logo
Katy Hessel: 'Everyone has to own their identity'

Katy Hessel: 'Everyone has to own their identity'

Hindustan Times09-05-2025
An art fair where you couldn't find a single work by women artists inspired you to create an Instagram page to showcase artworks by women and also enabled you to write The Story of Art Without Men. This erasure persists. At an all-male retrospective exhibition in January, I asked the curator about the erasure of women artists. Please contextualise why this remains the case.
How good that you noticed and were able to call that out. I think that's what it's about. We've to constantly remind ourselves about representation, and not in a pity sense at all.
It has to be a good, interesting work with a unique perspective. Textile can be a great work. So can be a piece of lace. A quilt can tell an incredible story as can a marble sculpture. Greatness can come in so many different ways. Where I live, in London, you think about what is great art built on. It's the Royal Academy, which was opened in the 18th century, and that very much established hierarchies in art. But who had access to all that? Men! It was almost built to kind of keep the women out. So, these hierarchies that have been built on what's great, they're so boring because if you're not seeing art by a wide range of people, then you're not seeing society as a whole. And you're just missing out on great art.
At the Jaipur Literature Festival, someone asked a question about labels. Though it's crucial, in a way, to do away with labels, we still do not have a level playing field. There is a history of sanitising the artworks of those who are not men. Then, there are the scholarships and grants based on an individual's identity from the margins. So, labels present a unique conundrum here. How do you reconcile with that?
It's like, would I want to be seen as a woman writer? Or would I want to be seen as a writer? I don't mind. But when I say 'a woman writer', to me, it doesn't mean anything derogatory or negative. Whereas in history, it was a derogatory thing. We're seeing this debate because of what we've witnessed. I talk about this, especially in the abstract expressionism chapter of the book that these women would abhor the idea of me putting them in this book because they were told that being a woman was a bad thing. It's not anything less.
Everyone has to own their identity. I own, for one, being a woman writer, but I also own being a writer. I don't want to be a token of sorts. What I mean by doing away with labels is that we shouldn't reduce this to a trend. We have to own all our identities but we must also disrupt, which is why I wrote this book. We need more works to spotlight works by women, nonbinary, and trans artists because they've not been given the space. The statistics prove that. For example, in London, only 1% of the National Gallery is by women artists, so there's a lot of work to be done.
You also say that this book is not the definitive history of art. What's left to be uncovered besides the bit about identity that we discussed?
I've never been to Japan. Or China. Or even a few places in the African continent. Also: I want to go back to a few places, for example, Brazil. That doesn't mean I'm not writing about them. I'm writing about tons of Japanese artists, but it'd have been great to see them for their context. I was in Delhi in January and I met so many artists of my age. I met older, established artists, so it was great to see their work in person and talk to them. It was exciting. I've a little column in the Guardian, and I've written about Ayesha Singh's work. There's always more to be exhumed.
During the consolidation of the works by women, what were the challenges you faced?
Oh, so many. Think about how many books there are on Michelangelo alone or Leonardo da Vinci but how many books there are about 16th and 17th-century women artists from Bologna or Italy or some other place? Hardly any. I was very lucky to stand on the shoulders of a lot of scholars who have come before me and whose works I have championed with my podcast and also with this book. It's very much a sort of collaboration in a way. Sometimes I'd learn that a work has been recently attributed to a woman artist, that sort of a thing one always discovers. We're starved of that knowledge.
What are the new ways of looking and critiquing in the world of art that you are witnessing today?
It's not like these artists [who're being exhumed] never existed. They've always existed. But I think it's about who gets to write art history, who gets to curate the shows, who gets to collect the art, who gets to support the artists.
I think that's changing. And that's important because the more people we have talking behind the scenes, the more that it's going to change because the artist's job is to make art. I'm not the artist. I'm there to facilitate.
What was the one discovery you made during your research that blew your mind.
My favourite is the Metropolitan Museum of Art story. In 1917, the Met in New York bought a painting for $200,000 when it was under the impression that it was by the neoclassical artist, Jacques-Louis David (1748–1825). And then decades later, they found out it was actually by a woman, Marie-Denise Villers. Would they have paid the same price tag? I don't know. But it definitely makes one curious about it.
If we're talking about the valuation of art, what immediately comes to mind is the $120,000 Art Basel Banana, titled Comedian. There's a group that says it was not about a banana and duct tape, but the concept; then, there's the other faction that says that it's bizarre.
I mean, I see both sides of [Maurizio] Cattelan's work. I think he's making a critique of the world that we live in and what the art market has become. In a way, what is art if not holding up a mirror to the world that you live in? That's one thing. I think it's clever to do that, this artwork. But I also think that it's complicated. You spend that much money and for what purpose? For what status? Is it for the purpose of art history? Or for the purpose of something else? I don't know. The value of art is a very complex, unregulated thing. I think maybe people's intentions aren't always something that is actually going to be exciting or progressive. If anything, it's actually just a bit boring.
Saurabh Sharma is a Delhi-based writer and freelance journalist. They can be found on Instagram/X: @writerly_life.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why do women reject men so brutally? It's kinder than breadcrumbing
Why do women reject men so brutally? It's kinder than breadcrumbing

