Gov. Josh Stein joins panel to discuss, debate housing affordability and supply crisis
High construction costs, labor shortages and supply chain issues all contribute to soaring housing costs and supply shortages, Gov. Josh Stein said Tuesday. But the state's growing popularity as a destination for transplants is also a big part of the problem, Stein said.
The governor noted that North Carolina is the third fastest growing state since the last census. The state, he said, added more people than any other except Texas and Florida. 'There are just a lot of people moving here and houses aren't being built fast enough,' Stein said.
When people move to North Carolina, Stein said, they need a place to stay and when there is a shortage of available units, newcomers, who often come with higher salaries and larger bank accounts, are willing to pay more for housing.
'And then it means everybody else is left to struggle,' he said.
Stein made his remarks during a roundtable discussion in Raleigh with more than a half-dozen housing experts and elected officials. The event was held at Milner Commons, a 156-unit public/private venture on Russ Street in Raleigh that was built to house seniors 55 and older with modest incomes.
Tuesday's meeting was an opportunity for Stein to discuss solutions to the housing crisis with housing experts and local officials and to consider legislation and public policy initiatives to speed up the building process to boost the state's housing supply.
'Our state is growing, and people need a safe and affordable place to live,' Stein said. 'We will remain focused on identifying solutions to lower the cost of housing for North Carolinians at every stage of life and work to ensure every person has a safe place to call home.'
The housing crisis in North Carolina is real. The state faces a five-year housing inventory gap of 764,478 units (322,360 rental units and 442,118 for-sale units), according to a recent statewide report commissioned by the NC Chamber Foundation, NC REALTORS and the N.C. Homebuilders Association.
And across the country, people, particularly those with low incomes, are finding rents increasingly unaffordable. A recent report by the National Low Income Housing Coalition (NLIHC) found a national shortage of 7.1 million affordable and available rental homes for extremely low-income renter households – those with incomes at or below the poverty level or 30% of their area median income, whichever is greater. This means that there are just 35 affordable and available rental homes for every 100 extremely low-income renter households nationwide.
North Carolina was slightly better off than the nation as a whole, but only slightly. The report revealed that only 41 affordable and available rental homes are available for every 100 of the 332,199 extremely low-income households in the state.
Even though Milner Commons is considered an affordable property, Yolanda Winstead, president and CEO of DHIC, the nonprofit that developed the senior community, said the rents are higher than DHIC would like because construction costs grew and interest rates continued to increase during the development process.
'With those things happening in real time as we're trying to get it on the ground, we had to fill the gaps that we experienced,' Winstead said.
Raleigh City Councilman Corey Branch said affordable housing developers are facing funding challenges that require government assistance due to higher construction costs and other development obstacles.
'A lot of the costs developers are facing, people don't see,' Branch said. 'So those are the things that we see and continue to put money into … but if you raise property taxes, then you're impacting the people you're trying to help.'
Samuel Gunter, executive director of the NC Housing Coalition, said it is critical to focus on increasing the state's housing supply.
'If we're not fixing and making sure that we have enough supply, then all of the other stuff we do to subsidize and stabilize [housing] is just not going to go far,' Gunter said.
Scott Farmer, executive director of the NC Housing Finance Agency, said the preservation of existing homes is often overlooked in the struggle to provide safe and affordable housing. One of the agency's most important tools is its Urgent Repair Program, which finances emergency repairs for low-income homeowners who are elderly or have disabilities and whose incomes are below 50% of the area media, Farmer said.
'We're able to go in and do small scale repairs to keep people in their homes,' Farmer said. 'Being able to open $17,000 to keep somebody in their house for an additional five years goes a long way toward saving those [state and federal] dollars because in an institutional setting, we know that's going to cost the state and federal government a lot more money.'
Stein's proposed state budget included $60 million to leverage federal and private resources to build more housing for low-income families, veterans, seniors and people with disabilities, he said. His proposal also includes $15 million for the Workforce Loan Program to aid in the construction and repair of affordable housing. He said he supports bipartisan proposals in the General Assembly to cut red tape and make it easier to build more homes. Budgets advanced by state lawmakers, however, have not been nearly so ambitious.
