Kenyan police officer held over brutality protest shooting – DW – 06/17/2025
A Kenyan police officer has been arrested over the shooting Tuesday of an unarmed civilian during a demonstration against the death of a blogger in police custody.
DW's Nairobi correspondent, Felix Maringa, witnessed and filmed the trader being shot in the head at close range.
His video shows two policemen repeatedly striking the man on his head before one of them fired at him with what appeared to be a shotgun.
Kenyan police shoot dead trader at protests in Nairobi
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
Police say the man was taken to hospital to be treated for his wounds.
It happened as a group of whip and club-wielding motorcyclists — known in Kenya as "goons" — assaulted protesters who were calling for an end to police brutality and demanding the resignation of a senior officer they blame for the death of blogger Albert Ojwang on June 8.
Protesters accused police of siding with their attackers
In a post on X, Amnesty International's Kenya chapter reported the presence of dozens of motorbikes carrying hooded passengers, who were seen whipping protesters and members of the public.
"The goons attacked us. They cornered us and beat us with whips and the police were just watching them do it," Hanifa Adan, one of the leading voices from last year's massive Gen Z-led protests in Kenya, told the AFP news agency.
Armed with whips and clubs the counter-protesters attacked demonstrators upset over the death of Albert Ojwang in police custody Image: Thomas Mukoya/REUTERS
"Police, shame on you, stop siding with the goons, side with the citizens who pay your salary through our taxes," one protester told Reuters.
Pictures taken by press photographers show counter-protesters running alongside police officers as they disrupted the demonstrations over Ojwang's death.
Unknown attackers run with clubs to attack protesters Image: Thomas Mukoya/REUTERS
Blogger's death in custody due to assault
Ojwang, a blogger, was arrested earlier this month for allegedly defaming the country's deputy police chief, Eliud Lagat. Police initially claimed he died "after hitting his head against a cell wall." However, an autopsy revealed injuries consistent with assault as the likely cause of death.
Since then, President William Ruto has acknowledged that Ojwang died "at the hands of the police." Two officers were arrested last week in connection with the death, but the investigation is ongoing.
Clashes erupt in Kenya's capital Nairobi
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
On Monday, Lagat announced he had temporarily stepped down from his position as investigations into Ojwang's death continue.
The protests over Ojwang's death reflect broader public concerns that little has changed since more than 60 people were killed during demonstrations last year, which were initially sparked by proposed tax increases.
Edited by: Alex Berry
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
DW
an hour ago
- DW
Amid severe heat wave, EU pitches flexible 2040 climate goal – DW – 07/02/2025
The EU has unveiled its new climate target, a 90% reduction in emissions by 2040. But not all member states are on board, while a provision to outsource part of the climate efforts abroad has generated controversy. With large parts of Europe gripped in a record-breaking heat wave, the European Commission has proposed that the bloc reduce its net greenhouse gas emissions 90% by 2040. That's in comparison to levels back in 1990, and on track to meet the target of net-zero emissions by 2050. The binding emissions reduction target was first proposed last year, and came after months of tough negotiations among member states. The existing target requires the EU to reduce net emissions by at least 55% by 2030; in May, the Commission said the bloc had already cut climate-warming emissions by 37%. The new target will give certainty to investors, "strengthen industrial leadership of our businesses, and increase Europe's energy security," the commission said in a statement on Wednesday. But not all member states are on board with the plan, and a controversial flexibility clause on buying carbon credits on international markets has activists crying foul. Under the proposal, EU member states could purchase international carbon credits on green projects in third countries from 2036 onward, using them to offset up to 3% of the benchmark 1990 emissions. "This can provide a safety-net to ensure a 90% target is achievable as we are closing on climate neutrality," the commission said. But activists have said the flexibility clause was included due to pressure from member states like France and Germany, along with major industry lobbyists, at the cost of reduced investments at home. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Mathieu Mal, a climate and agriculture expert at the European Environment Bureau, said the 3% flexibility clause was a "bad idea" for a variety of reasons. "What this means is that the EU would be investing in other countries outside the bloc to reduce their emissions, and that's problematic because we need these investments within the EU. We also have our sectors to decarbonize and we need funds for energy transformation here," he said. "Every country across the world needs to commit to climate action. If the EU counts these carbon credits towards its own goals then what about the countries who also need to reduce their emissions and achieve their own targets?" In May, the European Scientific Advisory Board on Climate Change advised against outsourcing part of the bloc's climate efforts, saying it "risk[s] diverting resources from domestic investments and could undermine environmental integrity." It called on