logo
Trump's Aug. 1 tariff deadline is near. These are the countries that have — and have not — signed a deal

Trump's Aug. 1 tariff deadline is near. These are the countries that have — and have not — signed a deal

CNBC4 days ago
Come Friday, the world will have to contend with higher tariff rates from the Trump administration, raising the specter of even more economic uncertainty.
For most countries, that can of worms has been kicked twice down the road, from "Liberation Day" on April 2, to July 9, and now to Aug. 1.
Back in April, Trump had claimed to have done "over 200 deals" in an interview with Time Magazine, and trade advisor Peter Navarro had said that "90 deals in 90 days" was possible. The country has fallen far short of that, with only eight deals in 120 days, including one with the 27-member European Union.
Here are where things stand in global trade.
The U.K. led the charge on trade agreements with the U.S., striking one as early as May. The framework includes a 10% baseline tariffs on U.K. goods, as well as various quotas and exemptions for products such as autos and aerospace goods.
But even after U.S. President Donald Trump met with Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Scotland recently, some points in their trade agreement remain uncertain. That includes tariffs on U.K. steel and aluminum, which the U.S. agreed to slash. Talks about the U.K.'s digital services tax, which Trump wants scrapped, also seem to be continuing.
Vietnam was the second to cross the line with the Trump administration, with Trump announcing a trade agreement on July 2 that saw the tariff imposed on Vietnam slashed from 46% to 20%.
One point with Vietnam was a 40% "transshipping" tariff on goods originating in another country and transferred to Vietnam for final shipment to the U.S, although it is not clear how this will be applied. Trump also claimed that there would be full market access to the country for U.S. goods.
Chinese manufacturers have used transshipping to sidestep the hefty tariffs on its direct shipments to the United States, using Vietnam as a major transshipment hub.
However, it seems that Vietnam was blindsided by the 20% rate imposed, according to a report by Politico. Politico said negotiators had expected a 11% levy, but Trump unilaterally announced the 20% rate.
Indonesia's tariff rate was cut to 19% from 32% in its agreement with Trump, announced on July 15.
The White House said Indonesia will eliminate tariff barriers on over 99% of U.S. products exported to Indonesia across all sectors, including agricultural products and energy.
The framework also says the countries will also address various "non-tariff barriers" and other obstacles that the U.S. faces in Indonesian markets.
Unlike its ASEAN counterparts above, which had sizable reductions to its tariff duties, the Philippines saw a decrease of a single percentage point to 19% from 20% on July 22.
Manila will not impose tariffs on U.S. goods as part of the agreement, according to Trump, who praised the country for what he described as "going OPEN MARKET with the United States."
In addition, Trump also said that the Philippines will work together "Militarily," without specifying any details. The two countries are already treaty allies, with Manila hosting U.S. troops and having a mutual defense treaty going back to 1951.
Japan was the second major Asian economy to come to an agreement with the U.S. after China, seeing its tariff rate cut to 15% from 25% on July 23, and being the first economy to see a lower preferential tariff rate for its key automobile sector.
Trump called the agreement "perhaps the largest Deal ever made," while adding that Japan would invest $550 billion in the United States and the U.S. would "receive 90% of the Profits."
The path to this agreement was fraught with uncertainty, with Trump saying days before the agreement that he did not expect the two countries to reach a deal.
He described Japan on separate occasions as "very tough" in trade talks and suggested the country was "spoiled" for not accepting U.S. rice despite facing a domestic rice shortage.
The European Union's agreement with the U.S. was struck just days ago, after long negotiations. EU goods are now facing a 15% baseline tariff rate, half the 30% Trump had previously threatened the bloc with. Existing duties on autos will be reduced to 15%, and levies on some products like aircraft and certain drug generics will go back to pre-January levels.
But the deal has been met with criticism, including from some European leaders. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou went as far as saying it was an act of "submission" and a "dark day." EU Trade Commissioner Maros Sefcovic, however, called it "the best deal we could get under very difficult circumstances."
