Charge dropped against Humansville city employee accused of rigging election
Humansville clerk accused of preventing candidates from running in April election
According to an official complaint obtained by Ozarks First Investigates from the Secretary of State, Piper was accused of blocking certain candidates from submitting paperwork to run in the April 2024 election.
According to a statement from Polk County Prosecutor Keaton Ashlock the person who filed that official complaint, along with other witnesses, failed to cooperate in the case which led to its dismissal:
'The Polk County Prosecutor has dismissed case 24WE-CR01059-01 which was initiatedthrough grand jury indictment on the charge of felony Election Interference under RSMo115.631 on July 10, 2024.
This decision was made after two of the State's main witnesses failed to appear onsubpoenas for depositions leading up to the scheduled trial date of April 30, 2025. This includedthe sole witness named in the probable cause statement submitted by the Secretary of State'sOffice, whose account was the basis for the charge.
The Sixth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States guarantees the right of acriminal defendant to confront and cross-examine witnesses at a trial. Furthermore, the rules ofthe Missouri Supreme Court Rule of Criminal Procedure 25 gives defendants the ability todepose witnesses prior to trial.
Without the cooperation of witnesses at depositions, and with no assurance that theProsecution would be able to provide necessary testimony at a forthcoming trial, the Prosecutor's Office deemed a dismissal necessary.'
Ozarks First Investigates asked Piper about the allegations at a city council meeting and she denied any wrongdoing.
Her case was moved to Webster County where a jury trial was scheduled for April 30, 2025, but it's now cancelled.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
10 hours ago
- Boston Globe
I was a bar advocate for 27 years. Here's why I had to quit.
This hourly rate barely covers the necessary expenses of the job: office rent (required by the Commonwealth), legal research subscriptions, administrative help, printing costs, and malpractice insurance. On top of these expenses, I often need to buy clothes for clients to wear at trial and personally pay for transportation costs to drug treatment facilities. Advertisement I write personal checks to fund my clients' constitutional rights, draining my savings so poor defendants can compete against well-funded prosecutors. Seventeen years ago, I carried $20,000 in IRS debt — money borrowed from my future to fund support for my clients. My husband has since paid that debt so I could continue the calling that was destroying me financially. I eventually stopped taking District Court cases because I was losing money on each case. Superior Court cases paid more, but the stress was much higher. These weren't simple matters — they were complex felonies involving thousands of pages of discovery, expert witnesses, and lengthy investigations. The higher pay barely covered the massive increase in work needed for a proper defense. After nearly three decades in the industry, I walked away from my three-year contract in February with Suffolk Lawyers for Justice because the work had become financially impossible. A recent work stoppage by defense attorney has forced the dismissal of numerous criminal cases, undermining public safety and the administration of justice. Advertisement The financial burden is only part of the story. The work itself is gutting and causes a psychological toll. Bar advocates visit prisons several days a week, often meeting with allegedly dangerous and mentally ill clients. For example, I once sat in a large cell at MCI- Cedar Junction Walpole's Disciplinary Unit interviewing a client chained to the floor, his body so restricted by restraints he could barely move. I remember him struggling to adjust his eyeglasses while wrestling with all the chains around his body. Correctional officers flanked each side of the room, their presence a constant reminder of the power imbalance that defines every aspect of the criminal justice system. Massachusetts, the second highest cost-of-living state, according to Forbes, pays court-appointed defense attorneys $65 an hour. New Hampshire, which isn't in the top 10 most expensive places to live, pays its attorneys $125 an hour. Maine pays its attorneys $150 an hour. Why is there such a big difference? This isn't just about wanting more money. It's also about whether Massachusetts is serious about equal justice. When defense attorneys are forced to choose between paying their bills and properly defending their clients, the constitutional foundation of our justice system crumbles. The Sixth Amendment right to counsel becomes an empty promise. The Massachusetts Legislature can address this crisis by amending the proposed compensation language in the bar advocate compensation bill filed by Representative Christopher Markey of Dartmouth: raise rates for homicide cases to $155 an hour, Superior Court non-homicide cases to $120 an hour, and District Court cases to $100 an hour. This increase would help the state retain experienced attorneys and ensure constitutional rights remain more than empty promises. Advertisement After 27 years as a bar advocate, I can say with certainty: Justice isn't just blind — it's also broken. Until Massachusetts pays what constitutional rights actually cost, the state will continue watching experienced defense attorneys abandon poor clients, leaving our most vulnerable citizens with lawyers who can't properly defend them. The choice is simple: Fund real justice or accept that equal justice is just empty courthouse decoration.
