Under Trump's distrust of foreigners, we're forgetting immigrants' contributions
A headline in the Miami Herald's May 18 front page states, 'Florida's mass deportation and immigration-enforcement blueprint explained.' The article details that Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration is aligned with President Trump's administration in cracking down on immigrants.
On the same front page was a story celebrating the achievements of the 2025 Silver Knight Awards recipients. Most of the recipients are children or grandchildren of immigrants.
The dichotomy makes one's head spin. One has to be ignorant — and racist — not to see the obvious contribution immigrants bring to our country.
Unless one belongs to a Native American tribe, we are all immigrants, including the governor and the president.
Monica Harvey,
Miami Shores
What's the benefit?
If President Trump and his inner cadre of xenophobes want to score political points, deporting Venezuelans who fled political and economic turmoil is unnecessary, as Trump won the election more than six months ago.
If he is trying to produce more goods and services domestically and maintain the economic boom South Florida has enjoyed over the last decade, how does removing thousands of potential and current workers, almost all who work for low wages, help the cause?
This pathological dislike and distrust of foreigners championed by the MAGA movement contradicts everything patriotism and American values stand for. If you love your country, why turn away the many masses who risked life and limb to get here?
Many Venezuelan conservative converts paraded around Doral with pro-Trump banners. Why turn on those who helped vote you in to office?
Suspending Temporary Protective Status obstructs fairness and growth. This can't be good policy nor even good politics.
Mark Elman,
Miami
Bus audit
Re: the May 18 Miami Herald story, 'Miami-Dade schools to audit bus camera program after investigation reveals issues.' I was happy to read that the school board voted in favor of a comprehensive audit and I look forward to the results.
I wonder, however, if it will raise the ethical question of whether the political influence of State Rep. Vicky Lopez benefited her son and the company he works for, BusPatrol. In Oct. 2024, after Lopez supported school bus camera laws, BusPatrol, the leading vendor, hired her son.
Barbara Sangetti,
Miami
Downtown living
I've long supported the Downtown Neighbors Alliance (DNA) and was proud to serve as its Development and Flagler Business Improvement District (BID) Liaison. However, DNA's campaign to dismantle the Miami Downtown Development Authority (DDA) relies on misleading 'facts' and risks harming the residents it claims to defend.
The DDA's $12.97 million annual assessment is reinvested into our community — clean streets, safety ambassadors, cultural events and public-realm projects like Flagler Street and the Baywalk. Fully 53% of the budget funds quality-of-life, arts, culture and urbanism initiatives; another 17% supports small-business grants and retail activities that keep our sidewalks vibrant and local economy healthy. Even the $750,000 sports sponsorship yields measurable boosts in visitor spending and property values — hardly 'taking money from residents' pockets.'
If one believes the DDA needs more resident voices, then join public meetings, attend town halls and demand clearer performance metrics. However, dissolving the DDA won't improve Downtown — it will abandon vital services and force the City of Miami to fill the gap, inevitably raising taxes. Miami deserves constructive debate, not reductive social-media slogans.
I urge my fellow residents to engage in the upcoming budget discussions, present our challenges fairly and work together for a stronger Downtown Miami.
Terrell N. Fritz,
director,
Flagler BID,
Miami
School e-buses
Miami-Dade County Public Schools have made groundbreaking progress by securing hundreds of electric school buses through the EPA's Clean School Bus Program, funded by the Inflation Reduction Act. These buses are already improving lives — reducing harmful air pollution, creating quieter and safer rides and cutting maintenance costs so more resources go back into classrooms. This success story, however, is now under threat.
The Trump administration has already terminated hundreds of grants and contracts supporting teacher preparation and education research. It has frozen funding awarded under the Clean School Bus Program and other clean-energy improvements and canceled approvals for states and school districts to spend millions in already-promised funds.
This funding isn't just about climate — it's a triple win for 'pupils, planet and prosperity.' Electric buses reduce asthma-triggering emissions, boost student learning by improving air quality and save school districts money in the long run. Our drivers love them. Our kids breathe easier because of them.
We cannot let shortsighted politics undo this progress. Miami-Dade families, educators and taxpayers all benefit from these clean-energy investments. We must fight to protect this program and ensure our children ride into a healthier, safer and more prosperous future.