all reduction toward net zero to be "achieved through domestic action." Critics of the clause have called it a ruse for heavy polluters who find it cost intensive to decarbonize in Europe and easier to invest in projects abroad that lack sufficient oversight. "The use of carbon credits is simply magical thinking for a bloc unwilling to live up to its responsibility for causing the climate catastrophe we're already living through," said Friends of the Earth Europe. "Carbon credits have a long record of failure and ultimately do not stop Europe emitting more than its fair share of carbon emissions." Speaking with DW, Mal highlighted previous concerns about green investments in third nations. "There have been lots of issues in the past. Projects carried out in some countries often don't have high standards, they often remain just on paper. There are questions if they were ever materialized," he said. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The Commission's new target has the backing of at least some of the EU member states. As Denmark takes over the EU's rotating presidency this week, it has listed the 2040 target as one of its top priorities. "Anyone who says that the green transformation cannot be achieved with high ambition and social justice at the same time should come to Denmark," said Villy Sövndal, a lawmaker with the European Greens group and Denmark's former foreign minister. "Competitiveness in the 21st century is not linked to fossil fuels but to the advancement of the energy transition," Pedro Sanchez, Spain's socialist prime minister, said last week at the EU summit in Brussels. But other countries consider the 2040 target to be too ambitious. Italy has said an 80-85% target for 2040 would be more realistic, and the Czech Republic said Wednesday it disagreed with the commission's proposal. Speaking at the EU summit, French President Emmanuel Macron also indicated it was still too early to agree to setting the target for 2040. "The reality is that I want to get my 2030 target right first," he said, "and take the democratic and political time to convince others to get to 2040." While Germany and France both back the 3% flexibility clause, France expects an even higher percentage of the overall goal to be met by purchasing international carbon credits, with some reports suggesting up to 10%. According to Teresa Ribera, the EU's green transition chief, some political groups in the EU continue to deny climate change whereas others lack courage in confronting their constituents about steps required to combat the problem. "Political courage is needed to understand that there is a difficulty," she said in an interview with on Wednesday. "You need to face it with honesty." The EU's climate plans have raised concerns around the costs of green transition and disruption to industrial growth and livelihood, if decarbonization is carried out without adequate support. However, Ribera believes there is no time to waste. "Sorry, but it'll be much more expensive if we don't act," she said. According to a Eurobarometer survey released this week, 85% of Europeans believe climate change is a serious problem and tackling it should be a priority, while 77% agreed that the cost of damage due to climate change is much higher than the investment needed for a net-zero transition. "As European citizens increasingly feel the impact of climate change, they expect Europe to act," the European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said on Wednesday. The proposal still needs the stamp of approval from the European Parliament and member states, and Climate Commissioner Wopke Hoekstra said he hoped an agreement could be reached before the UN climate change conference in Brazil in November. But time is short, and there are still doubts as to whether the proposal in its current form will be adopted as law.
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Fact check: How to spot AI-generated newscasts – DW – 07/02/2025
AI-generated newscasts are getting harder to spot — and they're flooding your feed. Here's how to avoid falling for the fakes. On TikTok, a reporter stands in front of a traditional red Royal Mail pillar box, with British flags fluttering in the background and a microphone in hand. He asks a female passerby who she plans to vote for in the upcoming election. "Reform," the woman replies. "I just want to feel British again, innit." A user comments below: "I wonder how much they paid her to say that." But this scene never happened. The interview is entirely fake. The reporter doesn't exist — he was generated by artificial intelligence. And if you look closely, there's a subtle clue: a faint watermark in the corner bearing the word "Veo," the signature of Google DeepMind's powerful new video-generation tool. This 8-second video isn't an isolated case. From TikTok to Telegram, synthetic newscasts — AI-generated videos that mimic the look and feel of real news segments — are flooding social feeds. They borrow the visual language of journalism: field reporting, on-screen graphics, authoritative delivery. However, they're often completely fabricated, designed to provoke outrage, manipulate opinion, or simply go viral. Hany Farid, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, who specializes in digital forensics, explains the dangers of these AI-generated news clips in an interview with DW. "If you're scrolling fast on social media, it looks like news. It sounds like news," said Hany Farid, a digital forensics expert and professor at UC Berkeley, in an interview with DW. "And that's the danger." Many synthetic videos blur the line between satire and reality, or are simply misleading. In another example(it is an 8-second clip too), a reporter appears