
Hawaii set to pay $750,000 in wrongful death settlement
COURTESY PHOTO Delmar Espejo : The 28-year-old was shot by a sheriff's deputy at the state Capitol in 2019 The state Legislature is expected to approve a $750, 000 settlement in the 2019 wrongful shooting death of an unarmed, disabled, homeless man by an on-duty state deputy sheriff, who was not criminally held responsible but since faces scrutiny in the deaths of two more people in 2021 and 2022 while a police officer in San Diego.
Delmar Espejo, 28, was shot in the back at close range and killed on Feb. 18, 2019, at the state Capitol rotunda by former Deputy Sheriff Gregory Bergman.
The victim's family filed a civil wrongful death lawsuit against the state and Bergman on Feb. 17, 2021. A jury awarded $2.27 million to Espejo's mother, Cresencia Espejo, including $1.52 million in punitive damages.
The shooting of Espejo was the 12th in a string of 16 shootings by Oahu law enforcement officers from 2018 to March 2019, eight of them deadly. The fatal shootings by Bergman and a second by a prison guard in March 2019 were the first fatal shootings in at least the previous 10 years by Department of Public Safety officers.
The state sought to overturn both the jury's verdict and a judge's findings and conclusions against the state and Bergman, who left Hawaii shortly after Espejo was killed. He became a police officer in San Diego, where he was involved in the shooting of a suicidal man ; the other, a man shot in the back, on his knees allegedly surrendering.
Bergman was never held criminally responsible for Espejo's death. The Department of the Attorney General in September 2019 cleared him, saying there was insufficient evidence to charge him, despite the Honolulu Police Department having opened a second-degree murder case after an autopsy revealed Espejo was shot in the back at close range.
Don 't miss out on what 's happening !
Stay in touch with breaking news, as it happens, conveniently in your email inbox. It 's FREE !
Email 28141 Sign Up By clicking to sign up, you agree to Star-Advertiser 's and Google 's and. This form is protected by reCAPTCHA.
The AG spokesperson at the time said the Attorney General's Office reached its conclusion by relying on HPD's preliminary findings and did not conduct its own investigation.
After the verdict in the civil case, the state and Bergman, who claimed self-defense, had filed a motion for a new trial, but instead a closed settlement conference was held Feb. 6. The parties reached a confidential agreement.
The state's $750, 000 portion was made public when it sought approval by the Legislature in House Bill 990 with other judgments against the state and settlement of claims.
The Department of the Attorney General did not respond to requests for comment.
On the evening of Feb. 18, 2019, Bergman was making his rounds and encountered Espejo, who had been drinking alcohol at about 8 :20 p.m. at the Ewa-makai corner of the state Capitol rotunda.
At a news conference the following day, then-Public Safety Director Nolan Espinda told the public the shooting resulted from an 'extreme struggle ' between a deputy sheriff and Espejo, who refused to dispense of his drink container, was combative and failed to obey numerous commands to stop fighting.
Instead of waiting for backup, the deputy got up close enough to Espejo so that according to Espinda's narrative, Espejo wrapped his arms around the deputy sheriff who, at over 6 feet 2 inches tall and 205 pounds, towered above the 5-foot-3, 117-pound shooting victim.
Espinda said that's when the deputy's gun discharged and killed Espejo.
Espejo walked with a limp and had withered legs from congenital polio as a child, which required surgery, his family and his family's attorney, Myles Breiner, said.
Espinda said there was no surveillance footage of the shooting at the state Capitol, despite numerous security cameras there.
Circuit Court jurors, in an overwhelming majority—11 to 1—found Nov. 29 that punitive damages in the amount of $1.52 million should be awarded to Espejo's mother and against Bergman.
Jurors found that compensatory and /or general damages of $750, 000 should also go to Espejo's mother.
The majority of jurors, 10 to 2, found Bergman was negligent in his use of force.
But a majority did not find that, based on the evidence, Bergman used excessive /
unreasonable force, and none found he committed battery on Espejo.
The jury unanimously found the state breached its duties to properly train and /or supervise Bergman.
Circuit Judge Dean Ochiai, in his Jan. 10 findings of fact and conclusions of law, awarded $750, 000 in general damages to Cresencia Espe jo, 'in which Bergman and the State of Hawaii are jointly and severally liable.'
The judge found Bergman violated training, department policy on use of force, failed to wait for backup, failed to remain 6 feet away, and shot Espejo in the back while pushing him down onto his stomach.