The Print

time9 hours ago

  • The Print

Why do women reject men so brutally? It's kinder than breadcrumbing

Nobody approaches anyone at clubs or parties. Gen Z prefers being ghosted on dating apps to the sting of a real-life 'no'. Some of us share the crests and troughs of our lives with strangers on not less than two to three apps, only to be unmatched mid-trauma dump—because they found someone hotter in the queue. Then there are the masochists who get into situationships. They get rejected by the same person every day. Now, that is commitment. Just ask anyone who's hit their daily 'like' limit on Hinge, only to be met with silence—five swipes, zero matches, and a bruised ego. For instant healing, you aggressively swipe left on everyone who liked you. But don't quote me on that, I will deny everything. Romantic rejection is a rite of passage, and everyone's either a victim or a villain. Online dating was designed to dodge it at all costs. But—surprise, surprise—it only gave rejection a software update. The new-age dating scene thrives on polite confusion. The painful clarity of 'I don't like you' is replaced with the more gutting 'I don't like you… enough'. There's always one person in a casual relationship burning the midnight oil for a boyfriend or girlfriend title, only to be slapped with a friend-with-benefits role, or a weekend hookup appointment. It's rejection in layers, or you can call it death by a thousand paper cuts. Grieving online Cultural critics blame the dating apps for the growing fear of rejection among Gen Z and for relationships that feel like an elaborate humiliation ritual. Content creators and dating experts on Instagram post carousels on how to rise above rejection. It's not you, it's them—that's the basic TED talk. Daters are advised to take it as a blessing, a redirection to better things. Because there are now a million ways someone can reject you, the online good Samaritans are also helping people read hidden signs in vague text messages and silent body language. Psychologists, on the other hand, are diagnosing people with rejection sensitivity dysphoria—a condition where rejections feel catastrophic. In simple therapy speak, the only treatment is 'healing your inner child'. The Jesus fanbase is spreading its own propaganda: 'So what he doesn't want you? God loves you.' To fact-check this claim, you must reach out to the press office in heaven. On the unhinged side—aka the interesting one—the discourse takes a juicier turn. The advice you get there sounds petty, but it works like a charm. Reject them before they reject you. Switch off the blue tick on WhatsApp, so you never know at what point you were ghosted. Always go for people uglier than you, so there's less risk of disappointment. 'People who are both job hunting and swiping on dating apps are burning the stick of dynamite at both ends,' read one tweet. Someone replied: 'I've been thinking about and then deciding not to even try to redownload a dating app every few days while I've been job hunting because I can only handle so much rejection at once.' Trust us to not suffer quietly through the pangs of unrequited love. We grieve online—via cryptic captions, sad girl playlists, and 20-minute voicenotes to our besties. Some of us even descend into the digital underworld of subtweets and AITA threads to roast our former flings. 'I gave the ugly guy a chance and he had the gall to block me,' one post read. It's still healthier than how some people handle rejection. Also read: Romance has the urgency of breaking news now. Dating apps are editorial fodder Danger: Rejections ahead While nobody takes rejection well, newspaper headlines reveal that it turns men into murderers, stalkers, and rapists. A 27-year-old chartered accountant said she blames her 'strict landlord' every time she wants to tell a man she can't bring him home after a lousy first date. This is not to rob women of their own predatory, pushy streak. Convinced of their fairy-like qualities, some of them can't digest that a man can reject them. Raanjhanaa's Kundan looks like a noob chaser compared to them. A Delhi-based man snubbed his one-night stand at least 20 times, and yet she wouldn't give up hounding him online and offline. She'd crash every party thrown by their mutual friends, just to grill him about why he won't return her calls. Worried about being bad-mouthed, the man caved and went on one more date with her. She didn't have fun that day, so she told him to never text her again. Love may be dead, but audacity lives on. Men also frequently call out women for being brutal in the way they reject them. The memes start with 'Worst she can say is no' and end with a punchline that would scar a person for life. In a viral text exchange doing rounds on social media, a guy asks a girl to clarify if he's her lover, sidepiece, friend, etc. She replies, 'Etc.' Who would survive this? In our defence, women say it's better to destroy someone in one blow than keep them hanging for months. 'I refuse to act like men who give breadcrumbs of affection for months till the other person takes the hint,' said a serial rejecter working in finance. The delivery is savage, but the intention is often mercy. Rejection has wrecked some people to the point that they've taken the involuntary celibacy route. Thanks to desi matrimony, not everyone will die single. Our parents are more than happy to take over the burden—and get rejected on our behalf. You can't pay me enough to take that route. I've spent enough on therapy to know I'm not everyone's cup of tea—and that's fine. This article is part of a series of columns on modern dating in India—the good, the bad and the cuddly. Views are personal. The author tweets @ratanpriya4. (Edited by Prasanna Bachchhav)