New York Post
4 days ago
- New York Post
Murder conviction tossed all because killer's sleepy pal was kicked out of NYC courtroom: ruling
A state appeals court tossed out a Queens murder conviction because the killer's buddy was booted from the courtroom for falling asleep — even though the accused was clearly guilty. The state Appellate Division panel said in a bizarre ruling last week that convicted killer Donald White was denied a public trial because Judge Michael Aloise booted his friend from the courtroom before White was found guilty of murder, robbery and weapons possession in 2016. 3 A state appellate court threw out a Queens murder conviction because the killer's friend was booted for falling asleep. Christopher Sadowski Advertisement 'Upon reviewing the record here, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence,' according to the decision, which was filed Wednesday. 'Nevertheless, the defendant is entitled to a new trial because the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in excluding a spectator from the courtroom, thereby violating the defendant's right to a public trial,' the judges said. The ruling means White, who is still being held in state prison, gets a new trial in the case. Advertisement Veteran civil rights attorney Ron Kuby, who was not involved in the case, chided Aloise's decision to toss White's pal, who was not identified, from the trial on the first day. 'Judges serve the public, not the other way around,' Kuby told The Post. 'A courtroom is not a judicial fiefdom. Every defendant has a Sixth Amendment right to a public trial. 3 A state appellate court said Donald White was denied a 'public' trial because his friend was kicked out of court. REUTERS 'Judicial pettiness and peevishness are not reasons to remove spectators,' he added. 'Now a murder case must be retried and the victim's loved ones must go through agony again, all because a judge got pissed at a spectator for napping.' Advertisement White, 36, was charged with killing pot peddler Henry Jenkins in St. Albans in June 2010. At trial, his pal dozed off in court during the first day of testimony. Aloise's decision to kick him out came after the jury left the room, but the Appellate Division judges said he was too hasty, and didn't consider other options — like warning the man not to do it again. Even though the judge reversed his decision the next day, the appeals panel said White's friend may not have known that — and thereby didn't know he was welcome back in the courtroom. Advertisement 3 Queens District Attorney Melinda Katz is reviewing the decision to throw out Donald White's murder conviction. Stephen Yang 'The spectator was not present at the time and had no reason to believe that he could return to the courtroom was insufficient to remedy the court's error,' the ruling said. A spokesperson for the Queens District Attorney's Office said prosecutors were reviewing the ruling. Al Baker, a spokesman for the state Office of Court Administration, which oversees the Empire State court system, declined to comment on Aloise's decision or the appellate ruling. White's attorneys did not respond to a request for comment.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Police: Pilot deceased after plane crashes in field near Lancaster Airport
LANCASTER, Pa. (WHTM) — Lancaster authorities have confirmed that the plane crash that occurred in a field in Warwick Township after departing from the Lancaster Airport this morning was fatal. According to the FAA, a Piper PA-46 aircraft crashed in a field after departing Lancaster Airport in Pennsylvania around 8 a.m. local time on Sunday, July 20, in Warwick Township, Lancaster County. This is the second incident near the Lancaster Airport in the last few days. According to Sgt. Adam Webber of the Northern Lancaster County Regional Police Department, one occupant, a male pilot, died in the crash. The FAA says only the pilot was on board. The FAA and National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) will investigate the crash. The NTSB will lead the investigation and provide any updates, per the FAA. An abc27 photographer is currently at the scene. Updates will be provided as they become available. This is a developing story. Stay with abc27 News as more information becomes available Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
