I Love an Old Pair of Shoes I Purchased Years Ago. I Asked AI to Find Me a Similar Style
But some styles are timeless, and you'll want to replace them when they've seen too many red wine spills or look a little weathered. The world of fashion moves faster than a Tinder swipe. Maybe artificial intelligence can help locate links to the original item sold elsewhere, or find a similar look.
If AI can help find the best deals online, be used as a shopping assistant and even as a personal assistant, maybe it can help replace my gorgeous pair of heels that I can't find anywhere.
With ChatGPT Search, I can upload a photo of my shoes, and it can search the internet for shopping links -- like a Google reverse image search on steroids. There's even specific AI shoe finder GPTs I could test out.
(Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)
Can ChatGPT magically find my favorite heels from a photo?
The first step was to take a few photos of my beloved shoes from different angles, making sure to capture the brand name. I bought these shoes close to a decade ago, when I was still living in Australia.
I made sure to snap any defining features and codes, like a sticker that miraculously stayed on the sole through just about every terrain -- grass, gravel, pavement and floorboards.
Next, I opened up ChatGPT, logged in and uploaded four photos with this prompt: "This is an old pair of shoes I love. I want to replace them with either the same item or something similar. I'm a US size 8. The code on the sole is 8M/38½. Here are four photos of the heels."
I made sure to select the Web Search button.
ChatGPT / Screenshot by CNET
It gave me some identifying information in order to help me direct my own Google search, but I wanted it to do it for me. The point was to save time using AI.
ChatGPT / Screenshot by CNET
I responded with this prompt: "Can you search the internet for links to the exact item?"
ChatGPT sourced a bunch of links with resale items and suggested I set up an alert using specific terms like "Lucky Brand Bertel black suede 8M."
While it didn't provide the specific product link, I liked being able to sort through the resale pages to see similar styles too.
ChatGPT / Screenshot by CNET
Before I get deep into online thrifting mode on eBay, I asked ChatGPT to find five new styles that are similar, either from Lucky Brand or the others mentioned.
This was fun! I learned that this product is a block-heel suede look, which is helpful to know for whenever I need to do my own searches:
ChatGPT / Screenshot by CNET
ChatGPT / Screenshot by CNET
My only critique so far is I'm not familiar with some of the stores ChatGPT provided links to. I wasn't sure if it was just pulling from eBay and unknown websites because it was trying to find resale items.
ChatGPT / Screenshot by CNET
So, I asked it to search sites that I'd usually buy shoes from, like DSW and Nordstrom.
It came back with direct links to these websites with the search pre-populated as "Lucky Brand" or "women's block heel sandals." This saved me some searching time, taking me straight to things like this Nordstrom page:
ChatGPT / Screenshot by CNET
It suggested Marshalls/TJ Maxx, which I had forgotten in my previous prompt. I liked the recommendations it gave, such as a specific style for comfort or for a higher heel. It also provided tips on when these brands typically run sales.
ChatGPT found me two heels I loved, but one was sold out:
ChatGPT / Screenshot by CNET
I found another two pairs of Lucky Brand finds from the links ChatGPT provided, only to discover they weren't even my size, even though I included that in my prompt:
ChatGPT / Screenshot by CNET
It was also interesting how the model didn't add any links from the Lucky Brand site itself, only third-party sellers. Always back up your ChatGPT activity with your own manual research.
AI chatbots can be a handy tool to get fashion advice, outfit recommendations, product comparisons and insights about your personal style. However, for online shopping, you're better off going directly to the brands and sites you love.
