logo
Fires ablaze in a stolen land: Israel's trees planted over Palestinian villages are in flames

Fires ablaze in a stolen land: Israel's trees planted over Palestinian villages are in flames

Mail & Guardian07-05-2025
Wildfires in Israel. (X)
The forests that cover the demolished Palestinian villages of the 1948 Nakba are ablaze at a time when Israel prepares to celebrate its 80th anniversary of colonial settler independence.
This is an apt symbol for the smoldering toxins in a failing Zionist system turning to ash. The genocidal apartheid state requests the West for help to fight the fires, while, without any scruples whatsoever, its military burns children and adults alive in Gaza, the West Bank and Lebanon, courtesy of United States, British, French and German bombs, to the cheers of most Israelis and the Zionist international.
Those like me, who were seduced as innocent children by the thieving Jewish National Fund (JNF) into providing pocket money to plant trees ostensibly to make the desert bloom, can feel redeemed by whatever cause is now wiping the stolen terrain of its camouflage.
I am proud that when I was minister of water and forests in the democratic South African government, I prevented a so-called South Africa Forest in the Galilee area of Occupied Palestine from being re-named the Nelson Mandela Forest.
The implanted vegetation conceals the depopulated and destroyed Palestinian village of Lubya, visited by South African filmmaker Heidi Grunebaum, who made a moving documentary, The Village Under the Forest. South African activist and renowned Middle East analyst Naeem Jeenah, who accompanied her on the trip searching for the site, recounts the experience.
'Heidi and I were the two non-Christians who were part of a South African delegation at a Christian conference in Bethlehem. After the conference, all eight of us were determined to visit Lubya — even though it was far out of our way. As we drove out to it, we all had mixed feelings, including a great deal of anger. Lubya had been depopulated in 1948, and alien trees had been planted over the village, and this new 'forest' was named after us!
'We found remains of homes, a water well, even a small mosque — partly buried under sand. One reverend in our group was determined to rip out every JNF tree that covered Lubya, a hopeless task, but his spirit reflected how we all felt: anger, defeat, betrayal. Perhaps we should have destroyed the board that said 'South Africa Forest', with a picture of our flag on it. Heidi's very personal film about Lubya, in different ways, mirrored how all eight of us felt on that day.'
The JNF planted alien trees from Europe and Australia, such as the pine and eucalyptus, full of inflammable sap that explodes like napalm, in hot, dry climates.
Those are thirsty trees that, like the alien Zionist settlers, guzzle up precious water from the aquifers at the expense of the Palestinian populace, and despoil the environment. The indigenous cedar and olive trees of the region were obviously shunned as being too Arabic.
The settlers planted trees to create their little Europe in the Levant, pretending they were making the desert bloom, and then, when the ethnic cleansing came, planted trees at a pace to cover up the scenes of butchery and demolition of hundreds of villages, hoping to obliterate any sign of a Palestinian presence.
The JNF boasts of having planted more than 260 million trees since it was founded by Theodor Herzl in 1901. Amid the Gaza genocide and onslaught on the West Bank, demented settlers carry out pogroms and set fire to the precious olive groves, source of Palestinian livelihood, sustenance, family heritage, bonds of love and culture, destroying nearly one million since 1967.
Alon Mizrahi, an exiled anti-Zionist Israeli, comments: 'From personal experience, those groves and 'forests' don't feel real. Like those who planted them, they emit a sense of shallowness and fragility. I grew up next to one, and, without knowing anything about the history of Zionism, they always felt strange to me, and never magical, the way a true forest feels.
'And so the fires raging today in those 'nature parks' of fake, sinister European pines can be seen (if you have a soul and an imagination) as an act of resistance and rejection by Palestinian communities who have been gone for decades but never abandoned, or forgotten, their homeland.'
The burning settler forests of Israel, a colonial blot on the stolen landscape, take me back to the opening of the armed struggle in South Africa in 1961, when we set alight the sugar cane and wattle plantations of colonial settlers who, like the Israelis, had dispossessed the indigenous people and stolen the land.
As a sign of the paranoia gripping Israel, Hebrew Channel 14 correspondent Hillel Biton Rosen has reflected the fear gripping settler minds: 'A mystery: dozens of fires have broken out across the country — and not a single one is in an Arab area.'
He is correct. The reason, of course, is that 'the Arab areas' have indigenous trees, and these are not flammable like the non-native trees are. Maybe there are other areas? In the dark days of apartheid rule in South Africa, there was a recurring fear among the white supremacist community that black servants would serve them poisoned coffee at wake-up time or slit their throats.
Those are the fears of settlers who like to enjoy life undisturbed by any sign of rebellion, and can never enjoy the sleep of the kind-hearted. Just as we South Africans overcame settler colonialism and apartheid, the Palestinian people's resistance, reinforced by international solidarity, will see victory as sure as the sun rises in the east and sets in the west.
Ronnie Kasrils is a veteran of the anti-apartheid struggle, and South Africa's former minister for intelligence services, activist and author. This article first appeared in The Palestine Chronicle.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Six more die of hunger in Gaza, Israel says UN trucks make fuel delivery
Six more die of hunger in Gaza, Israel says UN trucks make fuel delivery

