
Wimbledon says a call on a shot that landed out was missed because the electronic system was off
And, because the replay review procedure that used to be in place also has been scrapped, the chair umpire called for a do-over on the point at 4-all in the first set — much to the dismay of Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova, the player who would have won the game if the proper call had been made originally.
Pavlyuchenkova wound up getting broken there to trail Sonay Kartal of Britain, but she eventually did manage to come back to win the match 7-6 (3), 6-4 and reach the quarterfinals at the All England Club for the first time since 2016.
'You took the game away from me,' 2021 French Open runner-up Pavlyuchenkova told chair umpire Nico Helwerth at the changeover after the game ended.
Pavlyuchenkova, who is Russian, also said in the moment that the decision-making there went in Kartal's favor because she is a local player.
Next for Pavlyuchenkova is a match against No. 13 Amanda Anisimova of the United States, a 6-2, 5-7, 6-4 winner against No. 30 Linda Noskova on Sunday night. Anisimova also was a Wimbledon quarterfinalist in 2022; her best Slam showing was making the 2019 French Open semifinals at age 17.
At her news conference, Pavlyuchenkova said Helwerth told her following the match that he did think Kartal's shot landed out.
'I think he felt bad, a little bit,' Pavlyuchenkova said. 'He probably felt like he should have taken the initiative and called it out.'
Pavlyuchenkova also said Helwerth 'probably was scared to take such a big decision.'
Pavlyuchenkova was serving and had a game point when Kartal hit a backhand that landed beyond the opposite baseline, TV replays showed. But there was no sound of one of the recorded voices being used for the first time at Wimbledon to reflect when the technology being used in place of human officials determines that a ball landed out.
At least Pavlyuchenkova could joke about the whole episode later. Asked how she'd feel about it had she lost the match, Pavlyuchenkova responded with a laugh: 'I would just say that I hate Wimbledon and never come back.'
She also cracked that chair umpires are 'very good at giving fines and code violations' and never miss those, but perhaps it would be beneficial if they did a better job of noticing mistaken calls.
Kartal said she couldn't see where her shot went.
'That situation is a rarity. I don't think it's really ever happened — if it has. It's tough. What can you do? The umpire's trying his best in that situation, and he handled it fine,' Kartal said. 'I think the system just malfunctioned a little bit, and the fairest way was what he did: replay the point.'
Helwerth delayed play while he made a phone call from his stand. Eventually, play resumed, Pavlyuchenkova missed a forehand on the replay, then lost the game a few points later.
The tournament looked into it afterward and blamed 'human error,' saying that the line-calling setup 'was deactivated in error on part of the server's side of the court for one game by those operating the system,' according to an All England Club spokesperson, who added: 'We continue to have full confidence in the accuracy of the ball-tracking technology.'
The spokesperson also said Pavlyuchenkova and Kartal received apologies from the club.
The French Open is now the only Grand Slam tournament that still uses line judges instead of electronic calls.
From 2007 through last year, players were allowed to challenge in-or-out calls at Wimbledon; a video review was employed to decide whether a line judge's — or chair umpire's — ruling was correct. That challenge system was removed for the current tournament, but there immediately were demands on social media from some tennis fans or observers to bring that back to aid chair umpires.
Pavlyuchenkova agreed, saying: 'We should probably look into something else to have better decisions.'
Taylor Fritz, who reached the quarterfinals with a win at a different court Sunday, didn't see what happened. But when it was explained by a reporter, his biggest question was why the chair umpire didn't just make the call himself if it was so clear what actually happened on Kartal's shot.
'The chair umpire has to make the call,' 2024 U.S. Open finalist Fritz said. 'Why is he there if he's not going to call the ball?'