That's the fun part anyway.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
12 minutes ago
- Android Authority
I've used Pixel and Galaxy phones for a decade, and Google wins in one aspect every time
Robert Triggs / Android Authority I've been using smartphones since 2011, and they've all been Samsung and Google devices (aside from a few other brands due to my job). Both companies have come a long way over the years, and while the S24 Ultra is my phone of choice for now, that may soon change for one reason. Pixels and Galaxy phones each have their strengths and weaknesses, but one thing I've always found Google is best at is customer support, while Samsung has more reliable devices. As I think back on my experience with both, I've started to reevaluate which of those things is more important to me. Do I want a phone that's less likely to be a problem and accept that it'll be a fight if something does go wrong, or the inverse? How has your customer support experience been? 0 votes Samsung: Good NaN % Samsung: Bad NaN % Google: Good NaN % Google: Bad NaN % Galaxy phones have held up well, but foldables make it complicated Eric Zeman / Android Authority I've owned a lot of Samsung phones over the years. I started with the Galaxy S2 and S4, and then after a dip into the Google ecosystem, I've had the Galaxy S10 Plus and every Ultra from the S20 to the S24 series and a smattering of foldable review units. Of the eight Galaxy phones I've personally owned, only one has had an issue. Being in the UK, I've had to endure my fair share of Exynos-powered phones, and my S20 Ultra was by far the worst, suffering from an unfortunate failure in the summer of 2020. It got so hot during a video call with my then-fiancé that it cooked its motherboard. Samsung covered this on warranty, so I didn't have to pay for any repairs, but the process was a joke. Samsung has a repair-at-all-costs policy in the UK, causing considerable delays of weeks before I get my phone back. Samsung has a repair-at-all-costs policy in the UK. Because of that, my S20 Ultra was gone for six weeks while they replaced the motherboard, two of the rear cameras, the battery, and the rear glass, which cracked during removal. Replacing the phone would've been much simpler, but Samsung insisted on repairing it. To make matters worse, the phone got lost in shipping for another week. In total, I was without my phone for nearly two months. The experiences get worse when we look at my wife's phones. She's had the Z Flip 4, 5, and 6, and so far, only the latter has endured a full year with no more than an in-store screen protector change. Zac Kew-Denniss / Android Authority The Flip 4 had an unfortunate encounter with our fish tank, so I arranged a repair through our Samsung Care policy. Due to Samsung's insistence on repairing rather than replacing, the phone was initially gone for five weeks, during which time it had its motherboard, screen, hinge, frame, rear glass, and all of its cameras replaced. The only part of the phone that stayed the same was the cover display. The issues began when the phone came back. My wife was at work, so I started the phone up, intending to sign in for her and restore her data so she could switch back to it during her lunch break. Imagine my surprise when the phone defaulted to French out of the box and said 'Z Flip 4 Maison Margiela Edition' on the bootloader. That was a special black and white version of the phone, only sold in France, and the device in my hand was still Bora Purple. The phone was a mess once I got it started, with constant UI crashes, warnings, and an OS build several months old, with the software update screen not working. I called Samsung and learned that the repair center had flashed the wrong software build onto the phone after it was repaired, and I would need to send it off to be reflashed. A simple software flash sounds like something that could be done quickly, but it was gone for another three weeks. If I'm being realistic, those two instances aren't that bad. My S20 Ultra repair was in the middle of the pandemic, which certainly would have contributed to the longer wait. With the Z Flip 4, mistakes do happen in isolated instances. Unfortunately, things only got worse the following year with the Z Flip 5. Zac Kew-Denniss / Android Authority It's been over a year, and my blood still boils whenever I think about it. Aside from the Flip 4 that slept with the fishes, my wife and I baby our phones. They are always protected by a case and screen protector, and we take them out of those cases for a thorough cleaning at least once a week. But in February 2024, the Flip 5 died. It had never been dropped or banged, but the screen destroyed itself. The culprit? One of the rubber seals at the side of the display, along the hinge, came loose and got caught in the hinge mechanism. Claiming a component is 'engineered not to fail' on a foldable and asking me to pay full-price to repair it is a