Is Online Poker Legal in Mongolia? Here's What You Should Know
freepik
The Legal Background: A Grey Zone No More
For several decades, Mongolia has been in the grey legal area concerning online poker. Although the classical variant of gambling or rather the land-based component was prohibited in a direct manner, online gambling has not been directly discussed in the act. Due to this, Mongolian players had no problems with playing international poker games at sites like PokerStars or GGPoker and avoiding any legal persecution. The completeness of lack of enforcement along with thin online controls provided the impression that online poker was condoned, even when they were not actually legal.
This enabled an underground community of successful online poker to emerge. It was common for players to use foreign platforms — a typical poker site Mongolia users would access might be based in Europe or Asia — and to handle payments through digital wallets or foreign bank accounts, all while avoiding domestic regulation. Nevertheless, to the government, this unregulated industry became both a financial and social menace as it grew. Concerns about gambling addiction, fraud, and the outflow of money intensified pressure from stakeholders to control or completely ban online gambling.
Mongolia's Legal Pivot in 2025
The amendments to the Mongolian laws that had to do with gambling were far-reaching and were done by the Parliament in May 2025. The changes directly affected the face of online gambling because they criminalized all digital casino game websites, online poker sites, online slot machines, and online lotteries. Online gambling services face criminalization too, under the law. This also involved people who assist other people to open an account, provide payment services, or encourage criminal companies to gamble or advertise their websites in either way.
The new law gives the state agencies the authority to block the websites that engage in illegal gambling. Owing to this, thousands of websites that deal with gambling such as poker sites, have already been blockaded or become unreachable domestically in Mongolia. Governments are also increasing surveillance of online payments especially those that can be associated with offshore casinos.
Moreover, the new legislations openly forbid online gambling advertisements. Any advertising of online poker or other games that was carried out via websites, mobile apps, affiliate networks, or even social media is now discussed as a violation of Mongolian legislation. The punishment includes an administrative penalty to a criminal trial.
The Sports Betting Exception
Although the 2025 legislation was mainly limiting, an exception has actually been carved through it, and that is where sports betting is concerned. Both online and offline sports betting have been legalized through a state licensing system. This was done based on economic strategy. Legalizing a popular form of gambling, controlling it, and thus gaining control of tax revenues was one of the things the state intended to do in order to halt the continuous stream of money flowing to unlicensed foreign operators.
This legal difference between sports betting and other gambling activities is quite important. The fact is that, although poker and other games resembling casino ones are forbidden online, sports betting operators have an opportunity to receive official licenses and operate their activities under the governmental control of Mongolia. However, this might be under stringent supervision of the government such as identification, accountable gambling measures, and making the financial affairs visible.
This legal structure on sports betting will not automatically be applied to other forms of games such as poker according to the government. Until today, online poker is not availed of such an exemption.
Legal Consequences for Players and Providers
The new gambling laws are mostly directed at muzzling illegal activities and the worst penalties will be on the hands of persons operating, promoting, or facilitating online gambling sites. Now, speaking of individual players they cannot be left alone entirely. The players themselves may not be charged with a criminal offense; however, in case of the repeated occurrence of a prohibited gambling activity, a fine or an administrative measure may be applied on the basis of Article 4 of the law.
The government has instructed financial dealings to watch flag and scrutinize any transactions that are assumed to be related to online gambling. In other instances, their user accounts can be frozen or their funds can be confiscated in cases where it is being used to perpetrate criminal activity. There is also surveillance of the applications of virtual private networks (VPNs) and digital wallets which could assist a user in circumventing local blocks.
This enforcement situation is a new one that presents signs of being rather serious as the government gets down to crackdown. State-initiated media and public enlightenment have been applied as a means of cautioning the citizens on the effects of engaging in illegal gambling, such as poker.
The Skill Game-Debate
Another point that has emerged in Mongolia as it did in several other countries is the fact whether poker is a game of chance or skill. Pro-poker parties state that poker is a game of complexity and strategy quite unlike slots lottery or other pure games of chance in which luck alone takes the upper hand. In this regard, they assert that poker should be considered as a sport/competitive activity and not gambling as is the case with other types of gambling.
