The Agentic AI Dilemma: Promise, Pitfalls, and Practicality
At this early stage, agentic AI can only be pursued where it delivers clear value or ROI
Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own.
You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media.
"A lot is happening in terms of Agentic AI." This headline is everywhere but is it truly happening, or is it just another misleading hype in the tech world? Gartner has termed this trend as "agent washing"—the rebranding of existing tools such as AI assistants, robotic process automation (RPA), and chatbots, without any substantial agentic capabilities.
According to Gartner's latest report, more than 40 per cent of agentic AI projects will be cancelled by the end of 2027 due to escalating costs, unclear business value, or inadequate risk controls. Of the thousands of vendors claiming to offer agentic AI solutions, Gartner estimates only around 130 are legitimate.
"Most agentic AI projects right now are early-stage experiments or proof-of-concepts driven largely by hype and often misapplied," said Anushree Verma, Senior Director Analyst at Gartner. "This can blind organisations to the real cost and complexity of deploying AI agents at scale, stalling projects before they move into production. They need to cut through the hype to make careful, strategic decisions about where and how they apply this emerging technology."
The high cost of agentic AI
One of the major barriers to meaningful adoption is cost. So how much does it actually take to build agentic AI?
"For enterprises starting from scratch, developing Agentic AI internally could cost anywhere between INR 50 crore to INR 200 crore (approx. USD 6 million to USD 24 million) over 3–5 years, depending on scale, vertical, and use case," said Apurv Agrawal, Co-founder and CEO, SquadStack. "And even then, you're not guaranteed deployment success unless your systems are robust, your data flywheels are strong, and your change management is bulletproof."
So, what will it take?
Despite these early-stage challenges, the potential of agentic AI is immense. Gartner predicts that by 2028, at least 15 per cent of day-to-day work decisions will be made autonomously by agentic AI up from zero in 2024. Additionally, 33 per cent of enterprise software applications are expected to include agentic AI by 2028, compared to less than one per cent in 2024.
To prepare for this transformation, organisations must adopt significant mindset and infrastructure shifts. The voices in the Indian AI space weighed in:
Ganesh Gopalan, Co-founder & CEO, Gnani AI explained, "To effectively integrate Agentic AI into their operations, organisations must cultivate a mindset that embraces autonomy, continuous learning, and cross-functional collaboration. We often say that automation isn't AI and while many companies stop at basic task automation, what's truly needed is AI that works, understands, reasons, and adapts in real-time to deliver business outcomes."
"To support this, companies need to leverage API-first, modular system designs, which enable flexibility, allow for rapid development, and orchestrate AI workflows seamlessly across business areas while maintaining an engaging, human-like experience. Ultimately, businesses must understand that AI is not just a tool for automated responses but a way to improve and personalise customer engagement," added Beerud Sheth, Co-founder & CEO, Gupshup.
However, at this early stage, agentic AI can only be pursued where it delivers clear value or ROI.
"To get real value from agentic AI, organisations must focus on enterprise productivity, rather than just individual task augmentation," Verma said. "They can start by using AI agents for decision-making, automation for routine workflows, and assistants for simple retrieval. It's about driving business value through cost, quality, speed, and scale."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
5 ways people build relationships with AI
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Stories about people building emotional connections with AI are appearing more often, but Anthropic just dropped some numbers claiming it's far from as common as it might seem. Scraping 4.5 million conversations from Claude, the company discovered that only 2.9 percent of users engage with it for emotional or personal support. Anthropic wanted to emphasize that while sentiment usually improves over the conversation, Claude is not a digital shrink. It rarely pushes back outside of safety concerns, meaning it won't give medical advice and will tell people not to self-harm. But those numbers might be more about the present than the future. Anthropic itself admits the landscape is changing fast, and what counts as "affective" use today may not be so rare tomorrow. As more people interact with chatbots like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini and more often, there will be more people bringing AI into their emotional lives. So, how exactly are people using AI for support right now? The current usage might also predict how people will use them in the future as AI gets more sophisticated and personal. Let's start with the idea of AI as a not-quite therapist. While no AI model today is a licensed therapist (and they all make that disclaimer loud and clear), people still engage with them as if they are. They type things like, "I'm feeling really anxious about work. Can you talk me through it?" or "I feel stuck. What questions should I ask myself?" Whether the responses that come back are helpful probably varies, but there are plenty of people who claim to have walked away from an AI therapist