to describe an "unprecedented military convoy" moving through central London. She stands in front of a tank as a crowd looks on. Yet the video does not refer to any specific event, time, or context. DW Fact check has repeatedly observed how such clips resurface during times of crisis — like riots or major news events — repurposed to sow confusion or falsely suggest dramatic escalations. During the latest conflict escalation between Israel and Iran, TikTok and other platforms were swarmed with AI-generated content about the incident, including fake newscasts making false claims — such as Russia allegedly joining the war, Iran attacking the US, or Iran shooting down US B-2 bombers used in strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities. DW also observed a surge in synthetic news clips following the outbreak of protests in Los Angelesin June. The consequences extend far beyond social media. In 2024, Taiwanese researchers flagged AI-generated newscasts on local platforms that falsely accused pro-sovereignty politicians of corruption. The clips didn't just spread misinformation — they seeded distrust, undermining the credibility of all news outlets ahead of the country's elections. But some users turn to AI newscasts for parody or comic effect. One viral TikTokshows a synthetic anchor reporting in front of a pothole so deep that motorcycles vanish into it. Another has an avatar declaring, "I'm currently at the border but there is no war. Mom, Dad, this looks real — but it's all AI." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video So, how can you tell what's real? Start with watermarks. Tools like Veo, Synthesia, and others often brand their videos, though the labels are sometimes faint, cropped out, or ignored. Even clearly marked clips are frequently flooded with comments asking, "Is this real?" Fake newscasts are among the most polished AI-generated content. Because they often depict static news studio environments, typical AI giveaways — like awkward hand movements or inconsistent backgrounds — are harder to spot. But subtle clues remain. Watch the eyes and mouth. Synthetic avatars often blink unnaturally or struggle with realistic lip-syncing. Teeth may appear too smooth or unnaturally shiny. Their shape might even shift mid-sentence. Gestures and facial movements tend to be overly uniform, lacking the natural variation of real humans. Text can also be a giveaway. On-screen captions or banners often contain nonsensical phrases or typographical errors. In one example, a supposed "breaking news" chyron read: " The reporter's microphone was labeled "The INFO Misisery." As Farid explained, the challenge of spotting synthetic content is "a hard problem" — and a moving target. "Whatever I tell you today about how to detect AI fakes might not be relevant in six months," he said. So what can you do? Stick with trusted sources. "If you don't want to be lied to," Farid said, "go to reliable news organizations." The concept of AI presenters isn't new. In 2018, China's state-run Xinhua News Agency introduced a stilted, robotic AI anchor. At the time, it was more curiosity than threat. But the technology has evolved dramatically. Tools like Veo now let virtually anyone — with no media training — create polished, broadcast-style videos for just a few hundred euros a month. The avatars speak fluidly, move realistically, and can be dropped into almost any scene with a few typed prompts. "The barrier to entry is practically gone," said Farid. "You don't need a studio. You don't even need facts." Most of these clips are engineered for maximum engagement. They tap into highly polarizing topics: immigration, the war in Gaza, Ukraine, and Donald Trump, to provoke strong emotional reactions and encourage sharing. Social media platforms often reward this content. Meta, for instance, recently adjusted its algorithm to surface more posts from accounts users don't follow, making it easier for synthetic videos to reach broad, unsuspecting audiences. Monetization programs further incentivize creators: the more views a video racks up, the more money it can generate. This environment has given rise to a new breed of "AI slop" creators: users who churn out low-quality synthetic content tied to trending topics just to grab views. Accounts like this one— with about 44,000 followers — often jump on breaking news before journalists can confirm the facts. During a recent airline crash, dozens of TikTok videos featured AI avatars dressed as CNN or BBC reporters, broadcasting fake casualty numbers and fabricated eyewitness accounts. Many remained online for hours before being taken down. In moments of breaking news — when users are actively seeking information — realistic-looking AI content becomes an especially effective way to attract clicks and cash in on public attention. "Platforms have moved away from content moderation," Farid told DW. "It's a perfect storm: I can generate the content, I can distribute it, and there are audiences willing to believe it." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
DW
5 hours ago
- DW
'We reclaimed our voice': Why Kenyans protest on July 7 – DW – 07/02/2025
