
Katy Hessel: 'Everyone has to own their identity'
How good that you noticed and were able to call that out. I think that's what it's about. We've to constantly remind ourselves about representation, and not in a pity sense at all.
It has to be a good, interesting work with a unique perspective. Textile can be a great work. So can be a piece of lace. A quilt can tell an incredible story as can a marble sculpture. Greatness can come in so many different ways. Where I live, in London, you think about what is great art built on. It's the Royal Academy, which was opened in the 18th century, and that very much established hierarchies in art. But who had access to all that? Men! It was almost built to kind of keep the women out. So, these hierarchies that have been built on what's great, they're so boring because if you're not seeing art by a wide range of people, then you're not seeing society as a whole. And you're just missing out on great art.
At the Jaipur Literature Festival, someone asked a question about labels. Though it's crucial, in a way, to do away with labels, we still do not have a level playing field. There is a history of sanitising the artworks of those who are not men. Then, there are the scholarships and grants based on an individual's identity from the margins. So, labels present a unique conundrum here. How do you reconcile with that?
It's like, would I want to be seen as a woman writer? Or would I want to be seen as a writer? I don't mind. But when I say 'a woman writer', to me, it doesn't mean anything derogatory or negative. Whereas in history, it was a derogatory thing. We're seeing this debate because of what we've witnessed. I talk about this, especially in the abstract expressionism chapter of the book that these women would abhor the idea of me putting them in this book because they were told that being a woman was a bad thing. It's not anything less.
Everyone has to own their identity. I own, for one, being a woman writer, but I also own being a writer. I don't want to be a token of sorts. What I mean by doing away with labels is that we shouldn't reduce this to a trend. We have to own all our identities but we must also disrupt, which is why I wrote this book. We need more works to spotlight works by women, nonbinary, and trans artists because they've not been given the space. The statistics prove that. For example, in London, only 1% of the National Gallery is by women artists, so there's a lot of work to be done.
You also say that this book is not the definitive history of art. What's left to be uncovered besides the bit about identity that we discussed?
I've never been to Japan. Or China. Or even a few places in the African continent. Also: I want to go back to a few places, for example, Brazil. That doesn't mean I'm not writing about them. I'm writing about tons of Japanese artists, but it'd have been great to see them for their context. I was in Delhi in January and I met so many artists of my age. I met older, established artists, so it was great to see their work in person and talk to them. It was exciting. I've a little column in the Guardian, and I've written about Ayesha Singh's work. There's always more to be exhumed.
During the consolidation of the works by women, what were the challenges you faced?
Oh, so many. Think about how many books there are on Michelangelo alone or Leonardo da Vinci but how many books there are about 16th and 17th-century women artists from Bologna or Italy or some other place? Hardly any. I was very lucky to stand on the shoulders of a lot of scholars who have come before me and whose works I have championed with my podcast and also with this book. It's very much a sort of collaboration in a way. Sometimes I'd learn that a work has been recently attributed to a woman artist, that sort of a thing one always discovers. We're starved of that knowledge.
What are the new ways of looking and critiquing in the world of art that you are witnessing today?
It's not like these artists [who're being exhumed] never existed. They've always existed. But I think it's about who gets to write art history, who gets to curate the shows, who gets to collect the art, who gets to support the artists.
I think that's changing. And that's important because the more people we have talking behind the scenes, the more that it's going to change because the artist's job is to make art. I'm not the artist. I'm there to facilitate.
What was the one discovery you made during your research that blew your mind.
My favourite is the Metropolitan Museum of Art story. In 1917, the Met in New York bought a painting for $200,000 when it was under the impression that it was by the neoclassical artist, Jacques-Louis David (1748–1825). And then decades later, they found out it was actually by a woman, Marie-Denise Villers. Would they have paid the same price tag? I don't know. But it definitely makes one curious about it.
If we're talking about the valuation of art, what immediately comes to mind is the $120,000 Art Basel Banana, titled Comedian. There's a group that says it was not about a banana and duct tape, but the concept; then, there's the other faction that says that it's bizarre.
I mean, I see both sides of [Maurizio] Cattelan's work. I think he's making a critique of the world that we live in and what the art market has become. In a way, what is art if not holding up a mirror to the world that you live in? That's one thing. I think it's clever to do that, this artwork. But I also think that it's complicated. You spend that much money and for what purpose? For what status? Is it for the purpose of art history? Or for the purpose of something else? I don't know. The value of art is a very complex, unregulated thing. I think maybe people's intentions aren't always something that is actually going to be exciting or progressive. If anything, it's actually just a bit boring.
