Three in five Brits 'wouldn't even trust Starmer or Farage to watch their bag'
Politicians face a serious challenge winning back the trust of Brits too, with almost nine in ten having little or no faith in them, according to the findings.
A major new poll at the centre of the report lays bare just how disillusioned we are with the current system, and the depth of pessimism over whether things will get better.
Three in five Brits say they wouldn't trust Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Leader of the Opposition Kemi Badenoch or Reform leader Nigel Farage to even watch their bags – with similar levels of distrust for all three.
And the one word used most to describe the state of the country is 'broken', followed by 'mess', 'struggling', 'divided' and 'expensive'.
According to More in Common, the pollsters behind the 'Shattered Britain' report, most people in the UK can fit into one of seven segments that show their attitude to the nation's issues.
Craig Munro breaks down Westminster chaos into easy to follow insight, walking you through what the latest policies mean to you. Sent every Wednesday. Sign up here.
They are: Progressive Activists : Highly engaged in politics but feeling alienated, they are concerned with social justice and issues like climate change. Make up 12% of the population.
: Highly engaged in politics but feeling alienated, they are concerned with social justice and issues like climate change. Make up of the population. Incrementalist Left : Generally left-of-centre but preferring gradual change over revolutionary reform, with high levels of trust in experts. Make up 21% of the population.
: Generally left-of-centre but preferring gradual change over revolutionary reform, with high levels of trust in experts. Make up of the population. Established Liberals : Believe the system broadly works as it currently is and have faith in the UK's institutions to deliver continued progress. Make up 9% of the population.
: Believe the system broadly works as it currently is and have faith in the UK's institutions to deliver continued progress. Make up of the population. Sceptical Scrollers : Seek alternative sources of truth online due to loss of faith in traditional institutions, and are drawn to conspiracies. Make up 10% of the population.
: Seek alternative sources of truth online due to loss of faith in traditional institutions, and are drawn to conspiracies. Make up of the population. Rooted Patriots : Feel abandoned and overlooked by political elites, but not keen to overthrow the system as a whole. Concerned about community decline and migration. Make up 20% of the population.
: Feel abandoned and overlooked by political elites, but not keen to overthrow the system as a whole. Concerned about community decline and migration. Make up of the population. Traditional Conservatives : Respectful of authority and nostalgic for the past, believe in established norms. Make up 8% of the population.
: Respectful of authority and nostalgic for the past, believe in established norms. Make up of the population. Dissenting Disruptors: Drawn to dramatic change and strong leadership that will overthrow the status quo, feel disconnected from society and opposed to multiculturalism. Make up 20% of the population.
The report was based on a survey of 20,000 and dozens of focus groups which took place across the UK.
It found a lot of concern about money among the British public, too, with more than half saying they don't think the cost of living crisis will ever end and 43% citing money as their biggest source of stress.
Meanwhile, a majority of Brits – 53% – said they thought those in their children's generation would have a worse life than those in their parents' generation.
Two-thirds of people also said they're not sure politics will ever return to normal after saying it had become more chaotic over the past ten years.
Dianne from Bridgwater, described as a 'Rooted Patriot' in the report, told the pollsters: 'I think our government's the worst ones actually.
'They don't respect the people that vote for them, and if they were to do that then it would be a lot better, but they don't. You try to get the best for everybody and the government just laugh at you.'
Maddie, a 'Progressive Activist' from East Dulwich in London, said: 'You notice a difference, you notice everything going up, that transport and we're all sort of living on top of each other as well.
'And the rich are richer and the poor are poorer.'
It's not all bad news, though – the survey found people are largely very positive about the area in which they live.
While 'broken' was the most common word to describe the UK as a whole, people mostly said the place where they live is 'quiet', followed by 'nice', 'rural', 'safe' and 'peaceful'.
And in stark contrast to their attitude towards politicians, a majority Brits from all seven of the 'segments' included in the report said they trusted their neighbours.
Luke Tryl, Director of More in Common, said the research shows the country is 'exhausted, increasingly fragmented, and yearning for change – but deeply divided on what that change should look like'.
He added: 'Britain has seen difficult times before, and the purpose of this research is to help leaders navigate these new fault lines to find a way out of the current era of malaise.