Companies such as the Mongolian Sport Poker United Association have gone out of their way to ensure that poker is taken as a skill rather than a game of chance. This group is certified by the International Federation of Match Poker and it popularizes poker as a sport, rather than a gambling game. Nevertheless, the law of 2025 fails to distinguish between poker and other games of chance notwithstanding the attempts to do it. At the time being, the Mongolian legal system regards poker as similar to Internet casinos and virtual slots.
freepik
How Mongolia Compares to Other Countries
This of Mongolia is more prohibitive as compared to a number of other countries that have either legalized or regulated poker. As an example, there is a detailed system of gambling control in the United Kingdom, where licensed online poker sites are present. In the state of the United States, such as New Jersey or Pennsylvania, online poker is governed by state law in certain parts as well. On the other hand, Mongolia has lumped prohibition that best fits those found in places such as China where most gambling is prohibited on the web and its sites are actively blocked.
This rift represents two approaches to online gambling at a world level. Other nations are convinced that the better options to use are regulation, oversight, and taxation rather than prohibition. Others such as Mongolia call tough prohibition the only avenue available to curb the negative social and economic effects of gambling.
Like this:
Like
Related
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Starmer pins hopes on summer ‘refresh'
Sir Keir Starmer is hoping to get his premiership back on track with a summer 'refresh' after weeks of setbacks and controversies. The Prime Minister is planning to use the annual long recess of Parliament, which begins on July 22, to inject more purpose into the Government and could reshuffle ministers as soon as next week. The plans will begin on Friday, when Cabinet ministers have been summoned for an 'away day' with the Prime Minister at an undisclosed central London location. Over lunch and afternoon meetings, Sir Keir's top team will discuss the Government's upcoming plans ahead of the Autumn Budget, where Rachel Reeves is now widely expected to launch a wealth tax to plug a fiscal black hole worth tens of billions. Three Whitehall sources told The Telegraph there was widespread expectation Sir Keir would launch a ministerial reshuffle before the end of the month. Aides and ministers have rival theories about when the reshuffle will come, and who could be moved from their current role. Some expect that Sir Keir will conduct a full Cabinet reshuffle, believing that some of his ministers have underperformed since he took office last year. A Labour source suggested that Lisa Nandy, the Culture Secretary, who was subject to reshuffle speculation earlier in the year, could now be demoted. Downing Street was previously considering abolishing her department altogether. 'There could be a refresh of the top team, whether that is the Cabinet or the advisers,' said one government source. 'We seldom tend to rush these things.' A more popular theory is that Sir Keir will only reshuffle more junior members of the Government, perhaps to reward loyal backbenchers or recognise that some of MPs elected last year had been promoted too early. Contenders for a new job include Mike Tapp, the MP for Dover and Deal, who has been sent out by Labour Party headquarters to defend policy announcements in recent weeks, despite not appearing on the Government's payroll. One minister who is concerned about a reshuffle pointed to the away day on Friday as evidence that current Cabinet ministers will be safe, for now. There is also talk of a 'double reshuffle', which would see Downing Street aides replaced at the same time as ministers move portfolios. The recent welfare rebellion among Labour MPs has raised doubts about the abilities of Claire Reynolds, the No 10 official charged with speaking to backbenchers on behalf of the Government. 'Claire is not doing well,' said one government source. Morgan McSweeney, Sir Keir's chief adviser, is thought to be safe in his job after Sir Keir instructed the Cabinet explicitly not to brief against him to newspapers last month. The Irish strategy supremo has become a 'lightning rod' for critics of the Prime Minister himself in the Parliamentary Labour Party, but is not seriously at risk, another party source said. Downing Street is thought to have been planning to reshuffle ministers before July, but those plans have been frustrated by a series of high-profile diary events, including Emmanuel Macron's state visit to the UK. It comes after a bitter few weeks for the government, and increasing speculation about the prospect of wealth taxes in the summer. On Wednesday Sir Keir declined to rule out freezing income tax thresholds in the Autumn Budget, insisting that he would not be drawn into tax commitments several months in advance. No 10 spokesmen and government ministers are also refusing to rule out some form of wealth tax, as Ms Reeves did in April. The prospect of tax hikes and more rebellions has contributed to the feeling of a 'doom loop' among Labour MPs, with most counting down the days until they can return to their constituencies for the summer. 