Saurabh Sharma is a Delhi-based writer and freelance journalist. They can be found on Instagram/X: @writerly_life.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
4 hours ago
- India Today
Bengaluru auto driver's honest take on Hindi-Kannada row delights Internet. Watch video
A video of a woman chatting with a Bengaluru auto-rickshaw driver about language tensions prevailing in the city has gone viral. The reason, you may ask, is the driver's grounded reply. The clip, shared by Khyati Shree on Instagram, shows her trying to pick up basic Kannada phrases during the ride. The auto driver not only helps her patiently but also addresses the often-discussed 'Hindi vs Kannada' debate with disarming thoda aadmi ka problem hain, aisa aisa karke jhagda hota hai. Warna koi problem nahi hai, acche se rehte hai sab Bengaluru ke andar sab first class hai,' he says, implying that most language-related confrontations stem from personal frustration, not deep-rooted hostility. According to him, life in the city is peaceful and people generally get along well. Khyati seconded that thought in her caption. 'I've stayed in Karnataka for four months and travelled beyond Bengaluru. I've never faced any issues about language. I interacted with countless auto and cab drivers, locals, and ate at many places; no one cared if I spoke Hindi, as long as I was polite,' she further shared that despite reading about language clashes, her personal experience had been quite the opposite. 'Before travelling to coastal Karnataka, I was anxious about facing angry drivers. But that never happened. Knowing English helps, but it's more about how you behave,' she said. It's her second time in the city, and she added that 'the vibes are still nice.'Watch the video here: View this post on Instagram A post shared by Khyati Shree (@khyatishree2)Instagram users had a lot to say about the viral video. A user, who claimed to have lived in Bengaluru for 25 years, wrote, 'People here aren't bad. They only react when provoked. Never faced any language issue myself.'Another user called the city 'a vibe' and praised how it welcomes of the users, however, added a reminder: 'Respect goes both ways. Learn a few Kannada phrases - it makes locals happy. You wouldn't expect people to speak Hindi in Japan or China, would you?'While the internet often amplifies conflict, this video came as a much-needed reality check for all of us. Maybe, sometimes, all it takes is patience, politeness, and a little effort to understand each other.- EndsTrending Reel


News18
6 hours ago
- News18
‘Did The Last One Get Eaten?': Internet Laughs At African Cheetah Monitor Job Vacancy
An African wildlife conservancy is hiring a full-time cheetah monitor to track and care for cheetahs in the wild. Panyame Wildlife Conservancy, located in Mozambique, is getting a lot of attention online after posting a unique job opening on social media. The conservancy, known for its cheetah reintroduction efforts, announced that it is looking to hire a full-time cheetah monitor, but the internet has found the job description amusing and misunderstood it in the funniest way. On July 15, the conservancy shared an Instagram post about the vacancy. The role involves tracking and monitoring cheetahs across the vast land of the conservancy, taking care of them in bomas (enclosures), and working closely with anti-poaching teams. What the Job Actually Involves The job requirements are fairly standard: applicants must be fluent in English, physically fit, and 'bush-ready", meaning comfortable working in the wild. They should also have experience with Excel and data handling. Knowing Portuguese and Shona is considered a bonus. 'We're Hiring – Full-Time Cheetah Monitor. Join the Panyame Cheetah Project in the heart of wild Mozambique," the post reads. 'We're looking for a committed, hands-on field assistant to live full-time at our remote bush camp and help monitor, track, and care for the cheetahs we've translocated to the Panyame Conservancy. From feeding cheetahs in the bomas to tracking them across 210,000 hectares using telemetry and EarthRanger, this is real conservation in action," the post adds. How the Internet Reacted The post quickly went viral, gathering over 41,000 likes, 64,000 shares, and thousands of comments. However, many social media users misread the job description and took it in a different (and funnier) direction, leading to a flood of hilarious comments. A user joked, 'Do the cheetahs speak English and use Excel, or do I have to train them?" Another joked, 'Do they respond to pspspsps?" People were also curious (and worried) about the fate of the last employee, with comments like, 'What happened to the last employees?" and 'Did the last one get eaten?" An individual joked about the job description's emphasis on physical fitness: 'Physically fit? Do I need to run with them?" Meanwhile, someone else asked, 'Can I take my cheetah home if I'm working from home?" Despite the jokes, the post has caught the world's attention and might just find the brave soul ready to take on this wild role. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.


Indian Express
a day ago
- Indian Express
Bengaluru auto-rickshaw driver calls city ‘first class,' explains Kannada row with grace; says some drunk men create issues
In the midst of growing tensions and social media debates over the use of Marathi and Kannada in parts of Maharashtra and Karnataka, respectively, a heartwarming moment has emerged from Bengaluru, winning hearts online. A video of a candid conversation between a young woman and an auto-rickshaw driver is now going viral for all the right reasons, offering a refreshing counterpoint to the usual narrative of hostility and conflict. The video, shared on Instagram by user Khyati Shree, features her chatting with an auto driver as she tries to learn some basic Kannada phrases. He responds with patience and warmth, and when she asks about the recent spats over language issues in Bengaluru, his reply is disarmingly honest. 'Yeh thoda aadmi log daru wagera peke rehta hai, aisa aisa karke jhagda hota hai,' he says. 'Warna koi problem nahi hai, acche se rehte hai sab… Bengaluru ke andar sab first class hai.' (Some men get drunk and do mischief, otherwise there are no problems. Everything is first class in Bengaluru.) In other words, according to him, most of the so-called issues are blown out of proportion. What looks like anger, he explains, is often 'just frustration,' sometimes triggered by personal stress or alcohol, not any deep-seated animosity. He insists that within the city, people generally live peacefully and with mutual respect. Khyati, who has lived in Karnataka for four months, wrote in the caption that her own experience mirrors the driver's sentiment. Despite reading about ongoing 'Hindi vs Kannada' issues, she said she never faced any problems while traveling across the state, even in remote areas. 'As long as you're respectful, no one cares what language you speak,' she wrote. 'Knowing English definitely helps, but it's more about attitude than language.' A post shared by Khyati Shree (@khyatishree2) The video has struck a chord with many online. One viewer commented, 'Good awareness dear… respect each other… Bangalore people are not that bad! I've been here 25 years and never had any issues.' Another pointed out the importance of privacy in such content, writing, 'You should blur the face in videos like this. People like him deserve to be protected.' One user said, 'Kannadigas are welcoming, but respect must be mutual. If you want to live here, learn Kannada, speak Kannada, and respect Kannada… This is not forcing—it's a natural expectation. Everywhere in the world, people value their language and culture.'