State Sen. Julie Mayfield (D-Buncombe) said getting legislation passed to ease construction restrictions has been difficult this legislative session. Mayfield has introduced several housing-related bills including one that would allow more mixed-used developments across the state.
'We're working on it, but we haven't gotten anything passed yet,' Mayfield said. 'It's a little challenging … but I'm not giving up until that gavel comes down.'
Mayfield said voting to increase density in many communities across the state has proven to be a 'one-way ticket to getting unelected.'
'Now, there are enlightened communities like Raleigh and Chapel Hill and Durham and Asheville where that's not so much the case, but we have some communities who are not there.' As a fan of local government, Mayfield said she doesn't like telling local officials what to do. But adopting state laws to increase density could give resistant communities a much-needed nudge.
'These bills are not trying to be punitive to local governments; they're just trying to say we're [lawmakers] going to take this problem and pull it up here, so you don't have political risk around it anymore,' Mayfield said.
Homebuilder D.R. Bryan said local ordinances restricting density slows the development process and makes it difficult to build multi-family homes, which helps to increase the housing supply.
Another obstacle, Bryan said, is city and town employees who continue to work from home five years after the pandemic. He said the practice also slows the development process. Many builders prefer to meet face-to-face to discuss project rather than over Zoom, he said.
'The people who are reviewing our plans, we're having to communicate through email and maybe Zoom, and you just can't get it done,' Bryan said. 'You need to sit there and either have paper plans or a computer and say, 'OK, what do you mean here or there?''
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Rce may bring 'earthquake moment' in NC politics
One of the most important — and closely-watched — races of 2026 may be a race you probably haven't heard anything about. It's one in which fewer than 100,000 North Carolinians will actually vote, but its outcome will affect everyone in the state. Senate leader Phil Berger, arguably the most powerful politician in North Carolina, is facing a rare primary challenge from Rockingham County Sheriff Sam Page in N.C. Senate District 26, which includes parts of western Guilford County. And if recent polls are to be believed, Berger has an uphill battle ahead of him. The primary, which isn't until March, has started early and gotten ugly. Berger started rolling out endorsements from politicians like U.S. Sen. Ted Budd two months ago. He's boasting about how much money his campaign has already raised. His campaign has a 'war room' account on X that launches missives at Page on a near-daily basis. (The account bills itself as 'the unofficial fan page and rapid response defender of NC Senate President Pro Tem Phil Berger and his reelection campaign.') That's the kind of thing you'd expect to see for national campaigns, but not so much for the state legislature. It's unusual, of course, because it's the first time Berger has faced a serious primary threat in more than two decades. But it also seems a bit unusual that a primary for a state legislative seat would become such an expensive and bare-knuckled affair — or that it would begin nearly a year before the actual election occurs. There have been some fierce primaries on the Democratic side, such as in 2022, when Gov. Roy Cooper endorsed the primary opponent of state Sen. Kirk deViere, or in 2024, when two Democrats that had occasionally sided with Republicans lost to primary challengers. But none have been quite as intense as this, said Chris Cooper, a political science professor at Western Carolina University. 'It's not that we've never seen primary challenges, even recently in North Carolina, but with this much on the line and this early and this nasty, it just feels like kind of the next level,' Cooper said. Starting the fight this early might seem a little silly. By the time polls actually open, voters aren't going to remember which congressman endorsed Berger in May 2025, or that Page deleted a social media post about school choice in June. But the fact that voters won't remember those details doesn't mean they don't matter, Cooper said. What happens now allows candidates to shape public perception of themselves and their opponent in a positive or negative way. And as Election Day nears, voters may already feel a certain way about the candidates, even if they don't remember exactly why. What makes this race particularly different, though, is the candidates involved. If it were anyone else, the fight might not be nearly this intense. Berger, obviously, wields immense power. But Page, too, is well-known in the district, having served as sheriff since 1998. He's also cultivated a national profile for himself by aligning closely with Donald Trump. As Cooper put it: 'This isn't David and Goliath. This is David and David going against each other.' For the first time in a long, long time, Berger is campaigning like it's a race he could actually lose. He's legislating like it's a race he could actually lose, too. Berger is the lead