'If political leaders want to rebuild trust and build a broad coalition to fix a Britain that increasingly feels broken, they will have to navigate the new political map of Britain.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Until I had one, I was ignorant about the reality of miscarriages
MORE: Map reveals Nato's maritime security challenges – from Russia to terrorism
MORE: Delays and diplomacy: Inside Starmer's migrant deal announcement with Macron
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Delaying payouts for blood and Post Office victims is scandalous
Tens of thousands of people are thought to have received contaminated blood in the 1970s and 1980s LEON NEAL/GETTY IMAGES The familiar truism that justice delayed is justice denied has taken on a morbid sense of urgency for the many victims of the Post Office and infected blood scandals. Thanks to the courageous persistence of campaigners, public officials have been forced to face up to the moral enormity of these past wrongs: respectively, the most widespread miscarriage of justice, and gravest case of medical malpractice, in recent memory. Yet, those charged with remedying these injustices are continuing to drag their feet in awarding victims due redress. It has been estimated that at least 100 further victims of the infected blood scandal have died in the protracted interim between the conclusion of Sir Brian Langstaff's inquiry last year and being invited to apply for compensation. Likewise, some 345 former sub-postmasters are thought to have died before securing any financial restitution. Those still pursuing claims now find themselves caught in an interminable, tortuous, legalistic wrangle: one that seems cynically designed to delay and minimise the total amount of compensation that will eventually have to be paid out. • Keir Starmer: infected blood victims deserve justice now A report published last week into the human toll of the prosecutions made on the basis of the Post Office's defective Horizon IT system was unsparing in its grim detail. Its author, Sir Wyn Williams, concluded that the scandal had driven 13 people to suicide. Many other lives were blighted by addiction, divorce and financial ruin. Yet, the government's declared determination to correct these wrongs is belied by the gross deficiencies Sir Wyn identifies in the remuneration of those harmed. The Post Office compensation programme is byzantine in its complexity, with four separate schemes running in parallel. 3,700 former subpostmasters are yet to receive any payout. Many are locked in a legal limbo while their claims are subjected to excessively bureaucratic and adversarial scrutiny. Claimants are disadvantaged if they can't produce decades-old forms, often long lost. One sub-postmistress claims to have received a compensation offer worth just 0.5 per cent of her original claim. Sir Alan Bates, who championed his fellow sub-postmasters' cause, has fallen victim to what he describes as a 'quasi-kangaroo court', receiving a 'take it or leave it' quote amounting to less than half his submitted claim. Similarly shameful treatment has been meted out to those survivors among the 30,000 NHS patients infected with HIV and hepatitis by contaminated blood products. Last week, Sir Brian Langstaff warned that this compensation system too is creating 'obvious injustice'. Only 460 people have received full payouts, the result of a dilatory process forcing victims to be invited to make a claim rather than initiate one themselves. • Infected blood victims 'left suicidal' by compensation delays It is clear that government officials and civil servants tasked with disbursing payouts are subjecting comparatively powerless individuals to a level of rigoristic penny-pinching they would not dream of applying elsewhere. When set alongside the kind of financial waste casually tolerated within government, from the eye-watering sums sunk into HS2 to the near £2 billion in 'bounce back loan' fraud complacently written off by the very same department of business overseeing appeals by victims of the Post Office, the contrast is galling. Victims of the infected blood and Post Office scandals have had their right to restitution established by due process. Obstructionist officials should not be allowed to deny them justice.
Scottish Sun
2 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
UK is ‘number 1 target for Russian cyberattacks' as Vlad wreaks revenge for Ukraine backing and avoids offending Trump
THE UK has become the "number 1 target for Russian cyberattacks" as Vladimir Putin seeks revenge on Ukraine-backing enemies. Millions of Brits could be plunged into darkness as the mad zealot concentrates his sabotage on British infrastructure in a bid to avoid offending Trump. 5 Russian cyberattack threats have surged since the start of the year Credit: Getty 5 Mad Vlad is thought to be focusing his sabotage efforts on the UK Credit: EPA 5 UK leaders have been urged to ramp up protections against Russian threats Credit: Getty It's believed Trump's friendlier stance towards the raging despot has pivoted his attention away from American targets, concentrating his efforts on the UK instead. The UK has seen a significant hike in the number of Russian cyberattacks since the start of the year, according to government sources. An official told The Times: 'It's been really evident from Russia's recent propaganda that we're target No 1. 'If only the British state was as powerful as they claim.' Read more on World WAR FEARS UK faces war with Russia within next five years, warns ex head of British Army UK spy chiefs confirmed that Vlad's objective is to create "mayhem on British" and European streets – targeting key infrastructure and attempting to cause havoc with the economy. Last year, minister Pat McFadden, Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster, warned Britain and its allies "not underestimate" the threat posed by Russia in its "hidden war". Putin's forces have previously targeted UK energy infrastructure and "won't think twice" about attacking British businesses, he said. He warned an attack of this kind could turn the lights off for millions of people by shutting down power grids. The cyber attack plans would be an attempt to dilute support for Ukraine from allied states, he added. He slammed the Kremlin as "exceptionally" aggressive and "reckless" in this area, adding that a number of attacks had already