you're going to disappoint people. No one wants to pay more taxes. Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints but no one really likes them and I'm the one that has to sort the sums up.' The party faces difficulties ahead of the Scottish parliament elections in Holyrood next year. It has slipped backwards into third place, according to opinion polling, a year after it was neck and neck with the SNP. Polling in June showed it on 19%, behind the SNP in 29% and Reform UK on 22%. This is in contrast to a survey carried out a month after Labour's general election win last year, which showed the party just ahead of the ruling SNP, with Reform languishing far behind. There have been some signs of promise, however, as Labour won the Hamilton, Larkhall and Stonehouse byelection for the Scottish parliament in June. The closure of the Grangemouth oil refinery before its transition to an import-only terminal caused unpopularity for Labour. About 400 jobs were lost as a result of it shutting in April. The MP who had championed it being kept open, Brian Leishman, has since been suspended by Labour for rebelling over welfare reform. Meanwhile, the Labour government in Westminster's ban on new drilling in the North Sea has been accused of causing 'strangulation' of the economy in north-east Scotland. However, Reeves told the audience in the Scottish capital that the government was further investing in Scotland. She said the £200m investment in carbon capture technology in Aberdeenshire had been welcomed by the industry. She said she also understood Labour's windfall tax on oil and gas were not welcomed by the sector. 'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying but you can't really have one without the other,' she said.

Rachel Reeves admits Labour has ‘disappointed' people while in government
Rachel Reeves admits Labour has ‘disappointed' people while in government

The Independent

time2 hours ago

  • The Independent

Rachel Reeves admits Labour has ‘disappointed' people while in government

Rachel Reeves admits Labour has 'disappointed' people while in government. The politician said she understood that being Chancellor meant making unpopular decisions. She told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival that Labour had got the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing. But she said that balancing the books meant making tough decisions, even if the are unpopular. Appearing on the Iain Dale All Talk fringe show, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed. 'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change. 'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.' Ms Reeves pointed to Labour's £200 million investment in carbon capture in the north east of Scotland, which she said was welcomed by the industry. At the same time, Labour's windfall tax, she said, was not liked by the sector. 'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying, but you can't really have one without the other,' she said. Defending Labour's record, she said her party had the 'balance about right'. 'But of course you're going to disappoint people,' she added. 'No-one wants to pay more taxes. 'Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no-one really likes them and I'm the one, I guess, that has to sort the sums up.' Ms Reeves said Labour had to deliver on its general election campaign of change, adding that her party did not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not deliver the change it promised.

Reeves: Of course you are going to disappoint people as Chancellor
Reeves: Of course you are going to disappoint people as Chancellor

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Reeves: Of course you are going to disappoint people as Chancellor

Rachel Reeves admits Labour has 'disappointed' people while in government. The politician said she understood that being Chancellor meant making unpopular decisions. She told an audience at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival that Labour had got the balance right between tax, spending and borrowing. But she said that balancing the books meant making tough decisions, even if the are unpopular. Appearing on the Iain Dale All Talk fringe show, she said: 'The reason people voted Labour at the last election is they want to change and they were unhappy with the way that the country was being governed. 'They know that we inherited a mess. They know it's not easy to put it right, but people are impatient for change. 'I'm impatient for change as well, but I've also got the job of making sure the sums always add up – and it doesn't always make you popular because you can't do anything you might want to do. You certainly can't do everything straight away, all at once.' Ms Reeves pointed to Labour's £200 million investment in carbon capture in the north east of Scotland, which she said was welcomed by the industry. At the same time, Labour's windfall tax, she said, was not liked by the sector. 'I can understand that that's extra tax that the oil and gas sector are paying, but you can't really have one without the other,' she said. Defending Labour's record, she said her party had the 'balance about right'. 'But of course you're going to disappoint people,' she added. 'No-one wants to pay more taxes. 'Everyone wants more money than public spending – and borrowing is not a free option, because you've got to pay for it. 'I think people know those sort of constraints, but no-one really likes them and I'm the one, I guess, that has to sort the sums up.' Ms Reeves said Labour had to deliver on its general election campaign of change, adding that her party did not 'deserve' to win the next election if it does not deliver the change it promised.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store