sponsor on seven bills this session, the most he's introduced since becoming Senate leader 14 years ago, Axios Raleigh reported. He's also been more publicly supportive of Trump's agenda. It's a fascinating pivot, considering Republican legislators generally don't have to campaign too hard for general elections, let alone primaries. The most powerful people in the legislature tend to be almost insulated by their own power, and they aren't used to having to fight this hard to keep it. That's the kind of thing that Page seems set on challenging — he thinks power in Raleigh is too concentrated and that Berger has lost touch with what matters to people back home. The outcome of the race could have major consequences. A Page victory would prove that even the most powerful politician in North Carolina isn't invincible. It would also mean unseating the man who has led the Senate since Republicans gained control of the legislature in the 2010 elections, and who has overseen the passage of every significant piece of legislation they've passed since. What would the Senate, and the legislature, look like without him? 'If Berger were to lose, that would be, I mean, a kind of an earthquake moment in North Carolina politics,' Cooper said. 'And the vast majority of us don't get any say.' Distributed by Tribune Content Agency.


Politico
4 days ago
- Politico
Trump's trade deals leave industry in ‘paralysis'
Presented by Autos Drive America With help from Doug Palmer and Grace Yarrow QUICK FIX — As President Donald Trump rushes to finalize new trade deals before the end of the month, American companies operating abroad are still waiting for clarity on existing agreements. — A top South African official tells Morning Trade the country will not accept a trade deal with the United States that eliminates all tariffs on American goods. — Republican lawmakers from farm states are beginning to lose patience with Trump's tariff strategy as harvest season approaches. It's Monday, July 21. Welcome to Morning Trade! Got news tips? Suggestions? Want to grab a coffee? Hit us up at: ahawkins@ ddesrochers@ and dpalmer@ Follow us on X: @_AriHawkins, @drdesrochers and @tradereporter. Want to receive this newsletter every weekday? Subscribe to POLITICO Pro. You'll also receive daily policy news and other intelligence you need to act on the day's biggest stories. Driving the day WHERE ARE THE PAPERS? Trump is under growing pressure from the business community to clarify the terms of his new trade agreements, amid warnings that the uncertainty is rattling investor confidence and leaving millions of dollars' worth of goods stuck in limbo. Sean Stein, the president of the U.S.-China Business Council, which represents more than 270 American companies that do business in China, said the confusion created for industry is clashing with Trump's goal of courting foreign investment. 'So far, these deals are not creating an environment that's going to lead to more investment in the U.S.,' Stein told Morning Trade in an interview, saying Trump's approach to trade and tariffs have introduced risk into the investment environment, leaving companies in 'paralysis.' One step back: Despite pledging '90 deals in 90 days' back in April, the U.S. has announced 'deals' with just four countries — including the United Kingdom, China and Vietnam — more than 180 days into the president's second term. The recent deals have not been accompanied with the release of completed texts, and diplomats say talks over the toughest terms are still dragging on. Trump most recently announced a new agreement with Indonesia on Truth Social, later telling reporters its new tariff rate would be at 19 percent but providing no further details. Trump is eyeing an Aug. 1 deadline for new tariffs on countries that fail to strike a deal with the U.S., which Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick called a 'hard deadline' on Sunday in an interview with CBS News' 'Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan.' The administration also set an Aug. 12 target to reinstate sky-high tariffs on China unless the countries can reach a new arrangement, threatening yet another round of disruption for industries scrambling to keep up with shifting duty rates. It's complicated: Stein pointed to the lack of clarity about the terms of the deal with Vietnam as an example of the stress companies are under: Trump claimed he would slash tariffs on the country to 20 percent, or a 40 percent tariff if a product originated in a different country, but the administration has yet to clarify terms of the deal related to transhipment — leaving some companies with completed orders in limbo. The government of Vietnam has also not officially confirmed the terms of the deal, which people familiar with the discussions told POLITICO were altered at the eleventh hour. 'A day does not go by that I don't have two or three companies asking me, 'What does it mean?'' Stein said, referring to provisions of the Vietnam deal. ''What are they talking about?' Nobody knows. When you talk to people in the administration, they can't give you a clear answer about what they mean, either.' A right-leaning lobbyist from a major industry group, who frequently meets with administration officials and some of the country's largest multinational companies, said corporate leaders in all four countries have not yet received clear guidance — resulting in millions of dollars' worth of goods stranded at ports as businesses await clarity. 