
There is no safe amount of processed meat to eat, according to new research
Researchers analyzed data from more than 60 previous studies on the relationship between processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages and trans fatty acids in a person's diet and their risk of type 2 diabetes, colorectal cancer and ischemic heart disease, which reduces blood supply to the heart and cuts off oxygen and nutrients, according to the study published Monday in the journal Nature Medicine.
'Habitual consumption of even small amounts of processed meat, sugary drinks, and trans fatty acids is linked to increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes, ischemic heart disease and colorectal cancer,' said lead author of the study, Dr. Demewoz Haile, a research scientist at the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation in Seattle.
The data showed that people who ate as little as one hot dog a day when it comes to processed meats had an 11% greater risk of type 2 diabetes and a 7% increased risk of colorectal cancer than those who didn't eat any. And drinking the equivalent of about a 12-ounce soda per day was associated with an 8% increase in type 2 diabetes risk and a 2% increased risk of ischemic heart disease.
'This current research has shown, yet again and consistent with prior research … that to achieve health gains it is best to avoid or minimize the habitual consumption of each of processed meat, sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and industrially produced trans fatty acids (TFAs),' said Dr. Nita Forouhi, head of nutritional epidemiology at the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. She was not involved in the research.
The risk increased as consumption increased; and for processed meat consumption, the data showed that there is no 'safe amount,' she added in an email.
At first glance, the increase in risk seems modest and might look like the association is weak, said Dr. Mingyang Song, associate professor of clinical epidemiology and nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan Schoo of Public Healthl. He was not involved in the research.
'When we look at the actual data there, it's really remarkably consistent and remarkably strong, and even in the lower dose of consumption, we can still see an increased risk of disease,' he said.
The researchers examined dozens of earlier findings on diet and disease using a burden-of-proof method: a newer form of meta-analysis that not only tries to quantify an association across multiple studies but also accounts for the quality of each, Song said. 'One caveat is it tends to give very conservative results,' he added.
It's also important to note that the studies included in the analysis were observational, meaning that the data can only show an association between eating habits and disease –– not prove that what people ate caused the disease. They also relied on people recalling their dietary patterns, which can leave room for misremembering or misreporting, said Dr. Gunter Kuhnle, professor of nutrition and food science at the University of Reading in the United Kingdom. He was not involved in the study.
Utilizing even 'the most sophisticated techniques does not really solve the problem that the information about diet is rather limited – which is obviously a big problem in nutritional epidemiology in general,' he said.
There are many reasons why such foods could be associated with health problems. Sugar-sweetened beverages and processed meat –– such as sausages, bacon, salami and burgers –– can increase inflammation, which plays a big part in a variety of chronic diseases, Song said.
Processed meats are also often cured with nitrite, which is converted to carcinogenic nitrosamines in the stomach, Kuhnle said.
The problem with sugary drinks is that they are a quick way to consume large amounts of sugar, he added. Not only can that cause weight gain, but it also influences metabolic pathways that affect heart disease and diabetes risk, Kuhnle said.
Trans fatty acids reduce levels of good cholesterol and increase the bad, which is known to increase the risk of plaque buildup in arteries and heart disease, he added.
Other potential connections to consider are that people who are more likely to eat processed meats, sugar-sweetened beverages and trans-fats are often also at a higher risk of diseases because of 'lifestyle factors (smoking, lack of exercise), but also social factors such as education and income, chronic stress and limited access to health care,' Kuhnle said. 'It is very difficult to take these apart.'
Although the data can't say reducing your consumption of these foods and drinks will cause a lower risk of the diseases, it does suggest that a reduction is a good idea, Song said.
A sensible approach is to follow a varied and balanced diet that avoids excess, Kuhnle said.
That means people who drink a lot of sugary drinks should cut back, he said. It can also be helpful to avoid excess amounts of processed meats and avoid hydrogenated fats where possible –– although they are no longer as common as they used to be, he said.
'The goal shouldn't be perfection but rather a healthy and sensible dietary pattern that allows room for enjoyment,' Kuhnle said.
A good diet isn't just about what to avoid. It's also important to get good nutrients, Forouhi said. 'Wider research has shown us that overall dietary patterns that include higher consumption of fruit and vegetables, whole grains, legumes, nuts and fermented dairy products like yogurt are good for health and longevity,' she said.