Michele Drucker,
Miami
Medical advice
If Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., feels that people shouldn't take medical advice from him, then he should step aside in favor of someone who is qualified to give medical advice and head the national health agency.
Ted Burg,
Pembroke Pines
No property tax
The history of property taxation in the United States is long and complex, particularly in Florida, where politicians have consistently lacked the will to eliminate it. This ongoing inaction has created a catastrophic crisis for homeowners, especially retirees and senior citizens, many of whom are close to losing their primary residences.
Respected Wall Street Journal columnist John Steele Gordon, through a well-researched historical analysis of property taxes, argued that the current model should be suspended. He maintains that property taxes, which remain the primary source of revenue for local governments in the U.S., are a harmful relic of the 18th century. He advocates for their abolition, noting that such a tax no longer exists in any developed industrialized nation, but only in a few developing countries.
Notable voices have echoed this call. América TV host Juan Manuel Cao and Florida State Sen. Ileana García have both courageously spoken out in favor of abolishing property taxes. Their advocacy underscores the urgency of enacting a constitutional amendment to at least relieve retirees and elderly citizens of this onerous burden.
Fortunately, Gov. Ron DeSantis has the will to act. In March, he held a conference in Orlando with the Florida Association of Realtors, in which he reiterated his commitment to eliminating property taxes and expressed his intent to include a constitutional amendment on the 2026 Florida ballot.
A difficult path still lies ahead, with many local leaders opposing such change. It can be done. Germany, Japan and other nations have achieved this level of social well-being. We can too, by restructuring revenue sources, such as taxes on alcohol, cigarettes, gasoline, sales, tourism, home repair permits and other indirect taxes. Bureaucratic excess must be reduced, exorbitant public salaries re-evaluated and a portion of revenue from tariffs could be allocated toward replacing property tax income.
With strong leadership finally emerging, let us unite in support of a constitutional amendment on the 2026 Florida ballot to eliminate property taxes once and for all.
Domingo J. Delgado,
Sunny Isles Beach
Changing landscape
Seems like Sears in Coral Gables will be joining those magnificent places of my childhood, like Richard's Department Store, Jefferson's, Famous Restaurant in Miami Beach and Pirate's World in Dania Beach.
Today's youngsters won't have the joys of eyeing the candy displays nor waiting in line to talk to Santa. Instead, the Amazon truck pulls up, drops off your order without any conversation nor caring if the product satisfied your needs.
Oh, if only we could return to those simpler times.
Sol Yanowitz,
Miami
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump gets tariffs; Americans get price hikes
By David Gaffen and Marleen Kaesebier (Reuters) -U.S. President Donald Trump is getting his tariffs. Companies are making it clear how they intend to deal with it - passing them on to American consumers. Throughout the spring, big retailers and consumer product makers warned that levies on imported goods would squeeze their operations, forcing them to choose between lower earnings and passing on higher costs to customers. In the case of Procter & Gamble and others, it is both of those things. On Tuesday, the packaging giant, which makes household basics spanning from Bounty paper towel to Tide detergent, issued a sour outlook for 2025 and sent a message to big retailers like Walmart that it would have to raise prices on some U.S. goods from next week. This challenge facing companies in coming quarters will likely feed through to everyday consumers. P&G said it would raise prices on about a quarter of its products in the U.S. to help offset the cost of new tariffs. Price hikes are in the mid-single digits across categories, a spokesperson for the company said. While U.S. stock indexes have soared to record highs this year, built on massive investment in technology shares, many consumer bellwethers have struggled. Since Trump's April 2 "Liberation Day" tariff announcements, P&G shares have declined 19%; Nestle is down 20%; Kimberly-Clark has lost 11%, and PepsiCo is off nearly 7%, while the benchmark S&P 500 stock index has gained more than 13%. Consumer goods, food and drink companies have struggled with lackluster sales since the pandemic, as shoppers have balked at increasingly expensive name-brand packaged food. Nestle said last week that consumers in North America remained wary of paying more at the cash register. More price hikes will deepen investor worries about how big brands are navigating the combined challenge of thrifty consumers and hefty costs created by Trump's trade war. "You're going to see companies like Walmart, Amazon, and Best Buy forced to pass price increases to consumers," said Bill George, former chairman and CEO of Medtronic and executive education fellow at Harvard Business School. "Main Street has yet to see the fallout from increased tariffs - and they're going to go higher." Between July 16 and 25, companies in the Reuters global tariff tracker said they expected