South Korea is the latest country to reach an agreement, on Thursday, with the terms being somewhat similar to the one Japan received.
The country will see a blanket 15% tariff on its exports, while duties on its auto sector are also lowered to 15%. South Korea "will give to the United States $350 Billion Dollars for Investments owned and controlled by the United States, and selected by myself, as President," Trump said.
U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said "90% of the profits" from that $350 billion investment will be "going to the American people."
However, South Korean President Lee Jae Myung said the $350 billion fund will play a role in facilitating the "active entry" of Korean companies into the U.S. market into industries such as shipbuilding and semiconductors.
The Trump administration's trade talks with China has taken a different tack than the rest of the world. The world's second largest economy was firmly in Trump's trade crosshairs from the moment he took office.
Rather than a deal, China has reached a series of suspensions over its "reciprocal" tariff rate. It was initially hit with a 34% tariff from "Liberation Day," before a series of back-and-forth measures between the two sides saw the duties skyrocket to 145% duties for Chinese imports to the U.S. and 125% for U.S. imports to China.
However, both sides agreed to reduced tariffs in May, after their first trade meeting in Geneva, Switzerland. The truce was agreed to last till Aug. 12. China currently faces a 30% combined tariff rate, while the U.S. is looking at 10% duties.
The countries' most recent meeting in Stockholm ended without a truce extension, but U.S. Treasury Secretary said that any truce extension will not be agreed to until Trump signs off on the plan.
For countries without a deal, it appears that a higher global baseline tariff of about 15%-20% will be slapped on them, according to Trump, higher than the 10% baseline announced on "Liberation Day."
Countries with a trade surplus with the U.S. will most likely see a higher "reciprocal" tariff rate.
Here are some key trading partners that have not agreed to a deal with the U.S.
On Wednesday, Trump announced a 25% tariff on India, with an additional unspecified "penalty" for what he views as unfair trade policies and for India's purchase of military equipment and energy from Russia.
"While India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World," Trump said in a post on Truth Social.
The 25% tariff rate is modestly lower than what Trump imposed on India on "Liberation Day," when he announced a 26% rate on the key trading partner, but at the high end of the 20%-25% range that the U.S. president said he was considering.
There has been frequent back-and-forth between Canada and the U.S. over tariffs in recent months, with the country being hit by duties even before Trump announced his so-called "reciprocal" tariffs.
Canada is now facing 35% tariffs on various goods from Aug. 1, with Trump also threatening to increase that rate in case of retaliation. The rate is separate from any sectoral tariffs.
Trump has repeatedly cited drugs flowing from Canada to the U.S. as a reason for his move to impose tariffs. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said earlier this week that the partners were in an "intense phase" of talks, noting that it would be unlikely for an agreement not to include any tariffs, Reuters reported.
Like Canada, Mexico has also long been a U.S. tariff target, with Trump citing drugs and illegal migration as factors in his decision to announce levies on the U.S.' southern neighbor.
The president has said that Mexico has not done enough to secure the border. Mexico is set to be hit with a 30% tariff, with any retaliation set to be met with an even higher rate from the U.S.
The Mexican government has stressed that it is important for the trading partners to resolve their issues ahead of Aug. 1, but there have not been many signs of progress toward an agreement in recent weeks.
Australia currently faces the baseline 10% as it runs a trade deficit with the United States. However, the country could be facing a higher tariff rate if Trump decides to raise his baseline rate to 15%-20%.
Canberra has not been publicly known to be in trade talks with Washington, with Prime Minister Anthony Albanese reportedly arguing that Australia's deficit with the U.S. and its free trade agreement should mean there should be no tariff on Australian imports.
Most recently, Australia relaxed restrictions on U.S. beef, a move which the office of the U.S. trade representative credited to Trump, but Albanese had reportedly said the move was not prompted by Trump.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump admin live updates: Trump, Schumer trade barbs over Senate nominations