Indian man praises Netherlands' civic sense as authorities plan to fix minor road bumps near his home
Indian man praises Netherlands' civic sense as authorities plan to fix minor road bumps near his home

Hindustan Times

time12 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Indian man praises Netherlands' civic sense as authorities plan to fix minor road bumps near his home

An Indian man residing in the Netherlands has captured the attention of social media users after he posted a heartwarming video showing his appreciation for the country's proactive governance. Prabhu Visha, the man behind the viral clip, took to Instagram to share a short video of himself skating down a smooth stretch of road near his home, accompanied by a powerful message about civic responsibility and inclusiveness. A video went viral after an Indian man admired the Dutch government's plan to repair small road flaws.(Instagram/prabhuvisha) (Also read: Dutch princess attends graduation ceremony but doesn't receive diploma because…) 'Even small bumps matter here' The video opens with Prabhu gliding effortlessly on his skates. Overlaid on the clip is a simple but striking statement: 'This is why I believe the Netherlands truly cares for its people.' In the caption, Prabhu reflects on a recent experience that left him deeply impressed with the Dutch system. 'Coming from India, this honestly felt so beautiful to me. Near my home in the Netherlands, there were some small bumps on the road. For me, the road was already perfect. But then we got a letter from the government explaining they will fix it – with details of why, when, where and how,' he wrote. He added, 'It's possible some people complained about it, and that's why they're fixing it. But still, it's amazing that they listen and act. Even small bumps matter here – for pregnant women, people biking with kids, or the elderly. Seriously, hats off to this government for their inclusion and communication. This is what it means to work for the people and with the people. I wish every country cared for its people like this.' Take a look here at the video: Internet reacts with admiration The post struck a chord with viewers and prompted a wave of praise in the comments section. One user remarked, 'This is what public service should look like – listening and acting swiftly.' Another commented, 'I wish our local officials showed even half this level of concern.' A third wrote, 'This gives me hope that good governance still exists somewhere.' Others chimed in with admiration, calling the Dutch approach 'inspiring' and 'the gold standard in civic management.' One user noted, 'The fact they even explain why they're fixing something already better than most countries!'

Bengaluru auto driver's honest take on Hindi-Kannada row delights Internet. Watch video
Bengaluru auto driver's honest take on Hindi-Kannada row delights Internet. Watch video

India Today

timea day ago

  • India Today

Bengaluru auto driver's honest take on Hindi-Kannada row delights Internet. Watch video

A video of a woman chatting with a Bengaluru auto-rickshaw driver about language tensions prevailing in the city has gone viral. The reason, you may ask, is the driver's grounded reply. The clip, shared by Khyati Shree on Instagram, shows her trying to pick up basic Kannada phrases during the ride. The auto driver not only helps her patiently but also addresses the often-discussed 'Hindi vs Kannada' debate with disarming thoda aadmi ka problem hain, aisa aisa karke jhagda hota hai. Warna koi problem nahi hai, acche se rehte hai sab Bengaluru ke andar sab first class hai,' he says, implying that most language-related confrontations stem from personal frustration, not deep-rooted hostility. According to him, life in the city is peaceful and people generally get along well. Khyati seconded that thought in her caption. 'I've stayed in Karnataka for four months and travelled beyond Bengaluru. I've never faced any issues about language. I interacted with countless auto and cab drivers, locals, and ate at many places; no one cared if I spoke Hindi, as long as I was polite,' she further shared that despite reading about language clashes, her personal experience had been quite the opposite. 'Before travelling to coastal Karnataka, I was anxious about facing angry drivers. But that never happened. Knowing English helps, but it's more about how you behave,' she said. It's her second time in the city, and she added that 'the vibes are still nice.'Watch the video here: View this post on Instagram A post shared by Khyati Shree (@khyatishree2)Instagram users had a lot to say about the viral video. A user, who claimed to have lived in Bengaluru for 25 years, wrote, 'People here aren't bad. They only react when provoked. Never faced any language issue myself.'Another user called the city 'a vibe' and praised how it welcomes of the users, however, added a reminder: 'Respect goes both ways. Learn a few Kannada phrases - it makes locals happy. You wouldn't expect people to speak Hindi in Japan or China, would you?'While the internet often amplifies conflict, this video came as a much-needed reality check for all of us. Maybe, sometimes, all it takes is patience, politeness, and a little effort to understand each other.- EndsTrending Reel

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store