'My general advice: don't panic,' Kuhnle said in an email. 'Food is not just (a) source of nutrients –– it plays a central role in culture, pleasure, family life, and social connection. Reducing it solely to a list of health risks misses the bigger picture.'
Sign up for CNN's Eat, But Better: Mediterranean Style. Our eight-part guide shows you a delicious expert-backed eating lifestyle that will boost your health for life.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Text therapy: study finds couples who use emojis in text messages feel closer
The secret to a good relationship may be staring smartphone users in the face. A new study published in the journal Plos One found that using emojis in text messages makes people feel closer and more satisfied in their personal lives. Related: Emoji dumping: how to say it's over when you can't be bothered with words Researchers at the University of Texas spoke to 260 people aged between 23 and 67 and asked them to read 15 text message exchanges that varied only in the presence or absence of emojis. Participants were instructed to imagine themselves as the sender of each message while focusing on the recipient's replies to evaluate responsiveness, likability, closeness and relationship satisfaction. The study revealed that people who send emojis combined with text are seen to be more responsive in their relationships than people who send text alone. It also found emojis serve as nonverbal cues that signal attentiveness and emotional engagement. Luke McGregor, 42, and Amy Thunig-McGregor, 37, say being able to use emojis helps their family communicate better. Luke said he wasn't a regular emoji sender at the start of their relationship and had to learn to start incorporating them into text messages to Amy. 'I traditionally didn't use emojis that much but when I first got [together] with Amy, I noticed them using them a lot, so there was a vulnerability or a hurdle I had to get over to start using them myself,' McGregor said. 'I wanted Amy to know that they were loved, and so to become a regular sender of emojis to Amy in order to communicate affection was at least initially a big deal for me.' Amy said emojis were a good tool to enhance their communication. 'We're both autistic as well for context … it helps us really be clear with tone and intention in a way that isn't possible with just written text,' they said. Senior lecturer in psychology at Central Queensland University Dr Raquel Peel, who was not involved in the study, said sending emojis can be a creative alternative when people are unable to see their partner face to face. 'I don't think we can replace face-to-face interactions because we are talking about intimate partnerships and relationships, but we have to be realistic that this isn't always possible,' Peel said. 'So if you can't meet face to face with your partner for whatever reason staying connected is important. 'Using emojis is then an effective alternative.' Her advice was to not underestimate the value of communication in a relationship and to always try and stay connected to your partner in whatever way you communicate. 'One thing that people also forget when I'm talking to them about relationships is the value of humour and having a bit of fun,' Peel said. 'So if emojis can serve a purpose that way, which we know they can, it adds to the element of fun and connection through humour and that is really important.'
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Why Your Nervous System Might Be at War With Modern Life
A viral TikTok video is striking a deep chord with viewers who say it perfectly explains why they're exhausted, anxious, and burned out. The message? It's not just you—your nervous system may be in survival mode all the time. Brittany Piper, a 36-year-old Somatic Experiencing® practitioner and author of Body-First Healing, posted a video in March that's now racked up nearly half a million views. In it, she argues that our modern lives are fundamentally out of sync with what the human body—and especially the nervous system—was built to handle. 'It is my personal and professional belief that the drastic rise we are seeing in chronic physical and mental illness can be attributed to this one thing,' Piper says. 'We have created a world that our nervous system no longer wants to live in.' Piper compares the nervous system to a security alarm, constantly scanning for danger. In our fast-paced, hyper-connected world, it's often triggered, not just by traumatic events, but by everyday stressors like digital overload, political division, economic uncertainty, and social disconnection. The result? Our bodies stay locked in survival states like fight, flight, freeze, or shutdown, flooding us with cortisol and adrenaline. She told Newsweek that this ongoing activation can lead to anxiety, fatigue, pain, and other chronic issues. 'Many of the symptoms we face today at alarming rates,' she said, 'are not random symptoms, but the body's intelligent responses to overwhelm.' Piper's video has struck a nerve with thousands of viewers who say they've been desperate for answers, and her explanation finally makes sense of what they've been feeling. Her advice? Healing doesn't mean pushing harder. It means slowing down, grounding yourself, and building awareness of what your body is trying to tell you. Piper suggests starting with small actions: feel your feet on the ground, notice your breath, or identify something comforting in your environment. These steps, she says, can build a sense of internal safety and help regulate the nervous system. 'Healing is less about doing more,' Piper adds, 'and more about doing less, with more attunement.' As conversations around mental health, trauma, and somatic therapy gain mainstream traction, Piper's viral theory offers both validation and a practical path forward, especially for those who feel like they're stuck in overdrive. Why Your Nervous System Might Be at War With Modern Life first appeared on Men's Journal on Jul 5, 2025