feeling at least a little calmer. That's not because the AI gave them a miracle cure, but because it gave them a place to let thoughts unspool without judgment. Sometimes, just practicing vulnerability is enough to start seeing benefits. Sometimes, though, the help people need is less structured. They don't want guidance so much as relief. Enter what could be called the emotional emergency exit. Imagine it's 1 AM and everything feels a little too much. You don't want to wake up your friend, and you definitely don't want to scroll more doom-laced headlines. So you open an AI app and type, "I'm overwhelmed." It will respond, probably with something calm and gentle. It might even guide you through a breathing exercise, say something kind, or offer a little bedtime story in a soothing tone. Some people use AI this way, like a pressure valve – a place to decompress where nothing is expected in return. One user admitted they talk to Claude before and after every social event, just to rehearse and then unwind. It's not therapy. It's not even a friend. But it's there. For now, the best-case scenario is a kind of hybrid. People use AI to prep, to vent, to imagine new possibilities. And then, ideally, they take that clarity back to the real world. Into conversations, into creativity, into their communities. But even if the AI isn't your therapist or your best friend, it might still be the one who listens when no one else does. Humans are indecisive creatures, and figuring out what to do about big decisions is tough, but some have found AI to be the solution to navigating those choices. The AI won't recall what you did last year or guilt you about your choices, which some people find refreshing. Ask it whether to move to a new city, end a long relationship, or splurge on something you can barely justify, and it will calmly lay out the pros and cons. You can even ask it to simulate two inner voices, the risk-taker and the cautious planner. Each can make their case, and you can feel better that you made an informed choice. That kind of detached clarity can be incredibly valuable, especially when your real-world sounding boards are too close to the issue or too emotionally invested. Social situations can cause plenty of anxiety, and it's easy for some to spiral into thinking about what could go wrong. AI can help them as a kind of social script coach. Say you want to say no but not cause a fight, or you are meeting some people you want to impress, but are worried about your first impression. AI can help draft a text to decline an invite or suggest ways to ease yourself into conversations with different people, and take on the role to let you rehearse full conversations, testing different phrasings to see what feels good. Accountability partners are a common way for people to help each other achieve their goals. Someone who will make sure you go to the gym, go to sleep at a reasonable hour, and even maintain a social life and reach out to friends. Habit-tracking apps can help if you don't have the right friend or friends to help you. But AI can be a quieter co-pilot for real self-improvement. You can tell it your goals and ask it to check in with you, remind you gently, or help reframe things when motivation dips. Someone trying to quit smoking might ask ChatGPT to help track cravings and write motivational pep talks. Or an AI chatbot might ensure you keep up your journaling with reminders and suggestions for ideas on what to write about. It's no surprise that people might start to feel some fondness (or annoyance) toward the digital voice telling them to get up early to work out or to invite people that they haven't seen in a while to meet up for a meal. Related to using AI for making decisions, some people look to AI when they're grappling with questions of ethics or integrity. These aren't always monumental moral dilemmas; plenty of everyday choices can weigh heavily. Is it okay to tell a white lie to protect someone's feelings? Should you report a mistake your coworker made, even if it was unintentional? What's the best way to tell your roommate they're not pulling their weight without damaging the relationship? AI can act as a neutral sounding board. It will suggest ethical ways to consider things like whether accepting a friend's wedding invite but secretly planning not to attend is better or worse than declining outright. The AI doesn't have to offer a definitive ruling. It can map out competing values and help define the user's principles and how they lead to an answer. In this way, AI serves less as a moral authority than as a flashlight in the fog. Right now, only a small fraction of interactions fall into that category. But what happens when these tools become even more deeply embedded in our lives? What happens when your AI assistant is whispering in your earbuds, popping up in your glasses, or helping schedule your day with reminders tailored not just to your time zone but to your temperament? Anthropic might not count all of these as effective use, but maybe they should. If you're reaching for an AI tool to feel understood, get clarity, or move through something difficult, that's not just information retrieval. That's connection, or at least the digital shadow of one. You and your friends can now share and remix your favorite conversations with the Claude AI chatbot Anthropic's new AI-written blog is more of a technical treat than a literary triumph A new AI feature can control your computer to follow your orders
Bloomberg
3 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Humanoid Robots Play Soccer Poorly in Chinese Exhibition Match
