NIA Arrests 2nd Suspect In Killing Of 6 Meiteis Including 3 Children In Manipur's Jiribam
The National Investigation Agency (NIA) has made a second consecutive arrest in the case of killing of three Meitei women and three children in Manipur's Jiribam district in November 2024.
The NIA arrested Lalrosang Hmar alias Rosang from Mizoram's capital Aizawl on Thursday, the NIA said. He is a resident of Assam's Cachar district, neighbouring Jiribam.
The first accused, Thanglienlal Hmar, was also arrested yesterday from Aizawl by a joint NIA-Assam Police team.
Lalrosang was an active conspirator in the crime; the NIA recovered a mobile phone and a SIM card from him, which will be examined, the NIA said.
The arrest comes three weeks after the Manipur High Court ordered the NIA to give a report on the case, and three days after it ordered the NIA to file a chargesheet within a month.
The members of the Meitei community who were kidnapped from Jiribam, a district bordering Assam, and whose mutilated bodies were found floating in a river days later, were Yumrembam Rani Devi (60), Telem Thoibi Devi (31) and her daughter Telem Thajamanbi Devi (8), Laishram Heithoibi Devi (25) and her two children Laishram Chingkheinganba Singh (2.5 years old) and Laishram Lamnganba Singh (10 months old).
At that time, the Manipur cabinet in a resolution had called the suspects "Kuki militants".
The arrested suspect, however, belongs to the Hmar tribe, a distinct tribe and not part of the Kuki nomenclature. The Kukis in Manipur along with the Zomi and Hmar tribes have been rallying behind the banner of "Kuki-Zo" since ethnic violence with the Meiteis began in May 2023.
The women and children were kidnapped from Jiribam's Bokobera neighbourhood while another group of militants were engaged in a gunfight with the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). Ten of the militants were shot dead in the encounter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News18
17 minutes ago
- News18
Kerala Nuns Get Bail In Chhattisgarh 'Conversion, Trafficking' Case
Last Updated: After reviewing the evidence and arguments, the NIA court found grounds to grant conditional bail A special National Investigation Agency (NIA) court in Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, has granted conditional bail to Sister Sujata and Sister Anisha, two Catholic nuns from Kerala, along with Santosh Baghel, a tribal youth from Chhattisgarh. Their arrest had previously sparked controversy and allegations of political grandstanding, particularly surrounding issues of religious conversions and communal tensions in the region. The trio was apprehended in mid-July following complaints of forced religious conversions among tribal communities in Chhattisgarh's Bastar region. The case, filed under sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), prompted outrage from Christian organisations and human rights activists, who argued that the arrests were baseless and politically motivated. Critics claimed that certain factions were exploiting controversial anti-conversion laws to target missionaries and tribal individuals. After reviewing the evidence and arguments, the NIA court found grounds to grant conditional bail. Although the specific conditions were not immediately disclosed, they typically include restrictions such as not leaving the district without court permission, cooperating with the investigation, and avoiding tampering with evidence or influencing witnesses. The granting of bail indicates that the court did not find sufficient prima facie evidence to justify their continued incarceration for terror-related offences or recognised the potential for undue hardship due to the nature of the accusations. Conditional bail was granted to three people in the case, defence lawyer Amrito Das confirmed, according to a report by PTI. Speaking with the news agency, petitioner's advocate B Gopakumar said some bail conditions were also put up, including that, 'they will not be able to go abroad, they will have to surrender the passport, they should not influence the witness." view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
News18
an hour ago
- News18
Malegaon Blast Case: Here's What Retired ATS Officer Mehboob Mujawar Claimed
Last Updated: Mujawar, who was one of the investigating officers in the case, claimed that senior ATS officials had explicitly instructed him to detain and arrest RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat In the detailed order of the special NIA court of Mumbai in the 2008 Malegaon blast case seen by CNN-News18, the testimony of former ATS officer Mehboob Mujawar has brought to light serious allegations of coercion and internal pressure within the Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) during the initial stages of the investigation. According to the arguments presented by the counsel for accused number 10, ATS officer Mehboob Mujawar, who was one of the investigating officers in the case, claimed that senior ATS officials had explicitly instructed him to detain and arrest RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat. Mujawar, however, said he refused to comply with this 'illegal order", as he found no substantial role or involvement of Mohan Bhagwat in the alleged crime. As a consequence of his defiance, Mujawar alleged that he was subsequently implicated in a false case by the ATS, which was filed before a magistrate in Solapur. In support of these arguments, the defence counsel submitted certified copies of the said application and Mujawar's statement recorded under Section 313 of the CrPC in the court of the Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM), Solapur. The court's order further delves into corroborating testimonies. During his cross-examination, prosecution witness PW-320, ACP Mohan Kulkarni, rejected the suggestion that Mehboob Mujawar had been dispatched to apprehend a senior functionary of the RSS. However, Kulkarni did admit that Mujawar