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Justice Department's $15 Billion Crackdown Hits 22 Houston Fraud Cases
(Texas Scorecard) – As part of the U.S. Department of Justice's crackdown on healthcare fraud, more than a dozen individuals from the Houston-area have been charged. Nationwide, 321 individuals have been charged with multiple healthcare-related crimes, including wire fraud, bribery, and other fraudulent schemes. In total, the DOJ uncovered nearly $15 billion in fraudulent claims, and the United States has seized over $245 million in cash, luxury vehicles, and other assets in connection with the takedown. Attorney General Pam Bondi commented on the operation, stating: 'This record-setting health care fraud takedown delivers justice to criminal actors who prey upon our most vulnerable citizens and steal from hardworking American taxpayers. Make no mistake – this administration will not tolerate criminals who line their pockets with taxpayer dollars while endangering the health and safety of our communities.' According to the DOJ, 22 cases were announced Monday in Houston alone. These cases involve a wide array of healthcare fraud schemes, including unlawful distribution of controlled substances—some of which ended up on the black market—along with hospice fraud, kickbacks, and Medicare/Medicaid scams involving unnecessary genetic testing, durable medical equipment, and more. Among the most notable cases are Dera Ogudo (39) and Victoria Martinez (35), both of Richmond, who are accused of running a hospice facility that billed Medicare and Medicaid for end-of-life care while deceiving patients into believing they were receiving standard palliative or in-home services. Ogudo also allegedly paid bribes and kickbacks to Dr. Carlos Munoz, who certified patients for hospice care. The total fraud scheme is estimated at $110 million, with Munoz allegedly receiving over $300,000. Keilan Peterson and Kimberly Martinez of Houston have been charged with their alleged roles in a cash-for-prescriptions scheme operating through Relief Medical Center and GroveCare clinics. According to the indictment, Peterson paid three licensed physicians to give him, Martinez, and other clinic staff access to their electronic prescribing credentials. This allowed them to issue a high volume of prescriptions for controlled substances—including hydrocodone, carisoprodol, and oxycodone—without legitimate medical need. The indictment further alleges that Peterson funneled a portion of these prescriptions to his own business, Next Level Pharmacy, where he obtained the drugs and redistributed them illegally on the black market. In total, Peterson and his associates are accused of issuing more than two million pills, most of which were dispensed without medical justification and outside accepted professional standards. Dr. David Jenson, a podiatrist based in The Woodlands, and his business partner, Nestor Rafael Romero Magallanes, were charged with 14 counts of healthcare fraud for allegedly billing Medicare for expensive bioengineered skin grafts intended for chronic wound treatment. The pair allegedly received over $45 million in reimbursements. Brandy Williams, a Houston pharmacy owner, is accused of paying kickbacks to an unnamed podiatrist in exchange for unnecessary prescription referrals. Her pharmacy reportedly received over $4 million through the scheme. Tyneza Mitchell, a licensed nurse practitioner, allegedly received $2.1 million in Medicaid reimbursements for COVID-era treatments that were never provided. Chad Harper of Pearland is accused of using shell companies to pay bribes and kickbacks to marketers who generated business for his laboratories. The indictment claims Harper was reimbursed around $73 million by Medicare. Rami Abunakira, a Richmond resident involved with a lab in Dallas, is charged with billing Medicare $33.5 million for unnecessary genetic testing. Mahmood Sami Kahn and Suhaib Ahmad Chaudry, two Houston men charged in Illinois, are accused of masterminding a fraudulent COVID-19 testing operation. The pair allegedly manipulated labs in Texas and Illinois to submit false claims through a federal reimbursement program, receiving over $293 million, which they then laundered through multiple bank accounts. Kahn is also charged with wire fraud. U.S. Attorney Nicholas J. Ganjei responded to the sweeping operation: 'Americans rely on Medicare for needed treatments and life-saving care. Those [who] bilk this fund to unlawfully enrich themselves are ultimately stealing from the taxpayer and damaging public confidence in our health system. Today's takedown is a reminder to would-be medical fraudsters that the Department of Justice is always standing guard over the public fisc.'