Since 1990, "Saba Saba," meaning "Seven Seven" in Swahili, has become a call to action for Kenya's pro-democracy demonstrators. Despite the government's attempts to stop them, July 7 could see protests hit Kenya again. July 7 became the date Kenyan protesters in the 1990s used to steer the country clear of autocracy and toward political accountability. In 2025, that spirit may be more relevant than ever. "The striking similarity between the Gen Z protests of 2024-25 and the Saba Saba protests of the '90s is that both were centered on a clamor for better leadership," analyst Mutuma Kithinji tells DW. "It was the day people came out in open defiance of a brutal dictatorship," says human rights activist Wanjira Wanjiru. "It was a day we reclaimed our voice." By 1990, Kenya had known just two leaders, despite gaining independence in 1965. Daniel arap Moi had led Kenya for 12 years by exploiting intense ethnic-based rivalry, and Kenya effectively became a one-party state increasingly known for kleptocracy, corruption and state abuse. But extensive protests, the end of the Cold War, and a stagnating economy tempered Moi's grip on power. When two cabinet ministers, Kenneth Matiba and Charles Rubia, were detained without trial, the first Saba Saba protests erupted in July, 1990. 20 people were arrested and 1,056 people were charged, although no law enforcement officials faced prosecution. Protesters wanted a multi-party democracy, and despite state repression, Moi caved. While the resulting 1992 and 1997 elections were marred by violence and vote rigging, Moi's seemingly untouchable power was checked. Nairobian Eliza Njoroge says the Saba Saba protests remain influential to ordinary Kenyans. "They were disruptive, but made people very confident. They definitely changed Kenya, and the people realized they can speak up and that they have the power," she told DW. For analyst Kithinji, many of the same problems from 1990 are still prevalent today. "The Gen Zs feel the leadership does not address their issues: accountability, economic injustice, corruption, disappearance of people, extrajudicial killings, among others," he told DW. A view widely held, including by Kithinji, is that while the Saba Saba protests of 1990 had definitive political leadership figures such as Rubia and Mathiba, the Gen Z-led demonstrations are a grassroots movement without defined leaders or ethnic affliations. The Kenya Finance Bill protests of 2024 exploded in June after the government approved unpopular legislation that would have significantly increased taxation of ordinary Kenyans. President William Ruto was forced to shelve the bill. "We are doing the same things we did in 1990. The causes are the same, except that this time it's in a technologically different environment," says David Kyule of the University of Nairobi. A key factor, he says, is that young Kenyans today are better educated than the protesters in the 1990s, partly due to education rights enshrined in Kenya's 2010 constitution. "They have come of age in a time of widespread suffering and unmet expections," Kyule explains. But while the protestors have changed, their core grievances have not. And neither, arguably, has the attitude of the politicians in power, and how they have used force to respond. The mid-2024 demonstrations saw over 50 people killed when police and Kenyan Defence Force soldiers confronted protesters. "We have the current President (Ruto), who was there in those days, and many know him as a student of Moi," Kithinji told DW, adding "the government reponded with force in the 1990s and today." But according to Wanjira Wanjiru, another key concern is the unknown number of protesters who have forcibly disappeared.. "The abductions and extrajudicial killings happening today are more rampant. The blatant disregard for human rights is shocking, so is the disregard for rule of law," she told DW. Kenya, and particularly Nairobi, has already seen large, youth-led protests, initially to commemorate the deadly demonstrations of 2024. The unexplained death of blogger Albert Ojwang in police custody sparked more anti-police brutalitydemonstrations. In response, Kenya's Interior Minister Kipchumba Murkomen claimed the demonstrations were an attempted coup, and issued a "shoot to kill" directive for officers if they were attacked. The Kenyan government has also tried to cast protestors as a destabilizing force, mirroríng the approach of Moi's government in 1990. "There's no credible evidence suggesting that this is the case in either era," says Kithinji, adding "labeling the protestors as destabilizing is more about political control." David Kyule told DW that police responses have appeared to worsen the situation, with the ensuing chaos suggesting violence and destruction, rather than the initial, peaceful demonstrations. As for alleged attempts to intimidate protesters through abductions, Wanjiru says: "People have completely lost their fear. In fact, any attempt to bring back fear to the people kind of inspires more resistance and has the opposite effect," she told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video With the Saba Saba protests seeminly inevitable, Parliament has introduced a bill to restrict protests within 100 meters of key government institutions, such as the Parliament, State House and courts. "These are all attempts at cracking down the people's voice and to evade accountability. Instead of addressing the demands of the protesters, they're looking to crack down on democracy further," Wanjira told DW. Others remain unconvinced there will be justice for the scores of people already killed. A young Kenyan woman, who asked to remain anonymous, told DW: "Albert Ojwang's case is still in court. And Rex Masai, the first person we lost during last year's protest, his case is still in court. When you go to the streets to seek justice for those people, we lose more people. Will they get justice at any time?" John Marsha, a trainee journalist, said it remained important for Kenyans to stand up for their constitutional rights, and pointed to Ruto's government trying to ban coverage of the protests. "We are on the edge from where the country will probably plunge to a place that we will not be able to get ourselves out," he told DW. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
