Charlie Kirk calls Mamdani the 'campus riot' candidate, warns he's a preview of Democratic Party's future
Kirk called the democratic socialist's victory in last week's Democratic primary a "wake-up call" that, despite President Donald Trump's decisive victory in the 2024 election, "the radical left is not going away."
"The things he wants to do are so outrageous. They're so dangerous," Kirk told Fox News Digital in an interview Tuesday. "They are on a descent, honestly, that would make New York closer to a third world city. And that pains me because I love New York.
"But we must understand, though, that he fundamentally was able to build a coalition around economics. And there are a lot of people that are suffering economically right now. And when you have an economy that we inherited from Joe Biden - I believe Donald Trump is fixing it - that is not working, that is disordered, then you get radical politics as a result."
Among the far-left stances Mamdani has campaigned on include government-run grocery stores, free childcare, fare-free buses, raising taxes on the wealthy and slashing police funding. He has also promised not to cooperate with the Trump administration's efforts by ICE to deport illegal immigrants.
The conservative influencer believes Mamdani's rise was cultivated on New York's college campuses and by the unrest fueled by young voters in recent years.
"The sentiment towards the West is hyper-radicalized in a negative direction if you look at where a lot of these students are educated," Kirk said. "What happens on college campuses in New York will soon happen in City Hall. It's a very important thing. The college campuses are a leading indicator to City Hall. On one side, we see the Columbia protests for now nearly two years. And now all of a sudden people say, 'Where did this Mamdani guy come from?' Well, guys, you had the Columbia protest and the NYU protest and the encampments all over New York City that is going to express itself politically. And Mamdani is the encampment candidate. He is the campus riot protest candidate."
"Sometimes people think, 'Oh, what happens on college campuses is isolated, that it is just its own community.' No, it's a leading indicator, it's the canary in the coal mine, it's a harbinger, it is a signal of things to come."
Mamdani migrated to New York City when he was seven after being born in Uganda and living in South Africa. While he didn't attend Columbia or NYU, when he attended Bowdoin College in Maine, he was the co-founder of the college's chapter of Students for Justice in Palestine.
The 33-year-old New York state assembly member has been making headlines over his refusal to condemn the anti-Israel slogan "globalize the intifada" and his previous vow to have Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu arrested if he visits New York City.
While he thinks it's too soon to brand Mamdani as the face of the Democratic Party, Kirk does believe Mamdani represents the party's "socialist" base, which he traced to the 2016 presidential run of Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders.
"We have been dealing with a corporate Democrat Party, which is still very radical. But it's nowhere near the AOCs, the Bernie Sanders, the Ilhan Omars, the Rashida Tlaibs, the Brandon Johnsons, the Karen Basses," Kirk said. "And now we are starting to see that radical base rise to the surface.
"You are going to see hundreds of Mamdani-type candidates throughout the country pop up on city council, in mayors races, state representatives, Congress, senators. Mamdani is a preview of more to come in the Democrat Party."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
16 minutes ago
- CBS News
Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority strikes down 176-year-old abortion ban
The Wisconsin Supreme Court's liberal majority struck down the state's 176-year-old abortion ban on Wednesday, ruling 4-3 that it was superseded by a newer state law that criminalizes abortions only after a fetus can survive outside the womb. State lawmakers adopted the ban in 1849, making it a felony when anyone other than the mother "intentionally destroys the life of an unborn child." It was in effect until 1973, when the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark Roe v. Wade decision legalizing abortion nationwide nullified it. Legislators never officially repealed the ban, however, and conservatives argued that the U.S. Supreme Court's 2022 decision to overturn Roe reactivated it. Wisconsin Attorney General Josh Kaul, a Democrat, filed a lawsuit that year arguing that the ban was trumped by abortion restrictions legislators enacted during the nearly half-century that Roe was in effect. Kaul specifically cited a 1985 law that essentially permits abortions until viability. Some babies can survive with medical help after 21 weeks of gestation. Sheboygan County District Attorney Joel Urmanski, a Republican, defended