time19 minutes ago

Trump admin live updates: Trump, Schumer trade barbs over Senate nominations

The Senate voted on some of Trump's nominations before the August recess. 2:17 The Senate on Saturday considered some of President Donald Trump's nominations before the August recess. Earlier this week, Trump issued an executive order slapping tariffs on many of America's trading partners but the new duties are set to go into effect in seven days. Trump also continues to face questions over his administration's handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files and his relationship with the accused sex trafficker. Latest headlines: 3 minutes ago Johnson makes last-minute visit to Israel 57 minutes ago Greer suggests Aug. 12 tariff deadline for China could slide 1 hour and 37 minutes ago Texas state House set to consider new congressional maps on Monday Here's how the news is developing. 46 Updates Jul 28, 2025, 10:00 AM EDT Trump says he is 'allowed' to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell, but it's 'inappropriate' to discuss When asked by reporters if he would pardon Ghislaine Maxwell -- the convicted associate of deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein -- President Donald Trump said he is "allowed to give her a pardon" but "nobody's approached me with it." "Nobody's asked me about it. Right now, it would be inappropriate to talk about it," Trump said on Monday. He said he hasn't been "overly interested" in the Epstein files, and called the 'whole thing a hoax' in regard to whether his name is in the files. Jul 28, 2025, 9:56 AM EDT Starmer says he has a 'very good relationship' with Trump British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he has a "very good personal relationship" with President Donald Trump, emphasizing that the United Kingdom and the United States have "always stood together." In terms of best interests for the two countries, Starmer added that he and Trump have a "huge amount of common ground." Trump says he is 'not interested in talking' to Putin President Donald Trump said he has "always gotten along" with Russian President Vladimir Putin, but on Monday, he said he is "not interested in talking" to him. "Russia could be so rich right now. But instead, they spend everything on war. I really thought this was going to end. Every time I think it's going to end, he kills people," Trump said. Earlier on Monday, Trump said he would reduce the 50-day window for Russia to agree to a peace deal with Ukraine. Jul 28, 2025, 9:37 AM EDT Trump says Powell 'has to' cut interest rates While meeting British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, President Donald Trump said Fed Chair Jerome Powell "has to" cut interest rates. "He should cut. A smart person should cut," Trump said. This comes after Trump visited the Federal Reserve on Thursday, repeating calls for lower interest rates while standing alongside Powell.

Hochul warns that ‘pathetic' Stefanik is just Trump lemming
Hochul warns that ‘pathetic' Stefanik is just Trump lemming

New York Post

time20 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Hochul warns that ‘pathetic' Stefanik is just Trump lemming

Gov. Kathy Hochul on Sunday blasted 'pathetic' GOP potential election foe Elise Stefanik as someone who would give President Trump nearly unfettered power over the state if governor. Hochul, a Democrat, warned that the president, who grew up in New York, has his sights set on helping a Republican become governor. 'If a Republican gets elected as governor against me, think about the power that Donald Trump will have over everything in the state, including the city,' Hochul warned on ABC 7's 'Up Close with Bill Ritter. 'That's what should give people great pause,' she said. The governor seemed amused that Trump appeared to intervene in New York GOP politics to encourage Rep. Mike Lawler (R-NY) not to run against her. 4 Gov. Kathy Hochul on Sunday argued that her expected GOP rival will be a puppet for President Trump. Hans Pennink 4 Upstate GOP Rep. Elise Stefanik has been a fierce critic of Hochul's performance. Getty Images She also swiped at Stefanik, an upstate congresswoman who is widely expected to throw her hat into the 2026 gubernatorial ring, accusing her of playing rough and tumble politics. Last week, in the wake of the deadly Midtown massacre in which a sicko fatally gunned down four people, including an NYPD officer, Stefanik spotlighted a 2020 social-media post from Democratic Socialist mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani who said the NYPD is 'racist, anti-queer & a major threat to public safety.' 'Flashback : Kathy Hochul's very own Commie Mamdani A disgrace and truly unfit to be Mayor of NYC,' Stefanik wrote in the post. 4 The Midtown massacre gunman carried his rifle in plain view before Monday's heinous attack. Obtained by NY Post Hochul fired back Sunday, 'It's pathetic and especially in the time when we're a city that's in mourning, to be taking cheap shots and trying to infer that he had something to do with this,' the governor swiped. 'I mean, come on.' While Hochul is the favorite heading into 2026, Republicans have overperformed in several state elections in recent years. In 2022, for example, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin lost to Hochul by about 6.4 percentage points. Hochul also re-upped her well-worn push to ban so-called 'assault rifles' and noted how the gunman trekked down from Nevada to unleash upon innocent people in New York City. 'Why do we even allow these weapons of mass destruction to be sold anywhere in America? Other countries have completely banned them,' the governor said. 'Why can't Congress and the president step up and say, 'This is it, no more?' ' The gunman, who died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound, carried an M4 rifle while marching into the building to unleash fire, according to the cops. Hochul argued it takes 'political courage' to enact gun control and appealed to Trump. 4 President Trump has helped clear a path for Elise Stefanik to apparently run for governor in his home state, New York. AP 'I'd be willing to make the case,' she said. 'And you know how important this is. You never know what's going to be a breakthrough. 'This is President Trump's hometown. He knows these streets. He knows these buildings. And so does anyone who might understand the incredible vulnerability that people and they're going to their jobs every single day in Midtown.'

