US envoy Tom Barrack arrives in Beirut for high-level talks
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
L'Orient-Le Jour
11 hours ago
- L'Orient-Le Jour
No breakthrough in Barrack's latest trip to Beirut, all eyes on Berri
BEIRUT — The ball is in the Lebanese court. That is the main message from U.S. envoy Tom Barrack during his third visit to Beirut on Monday, to discuss the issue of Hezbollah's disarmament. The diplomat reaffirmed that this matter is up to the Lebanese authorities, who must define the approach themselves. After his meeting with Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, the U.S. envoy said that Hezbollah's disarmament is "an internal Lebanese issue," as Hezbollah circles accuse the Americans of wanting to impose this disarmament to "reassure Israel." 'The United States is not here to force Israel to do anything. We are here to use our influence to bring calm minds together around a solution,' he continued, believing that the cease-fire agreement reached in November to end the war between Hezbollah and the Hebrew state 'did not work.' Arriving in Beirut on Sunday evening, the U.S. envoy was first received by President Joseph Aoun before his meeting at the Grand Serail. According to the presidency, Aoun handed him a 'draft memorandum of understanding' outlining Lebanon's commitments since the cease-fire. These include points from the truce agreement, the president's inauguration speech, and the ministerial statement of Salam's Cabinet. Among these commitments, the presidency cited 'the urgent need to save Lebanon by extending the state's authority over its entire territory with nothing but its own forces, monopolizing arms exclusively in the hands of the Lebanese Army and asserting the authority of the Lebanese constitutional institutions over decisions of war and peace.' These factors must be ensured 'simultaneously and in parallel with maintaining Lebanese sovereignty over all its international borders, reconstruction, and the initiation of economic recovery.' Hezbollah is 'a terrorist organization' In his remarks, Barrack stated that 'President Donald Trump attaches importance to the situation in Lebanon and the restoration of stability in the region.' 'My return to Lebanon comes as Syria and the region have once again become unstable, and today we must focus on Lebanon to restore stability,' he stressed, affirming that he would 'continue his meetings with Lebanese officials working towards solutions,' whether on security issues or economic reforms. He also claims not to have taken note of Hezbollah's 'remarks' on his roadmap, adding that for the American administration, Hezbollah is 'a terrorist organization' with which it does not engage in dialogue. In short, no tangible progress was recorded during this tour. The U.S. envoy still insists on the need to move to operational steps for the state's weapons monopoly, through a clear and public decision by official Lebanon and with the approval of all parties. Certainly, according to L'Orient Today's information, the Lebanese response he received reaffirms Lebanon's attachment to the weapons monopoly as well as its commitment to the ministerial statement and the presidential inaugural address. But what Washington now expects is a concrete mechanism for implementation and the start of its execution. This mechanism is still to be defined in its details. These details concern the launch date of its implementation, considering it is meant to be conducted in several stages. The first would consist of a clear government decision in favor of the state's monopoly on arms. The second would see Hezbollah begin to hand over its weapons north of the Litani River, notably missiles and drones, with the United States pressuring Israel to avoid escalation, cease its aggressions, violations, and targeted assassinations. The third step should concern Beirut and its suburbs, especially the southern suburb, concurrently with American pressure on Israel to initiate a withdrawal from occupied points. The fourth stage would be dedicated to the withdrawal of weapons from the Bekaa region. Nabih Berri's proposal In this context, Lebanon has clearly expressed its requirements, particularly the effective cease-fire implementation by Israel, the need to activate the monitoring committee's work on the agreement, and the importance of maintaining the role of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL). Barrack emphasized that the Lebanese state must prove its effectiveness and remain attentive to regional developments. Lebanon has also insisted on obtaining guarantees regarding control of the situation in Syria, in light of concerns expressed by several Lebanese factions regarding the repercussions of recent events in Syria, especially after the clashes in Sweida. Some believe that Hezbollah is using Syrian instability as a pretext to keep its weapons, citing the defense of the Shiite communities' presence in the area and the protection of border region. But Barrack's logic is clear: to end Israeli violations and strikes, Lebanon must begin to regain the weapons monopoly, as the State alone is responsible for the security of its citizens. The Lebanese response has not received Hezbollah's approval, as it does not consider itself concerned by this document. On Friday, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem rejected the American proposal, believing that Washington is trying to reach a new agreement and is pressuring the Lebanese Army to remove his party's weapons at the risk of provoking civil war. In this context, the main issue remains Tuesday's scheduled meeting between Barrack and Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri. According to some reports, Berri is expected to put forward a proposal consisting of a 15-day suspension of Israeli military operations during which a serious dialogue would take place with Hezbollah on the mechanism for returning weapons to the state. The Americans have not yet responded to this proposal, but according to well-informed sources, Barrack should travel to Israel to discuss it with officials. Other meetings The envoy was also received by Elias Audi, the Greek Orthodox Metropolitan of Beirut, with whom he discussed the situation in Lebanon and the region, and by Druze leader Walid Jumblatt. L'Orient Today learned that Maronite Patriarch Bechara Rai will meet with Barrack on Wednesday, who is also expected to meet with the commander of the army, General Rodolphe Haykal. A dinner bringing together several MPs is also planned at the U.S. Embassy.