to lose a combined $7.1 billion to $8.3 billion for the full year. GM, Ford and other carmakers have absorbed the cost of tariffs - totaling billions of dollars - so far. Many companies shipped more goods and raw materials into the U.S. before tariffs hit. Economists and analysts reckon that hoarding has helped some delay hiking prices until later in the year and explains why tariffs have not yet shown up in U.S. inflation data. Andrew Wilson, International Chamber of Commerce deputy secretary general, estimates inflation will be felt once companies have run down inventory, but that might not be until the fourth quarter or first quarter of next year. Others like Ray Ban-maker EssilorLuxottica have already hiked prices. Swiss watch and jewelry maker Swatch increased prices by about 5% after Trump announced tariffs in April with "zero impact" on sales, CEO Nick Hayek told Reuters recently. High-end brands like Tissot watches are less price sensitive to increases. Customers wanting to splash out on an expensive watch might also buy abroad when travelling where taxes are lower, he said. "You cannot do this with cars. You cannot do this with machines. But you can do this with watches. So it's not so problematic for us," he said. Sign in to access your portfolio
Fast Company
16 minutes ago
- Fast Company
EPA seeks to repeal ‘holy grail' finding for climate regulation
IMPACT The 'endangerment finding' is the legal underpinning of a host of climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants, and more pollution sources. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin attends a Make America Healthy Again (MAHA) Commission Event in the East Room of the White House, Thursday, May 22, 2025, in Washington. [Photo: AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin, File] BY Associated Press Listen to this Article More info 0:00 / 0:00 President Donald Trump 's administration on Tuesday proposed revoking a scientific finding that has long been the central basis for U.S. action to regulate greenhouse gas emissions and fight climate change. The proposed Environmental Protection Agency rule would rescind a 2009 declaration that determined that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare. The 'endangerment finding' is the legal underpinning of a host of climate regulations under the Clean Air Act for motor vehicles, power plants and other pollution sources that are heating the planet. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin announced the proposed rule change on a podcast ahead of an official announcement set for Tuesday in Indiana. Subscribe to the Daily Company's trending stories delivered to you every day Privacy Policy | Fast Company Newsletters Repealing the endangerment finding 'will be the largest deregulatory action in the history of America,' Zeldin said on the Ruthless podcast. 'There are people who, in the name of climate change, are willing to bankrupt the country,' Zeldin said. 'They created this endangerment finding and then they are able to put all these regulations on vehicles, on airplanes, on stationary sources, to basically regulate out of existence, in many cases, a lot of segments of our economy. And it cost Americans a lot of money.' The EPA proposal must go though a lengthy review process, including public comment, before it is finalized, likely next year. Environmental groups are likely to challenge the rule change in court. Zeldin called for a rewrite of the endangerment finding in March as part of a series of environmental rollbacks announced at the same time in what he said was 'the greatest day of deregulation in American history.' A total of 31 key environmental rules on topics from clean air to clean water and climate change would be rolled back or repealed under Zeldin's plan. He singled out the endangerment finding as 'the Holy Grail of the climate change religion' and said he was thrilled to end it 'as the EPA does its part to usher in the Golden Age of American success.' Tailpipe emission limits also targeted The EPA also is expected to call for rescinding limits on tailpipe emissions that were designed to encourage automakers to build and sell more electric vehicles. The transportation sector is the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Environmental groups said Zeldin's action denies reality as weather disasters exacerbated by climate change continue in the U.S. and around the world. 'As Americans reel from deadly floods and heat waves, the Trump administration is trying to argue that the emissions turbocharging these disasters are not a threat,' said Christy Goldfuss, executive director of the Natural Resources Defense Council. 'It boggles the mind and endangers the nation's safety and welfare.' Under Zeldin and Trump, 'the EPA wants to shirk its responsibility to protect us from climate pollution, but science and the law say otherwise,' she added. 'If EPA finalizes this illegal and cynical approach, we will see them in court.' advertisement Three former EPA leaders have also criticized Zeldin, saying his March announcement targeting the endangerment finding and other rules imperiled the lives of millions of Americans and abandoned the agency's dual mission to protect the environment and human health. 