joke. Rather than send the phone away, we took it to a Samsung Store. The employee inspected the device and then told us that while it was clear the phone was in pristine condition, we'd need to pay for the repair. According to Samsung's repair guide for the Z Flip 5, that component was 'engineered not to fail.' Last time I checked, most things aren't engineered to fail, but it sometimes happens anyway. Thankfully, our Samsung Care plan meant it cost £90 rather than the full repair cost, but even so, this was a low blow. Pixels break, but Google cares My experience with Google devices has been the opposite. I've owned the Nexus 6, 6P, Pixel XL, 2XL, and 3XL, and each of them had to go through warranty at least twice. Two of my Nexus 6s popped their rear panel, four Nexus 6Ps either bent or had the display pop out of the frame, two Pixel XLs developed dead speakers, one 2XL got dead display pixels while the other decided it didn't want to take pictures anymore, and my 3XL couldn't record video without crashing. The latter was in its return window, so I sent it back and got an S10 Plus instead. That's a terrible track record to be sure, and my Android Authority colleagues tell me I'm the unluckiest guy on the planet because nothing this terrible has ever happened to their Pixels, especially this frequently. But something impressed me during that time: Google's support really looked after me. I purchased all of those devices through the Google Store, and it replaced each of them with either a brand-new phone or a freshly refurbished unit in less than 48 hours of my reporting the issue. Aside from the support agent encouraging me to use the charging brick that came with the phone (the 6a doesn't come with one), Google's support experience was perfect. Google's warranty policy, at least in the UK, is to replace the faulty phone right away to minimise the impact on the user. Then the defective device gets repaired and fully refurbished so that it can be used as a replacement for someone else who makes a warranty claim. It's an efficient process that made me feel cared for as a customer. Google's customer support is always friendly and (usually) asks questions and offers troubleshooting steps that make sense. Zac Kew-Denniss / Android Authority I had another solid experience with Google support in the last few weeks. Pixel 6a battery problems are widespread, and my Grandfather's 6a developed a swollen battery. In the UK, phones get a two-year manufacturer's warranty, but this 6a was over three years old, so Google didn't have an obligation to do anything. Still, I reached out to support, and in less than 12 hours, a refurbished 6a that had a brand new battery and display arrived at my door. Aside from the support agent encouraging me to use the charging brick that came with the phone in the future (the 6a doesn't come with one), the support experience was perfect, and everything was sorted via a live chat in less than half an hour. Pixels have improved Robert Triggs / Android Authority Another thing to consider is that Pixels have improved over the last few years. My cousin has had a Pixel 6 Pro since launch, and it's never let him down. A friend has a 7a and loves it, and several people I know have various models of the Pixel 9 series and couldn't be happier. Phones from all manufacturers will have issues at times, but from the experience of those around me, it seems that Google's reliability has improved, and users aren't facing frequent issues like I did in my early Pixel days. Even with Android 16's expressive redesign, I still prefer One UI. But that's undermined by the knowledge that Samsung's customer support will be an uphill battle if anything goes wrong. Pair the improved reliability with fantastic customer support, and I'm left wondering if I should go back to using a Pixel. I still love Samsung's products. I've had the S24 Ultra since it launched, and it's never once let me down. The Material Expressive redesign of Android 16 looks fantastic, but I still prefer One UI overall. However, no matter how much I love One UI or the phone it runs on, I always have that fear that if something does go wrong, getting it fixed would be an uphill battle with Samsung, and until the company changes that, it could be time for me to move on. Follow
CNET
12 minutes ago
- CNET
Gmail's New Feature Lets You Clean Up Your Inbox in a Couple of Taps