'The administration is not being transparent. They are not being open. There are just so many questions,' said the corporate lobbyist, who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'The president sees being non-transparent, being unpredictable as a real strength. He wants to keep everybody off balance. But for an administration that says, well, 'we're all about business,' it's been generally totally unresponsive and totally non-transparent.' Let's Make a Deal WHERE A ZERO-TARIFF DEAL WON'T FLY: There is no chance that South Africa would accept a trade deal with the United States that eliminates all tariffs on American goods, like the Trump administration says Vietnam and Indonesia have agreed to do, a top official at the Congress of South African Trade Unions told Morning Trade. If that's the best the United States can offer, South Africa will just live with the 30 percent tariff that Trump has threatened to impose effective Aug. 1 and try to develop new markets elsewhere, said Matthew Parks, parliamentary coordinator for the trade union group, after the annual USTR hearing on country eligibility for duty-free treatment under the African Growth and Opportunity Act on Friday. 'There's no South African company who could compete with a 30 percent tariff,' meaning 'thousands' of South African workers could lose their jobs, Parks said. Trump's earlier decision to impose a 25 percent tariff on autos and auto parts has already caused South Africa's auto exports to the United States to plummet 85 percent in recent months, he added. AGOA time running out: Friday's AGOA hearing was premised on the idea that the program will continue to exist, despite its pending expiration on Sept. 30. However, with that date less than three months away, there appears to be no chance of Congress passing a full 10- or 15-year renewal, as program supporters would like. Parks, who said he spent several days meeting with lawmakers last week, expressed hope Congress could at least approve a one- or two-year renewal before the program expires. That would provide a bridge past the 2026 congressional elections, when it might be easier to do more comprehensive reform, he said. However, spokespeople for Senate Finance and House Ways and Means did not provide any information Friday on that possibility. REGULATORY REVIEW WILL 'WAIT AND SEE' LAST? Farmers' patience with Trump could be waning as they scramble to understand and brace for a looming trade war ahead of harvest season, according to interviews conducted by POLITICO agriculture reporter Samuel Benson. Senate Ag Chair John Boozman (R-Ark.) said farmers have had a 'wait and see' attitude towards the tariffs, trusting the Trump administration's work to get new trade deals done to open new markets. But he said farmers are 'anxious' in light of Trump's slew of new tariff threats. 'Our farmers are in trouble,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville (R-Ala.) said last week. 'They're in bad trouble. I don't know whether there's anything we can do to save them, unless these tariffs work, and I hope we can. We're going to do everything we possibly can.' Background needed: Trump's farm state allies on Capitol Hill have stood by his ultimate goal of securing new markets for farmers — but it's not clear how long their patience will last. The push comes as a growing number of mostly House Republicans start to gently push back on Trump's targeting of critical sectors with tariffs. Is time running out? One agriculture industry lobbyist, granted anonymity to discuss concerns about the administration's tariff approach, said that Trump has about a month and a half to prove his trade plans are working before farmers start harvesting and selling their products. 'We're getting closer to harvest time,' the person said. 'We're getting to the point where those sales numbers are really going to matter, the prices are really going to matter.' TO THE LAND OF THE MAPLE LEAF: Senate Finance Committee ranking member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) is leading a bipartisan group of senators to Ottawa this week to meet with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney and other senior officials, according to an advisory. The delegation — which includes Sens. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska), Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) and Catherine Cortez Masto (D-Nev.) — aims to reaffirm U.S.-Canada ties as Ottawa faces 35 percent tariffs, effective Aug 1. TRADE OVERNIGHT — Trump and Xi Jinping tipped to meet ahead of or during Apec summit in South Korea, writes the South China Morning Post. — Tariff anxiety grips defense elites at Aspen conference, POLITICO reports. — Former ambassador to China: Beijing hasn't 'outplayed' Trump on trade, POLITICO Pro reports. — Meta rebuffs Brussels over AI rules, per POLITICO Pro. — Taiwan-US tariff deal will only impact import of cars from US, Taiwan News reports. THAT'S ALL FOR MORNING TRADE! See you again soon! In the meantime, drop the team a line: dpalmer@ ddesrochers@ and ahawkins@ Follow us @POLITICOPro and @Morning_Trade.