was indeed sent to trace absconding accused AA-1 (Ramji Kalsangra) and AA-2 (Sandeep Dange). Kulkarni also denied a suggestion that Mujawar had publicly stated that the ATS had shot dead two persons, which might have been a reason for his exclusion from the charge sheet's witness list. Further adding to the picture, the cross-examination of prosecution witness PW-321, Dy. SP Anil Dubey, confirmed his awareness that Mehboob Mujawar was indeed a member of the ATS team and that his statement had been recorded by Wankhede. Considering the entirety of this evidence, the court's order explicitly noted that Mujawar was a member of the ATS team and had investigated the present case under the direction of his senior officers. It was also revealed that he had been questioned in connection with the deaths of Ramchandra Kalsangra (AA-1) and Sandeep Dange (AA-2) concerning his statements made before the media and news agencies. Significantly, the court pointed out that despite his involvement and the critical nature of his allegations, Mujawar's name was neither included in the witness list nor was he produced as a witness by either the prosecution or the defence during the trial. view comments First Published: August 03, 2025, 05:06 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Purohit has indulged in acts never permitted by his office: NIA court
Mumbai: Observing that the prosecution had failed to prove its case because of lapses by police officers, hostile witnesses, and lack of material evidence, a special NIA court that acquitted Lt Col Prasad Purohit in the 2008 Malegaon blast case rejected his defence that his actions were part of his official military intelligence duties and therefore did not require prosecution sanction. It held that "he has done those acts which were never permitted by his office", reports Rebecca Samervel. Special judge A K Lahoti said serious charges of murder and criminal conspiracy were also levelled against Purohit along with other charges, showing his involvement, and hence his own officer had handed over his custody to the ATS. "On going through the papers, it is sufficient to hold that the act done by him was not in discharge of his official duty. He has done those acts which were never permitted by his office. Those acts could not be covered or protected under the garb of section 197 CrPC," the judge said in his order. He also clarified that a sanction under Section 197 of CrPC was not necessary to prosecute Purohit, a govt servant, under the circumstances of the case. Section 197 speaks about obtaining prior sanction for prosecuting public servants for offence committed while discharging official duty. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Do you have a mouse? Play this for 1 minute and see why everyone is crazy about it. Play Game Undo The NIA special court judge noted that the prosecuting agency in the 2008 Malegaon blast case had collected incriminating evidence against Purohit showing his direct involvement in the alleged offence which included the charge of murder and criminal conspiracy. You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai "Those charges never require a sanction. On the other hand, the authorised officer of the military submitted the decision given by their Competent Military Authority as per Military Rules to institute the proceeding against A9 (accused 9, Purohit) before criminal court. His custody was given by military officers to ATS. In such peculiar facts, the defence taken by A9 pertaining to sanction u/s 197 of CrPC does not survive," the judge said. Part of the case against Purohit who was in the military intelligence at the time revolved around his alleged involvement with a group called Abhinav Bharat. The organisation was at the centre of the alleged conspiracy. While Purohit's lawyer submitted he was permitted to collect information from ISI or SIMI or other terrorist organizations, the judge pointed out it was not his claim that he was also member of those organizations. "Becoming a member of a selective organization without express permission is nothing but an act done out of the purview of discharge of duty," the judge said. The judge also observed that under circumstances of the case, charges of ATS and NIA against Purohit were serious and based on evidence investigating agencies collected during the course of their respective probes. The judge noted that his association with Abhinav Bharat Trust or Abhinav Bharat organisation would not be per se illegal and was part of his duty. However, the court said the charges against him show that he floated the Abhinav Bharat organisation and was founder member of Abhinav Bharat, collected huge funds and had control over financial transactions. He has accepted thousands of rupees from co-accused and utilized those amounts for private use, the judge noted. "Nothing material came on record to show that all those allegations or charges were fake, baseless and all those acts were done by A-9 with the permission of his superior officer. Merely the prosecution failed to prove the charges levelled against the accused in the absence of cogent evidence doesn't mean that all the charges were baseless or without foundation," the judge said. Seven defence witnesses, all related to Purohit, had deposed during trial. The judge said the (military) officers examined as defence witnesses or those who were working in the SCLU (Southern Command Liaison Unit) at the relevant time had not shown any interest in saving Purohit. "They had kept mum for several years. Their own inaction shows they might have noticed the action taken by ATS was proper, as their senior officers had also not shown any interest to protect their own officer considering the allegations and charges levelled. It shows that they had accepted the fact of arrest at the hands of ATS was proper," the judge said. Get the latest lifestyle updates on Times of India, along with Friendship Day wishes , messages and quotes !