___
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Western Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Legal challenge over Wimbledon expansion set to be heard at High Court
Save Wimbledon Park (SWP) is challenging the decision by the Greater London Authority (GLA) to give the green light to the All England Club's proposal to build 39 new courts, including an 8,000-seat stadium, on the former Wimbledon Park Golf Club. Planning permission for the scheme was granted last year by Jules Pipe, London's deputy mayor for planning, who said that the proposals 'would facilitate very significant benefits' which 'clearly outweigh the harm'. Debbie Jevans, chair of the All England Club, said at the time that the proposals would deliver 27 acres of 'newly accessible parkland for the community', and would allow the qualifying tournament for Wimbledon – currently staged at Roehampton – to be held on-site. But campaigners say that Wimbledon Park, a Grade II*-listed heritage site, is subject to similar protections as the green belt or royal parks and that allowing development on the site would set a 'dangerous precedent'. SWP's lawyers are set to argue that the GLA's decision failed to take into account the implications of 'restrictive covenants' on the use of the land, and that the development would cause 'deliberate damage'. The GLA is defending the legal challenge at a two-day hearing before Mr Justice Saini, which is due to begin at 10.30am at the Royal Courts of Justice in London. The plans were first submitted to both Merton and Wandsworth Councils, with the park straddling the boroughs, in 2021, three years after the All England Club bought out golf club members with the intention of developing the land. After Merton Council approved the plans, but Wandsworth Council rejected them, the Mayor of London's office took charge of the application. Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan then recused himself from the process in 2023, having previously expressed public support for the development. The plans attracted opposition from Fleur Anderson, the Labour MP for Putney, and Richard Rees, who was previously the lead planner for the building of Wimbledon's Court One and the development of 'Henman Hill'. Ahead of Tuesday's hearing, Christopher Coombe, a director of SWP, said: 'If this decision by the GLA is upheld and the development goes ahead, the detrimental impacts on our environment and delicate ecosystem will be devastating. 'Our community has given massive support to the campaign over four years, desperate to stop the loss of open space intended for public recreation. 'This is not just in SW19; it's happening all over London. Once built, it is gone forever, and there is very little local trust in an organisation that prides itself on fair play, but then breaks its word. 'We all love the Wimbledon championships, but don't believe the proposal is really about protecting the future of the world's best tennis tournament. 'We will continue to press (the All England Club) to reconsider their fighting stance towards our community and to join us in finding a resolution that we can all get behind.' A spokesperson for the All England Club said: 'Our proposals will deliver one of the greatest sporting transformations for London since 2012. 'They are crucial to ensuring Wimbledon remains at the pinnacle of tennis, one of the world's best sporting events, and a global attraction for both London and the UK. 'On offer are substantial year-round benefits for our community and the delivery of significant social, economic, and environmental improvements. 'This includes more than 27 acres of new public parkland on what is currently inaccessible, private land. 'Our plans will increase the size of Wimbledon Park by a third and create spaces for people and nature to thrive. 'There will be a very significant increase in biodiversity across the site and our proposals are underpinned by more than 1,000 hours of ecological surveys, which are endorsed by the London Wildlife Trust. 'We have spoken to more than 10,000 people as part of our consultation events, and we know that the vast majority of people just want us to get on and deliver the many benefits on offer.' A GLA spokesperson said: 'The Mayor believes this scheme will bring a significant range of benefits, including environmental, economic, social and cultural benefits to the local area, the wider capital and the UK economy. 'It will create new jobs and green spaces and cement Wimbledon's reputation as the greatest tennis competition in the world. 'An application has been made for the court to determine this matter, and it is therefore inappropriate for the mayor to comment further at this stage.'


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Nick Kyrgios reveals stunning plan to hold 'battle of the sexes' tennis match against world No.1 Aryna Sabalenka
Nick Kyrgios has revealed he and three-time Grand Slam champion Aryna Sabalenka are planning to stage a battle of the sexes exhibition match this year - with two major rule changes to make the clash more difficult for him. Kyrgios, a Wimbledon men's singles finalist and outspoken commentator, has left fans buzzing about his plans to take on the world No.1 female player. 'Sabalenka and I are thinking about doing a battle of the sexes later in the year,' he told Talk Sport. 'Where the court is going to be slightly smaller [at Sabalenka's end], for me with one serve... 'I'm playing on a slightly smaller than the usual tennis court.' The Australian said the match, inspired by 1973's infamous 'battle of the sexes' tennis match between Billie Jean King and Bobby Riggs, will likely take place in Hong Kong later in the year. 'I'm really nervous about it, to be honest, she's in her absolute prime right now,' he said. 'And she's getting the wooden legs [version] of me - but I'm still feeling confident that I can get her. 'I think I've still got enough variation and talent in the tank to take Sabalenka, but she's fierce and I'm feeling nerves right now.' The original 'battle of the sexes' match in 1973, was one of biggest media events of its day and King's impressive victory was widely credited with striking an impressive blow for the women's liberation movement. Despite being 55 at the time, retired tennis champ Bobby Riggs was expected to comfortably beat Billie Jean King, then 29 and the world's No. 2 female player. Four months earlier, Riggs had easily dispatched with the women's No. 1 Margaret Court. Instead, Riggs lost 6-4, 6-3, 6-3 to King before a stunned audience of 30,472 fans at the Houston Astrodome. It's still the largest crowd in to ever attend a tennis match in the USA and millions more were watching on TV. The outcome has repeatedly been dogged by claims it was fixed or the result was thrown, something Riggs repeatedly denied until his death in 1995. Sabalenka, 27, is an intense competitor and one of the most expressive players in the game. But Kyrgios says she is very different off the court. 'When she is on the court she is incredibly intense, she is fierce, she has a big game. She is almost scary,' he said. 'But off the court she is gentle. She came on my podcast and I really got to know and connect with her at a human level and she is really funny, she is nice and she was telling me that she wanted to change that perception.

Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Mirra Andreeva oblivious to the fact she'd won after swatting aside Emma Navarro
The Russian teenager became the youngest woman to reach the Wimbledon quarter-finals in 18 years by breezing through round four with a rapid 6-2 6-3 win over world number 10 Emma Navarro. But an unaware Andreeva was so focused on her performance – and trying not to look at Roger Federer in the Royal Box – she lined up to face another Navarro serve, rather than celebrate converting match point. Marvellous Mirra 🤩 The 18-year-old shines on her Centre Court debut, booking a place in the #Wimbledon QF — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 7, 2025 With her American opponent waiting at the net to shake hands, the 18-year-old briefly looked bemused before jogging in from the baseline, to the amusement of spectators. Andreeva laughed off the incident in her on-court interview, saying: 'I kept telling myself I'm not the one who is up on the score, I am the one who is down. 'That helped me to stay focused and in the end I completely forgot the score. 'I'm happy that I did it because I think I would have been three times more nervous on a match point.' Aside from the humorous mix-up, Andreeva suffered no hiccups as she emphatically stayed on course to emulate coach Conchita Martinez – the 1994 Wimbledon champion. She blitzed Navarro to clinch the opening set in just 33 minutes and, despite being broken twice in the second, was not unduly troubled. Aged 18 years and 75 days, Andreeva is exactly the same age as Czech player Nicole Vaidisova was when she progressed to the last eight in 2007. 'It is something crazy,' she said, after setting up a meeting with Belinda Bencic with victory in 75 minutes. 'I was super nervous before playing for the first time on Centre Court. 'I really tried my best not to look over there in the box because I knew as soon as I would look there I would completely lose my focus. "It's been one of my dreams to see you in real life." 🫶 Mirra Andreeva kept her nerve playing on Centre Court in front of Roger Federer #Wimbledon — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 7, 2025 'I saw Roger and (his wife) Mirka and it means a lot that you came and watched my match. It has been one of my dreams to see you in real life.' Earlier, Bencic blew five match points on her own serve before bouncing back to reach the quarter-finals for the first time. The 2021 Olympic champion also saved three break points in a captivating ninth game of the second set against Ekaterina Alexandrova. Russian 18th seed Alexandrova eventually broke to prolong the Court One contest but Bencic responded immediately to progress 7-6 (4) 6-4. 'For you guys it was entertaining but for me it was a big stress,' Bencic said on court. 'It was a difficult moment. 'I always got stuck in the fourth round. It was so important for me to breakthrough to the quarter-finals. It's a dream come true.' Bencic's best run in SW19 comes after she missed last year's Championships due to the birth of daughter Bella in April 2024. 'We did an amazing job coming back,' said the 28-year-old Swiss player. 'It's amazing to share the memories together as a family. I'm enjoying it more. I juggle it like every mum does.' Five-time grand slam champion Iga Swiatek cruised through to her second Wimbledon quarter-final. Super Swiatek 🇵🇱 The No.8 seed sails through to the QF, beating Clara Tauson 6-4, 6-1#Wimbledon — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 7, 2025 The Polish world number four began with successive double faults before defeating Danish 23rd seed Clara Tauson 6-4 6-1. 'Even though the beginning was pretty shaky with the double faults, I managed to play well and solid,' she said. 'I'm not sure if Clara felt well, she said at night she was sick so hopefully she's going to have a fast recovery. 'It's the first time I enjoyed London – sorry guys, I always loved it! We're tennis players. We feel well off the court when we feel well on the court. 'This year I feel I can just play my game and hopefully it's going to last as long as possible.' Russian world number 19 Liudmila Samsonova awaits Swiatek after she beat unseeded 22-year-old Spaniard Jessica Bouzas Maneiro 7-5 7-5.