Axios
15-07-2025
- Axios
North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein's flurry of legislative actions
North Carolina Gov. Josh Stein has taken action on a flurry of legislation in recent weeks, vetoing more than a dozen bills and signing nearly 50 others into law. Why it matters: At the same time, Stein, a Democrat, has managed to maintain a seemingly amicable relationship with North Carolina's Republican-controlled legislature. Driving the news: While Stein has denounced and blocked some key conservative priorities from becoming law, he's also stood shoulder-to-shoulder with Republicans as he's celebrated and signed into law bipartisan initiatives spearheaded by the GOP legislature. Last Thursday, Stein held a bill signing ceremony for four bills that supporters say will lower prescription drug costs, ease transitions for military families who are relocating, crack down on crimes like reckless driving and make it easier for some domestic violence victims to obtain restraining orders. Republicans joined Stein at the mansion to celebrate the bills becoming law. That same day, Stein vetoed three bills, including one that would allow some employees and volunteers to carry weapons at private schools. The big picture: Six months into his term, Stein still appears to have a working relationship with GOP legislative leaders, even as Republicans and Democrats at the federal level remain largely divided. It comes at a pivotal moment for the state: Western North Carolina still has a long way to go in recovering from Hurricane Helene. Meanwhile, the state is bracing for federal budget cuts made in Congress' newly passed "Big, Beautiful Bill." Stein and Republican lawmakers will have to work together to continue to fund Helene recovery efforts and navigate the impact of federal budget cuts on the state's Medicaid and SNAP recipients. Flashback: In March, some political observers said Stein was still in a "honeymoon" phase and predicted that his working relationship with the legislature would fall apart when Stein started vetoing Republican bills. Even after 14 vetoes, however, that doesn't seem to be the case. Zoom in: Stein issued his first vetoes a month ago, blocking "The Criminal Illegal Alien Enforcement Act," "Freedom to Carry NC" and the "North Carolina Border Protection Act" from becoming law. He steered clear of attacking Republicans directly and instead said two of the bills would make North Carolinians less safe and one, "The Criminal Illegal Alien Enforcement Act," was unconstitutional. Stein also vetoed legislation changing oversight of charter schools, clarifying the state auditors' power, banning some diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and rolling back some carbon reduction goals for Duke Energy. After vetoing some of those bills earlier this month, Stein changed his tune, however, calling the bills "mean-spirited" and saying they would "marginalize vulnerable people and also undermine the quality of public services and public education." "At a time when teachers, law enforcement, and state employees need pay raises and people need shorter lines at the DMV, the legislature failed to pass a budget and, instead, wants to distract us by stoking culture wars that further divide us," Stein said in a statement. "I stand ready to work with the legislature when it gets serious about protecting people and addressing North Carolinians' pressing concerns." What we're watching: Stein's ability to keep his party in line may soon be tested. Republicans no longer have a supermajority in the legislature, so they need just one Democrat in the House to side with them to override a veto.