LBCI
11 hours ago
- LBCI
MP George Bouchikian denies fleeing Lebanon ahead of immunity lift request
Lebanese MP George Bouchikian on Monday denied media reports suggesting he left the country to avoid legal prosecution, saying his recent departure was a long-planned personal trip and that no legal action had been initiated against him at the time. In a statement issued from abroad, Bouchikian said he left Lebanon on July 7 for a family trip that had been arranged months in advance. 'At the time of my departure, no decision had been issued to pursue legal action against me, nor was there any formal request to lift my parliamentary immunity,' he said. 'The General Security's travel records clearly confirm my departure date and the purpose behind it.' The request to lift Bouchikian's immunity, submitted by Lebanon's public prosecutor, was dated July 9—two days after he had already left the country. 'This completely discredits claims that I left to evade accountability,' he added. Bouchikian reaffirmed his willingness to cooperate with judicial authorities. 'I am fully prepared to respond to any competent legal body, in the appropriate place and time, in full respect of the constitutional process and transparency,' he said. The MP also noted that his legal team took immediate action upon being notified of the request to lift his immunity. Formal submissions were filed to the Speaker of Parliament, the Parliament Bureau, and the Administration and Justice Committee. 'A detailed legal memorandum was also submitted, laying out factual, legal, and constitutional arguments in response to the request,' he said, adding that the document is now in the hands of lawmakers ahead of the parliamentary session scheduled for July 23. Bouchikian expressed confidence in Parliament's ability to handle the case fairly. 'I trust that MPs will address this matter objectively and without influence from media pressure or populist narratives,' he said. 'No one is above accountability, and no one should be denied legal protection,' he concluded. 'Justice cannot be achieved through double standards.'
LBCI
11 hours ago
- LBCI
Lebanese Forces reject sectarian accusations, reaffirm commitment to national unity
In a statement released on Monday, the Lebanese Forces' media office emphasized that the party's stance toward all Lebanese sects is well-known and clear, based on 'full respect and equal citizenship,' reflecting its commitment to the Lebanese idea and its defense of it. 'This conviction is reflected in two directions,' the statement read. 'First, in a national discourse that transcends all sects; and second, in the membership of citizens from all sects—particularly the Sunni community—within the Lebanese Forces, in addition to the strong relationships the party maintains with Sunni, Druze, and Shiite leaders, except for those who are not only in ideological opposition to the LF, but to the very concept of Lebanon.' The party expressed regret over what it called 'malicious attempts' by some parties to sow division and constantly target the LF, blaming it for irresponsible statements 'that do not reflect the party's values, principles, or rhetoric, even if such statements come from individuals close to the LF.' It concluded by affirming that 'the only official representatives of the Lebanese Forces are its president, executive body, parliamentary bloc, media office, and statements issued by the party's authorized institutions. Any other statements, regardless of the speaker's proximity to the party, do not represent the LF.'