The Herald

timea day ago

  • The Herald

Six more die of hunger in Gaza, Israel says UN trucks make fuel delivery

The Hamas-run Gaza government media office said on Sunday nearly 1,600 aid trucks had arrived since Israel eased restrictions late in July. However, witnesses and Hamas sources said many trucks have been looted by desperate displaced people and armed gangs. More than 700 trucks of fuel entered the Gaza Strip in January and February during a ceasefire before Israel broke it in March in a dispute over terms for extending it and resumed its major offensive. Palestinian local health authorities said at least 40 people had been killed by Israeli gunfire and air strikes across the coastal enclave on Sunday. Deaths included people trying to make their way to aid distribution points in southern and central areas in Gaza, Palestinian medics said. Among those killed was a staff member of the Palestinian Red Crescent Society, which said an Israeli strike at their headquarters in Khan Younis in southern Gaza ignited a fire on the first floor of the building. The Gaza war began when Hamas killed more than 1,200 people and took 251 hostage in a cross-border attack on southern Israel on October 7 2023, according to Israeli figures. Israel's air and ground war in densely populated Gaza has since killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, according to enclave health officials. According to Israeli officials, 50 hostages remain in Gaza, only 20 of whom are believed to be alive. On Saturday, Hamas released its second video in two days of Israeli hostage Evyatar David. In it, David, skeletally thin, is shown digging a hole that, he says in the video, is for his own grave. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday he had asked the International Committee of the Red Cross to give humanitarian assistance to the hostages during a conversation with the head of the Swiss-based organisation's local delegation. Reuters

'Propaganda masquerading as strategic realism'
'Propaganda masquerading as strategic realism'

IOL News

time2 days ago

  • IOL News

'Propaganda masquerading as strategic realism'

