Government urges Fujitsu to pay compensation to victims of Post Office scandal
They also argued the under-fire company 'should be nowhere near' new Government contracts as it emerged it continued to secure lucrative multimillion-pound deals with Whitehall, bankrolled by the taxpayer.
The company has already acknowledged it has a 'moral obligation' to contribute to compensation, pending the outcome of the public inquiry led by Sir Wyn Williams.
Chair Sir Wyn Williams (Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry)
The firm has come under renewed pressure after the publication of the first part of Sir Wyn's final report.
It found around 1,000 people were wrongly prosecuted and convicted after Fujitsu's defective Horizon accounting system made it appear as though money was missing at their Post Office branches.
Some victims were sent to prison or financially ruined, others were shunned by their communities, and some took their own lives.
The long-running battle for justice accelerated dramatically after ITV broadcast the drama Mr Bates Vs The Post Office, which highlighted the scandal.
Sir Wyn said around 10,000 people are eligible to submit compensation claims following what has been dubbed as the worst miscarriage of justice in British legal history.
Labour former MP Kevan Jones, who now sits in the upper chamber as Lord Beamish, has been a long-standing champion for the subpostmasters.
Kevan Jones (PA)
He said: 'To date, the Government and taxpayers have paid over a billion pounds, quite rightly, to those victims.
'Fujitsu have not paid one penny piece. They may have a moral obligation, but moral obligations do not pay compensation.'
He added: 'So when will the Government get on and force Fujitsu to act on its moral obligations, put its hands in its pockets and at least pay some interim payments?
Responding, Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent said: 'With regards to the payments by Fujitsu, we urge them to make interim payments, but there are ongoing conversations with Fujitsu, including regular meetings with the Crown representative, the Cabinet Office and DBT (the Department for Business and Trade) and we will continue to have such meetings.'
Conservative peer Lord Arbuthnot, who played a pivotal role in exposing the scandal, said: 'Fujitsu has paid not one penny towards the victims of the havoc and misery that it helped to cause.
'Is the Government – is the country – over a barrel to Fujitsu? If not, why is Fujitsu still winning government work? If we are, what are the Government doing about it?'
Lady Anderson said: 'They have accepted that they have a moral obligation to give funds, but he will be even more aware than I am that we are yet to see a penny.
'Fujitsu have agreed that they will have to make a financial contribution, but I am urged not to give a running commentary, although we will welcome any interim payment in due course.'
In addition to extensions available under Fujitsu's existing contracts, a further 12 new deals had been struck with the company over the last year.
The Government has said the majority are for services already provided by Fujitsu and were put in place to ensure continuity of services.
Liberal Democrat Lord Clement-Jones raised concerns over HM Revenue & Customs continuing to award contacts to Fujitsu.
He said: 'In the light of the Horizon report, which condemns Fujitsu's conduct as a key contributor to the suffering of thousands of innocent people, isn't it already very clear that Fujitsu should be nowhere near any new contract?'
Lady Anderson said: 'Some of this is about continuity of service, to make sure that we are still able to have business supply secured.'
Given the 'human tragedies' caused by the wrongful convictions of subpostmasters, Baroness Ritchie of Downpatrick pressed the minister over due diligence measures 'to ensure that contractors with a history of significant failures or legal issues can demonstrate that they have addressed these concerns before being awarded new contracts'.
Lady Anderson said new procurement legislation provided buyers with more scope to exclude suppliers who had performed poorly on previous contracts.
She added: 'Due diligence on such failures is also more straightforward as the act now provides for the sharing of information on poorly performing suppliers.'
A Fujitsu spokesperson said: 'We remain committed to providing our full cooperation to the inquiry as Sir Wyn prepares his final report and we are engaged with Government regarding Fujitsu's contribution to compensation.'
They added: 'We continue to work with the UK Government to ensure we adhere to the voluntary restrictions we put in place regarding bidding for new contracts while the Post Office inquiry is ongoing.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Cambrian News
an hour ago
- Cambrian News
Wales' Flying Start programme exceeds expansion targets
The Welsh Government has invested an additional £25m this year to support the expansion to reach more families in Wales, and phase 3 is expected to reach more than 4,000 additional children nationwide.