They looked like tipsy 7-year-olds stumbling about the soccer pitch. But the game that unfolded at an industrial zone in Beijing was a breakthrough for humanoid robots and the artificial intelligence that powered them through a 5-3 match on Saturday. Clad in black and purple jerseys with individual player numbers, diminutive humanoids faced off for two 10-minute halves, their movements controlled not by gesticulating coaches on the sidelines but by built-in algorithms.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Concern Over Brazil's Sugar Supplies Lifts Prices
July NY world sugar #11 (SBN25) Friday closed up +0.16 (+1.02%), and August London ICE white sugar #5 (SWQ25) closed up +6.80 (+1.42%). Sugar prices moved sharply higher Friday as short-covering emerged after JPMorgan Chase revised its Brazil sugar outlook for 2025/26 to a deficit of -900,000 MT from a previous projection of a +200,000 MT surplus, citing disappointing yields and a low sucrose content in Brazil's sugar harvest. The Outlook for Abundant Coffee Supplies Undercuts Prices What's Driving Platinum? Cocoa Prices Slip as Dollar Strength Sparks Long Liquidation Stop Missing Market Moves: Get the FREE Barchart Brief – your midday dose of stock movers, trending sectors, and actionable trade ideas, delivered right to your inbox. Sign Up Now! Sugar prices have plummeted over the past three months, with NY sugar posting a 4-year low in its nearest futures contract on Thursday. Sugar prices have sold off due to expectations of a global sugar surplus. On May 22, the USDA, in its biannual report, projected that global 2025/26 sugar production would increase by +4.7% y/y to a record 189.318 million metric tons (MMT), with a global sugar surplus of 41.188 MMT, up 7.5% year-over-year. The outlook for higher sugar production in India, the world's second-largest producer, is bearish for prices. On June 2, India's National Federation of Cooperative Sugar Factories projected that India's 2025/26 sugar production would climb +19% y/y to 35 MMT, citing larger planted cane acreage. The outlook for abundant rainfall in India could lead to a bumper sugar crop, which is bearish for prices. On April 15, India's Ministry of Earth Sciences projected an above-normal monsoon this year, with total rainfall forecast to be 105% of the long-term average. India's monsoon season runs from June through September. Signs of larger global sugar output are negative for prices. On May 22, the USDA's Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) predicted that Brazil's 2025/26 sugar production would rise +2.3% y/y to a record 44.7 MMT. Also, India's 2025/26 sugar production is projected to rise +25% y/y to 35.3 MMT, citing favorable monsoon rains and increased sugar acreage. In addition, Thailand's 2025/26 sugar production is expected to climb +2% y/y to 10.3 MMT. In a bearish factor, the Indian government said on January 20 that it would allow its sugar mills to export 1 MMT of sugar this season, easing the restrictions placed on sugar exports in 2023. India has restricted sugar exports since October 2023 to maintain adequate domestic supplies. India allowed mills to export only 6.1 MMT of sugar during the 2022/23 season to September 30, after allowing exports of a record 11.1 MMT in the previous season. However, the ISMA projects that India's 2024/25 sugar production will fall -17.5% y/y to a 5-year low of 26.2 MMT. Also, the ISMA reported last Monday that India's sugar production from Oct 1-May 15 was 25.74 MMT, down -17% from the same period last year. In addition, Indian Food Secretary Chopra said on May 1 that India's 2024/25 sugar exports may only total 800,000 MT, below earlier expectations of 1 MMT. The outlook for higher sugar production in Thailand is bearish for sugar prices. On May 2, Thailand's Office of the Cane and Sugar Board reported that Thailand's 2024/25 sugar production rose +14% y/y to 10.00 MMT. Thailand is the world's third-largest sugar producer and the second-largest exporter of sugar. Sugar prices have some support from reduced sugar production in Brazil. Unica reported last Monday that the cumulative 2025/26 Brazil Center-South sugar output through May is down by -11.6% y/y to 6.954 MMT. Last month, Conab, Brazil's government crop forecasting agency, said 2024/25 Brazil sugar production fell -3.4% y/y to 44.118 MMT, citing lower sugarcane yields due to drought and excessive heat. A positive factor for sugar prices is the expected increase in sugar imports from Pakistan, following the Pakistani government's announcement last Friday that it plans to import 250,000 metric tons of raw sugar due to a disappointing sugarcane harvest. The International Sugar Organization (ISO) raised its 2024/25 global sugar deficit forecast to a 9-year high of -5.47 MMT on May 15, up from a February forecast of -4.88 MMT. This indicates a tightening market following the 2023/24 global sugar surplus of 1.31 MMT. ISO also cut its 2024/25 global sugar production forecast to 174.8 MMT from a February forecast of 175.5 MMT. The USDA, in its bi-annual report released May 22, projected that global 2025/26 sugar production would climb +4.7% y/y to a record 189.318 MMT and that global 2025/26 human sugar consumption would increase +1.4% y/y to a record 177.921 MMT. The USDA also forecasted that 2025/26 global sugar ending stocks would climb +7.5% y/y to 41.188 MMT. On the date of publication, Rich Asplund did not have (either directly or indirectly) positions in any of the securities mentioned in this article. All information and data in this article is solely for informational purposes. This article was originally published on