How foreign policy could crash Republican midterm prospects
How foreign policy could crash Republican midterm prospects

The Hill

time20 minutes ago

  • The Hill

How foreign policy could crash Republican midterm prospects

This summer's MAGA revolt over the Epstein Files has challenged the longstanding assumption that President Trump has an unbreakable bond with the Republican base. Trump loyalists from Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) to Steve Bannon to Tucker Carlson have recently criticized the president not just on the Epstein disclosures but also on Medicaid cuts in the 'One Big Beautiful Bill.' Yet new polling shows that another issue could cost Trump crucial support and substantially lower his standing among independent voters whom Republicans need in order to win future elections. While Republicans largely rallied around Trump following the June 22 bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities, recent YouGov polling commissioned by the Center for Economic and Policy Research demonstrates substantial political risks for the president and his party if he supports an expanded war involving Israel and Iran. When respondents consider the economic consequences of a broader conflict, as well as their trust in the justifications offered for involvement in such a war, Trump faces overwhelming dissent among Independents. These voters are about one-third of the electorate and currently about evenly split between Democrat-leaning and Republican-leaning. If an issue becomes important in an election and the Independent voters move strongly in one direction, that can swing the election. A clear majority of voters — 65 percent — reported they would hold Trump responsible if gasoline prices rose to $6 a gallon as a result of expanded U.S. military involvement. Among Independent voters, this sentiment rises to 69 percent. Further, when informed that economists would expect a significant rise in mortgage interest rates to result from an expanded conflict — potentially adding over $100,000 in lifetime payments for a typical home — 72 percent oppose U.S. military involvement, with two thirds of those expressing 'strong' opposition. Most polls treat foreign policy decisions as isolated events, simply asking whether voters support or oppose military action. But major interventions do not occur in isolation — they can impact gas prices, mortgage rates and overall confidence in politicians and their political parties. A true measure of public sentiment on expanded military involvement must account for these potential and even likely consequences, which often drive voter attitudes more than abstract strategic considerations. Donald Trump rose politically by highlighting Americans' declining trust in institutions, from government regulators and health experts to traditional media. But the polling shows that Trump himself faces serious accusations from his base of breaching public trust and caving to wealthy donors advocating unconditional support for Israeli policies that millions of voters view as wrong and dangerous. Sixty-three percent of respondents expressed concern that Trump's decision to attack Iran could be influenced by major campaign donors, a concern particularly strong among Independents. And two-thirds of voters — including nearly one-third of Republicans — feel that intervening in an Israel-Iran conflict contradicts Trump's core 'America First' promise. In June, Tucker Carlson accused Trump of being 'complicit in the act of war' following Israel's attacks on Iran, and influential MAGA voices like Steve Bannon echoed similar skepticism. Yet commentary alone is unlikely to shift conservative public opinion. People respond to tangible impacts in their lives. If Trump once again follows Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into major military action in the Middle East, the consequences may extend beyond geopolitics and significantly impact the president's party in next year's midterm elections. Consider some midterm math. On all five questions related to U.S. intervention in Iran, voters who identify as Republican or Democrat overwhelmingly aligned with their respective parties. For example, by a ratio of 88 percent to 12 percent, Democrats said they did not believe that 'Trump is getting involved in this war for the sake of U.S. national security.' Republicans held the opposite view, with 77 percent believing national security was the reason and 23 percent not believing it. This leaves Independent voters as potentially decisive. According to current polling data, Independents are evenly divided between 'Republican-leaning' and 'Democrat-leaning,' generally indicating close national elections. However, on questions regarding U.S. participation in a war against Iran, Independents are solidly opposed, by a margin of two to one. This leads to an overall result of 63-37 saying that they do not believe that U.S. involvement in such a war is 'for the sake of national security.' While the June war between Israel and Iran appears to be over, another Israeli attack in the near future remains quite possible. Should Trump decide to join such an operation before the next election, it could significantly undermine Republican chances of retaining Congress. Mark Weisbrot is co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research. He is the author of 'Failed: What the 'Experts' Got Wrong About the Global Economy (Oxford University Press). Justin Talbot Zorn is a senior adviser at the Center for Economic and Policy Research, a Truman National Security Fellow, and served as legislative director for three members of Congress.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store