'Everyone is so tired and worn down,' said one minister, gloomily. Amid the dire mood, Downing Street is hoping to regroup over the summer break and bring a new narrative about 'phase two' of Sir Keir's premiership in September, one party source said. Downing Street sources said there were no plans for a formal 'reset' – a strategy used by ailing prime ministers to put distance between themselves and their failings. But Whitehall insiders said there was increasing chatter about a 'refresh' to the administration and new tactics to keep Labour MPs supportive of the Government's plans. The first 'moment' of the next session of Parliament could be Donald Trump's visit to Britain in September, although there is talk that the visit could be deliberately held when MPs are not sitting to avoid debates about whether he should address parliamentarians while he is in the UK. The Government will also publish two strategies, on the defence industrial strategy and ethics and integrity, which had been expected to be laid before the summer recess but have been delayed. They will be followed by Labour's annual conference, which begins on September 28. Mr Trump, who launched legal action over the party's activists campaigning for his rival Kamala Harris, is not likely to make an appearance there. Labour sources said the conference would be a good moment to finish the 'refresh' and that Sir Keir would give the party faithful new promises on the theme of 'national renewal'. The Prime Minister's plan for office has been modelled on his approach to leading Labour in opposition, when he ran a three-stage process to 'detoxify' the party, attack the Tories and set out an alternative plan. Now, his process involves 'rebuilding' after 14 years of the Conservatives in power, setting out a vision of 'renewal' for the remainder of the Parliament, and offering voters something more in a second term. 'In the first year we have been focussed on fixing the foundations, but now we are moving towards making this a fairer country for ordinary people so that we can deliver the national renewal,' said a party source. The launch of a new political outfit by Jeremy Corbyn and Zarah Sultana, both serial Labour rebels, is also likely to peel off some of the party's voters at a time when it is already struggling with the challenge of Reform UK. One survey published on Friday found that a new Left-wing party would attract around 20 per cent of voters – far higher than many Labour strategists expected. For now, Sir Keir still has the support of the major Labour-affiliated trade unions, who have cautiously welcomed his reforms on public ownership and employment rights. 'It's a bit early in the cycle to know what is coming,' said one union official. The polls, however, show that the Prime Minister is fighting an uphill battle with the electorate. His personal opinion ratings have fallen to their lowest level on record, and the proportion of the public that think he should step aside for another leader is now higher than ever.
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labour MPs alarmed by rise in sponsored events arranged by party
Labour MPs have privately raised alarm at the number of sponsored corporate receptions for backbenchers that have been arranged by the party, amid concerns about perceived conflicts of interest. MPs have received invitations for networking receptions that include explicit advertisements for property developers or public affairs firms. The invitations are sent to MPs directly from the parliamentary Labour party (PLP) office and forwarded by party whips. 'The PLP office has literally become a public affairs agency,' one MP said. 'The wording is genuinely shocking.' An invitation for a summer reception in London said it would be an MP-only event and an 'opportunity for members of the PLP and frontbenchers to relax in a private setting with senior party figures as we return from the summer recess'. The PLP reception would be hosted in partnership with the property developer Vistry, the invitation said, and included a lengthy advertising pitch for the company. 'As the country's largest homebuilder, we leverage our expertise, skills and scale to deliver quality new housing,' it read, and went on to promote Vistry's timber-manufacturing capability. A party source said attendance was optional for MPs but at least one invitation made it clear there was an expectation for MPs to attend. 'These bi-annual events are important for the Party, so your attendance would be greatly appreciated,' one said. MPs are understood to have complained about the explicit corporate nature of the event on an MPs WhatsApp group. A similar event hosted for Labour MPs in the north-west has been sponsored by Mitie, the facilities management company that provides outsourcing services. One MP said this was directly at odds with Labour's stated values to return to insourcing services. This week MPs were invited to attend a 'kickstart economic growth PLP reception' with 'important speakers' at Mastercard's headquarters that had been arranged so MPs would have time to return to vote in the Commons. 