Palestinian children clamour for a meal at a charity kitchen in the Mawasi area of Khan Yunis in the southern Gaza Strip. Image: AFP Ziyad Motala There is a certain predictability in the Sunday Times' editorial arc of late, an increasingly tired soliloquy in praise of empire, veiled in the language of pragmatism and national interest. But even by its declining standards, the paper's recent conduct reveals something altogether more disquieting: an abdication of journalistic integrity in favour of ideological alignment with Zionist hasbara and Washington's punitive caprice. For months, the Sunday Times stonewalled a public inquiry, refusing to disclose that its columnist, S'thembiso Msomi, had taken a trip to Israel and written an article in April 2025, a reverent portrayal of Israeli resilience masquerading as impartial analysis, which was funded by the South African Jewish Board of Deputies. This silence was not inadvertent. It was calculated. Only this past Sunday, after a formal complaint was lodged with the Press Council, did the paper grudgingly acknowledge this inconvenient fact. The admission came in the form of a subdued notice buried deep within the paper, accompanied by the usual euphemisms of 'clarification' and 'apology.' One suspects the intent was plain: to bury the admission and hope the public would move on, none the wiser. This is no minor infraction. The Press Code is unambiguous: publications must disclose when a third party finances the cost of news gathering. Failure to do so compromises not only the perceived neutrality of the journalist but the editorial independence of the publication itself. The Sunday Times, one of South Africa's prominent newspapers, violated this basic tenet of ethical journalism and only confessed months later when cornered. But Msomi's subsidised propaganda piece is merely the tip of a much larger ideological iceberg. For some time now, the Sunday Times has become a dependable sanctuary for pro-Israel apologetics and the exculpation of American imperial tantrums. William Gumede's April 27 supplication for normalisation with Israel was not just intellectually lazy; it was ideologically revealing. That his organisation, Democracy Works, has itself been the recipient of funding from several dubious foreign entities raises questions about whether we are reading South African analysis or something concocted in the backrooms of Tel Aviv and Washington, D.C. Not to be outdone, David Bruce, in a piece on July 18, urged the ANC to 're-engage' with Israel, as though genocide were a minor irritant to be filed under diplomatic collateral. This week, Richard Gumede once again joined the chorus with a patronising lecture about South Africa's 'anti-American' posture, couched, of course, in the language of concern for ordinary South Africans. He argues that the ANC's refusal to grovel before Donald Trump's grotesque 'America first' foreign policy is somehow an affront to rational diplomacy. It is a line of reasoning so bankrupt, so wilfully ahistorical, that one wonders whether Gumede has mistaken State Department press releases for political philosophy. To Gumede, the refusal to embrace the punitive actions taken by the United States against its adversaries, China, Russia, and Iran, is symptomatic of ideological recklessness. That these are states with whom South Africa has longstanding economic and strategic ties is brushed aside. That they are themselves frequent targets of American hostility for daring to act independently of Washington's diktats is of no concern. And that Donald Trump's America is perhaps the least principled, most corrupt and least coherent United States government in recent memory is something Gumede conveniently omits. Let us be clear. No state, regardless of its alliances or ideological pretensions, should enjoy impunity for violating international law or trampling on human rights. Those who commit war crimes or persecute their people must be held accountable without exception. Yet to invoke China, Russia or Iran as stock villains to deflect from the horrors in Gaza is not only evasive, it is intellectually bankrupt. Any person possessed of even modest moral clarity can see what is unfolding there: a sustained campaign of collective punishment, bolstered by the silence and acquiescence of the self-styled democratic West. Only a fool believes the United States has a principled interest in human rights. The historical record is unambiguous. So long as the foreign despot salutes the American flag and pledges fealty to Washington, tyranny becomes tolerable, and repression conveniently overlooked. It is particularly rich that Gumede offers up corruption as one of the United States' primary concerns with South Africa. One must ask: Is this the same United States whose president auctioned off foreign policy to the highest bidder, made his inaugural visits to the gilded palaces of Riyadh and Abu Dhabi, and returned with real estate contracts for his family? Is this the America whose transactional foreign policy includes deals with murderers and autocrats in exchange for arms deals and hotel licences? If so, Gumede's invocation of corruption is not just misguided. It is obscene. Equally revealing as what the Sunday Times chooses to publish is what it deliberately leaves out. While major newspapers across the globe devoted front pages this Sunday to the deepening famine in Gaza, where Israel stands credibly accused of weaponising starvation against a besieged population, the Sunday Times offered not a single article on the subject. Instead, readers were served yet another polemic lamenting South Africa's supposed diplomatic 'missteps' for refusing to placate the unplacatable. At the very moment when two respected Israeli human rights organisations, B'Tselem and Physicians for Human Rights Israel, joined the growing international consensus that Israel is committing genocide, the Sunday Times chose to publish yet another piece dismissing South Africa's ICJ application as nothing more than political 'lawfare.' This posture is part of a broader pattern of editorial capture. In an earlier column by Rowan Polovin on May 18, the Sunday Times provided a platform for the chair of the South African Zionist Federation to distort history, sanitise Israeli apartheid, and peddle neocolonial binaries between the "West" and global irrelevance. Polovin's article was not journalism. It was propaganda masquerading as strategic realism, replete with the ugliest strands of ethnic chauvinism and settler-colonial nostalgia. This is not journalism. It is ideological mimicry. The Sunday Times' descent into apologetics for Zionist repression and American belligerence reflects a broader pattern among certain elite opinion-shapers in South Africa. They dress up subservience and Israeli apartheid as realism, and fealty to empire as prudence. But the effect is the same: the slow domestication of South African political discourse in service of foreign powers whose only consistent principle is the ruthless preservation of their interests. In an age when facts are politicised and justice is routinely subverted, affectations of neutrality serve only to mask complicity. The Sunday Times has not simply abdicated its duty to inform. It has aligned itself with the architects of obfuscation, giving comfort to power, to oppression, and Israeli apartheid, something unimaginable in a democratic South Africa bending to the whims of Donald Trump. * Ziyad Motala, Professor of Law, Howard Law School ** The views expressed in this article are necessarily those of The African, IOL or Independent Media.

Global peace goals unite SA and China
Global peace goals unite SA and China

The Citizen

time4 days ago

  • The Citizen

Global peace goals unite SA and China

China and SA highlight their roles in resolving global conflicts and commit to defending human rights and international cooperation. The different roles that South Africa and China continue to play in the pursuit of peace and stability in the world have been praised by Gauteng legislature speaker Morakane Mosupyoe and Chinese consul-general in Johannesburg Pan Qingjiang. Mosupyoe was a guest speaker at the commemoration of the 80th anniversary of China's victory over Japan organised by the China consulate on Wednesday evening. SA and China reaffirm commitment to global peace She cited South Africa's peace missions in conflicts such as the Ukrainian-Russian war, the Israel-Palestinian war, the Democratic Republic of Congo conflicts and several others on the continent. China mediated in ending long-standing tension between Iran and Saudi Arabia and albeit rejected by the US, it also offered its expertise in resolving the ongoing bloody war in Ukraine. ALSO READ: China pedals ahead with innovation 'Both China and South Africa are bound together by their shared values and aspirations – that of fighting for peace, promotion of human rights and international solidarity,' Mosupyoe said. 'Therefore, I want, on behalf of the people of South Africa, to recommit ourselves to a world free of any form of aggression, imperialism and subjugation of one nation by another. 80th war commemoration She said the commemoration of the resistance war against Japan was an opportunity to strengthen bilateral relations between South Africa and China, 'to continue fighting for our common interest in the world'. 'Our bilateral relations become even more relevant today when the world is beginning to experience the resurgence of narrow nationalistic sentiments which threaten world peace and solidarity. We must remain resolute in our commitment to a world free of any form of aggression.' NOW READ: SA and China agree to collaborate on AI and innovation

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store