the ban in court, arguing that the 1849 ban could coexist with the newer abortion restrictions, just as different penalties for the same crime coexist. Dane County Circuit Judge Diane Schlipper ruled in 2023 that the 1849 ban outlaws feticide — which she defined as the killing of a fetus without the mother's consent — but not consensual abortions. Abortions have been available in the state since that ruling but the state Supreme Court decision gives providers and patients more certainty that abortions will remain legal in Wisconsin. Urmanski asked the state Supreme Court to overturn Schlipper's ruling without waiting for a decision from a lower appellate court. It was expected as soon as the justices took the case that they would overturn the ban. Liberals hold a 4-3 majority on the court and one of them, Janet Protasiewicz, openly stated on the campaign trail that she supports abortion rights. Democratic-backed Susan Crawford defeated conservative Brad Schimel for an open seat on the court in April, ensuring liberals will maintain their 4-3 edge until at least 2028. Crawford has not been sworn in yet and was not part of Wednesday's ruling. She'll play pivotal role, though, in a separate Planned Parenthood of Wisconsin lawsuit challenging the 1849 ban's constitutionality. The high court decided last year to take that case. It's still pending.
Yahoo
20 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Fact check: Medicaid cuts for immigrants in Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill'
(NewsNation) — The White House has posted a 'mythbuster' fact sheet defending its proposed Medicaid changes in President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' — but is it accurate? The nearly 1,000-page megabill outlines the removal of 'at least 1.4 million' immigrants who are in the United States unlawfully from Medicaid, the administration said. According to the White House, doing so would strengthen Medicaid for 'the American citizens for whom the program was designed — pregnant women, children, people with disabilities, low-income seniors, and other vulnerable low-income families.' That's not entirely true. No, immigrants who have entered and remained in the U.S. illegally are not eligible for Medicaid. Although they might benefit from some of its services — including emergency care — they aren't eligible for federally funded Medicaid coverage. The Congressional Budget Office and research organizations such as the Kaiser Family Foundation and Georgetown University's McCourt School of Public Policy corroborate these restrictions. Trump-Musk feud reignites over the 'big, beautiful bill' The White House's 1.4 million estimate appears to refer to those with questionable immigration status who will lose coverage due to reductions in state health care programs currently providing them with assistance. These programs are funded by the states, not through federal Medicaid dollars. Some emergency services provided by hospitals are available to people lacking a Medicaid-eligible immigration status. Services include 'those requiring immediate attention to prevent death, serious harm or disability, although states have some discretion to determine reimbursable services,' according to the KFF. 5 takeaways as Senate ships Trump's megabill to House The foundation estimated emergency care for undocumented patients accounted for less than 1% of Medicaid spending from 2017 to 2023. Trump and most congressional Republicans claim the reductions aren't true cuts, arguing that no one who should be on Medicaid will lose benefits. 'We're cutting $1.7 trillion in this bill, and you're not going to feel any of it,' Trump said at the White House last week. 5 takeaways as Senate ships Trump's megabill to House But experts and health advocates say a recent CBO analysis confirms that despite Trump's repeated pledges to only cut waste, fraud and abuse in Medicaid, the legislation would enact an unprecedented reduction in the program currently used by more than 70 million low-income Americans. 'This bill isn't being crafted to improve health care in America, or to improve the Medicaid program, or to improve the [ACA]. The purpose of these cuts in the bill is to try to find savings to pay for tax cuts,' said Andrea Ducas, vice president of health policy at the Democratic-aligned Center for American Progress. NewsNation partner The Hill contributed to this report. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Bloomberg
21 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Bessent Advisor Says Tariffs Could Bring in $300 Billion
Joseph Lavorgna, counselor to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, says 10-12 countries are close to reaching a new trade deal with the US and about another 20 are negotiating in good faith. He talks about the potential revenue from tariffs and the strength of the US dollar on "Bloomberg Surveillance." (Source: Bloomberg)