'If there's an endangerment finding to be found anywhere, it should be found on this administration because what they're doing is so contrary to what the Environmental Protection Agency is about,' Christine Todd Whitman, who led EPA under Republican President George W. Bush, said after Zeldin's plan was made public. The EPA proposal follows an executive order from Trump that directed the agency to submit a report 'on the legality and continuing applicability' of the endangerment finding. Conservatives and some congressional Republicans hailed the initial plan, calling it a way to undo economically damaging rules to regulate greenhouse gases. But environmental groups, legal experts and Democrats said any attempt to repeal or roll back the endangerment finding would be an uphill task with slim chance of success. The finding came two years after a 2007 Supreme Court ruling holding that the EPA has authority to regulate greenhouse gases as air pollutants under the Clean Air Act. Passing court muster could be an issue David Doniger, a climate expert at the NRDC, accused Trump's Republican administration of using potential repeal of the endangerment finding as a 'kill shot'' that would allow him to make all climate regulations invalid. If finalized, repeal of the endangerment finding would erase current limits on greenhouse gas pollution from cars, factories, power plants and other sources and could prevent future administrations from proposing rules to tackle climate change. 'The Endangerment Finding is the legal foundation that underpins vital protections for millions of people from the severe threats of climate change, and the Clean Car and Truck Standards are among the most important and effective protections to address the largest U.S. source of climate-causing pollution,' said Peter Zalzal, associate vice president of the Environmental Defense Fund. 'Attacking these safeguards is manifestly inconsistent with EPA's responsibility to protect Americans' health and well-being,' he said. 'It is callous, dangerous and a breach of our government's responsibility to protect the American people from this devastating pollution.' Conrad Schneider, a senior director at the Clean Air Task Force, said the Trump administration 'is using pollution regulations as a scapegoat in its flawed approach to energy affordability' and reliability. He and other advocates 'are dismayed that an administration that claims it cares about cleaner, healthier and safer air is seeking to dismantle the very protections that are required for those conditions,' Schneider said. —Matthew Daly, Associated Press The early-rate deadline for Fast Company's Most Innovative Companies Awards is Friday, September 5, at 11:59 p.m. PT. Apply today. Explore Topics Climate change Donald Trump EPA global warming greenhouse gas emissions pollution
New York Post
16 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump reacts to Starmer plan to recognize Palestine: ‘Could make the case that you're rewarding Hamas'
WASHINGTON — President Trump warned Tuesday that British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's plan to recognize a Palestinian state in September if the Israeli government fails to meet certain conditions could reward Hamas and stressed that the US won't follow suit. 'You could make the case that you're rewarding Hamas if you do that,' Trump told reporters onboard Air Force One en route to Washington from Scotland. 'I'm not about to do that.' 3 President Trump and Keir Starmer in Scotland on July 28. REUTERS Earlier in the day, Starmer committed to granting Palestine UK recognition during the United Nations General Assembly in September, following in the footsteps of France, unless Israel takes 'substantive steps' to remedy humanitarian concerns in the Gaza Strip and agrees to a long-term plan for a two-state solution. Trump, who met with Starmer at his golf resort in Turnberry, Scotland on Monday, said that the British PM didn't tell him of his plan beforehand. 'We never did discuss it, and we have no view on that. We're going to get a lot of money to the area so they can get some food,' the president said. Last week, Trump had struck a more dismissive tone against French President Emmanuel Macron, chiding that 'what he says doesn't matter' and that the move didn't 'carry any weight.' 3 Trump and Starmer speak to the media at the Trump Turnberry golf course in Turnberry, Scotland on July 28, 2025. AP Starmer, Macron and other Western leaders have sought to ramp up pressure on Israel to allow more humanitarian aid to flow into the war-torn enclave amid troubling images of starved children in Gaza. Hamas has so far refused to give up remaining Israeli hostages to end the war and allow for a cease-fire, which many officials believe would make distributing aid in Gaza much more doable. The latest round of negotiations broke down last week. 3 Hamas fighters in Gaza City before the release of Israeli hostages on Feb. 1. MOHAMMED SABER/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock Over the weekend, Israel began allowing airdrops of humanitarian aid into Gaza. On Monday, Trump publicly cast doubt on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's denial that there was mass starvation in Gaza and said that the US intends to send more food to the Palestinians there. 'Those are kids that are starving,' Trump reflected Tuesday en route back to the US. 'You see the mothers. They love them so much. There's just nothing they seem to be able to do. They got to get them food, and we're going to get them food.'
