First ‘one nation, one election' likely in 2034, shorter terms for state assemblies after 2029: Report
PP Choudhary, head of the Joint Parliamentary Committee on the bill (The Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024), told The Times of India that, for instance, the assembly elected in 2032 in Uttar Pradesh, India's largest electoral state, may serve only two years to synchronise with the 2034 Lok Sabha elections. The Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024, and the Union Territories Laws (Amendment) Bill, 2024, include provisions for simultaneous Lok Sabha and state assembly elections.
To implement simultaneous elections, the President may issue a notification on the sitting of the Lok Sabha after a general election. The tenure of all state assemblies formed after this date will end concurrently with the Lok Sabha's five-year term. If the Lok Sabha or a state assembly is dissolved before completing its five-year term, elections will be held to cover the remaining duration, aligning the next election with the simultaneous election cycle.
If the Election Commission of India (ECI) determines that a state assembly election cannot be conducted as part of simultaneous elections, it may recommend to the President to defer that election. The President can then order the election to be held later.
The Constitution (129th Amendment) Bill, 2024, grants the ECI authority to recommend postponing a state assembly election to the President without requiring parliamentary approval, unlike the current Article 356, which imposes specific conditions and parliamentary consent for such delays.
PP Choudhary, the Bharatiya Janata Party MP from Pali, Rajasthan, told ToI that the Joint Parliamentary Committee's (JPC) tenure might be extended due to a consensus among members to visit various states and Union Territories before finalising recommendations.
The JPC, chaired by Choudhary, has already visited Maharashtra and Uttarakhand. The bills, introduced in the Lok Sabha in December last year, were referred to this panel, which has been engaging with stakeholders for feedback.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
25 minutes ago
- Indian Express
BJP targets Tejashwi, India bloc: ‘They want to turn country into Islamic state'
Continuing its attack on the INDIA bloc over the issue, the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) on Tuesday accused former Bihar Deputy Chief Minister Tejashwi Yadav and the opposition alliance of being anti-backward, anti-Babasaheb Ambedkar, and anti-Constitution. Alleging that the priority of the RJD, Congress and the INDIA bloc was to implement 'Sharia law, polygamy… halala and empowerment of only one religion', BJP national spokesperson Gaurav Bhatia said that such 'mamazwadis' wanted to 'turn India into an Islamic' state. 'Their priorities lie in Sharia law, practices like halala, and the empowerment of only one particular religion. Prime Minister Narendra Modi Ji envisions the empowerment of Dalits, women, and the backward sections of society — but Tejashwi Yadav opposes that vision. Whenever they talk of Sharia, the Bharatiya BJP will respond by standing firmly with the Constitution,' Bhatia said at a press conference. He said Tejashwi's remarks about 'throwing the Waqf Act into the dustbin' is extremely unfortunate and that the intentions of the 'RJD, Tejashwi, and Lalu Prasad are crystal clear that they are determined to pursue communal politics'. 'A few days ago, an image surfaced showing Dr B R Ambedkar's photo was placed at the feet of Lalu Prasad and he didn't stop his supporters from doing so. Neither Lalu nor Tejashwi Yadav has apologised for it to this day…This wasn't just an image — it reflects a mindset that wants to turn India into an Islamic nation,' he alleged.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Ban to 7-year jail: Fears of abuse over Karnataka Bill to curb fake news
Defining fake news in sweeping terms to include content that is deemed 'anti-feminism' and 'disrespect of Sanatan symbols'; prescribing a seven-year jail term for social media users held guilty of posting 'fake news' as decided by a committee headed by the state Information & Broadcasting Minister; setting up special courts to deal with cases under the law — Karnataka's Bill to curb fake news raises several questions of free speech and state overreach. The Karnataka Mis-Information and Fake News (Prohibition) Bill, 2025, in the name of prohibiting misinformation and fake news, empowers a committee of lawmakers to identify and label content on social media as 'fake news.' It is the first of its kind state legislation to deal with digital platforms and free speech. 'Any social media users, if found guilty by the Authority for posting fake news on the social media platform shall be punished with imprisonment which may extend up to seven years and fine which may extend up to Rs 10 lakh or with both,' the Bill states. That 'Authority,' under Section 5 of the Bill, includes the Minister for Kannada and Culture Information and Broadcasting as the ex-officio Chairperson; one member each from the Legislative Assembly and the Legislative Council to be nominated by their respective Houses; two representatives from social media platforms appointed by the state government and a senior bureaucrat as Secretary. This Authority's mandate is to 'ensure complete ban on promotion and spread of fake news' including 'posting of contents which are abusive and obscene including anti-feminism and insult to the dignity of the female'; 'disrespect of sanatan symbols and beliefs' among others. The Authority