Unless you're always on top of what's going on in your Gmail inbox, there's a good chance that you're subscribed to at least a few newsletters that you've been meaning to unsubscribe to. While it wasn't hard to unsubscribe to a single newsletter before, Gmail's new feature will let you get an overview of your existing subscriptions and bulk unsubscribe with a few taps. Previously, when you viewed an email newsletter, an "unsubscribe" option would appear at the top so you could quickly unsubscribe with a single tap or click, but that would (obviously) only work for the individual newsletter. The new feature centralizes all of your newsletter subscriptions so you can declutter unnecessary future emails with ease. Below, we'll show you where to find the new feature and how to quickly unsubscribe from unnecessary or out-of-control senders to tame your inbox. While you're at it, here's how to free up 15GB of Gmail space. Here's where to find the new Manage Subscriptions feature in the Gmail app The new Manage Subscriptions feature is tucked into the sidebar of the Gmail app. Gmail/Screenshot by Arielle Burton Before you can use the feature, you should check to see if you have it first. Here's how. Open the Gmail app on your iPhone or Android phone app on your iPhone or Android phone Tap the menu bar at the top left (three stacked lines) If you have the feature, Manage Subscriptions should be below the Trash section How to find Manage Subscriptions Gmail for the web Login to Gmail from a web browser On the left, click More Click on Manage Subscriptions The feature is currently rolling out to the web, Android and iPhones in select countries, so you might need to wait a bit if you don't have the new view just yet. How to manage subscriptions from the new view Once you arrive at the Manage Subscriptions section, a list of the newsletters you're currently subscribed to will be displayed, sorted by the most frequent senders and the number of emails they've sent in the past few weeks. Tapping directly on the sender name will bring up the most recent emails received and you can easily unsubscribe by tapping the icon to the right of the name, which looks like an email with a minus sign "-" in front of it. Gmail will send an unsubscribe email to the newsletter you no longer want to receive. Google Once you've tapped that unsubscribe icon, Gmail will ask if you want to stop receiving emails from the sender. Once you tap unsubscribe, an email will go to the sender notifying them of the unsubscribe request. It can take a few days for the sender to honor the request but all emails sent by them should be sent to your Spam folder going forward. If you want to get an even better grip on Gmail, don't miss these 10 tips.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Top economist Brad DeLong to recent college grads: Don't blame AI for job struggles—blame the sputtering economy
As recent college graduates face one of the toughest job markets in years, Berkeley economist and voluble Substacker Brad DeLong has a message for those struggling to land their first full-time gig: Artificial intelligence (AI) and automation are not to blame. Larger forces are at work. DeLong, a professor at UC Berkeley and former Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, argued in a recent essay that the challenges confronting young job-seekers today are primarily driven by widespread policy uncertainty and a sluggish economy—not by the rapid rise of AI tools like ChatGPT or data-crunching robots. DeLong offered his analysis on July 23, roughly 10 days before the July jobs report stunned markets, revealing that the economy has been much weaker than previously thought for several months. Prominent business leaders had also flagged troubling signs in the economy before the July jobs report dropped. IBM Vice Chair and former Trump advisor Gary Cohn went on CNBC a day before the jobs data, noting 'warning signs below the surface.' Cohn said he pays close attention to the quits rate in the monthly JOLTS data, arguing that 150,000 fewer quits was an ominous sign of poor economic health. DeLong sounded a prophetic note, writing that 'policy uncertainty' over trade, immigration, inflation, and technology has 'paralyzed business planning,' leading to a self-reinforcing cycle of hiring freezes. New entrants to the job market are bearing the brunt of the retreat to risk aversion. In other words, the college graduate class of 2025 is really unlucky. The economist argued that the uncertainty causes companies to delay major decisions—including hiring—in the face of an unpredictable policy environment. 'This risk aversion is particularly damaging for those at the start of their careers, who rely on a steady flow of entry-level openings to get a foot in the door,' he wrote. DeLong has sounded similar warnings of a slowdown for years. He talked to Fortune in 2022 about his theory of the economy starting to sputter from his book Slouching Towards Utopia. In 2025, he wrote, the big story in the jobs market is not actually AI, but something different. Policy paralysis So, what's really keeping freshly minted graduates from clinching that all-important first job? DeLong cited Bloomberg BusinessWeek's Amanda Mull and her theory about 'stochastic uncertainty'—a cocktail of unpredictability around government policies, trade, immigration, and inflation. Companies aren't firing; instead, they're just waiting. And many are delaying new hires in anticipation of possible sudden shifts in tariffs, inflation rates, and