The lawsuit was initially filed against the state, Public Safety Department, Sheriff Division, Bergman in his individual capacity and Public Safety Director Nolan Espin da individually and in his official capacity.
The judge found Bergman, who had been a deputy sheriff for less than two years, called but failed to wait for backup.
He confronted Espejo for drinking alcohol, a petty misdemeanor, and ordered him to pour out the drink.
'From the time Bergman reached toward Espejo to force him to pour out the bottle in less than 1 minute, (he ) had shot Espejo in his upper back, ' the judge said.
An Internal Affairs investigator and Bergman testified he had at least six opportunities to call for backup and maintain a 6-foot distance and use a baton or pepper spray, but instead rushed to tackle Espejo for refusing to pour out the drink.
'While pushing Espejo down onto his stomach, Bergman discharged one round into the unarmed Espejo's back, ' the judge found.
The judge quoted Bergman's testimony as to why he did not follow the department's crisis intervention training that avoids injury to officer and citizens and the need to deescalate and wait for backup.
Bergman said, 'I thought I could take him, ' according to the Internal Affairs investigator's testimony.
The court also found that numerous items of evidence, which should have been in the state's custody and control, were lost. They include footage from eight HPD body cameras, Bergman's interview with HPD and video footage from the state Capitol.
The San Diego Police Department confirmed with the Honolulu Star-Advertiser that Bergman was hired in 2019 shortly after the Hawaii shooting, but would not respond to questions concerning the San Diego shootings, nor whether he is in good standing.
The California Department of Justice is investigating Bergman and another officer in the Dec. 8, 2022, shooting of John Ray Romero, the Office of the Attorney General's website shows.
In that case, Romero had a gun pointed to his own head when police arrived, according to news reports. He asked police to shoot him. Bergman and another officer reportedly did.
In a July 23, 2021, case, Bergman was one of two officers involved in the shooting death of Jesus Veleta, a 22-year-old armed man who was shot in the back.
The Veleta family filed a $20 million legal claim against San Diego County, alleging Veleta was in the process of surrendering and was on his knees with his back turned when he was shot. The complaint accuses the officers of using excessive and lethal force.
The San Diego County District Attorney's Office had previously cleared Bergman and the other officer of criminal liability.
The DA's report said Veleta stumbled and fell, and officers ordered him to drop the gun. He 'raised it up behind him back towards the officers.'
Officers fired and struck him in the back.
'Veleta threw his handgun in front of him as the officers discharged their weapons, ' the report said.
The DA concluded Veleta ignored multiple commands to drop the gun and made no indications he was going to surrender, and that the officers reasonably believed he would shoot them unless they fired.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
NM lawmakers' addresses removed from website as precaution amid security concerns
Jul. 23—SANTA FE — The New Mexico Legislature has removed lawmakers' home addresses from the legislative website, following the shooting of two Minnesota lawmakers at their homes last month. The decision to do so was made "in an abundance of caution" by the Legislature's administrative arm, the Legislative Council Service, in consultation with top-ranking Democratic lawmakers, said LCS Director Shawna Casebier. She said legislators are encouraged to use a post office box or nonresidential mailing address for posting to the legislative website, while describing the question of whether home addresses will be returned to the public website as an "ongoing discussion." Other states have taken similar steps since the June shootings in Minnesota, in which state Rep. Melissa Hartman and her husband were killed. Another Democratic legislator, state Sen. John Hoffman, was also shot in his home but survived. New Mexico lawmakers have grappled with security concerns even before the Minnesota assassination, including after a string of drive-by shootings targeting Democratic elected officials' homes took place following the 2022 general election. No one was injured in those shootings, but Solomon Peña, a former Republican state House candidate, was convicted in March of all counts he was charged with in connection to the shootings. He faces a mandatory 60 years in prison when sentenced next month. After those shootings, legislators' addresses were removed from the legislative website but some were later reposted at the request of individual lawmakers, Casebier said. Senate President Pro Tem Mimi Stewart, D-Albuquerque, said she and House Speaker Javier Martínez, D-Albuquerque, were in quick agreement on the decision to remove lawmakers' addresses from the website after last month's shootings in Minnesota. She also said Senate Democrats recently held a caucus meeting on security issues, during which legislators were urged to look into home security technology and were provided with additional information. "It's just sort of basic security precautions that we're trying to think about," Stewart told the Journal. "We have to pay attention and we're doing it." But she also acknowledged that political violence