is also tasked with ensuring 'only those content(s) are posted on the social media platform which are based on authentic research on the subjects related to science, history, religion, philosophy, literature.' This Bill comes in the face of an unequivocal ruling by the Bombay High Court last September that struck down as unconstitutional a key provision of the amended Information Technology (IT) Rules, 2021 which empowered the government to identify 'fake news' on social media platforms through a 'Fact Check Unit' (FCU). The Court had held that lack of judicial oversight in the Rules was unconstitutional. The Bill also makes the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita's provision on granting anticipatory bail inapplicable to offences under the proposed law. The Bill's descriptions of fake news and misinformation widen the scope of abuse and misuse. For instance, fake news is described under Section 2(i) of the Bill as 'purely fabricated content' and 'editing audio or video which results in the distortion of facts and/or the context.' Misinformation is defined as 'knowingly or recklessly making a false or inaccurate statement of fact.' The provision states that 'opinions, religious or philosophical sermons, satire, comedy or parody or any other form of artistic expression' are exempted from the definition. What constitutes 'artistic expression' is not defined in the Bill. In January 2024, Justice Gautam Patel of the Bombay HC had also struck down the Centre's IT rules for vague and overbroad terms such as 'fake,' 'false,' and 'misleading.' 'Vagueness and overbreadth are both linked to the concept of the chilling effect,' the ruling had said. In the landmark 2013 ruling in Shreya Singhal v Union of India, striking down 66A of the Information Technology Act that allowed blocking of content, the Court had emphasised that vague definitions cannot be justified to curb free speech. 'Information that may be grossly offensive or which causes annoyance or inconvenience are undefined terms which take into the net a very large amount of protected and innocent speech. A person may discuss or even advocate by means of writing disseminated over the internet information that may be a view or point of view pertaining to governmental, literary, scientific or other matters which may be unpalatable to certain sections of society. It is obvious that an expression of a view on any matter may cause annoyance, inconvenience or may be grossly offensive to some,' the Court had said. Apurva Vishwanath is the National Legal Editor of The Indian Express in New Delhi. She graduated with a B.A., LL. B (Hons) from Dr Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow. She joined the newspaper in 2019 and in her current role, oversees the newspapers coverage of legal issues. She also closely tracks judicial appointments. Prior to her role at the Indian Express, she has worked with ThePrint and Mint. ... Read More
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
AAP's Sanjeev Arora resigns from Rajya Sabha after winning bypoll in Punjab
New Delhi [India], July 2 (ANI): Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) leader Sanjeev Arora has resigned from Rajya Sabha after he was elected as the MLA from the Ludhiana West assembly constituency in the recently concluded bypolls. His resignation from the upper house was accepted by Vice President and Rajya Sabha chairman Jagdeep Dhankar on Tuesday with immediate effect, finding the same in conformity with Article 101 3(b) of the Constitution. This comes after Sanjeev Arora, the newly elected MLA from AAP in Punjab, on Saturday took oath in the state assembly after winning the recently concluded bypoll from Ludhiana West assembly constituency. The AAP has retained the seat. Punjab assembly speaker Kultar Singh Sandhawan administered his oath in Chandigarh. Speaking on this occasion, Punjab New and Renewable Energy Minister Aman Arora called Sanjeev Arora an honest person while expressing gratitude towards the voters for extending their support. He said that people had supported them since they had faith in AAP national convenor Arvind Kejriwal and Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann. 'It is a matter of great joy that a very honest person, Sanjeev Arora, has become a member of the Punjab Vidhan Sabha today. I thank the people of Ludhiana West. They have supported us by putting faith in Arvind Kejriwal's policies and Mann's work (as CM). They have supported Sanjeev Arora because of his decency. Many thanks to the public, workers and everyone,' Punjab AAP chief told ANI. He added, 'Any person found involved in corruption or drug business will not be spared; action will be taken (against them).'With Sanjeev Arora winning the Ludhiana West by-election in Punjab, the party's Rajya Sabha seat has now become vacant, and the party is yet to decide on a candidate for the same. Speaking to ANI, Arora said that Kejriwal has already said that the party will take a decision on this matter. 'I don't know anything about this (who will go to the Rajya Sabha), our national convenor, Arvind Kejriwal, has said that the party will take a decision on this,' Arora told ANI. Arora won the Ludhiana West assembly seat by-election by a margin of 10,637 votes, garnering 35,179 votes in total. The Ludhiana (west) assembly seat fell vacant in January after the death of AAP MLA Gurpreet Bassi. The AAP fielded Rajya Sabha MP Sanjeev Arora from the seat, while the Congress had fielded former state minister Bharat Bhushan Ashu, and the Shiromani Akali Dal (SAD) had fielded Parupkar Singh Ghumman. (ANI)