regulatory environments. The result is a wait-and-see climate where employers, worried about future economic shocks, have selected caution over expansion. The holding pattern hits new entrants to the workforce especially hard. While overall unemployment in the U.S. remains low, the situation is uniquely difficult for new graduates relative to the rest of the workforce. Citing economists including Paul Krugman, DeLong noted that while the absolute unemployment rate for college graduates isn't alarming, the gap between graduate unemployment and general unemployment rates is at record highs. In the past, higher education reliably led to lower unemployment, but now recent grads are struggling 'by a large margin' compared to previous generations. As previously reported by Fortune Intelligence, Goldman Sachs has argued that the college degree 'safety premium' is mostly gone. The team, led by Goldman's chief economist Jan Hatzius, wrote: 'Recent data suggests that the labor market for recent college graduates has weakened at a time when the broader labor market has appeared healthy.' It also found that since 1997, young workers without a college degree have become much less likely to even look for work, with their participation rate dropping by seven percentage points. Mull cited an analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York which found that tech and design fields, including computer science, computer engineering, and graphic design, are seeing unemployment rates above 7% for new graduates. Why the AI hype misses the mark Although the tech sector is buzzing about AI's potential to replace junior analysts or automate entry-level tasks, DeLong urged caution in assigning blame. In his typical style, he noted, 'there is still [no] hard and not even a semi-convincing soft narrative that 'AI is to blame' for entry-level job scarcity.' Hiring slowdowns, he pointed out, are driven by broader economic forces: uncertainty, risk aversion, and changes in how companies invest. Here again, DeLong's analysis rhymes and aligns with recent research from Goldman's Hatzius. The bank's quarterly 'AI Adoption Tracker,' issued in July, found that the unemployment rate for AI-exposed occupations had reconciled with the wider economy, which contradicts fears of mass displacement. They also noted there have been no recent layoff announcements explicitly citing AI as the cause, underscoring that it's contained to disruption of specific functions, not entire industries. Crucially, he argued, rather than hiring people, companies in the tech sector are splurging on 'the hardware that powers artificial intelligence'—notably Nvidia's high-performance chips—fueling a boom in capital investment while sidelining junior hires. 'For firms, the calculus is straightforward: Investing in AI infrastructure is seen as a ticket to future competitiveness, while hiring junior staff is a cost that can be postponed.' Underpinning these trends is a shift away from any and all risk. Employers prefer to hire for specific short-term needs and are less willing to invest in developing new talent—leaving young applicants caught in a cycle where 'just getting your foot in the door' is more difficult than ever. Incumbent workers, worried about job market uncertainty, are less likely to change jobs, leading to fewer openings and greater stagnation. DeLong's analysis harmonized with Goldman Sachs' findings about the declining premium attached with a college degree: 'For the longer-run, the rise in the college wage premium is over, and a decline has (probably) begun.' For decades, he continued, a college degree was a ticket to higher earnings, and the labor market rewarded those with advanced skills and credentials. In recent years, though, 'this has plateaued and may even be falling.' The causes are complex, he added, but the takeaway: While degrees remain valuable, they are no longer the ever-ascending ticket to prosperity they once were. These comments confirm the gloomy remarks of University of Connecticut professor emeritus Peter Turchin, who recently talked with Fortune about the declining status of the upper middle class in 21st century America. When asked where else he sees this manifesting in modern life, Turchin said, 'It's actually everywhere you look. 'Look at the overproduction of university degrees,' he said, arguing that the decreasing premium that Goldman and DeLong write about shows up in declining rates of college enrollment and high rates of recent graduate unemployment. 'There is overproduction of university degrees and the value of a university degree actually declines.' DeLong's bottom line for recent grads: Blame a risk-averse business climate, not technology, for today's job woes. And now that we know the economy may have been much more risk-averse in 2025 than previously, DeLong's warnings are worth revisiting. DeLong did not respond to a request for comment. For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