been foiled both publicly and behind the scenes. According to Richard Horne, the head of GCHQ's national Cyber Security Centre (NCSC) the UK is dangerously unprepared for this surge in cyber attacks. Speaking at the launch of the NCSC annual review last year, which lay bare the alarming rise in cyber threats facing the UK, he urged UK leaders to increase the pace they're working at to "keep ahead" of Putin. Putin warns Trump he 'will have to respond' to Ukraine's daring drone attack in hour-long phone call with president He said that the NCSC received 1,957 reports of cyber attacks in 2024, 430 of which needed support from the centre's incident management team - up from 371 the previous year. Of these incidents, 89 were nationally significant. PREPARING FOR WAR Just a couple of months ago, reports emerged of government officials racing to update decades-old contingency plans to protect the country and prepare for any potential combat. The classified "home defence plan" would lay out how Downing Street will respond if Vladimir Putin declares war on the UK, including moving the Royal Family into bunkers. Ministers worry Britain could be outfought by Russia on the battlefield, but also poorly defended at home as things stand. Experts have warned that the country's national infrastructure is vulnerable ahead of the release of Labour's Strategic Defence Review - an examination of the Armed Forces. As military warfare has evolved in the past two decades, fears are that Putin could launch a combination of attacks, including conventional ballistic missile strikes, sabotage and the latest tactic in the Russian playbook - cyber warfare. But Britain - which is just beginning to review and revise its security and contingency plans for the first time in more than 20 years - is feared to not be fully prepared to go to war against the Russians. Former Nato commander Colonel Hamish De Bretton-Gordon told The Sun: "Britain is very much in the sights of Putin's derision, and we are the ones likely to be attacked first. "Britain really has got to dust off its contingency plans. Over 20 years of neglect, and we understand that's exactly what this report is about at the moment." 5 Britain is just starting to review and revise its security and contingency plans for the first time in more than 20 years Credit: Getty 5 Fears are that Putin could launch a combination of attacks Credit: Reuters Retired military officer Colonel Richard Kemp, who was working in the Cabinet Office when the contingency plans were last updated, told The Sun: "Contingency plans like this should be updated frequently. Twenty years is far too long, especially given the radically changed threat picture. "Putin has said Britain is in his crosshairs since the invasion of Ukraine in 2022. "Even before then, he proved he was willing to attack this country, including with a nerve agent attack in Salisbury in 2018. We should take him seriously." The classified plan by the Cabinet Office's Resilience Directorate - which was last updated in 2005 - would set out war strategies in the event of a catastrophic attack by the Russians, which could well involve tactical and strategic nuclear weapons. The plan is based on the War Book, a Cold War dossier of instructions for government response to nuclear attacks. Under such plans, Britain could be divided into 12 zones, each governed by Cabinet ministers, and food rationed. The plans will include scenarios like widespread sabotage and crippling cyber warfare, which were seen as a limited threat back when the document was last updated. It will also direct the PM on how to run a wartime government, as well as strategies for travel networks, courts and the postal system, reports the Daily Telegraph. Although the highly-classified document is expected to never be revealed in the public domain, military experts suggest what could be changed to prepare us for a potential war against the Russians. Colonel Bretton-Gordon said that cyber attacks will be given a major chunk of attention in the latest round of updates. He believes the Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) would be given additional funding to improve the existing measures against cyber attackers.
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
UK to strike migrant return deal with Iraq in latest bid to stop small boats and send more asylum seekers back
Yvette Cooper is set to strike a migrant returns deal with Iraq which would enable the UK to send more failed asylum seekers back. The Home Secretary is said to be in the 'final stages' of agreeing the pact to speed up cooperation between London and Baghdad. Ministers are under pressure to get a grip of the migrant crisis with 2025 on course to be a record year for small-boat crossings. More than 21,000 people have already made the perilous journey across the Channel, and Iraqi Kurds now dominate the people smuggling networks. Ms Cooper struck a deal with Iraq at the end of last year to tackle the gangs, including greater intelligence sharing and more law enforcement operations. Since then, the National Crime Agency has been working with the Kurdish authorities and says it has succeeded in targeting criminals operating in places where they thought they were 'untouchable'. But Ms Cooper hopes to strike an enhanced deal by the end of the summer to speed up cooperation between the UK and Iraq, enabling migrants to be detained and deported more quickly, The Sunday Times reported. Meanwhile, it emerged that the Government is looking at digital ID cards for migrants, so they can show if they have the right to live and work in the UK. Sir Keir Starmer will this week discuss border security with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Writing in the Sunday Express, Sir Keir said Mr Merz's visit to the UK will include talks on 'what more we can do together to prosecute criminal networks and prevent people smuggling to the UK'. According to the Home Office, 353 people crossed the English Channel by small-boats on Friday, just a day after the Prime Minister signed a deal with French president Emmanuel Macron aimed at deterring migrants from making the dangerous crossing. Under the terms, the UK will be able to send migrants back to France for the first time in exchange for asylum seekers with links to Britain. The so-called one in, one out deal is due to begin in weeks on a pilot basis, but needs final legal verification from the EU.