'PLP staff are on hand outside and in the venue,' the invitation read. The credit card company also hosted a reception for Labour's MPs in the north-west, with the PLP office invitation offering a tour of Mastercard's 'experience centre', where the company would demonstrate 'some of the cutting-edge technology and innovation that's supporting small businesses'. MPs have previously complained about a winter reception, held for the London regional group of MPs, sponsored by the communications consultancy Kanda. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion The invitation included a lengthy advertising blurb for Kanda, which said the company worked with clients 'to understand, navigate and respond to the commercial drivers impacting the real-estate sector, including government legislature [and] local issues'. First Rail, a leading transport group operating Avanti West Coast and Great Western Railway, sponsored a similar reception for the northern regional group of MPs and another event with Go Ahead, also a large public transport group with contracts across the north of England. A regional reception in December for Scottish MPs was sponsored by Octopus Energy, at the same time the renewable energy group was pushing for a zonal pricing scheme that would benefit Scotland. The energy secretary, Ed Miliband, has since decided not to go ahead with the project. Members of the PLP group of MPs from the north of England said they were frequently invited to commercial briefings, including with BP Teesside, Yorkshire Water and the British Association of Independent Exploration Companies that lobbies on behalf of the North Sea energy industry. The invitations were also promoted to MPs by party officials. A Labour party spokesperson said: 'Commercial partnerships at events are a longstanding practice and have no bearing on party or government policy.'
Telegraph
5 hours ago
- Telegraph
The Chancellor's in hysterics ... but not tears this time
How was PMQs? Well, to paraphrase The Day Today: ' No one cried… ' You have to feel sorry for Rachel Reeves, given that she must now spend the rest of her life looking as cheerful as possible, bursting into laughter every time she stubs her toe, or chuckling at the rain. This PMQs, trying to prove that she's not having a breakdown, she found the questions and answers unnaturally hysterical – until Starmer told the Tories off for laughing about special needs kids, and the giggle was tamed into a half-smile. Keir Starmer has no time for levity. His trick is to open with a lengthy list of tragedies so that any jocularity by the Opposition looks unserious. Today it was the commemoration of 7/7, the death of Norman Tebbit, the 30th anniversary of Srebrenica, and 25 years since the Marathon bar became Snickers. Labour's John Slinger asked about Covid corruption, possibly a dig at James McMurdock, who has quit Reform to spend more time sitting next to Rupert Lowe. The PM said, ever so sincerely: 'We will ... go after the fraudsters… no matter who they are, or where we find them.' The Speaker then invited Nigel Farage to speak – and hilarity ensued. A rod for Labour's back? Remainers shouted 'you lied!' as Nige tried to talk about post-Brexit asylum policy, to which Lee Anderson yelled 'would you shut up?' – nailing the public's vote for next Speaker of the Commons. Kemi brought her A game, yet again. First question: does the PM stand by his pledge not to raise direct taxes? The PM said 'yes', and the backbenchers loved it. But having furnished us with that most unusual of things – a direct answer – he must have realised he'd walked into a trap, because anything less frank that followed would have sounded like evasion. Would he raid pensions? It's complicated. Council tax? The dog ate my homework. Wealth tax? Keir Starmer isn't in right now, so please leave a message after the beep. He was helped, of course, by Ed Davey. The Lib Dem leader asked about Tory failures in office and invited the PM to join him in an alliance to reform education. What a suck-up! Imagine going through life with the burning ambition to be deputy prime minister, to reach the second rung of the ladder and no further. That's our Ed, a man with his eyes on the prize of propping up a future minority Labour government, in a desperate bid to keep from office a Reform cabinet featuring two Nolan sisters and a Krankie. Tears of laughter Afterwards, another Lib Dem declared Tewkesbury to be the 'unsung nucleus of Gloucestershire's culture' and urged the PM to visit its medieval festival. I won't repeat Keir's woeful joke: suffice to say the Chancellor laughed so hard she almost cried, but thankfully did not. On GB News later: 'We are live at a bizarre accident, Tom, where the Chancellor, attending a joust, was shot with an arrow, fell 60 feet from a stone tower and was impaled on a lance. Chancellor, how do you feel?' 'I feel great, actually,' laughs Reeves from her stretcher, 'but it was a personal moment so it would obviously be inappropriate to discuss it. Haha!'