Scottish Sun
an hour ago
- Scottish Sun
I was MI6 spy inside Al Qaeda – I'm haunted by 9/11 tip that came too late… but I saved thousands from another attack
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) WHILE thousands have suffered from Al Qaeda's brutality, few understand its inner workings as well as Aimen Dean, a former operative turned British spy. From 9/11 to London's 7/7 attacks, the terrorist group is linked with some of the most vicious atrocities of the 21st century. 10 Aimen Dean was MI6's top spy inside Al Qaeda Credit: BBC 10 Hijacked United Airlines Flight 175 crashed into the south tower of the World Trade Center on September 11, 2001 Credit: Getty 10 Al Qaeda were linked to the 7/7 attack on London Credit: PA:Press Association 10 Aimen with older brother at their home in Saudi Arabia Credit: Supplied / Aimen Dean The dad-of-one was 17 when he met Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks, which killed almost 3,000 civilians. He had just emerged from a year battling the Serbs in the Bosnian war, where he was exposed to "charred remains, mutilated bodies, and mass graves". Speaking exclusively to The Sun, Aimen revealed he was lured in by the promise of fighting a 'villainous' America who he blamed for the lengthy war. But he turned on them when he saw the true face of the terror group - appalled by how they would indiscriminately slaughter civilians. Aimen was speaking to us as this week Britain marked 20 years since 7/7 - where 52 people were killed and 784 as bombs went off across the London Underground and on a bus. 'He was so convincing, he was so eloquent that I believed what I now know were delusions," he said. 'Kill or be killed' Aged 18, Aimen travelled to a secluded mountainous spot in Afghanistan where he would spend the next 11 months learning how to build bombs. As a self-confessed bookworm and "nerd", the intellectual rigour and mathematical precision required for bomb making proved an exciting - albeit risky - endeavour for the teenager. 'I remember thinking this is so much fun, why didn't they teach chemistry like this at school?' he said. Joined by three other men - including Moez Fezzani, now an ISIS leader in Libya - he spent his days mixing highly toxic chemicals under the watchful leadership of vengeful chemist and terror mastermind Abu Khabab. Inside 7/7 The story behind Britain's worst ever terror attack Khabab was in charge of developing Al Qaeda's mass-casualty weapons and was linked to a series of terror plots before being killed in a CIA drone strike in 2008. Outside of building bombs, the group spent their time debating and listening to the radio. "We would just sit down and discuss everything endlessly. We would talk about what is wrong with the world. "We would reinforce each other's negative views and talk about the need for change and how this could only come if we tear the system down," Aimen recalled. With just a mattress on the floor to sleep on and little else but books to keep him occupied, the bunker was basic at best. I remember thinking this is so much fun, why didn't they teach chemistry like this at school? Aimen Dean Bombs and extremely toxic chemicals were stored in wooden shelves, which Aimen joked would have given any British health and safety inspector a heart attack. He said: 'We were dealing with chemicals all the time so they gave us lots of fruit to build up our resilience.' 'Khabab told us that your first mistake is your last mistake. He had two missing fingers to which I said, well you are testament of living to make another mistake. 'He said: 'it's idiots who came before you who did this. They are no longer here anymore - I was just collateral damage'". Your first mistake is your last mistake Terror leader, Abu Khabab But just under a year after Aimen joined the terror group, his life took a drastic turn when news of a suicide bomb attack in East Africa upended his views and beliefs. The devastating assault on U.S embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Tanzania resulted in 200 deaths and an estimated 4,000 wounded. According to Aimen, some 150 civilians were also blinded because the vans were 'loaded with shrapnel' to maximise death and destruction. 10 Aimen Dean was 17 when he met Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, pictured, the mastermind behind the 9/11 attacks Credit: AP 10 Firemen walk amid the smouldering rubble of the World Trade Center following 9/11 Credit: AFP New beginnings 'This is when I started to have doubts and I realised things were going in the wrong direction. "I realised it was about making gas canisters full of hydrogen cyanide to attack nightclubs and cinemas,' he said. 'My good moral compass and critical thinking kicked in. "I thought, what if I build something for someone that is then used on civilians? I disagreed completely with this," he added. When he raised his concerns with Khaleb, the terror leader replied: 'The world is not the Disney movies that you watch. "This is a jungle. Kill or be killed. The world only respects one language: terror.' Feigning sickness, Aimen was sent to Qatar where he renounced his oath to the terror group and decided he would never go back. I started to have doubts and I realised things were going in the wrong direction Aimen Dean Arriving in the country, he was questioned by security services as a suspected Al-Qaeda member. He cooperated by giving them a number he had memorised for an Al-Qaeda bank account. Delighted at having landed on an treasure trove of intelligence, the Qataris offered him the choice of being handed over to America, France or Britain. 'I felt little cultural affinity with the French and didn't speak the language. And I didn't trust the Americans either," said Aimen. Within nine days he had 'landed in the lap' of MI5, who he said enthusiastically whisked him back to the UK after quickly recognising his impressive knack for map reading and photographic memory. Arriving in the UK, he was offered a Coca-Cola which he tried for the first time (now, his favourite drink) and a Harry Potter book. The next six months were filled with long training days and getting to grips with English before being sent to live in a flat with an Al Qaeda operative in London. 