targeting elected officials has already discouraged some potential candidates from running. She also said it could prompt some legislators to step down. "It's a scary time we live in," Stewart said Wednesday. "We're trying to allay those fears and keep people safe." The recent actions come after previous steps to address security concerns. In 2021, top-ranking New Mexico lawmakers voted to ban guns and other weapons from the Roundhouse, with certain limited exceptions. That vote led to metal detectors being installed at the public entrances to the building. Meanwhile, a 2023 elections bill included a provision that allows elected officials in New Mexico to keep their home addresses confidential in certain mandatory filings with the Secretary of State's Office. Stewart said the security-motivated policies would not make the Legislature less transparent, citing the webcasting of all interim committee hearings and other initiatives. Many legislators also have the names and phone numbers of their district legislative assistants posted on the Legislature's website. "We don't intend to lock the public out of anything," said Stewart. Solve the daily Crossword


CBS News
2 days ago
- CBS News
82-year-old Le Sueur man killed in UTV crash, sheriff says
An 82-year-old man was killed in a UTV crash on Tuesday afternoon in southern Minnesota. Le Sueur County Sheriff Brett Mason says it happened at about 4 p.m. in Sharon Township, located about 60 miles southwest of Minneapolis. The victim, from Le Sueur, was driving eastbound on Le Sueur Creek Road in a side-by-side when he collided with a sedan traveling southbound on County Road 15. The man was "ejected from the side-by-side," Mason said, and was pronounced dead at the scene by first responders. The driver of the sedan, a 16-year-old girl, was not hurt in the crash. Mason says his office is still investigating with the assistance of the Minnesota State Patrol. The Minnesota Department of Public Safety says as of Tuesday, there have been 184 traffic deaths in the state.

Boston Globe
2 days ago
- Boston Globe
This pay dispute is turning into a public safety crisis
Advertisement Indeed, what started as a pay dispute is now a real threat to public safety. People accused of crimes are entitled to a lawyer under the US Constitution. Most can't afford one, so the state provides them. Massachusetts is one of a handful of states that often contracts that work out to a bar advocate — a private attorney hired by the state to represent indigent defendants. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up But their pay is so low — $65 an hour, far lower than in neighboring states — that a large group of bar advocates have stopped taking new cases. If the state's rate were actually competitive, you might expect to see other lawyers hungry for work rushing to fill the void. Notably, they're not. Advertisement Now judges have no choice but to free some defendants. Earlier this month, a single justice of the Supreme Judicial Court Legislative leaders have complained that the bar advocates didn't give them proper warning, and that they don't like being pressured by the work stoppage. Representative Aaron Michlewitz (D-Boston), chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, But legislative pique is not a good enough reason to let this dangerous situation drag on. And anyway, lawmakers knew or should have known that pay was a serious and legitimate issue for those court-appointed lawyers — and that the consequences for ignoring it could be grave. At a hearing last March before the House and Senate Ways and Means Committee, Anthony J. Benedetti, chief counsel for the Committee for Public Counsel Services (CPCS) — which administers the appointment of attorneys — made the case for modest increases in their hourly wage. Advertisement And bar advocates said as early as That should have been more than enough time to reach a deal. While the $35 per hour increase that bar advocates are said to be seeking may be too high, there should have been — should still be — some way to reach a compromise. After all, that's what lawyers do all the time. (Lawmakers have said meeting the demand would cost about State Senator Lydia Edwards (D-Boston), who cochairs the Judiciary Committee, told the editorial board that bar advocates should go back to work with a commitment from the Legislature to work on an increase on their wages. 'Call it a win. Be better organized now. Set out a realistic increase that this Legislature can meet now,' she said. But that would require bar advocates to give up leverage in the hope that lawmakers are acting in good faith — a tough sell, given the lack of respect shown for earlier pay raise requests. Meanwhile, from the office of Governor Maura Healey comes this statement: 'Bar advocates do incredibly important work to make sure that everyone has their due process rights protected, and they deserve to be paid a fair wage. Governor Healey is concerned about the negative public safety impacts of this work stoppage. She urges all those impacted to work together to reach a resolution and ensure that all defendants receive the representation to which they are entitled.' Advertisement The governor has also said she'll do 'everything' she can to end the impasse. But there still appears to be no end in sight, and it's only a matter of time before the dispute leads to consequences much more dire than a broken cannon. Editorials represent the views of the Boston Globe Editorial Board. Follow us