10 Osama bin-Laden addresses a news conference in Afghanistan on May 26, 1998 Credit: Reuters 10 Aimen worked for the MI5 and MI6 for eight years, becoming one of the secret service's most audacious spies Credit: Supplied / Aimen Dean On becoming an informant for the British Secret Intelligence Service he said the best piece of advice he received was to just 'go and have fun'. During this time, Aimen hopped between homes and became close with his roommates by leaning on his superior intellect and offering them religious guidance. He said: 'I am generally theologically better trained than the average Al Qaeda person so I ended up being kind of like a spiritual coach. "It's a bit brutal but it means they will open their hearts and minds to me, which made my espionage much easier.' It wasn't long before Aimen was asked if we would go back to Afghanistan and acquire intelligence for the MI6. This is a jungle - kill or be killed. The world only respects one language: terror Abu Khabab After rigorous training, he returned to the Middle East pretending his return was so he could get back in touch with his spirituality. He spent the next eight years spying for MI5 and MI6, becoming one of the secret service's most audacious spies. When asked about any close calls, he told The Times about a period in 2001, when he was called to meet one of bin Laden's closest lieutenants. He feared they had clocked on but was instead asked to deliver a message to four "brothers" in London, instructing them to "leave the country". The message read: "They must leave the country and come here before September 1. Something big is going to happen and we expect the Americans to come to Afghanistan." Aimen was walking along Oxford street later that year when he learned of the terror attack on America's Twin Towers and remembered those haunting words: "something big". Not long after, he caught wind of a worrying plot engineered by his former leader Khabab to bomb the New York Subway. Thanks to Aimen's tip, news of the planned attack was passed to the Oval office and successfully foiled. When asked about any close calls, he recalled the time he was cooking at the military camp and suddenly felt the cold end of a pistol against his lower spine. "Someone said, that's it confess, we know who you are. We know who you are working with," he said. His thorough training had taught him how to detect a bluff, so he held his nerve. It later transpired the incident was a routine test. Did he ever feel scared? Nervous, yes, he said. But the trick is to always "forget you're spying". 10 Aimen has a brilliant photographic memory which he owes to hours spent reading growing up Credit: Supplied / Aimen Dean
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Britain is broke: how inflation-linked debt costs us £60bn
Britain is broke. That was the depressing conclusion of the Office for Budget Responsibility's annual report on the future of the public finances published this week. Of course the fiscal watchdog did not choose those exact words. Instead it used 65,000 other words, but if you were to distil the overall message, it's hard to come to a different conclusion. The watchdog chose to focus its report this year on the ruinous cost of the triple-lock pension promise and the strain that net zero will place on the public purse. But in Westminster, all the talk is about how a little-known policy decision made decades ago is putting the government in an uncomfortably tight fiscal straitjacket. That decision was to start promising investors who lent money to the government that their cash would be protected from the ravages of inflation. Or in more technical language, the government started issuing index-linked gilts that were tied to the retail prices index (RPI) measure of inflation. This innovation meant investors could lend the government money safe in the knowledge that if inflation rose, the amount of interest they would receive and the amount returned at the end of the term of the loan would rise so the real value of their investment would never fall. Conventional gilts offer no such protection. The lender is just paid a fixed amount of interest each year, and a fixed amount of cash is returned at the end of the term. The consequences of this policy for the public purse are only now beginning to be felt because of the higher levels of inflation since the pandemic. The numbers are stark. In 2020 the government spent £25 billion a year on debt interest, but in the last tax year it spent £105 billion. By comparison, it spends £60 billion on schools, £55 billion on defence and £20 billion on the police. So who is to blame and how did we get here? The short answer is politicians. The long answer is more complicated. Decisions on the type of debt to issue each year are made by the chancellor but they are informed by officials and subject the demands of the market. The record shows that particularly high levels of index-linked gilts were issued under the chancellorships of Gordon Brown and George Osborne. However, the policy itself was first introduced by Geoffrey Howe, who was chancellor in 1981. Howe made the decision in part because the early Thatcher government was struggling to borrow what it needed after the economic crises of the 1970s, but also because it signalled that the Treasury was serious about cracking down on inflation. By promising to protect the real value of money lent to the Treasury, investors were reassured that the new government would not repeat the reckless and inflationary policies of the previous decade. There was also strong demand for this type of government debt from the pensions industry because it helped to fund the inflation guarantees in final salary schemes. • OBR rings alarm on pensions, climate change and the fiscal rule In the decades that followed, index-linked gilts, or 'linkers' as they became known, were hailed as a clever innovation because they met this demand and actually saved the government money. The reason was that investors would accept a lower rate of return on index-linked loans than conventional gilts because of the inflation protection they offered. Provided the RPI rate remained low — and over the next few decades it generally did — the government benefited by having to pay less interest on its debts. Indeed, an official analysis in 2023 found that the Treasury cumulatively saved £158 billion by issuing linkers in place of conventional gilts between 1981 and 2022. However, the equation dramatically shifted in 2022 when inflation surged to a high of 14.2 per cent. Suddenly, the amount the government had to pay to service its debts ballooned. Britain's public finances were hit uniquely hard because over the preceding decades the UK government had issued so much more index-linked debt than anyone else. By 2022, nearly 25 per cent of Britain's outstanding borrowing was index-lined, more than twice as much as any other G7 country. Italy has the next highest holding at 12 per cent but US debt has only 7 per cent and Germany less than 5 per cent. This meant that between 2019 and 2022, debt interest costs increased faster in the UK than in every other OECD country. The proportion of this increase that is down to linkers is subject to debate because the pandemic greatly increased government borrowing generally and the interest rates on conventional gilts also increased. However, an analysis by The Times of RPI rates and the stock of outstanding government debt, suggests the decision to issue linkers over conventional gilts cost the Treasury £62.8 billion in higher interest payments during 2022 and 2023. To put this in perspective, a penny on income tax raises only about £6 billion. These higher borrowing costs are set to continue for years to come as linkers mature and are repaid. It is one of the main reasons why the annual bill for servicing the nation's debt is set to hit £132 billion by 2030, according to the OBR. Whatever the exact cost of linkers, there can be no doubt that they have severely constrained Rachel Reeves's ability to enact meaningful policy, or borrow to invest in Britain's creaking public services. To make matters worse for the chancellor, investors in the gilt markets are acutely aware of the government's inflation-based debt problem so they scrutinise her every policy decision. Any move that suggests Labour might abandon fiscal responsibility rapidly raises the interest rates they demand to lend to the government. That is a major problem when the Treasury needs to borrow more than £250 billion this year and why these investors have been nicknamed the 'bond vigilantes'. The bond market really is an ever-present sword of Damocles hanging over the government. Anyone who doubts its power should remind themselves what happened to Liz Truss following her disastrous mini-budget. Perhaps understandably, no one is jumping to the front of the queue to take the blame for creating this situation. A Treasury source said that successive chancellors had to decide between the 'short-term attraction' of index-linked gilts and the longer-term risk. The 'red hot' demand from the pension industry made those decisions harder. However, the source admitted that, in hindsight, the issuing of index-linked gilts 'went too far'. While no politicians have publicly blamed the officials who advised them, questions have been asked about the role of civil servants. The principal official responsible for advising the government through the Brown and Osborne period was Sir Robert Stheeman, who was chief executive of the Debt Management Office (DMO), a Treasury agency created in 1998 when the Bank of England became independent. The DMO took on the bank's role of issuing and servicing gilts, with an objective to 'minimise financing costs over the long term, taking account of risk'. While there is no public record of Stheeman, who was earning £145,000 a year when he left in 2024, explicitly calling for more linkers, he did repeatedly describe them as a 'key part of the UK financing programme' and emphasised their cost advantages under certain market conditions. Last year, his replacement, Jessica Pulay, noted the markets' robust demand for index-linked gilts. However, ascribing any blame to officials at the DMO is tricky because they have no decision-making role and are only there to advise and execute government orders. So as successive chancellors were making merry in the bond markets, drunk on the illusion that inflation was a historic problem, did anyone raise the alarm? The short answer is very few. There were some warnings but they were muted. For example, in the mid 2010s, the House of Lords economic affairs committee highlighted that the UK's large share of inflation-linked debt made the public finances unusually vulnerable to inflation shocks — however it was presented only as a theoretical risk. Given the extended period of low inflation the country had benefited from, few took much notice. It was only when the OBR raised the alarm in 2017 that the Treasury decided to act. In the 2018 budget, Philip Hammond announced the government would gradually reduce the proportion of index-linked gilts it issued. Over the next five years, the share of government borrowing raised using linkers fell from 23.5 per cent to 12.4 per cent. However, it was too little, too late. Decades of much higher levels of issuance, and the fact that the inflation uplift on these debts kept their value rising, meant that by 2022, when inflation surged, more than 25 per cent of all outstanding gilts were still index linked. Rumours in Westminster suggest that for years the Treasury did not want to address the risks because linkers were considered a useful tool to constrain excessive departmental spending and the profligacy of No 10. The theory is that having a high proportion of index-linked gilts meant that large increases in public spending would be inflationary and therefore prohibitively expensive. Whether that theory is true, remains to be seen. However, what cannot be disputed is that Britain's debt experiment will handicap chancellors for years to come.
