Rachel Reeves set to reject introducing wealth tax
Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander refused to be drawn on the issue earlier this month by the BBC's Laura Kuenssberg, while Keir Starmer also declined to rule out the measure at PMQs after Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused him of "flirting" with the idea.
But Cabinet ministers have reportedly told The Times that a wealth tax is a 'non-starter', alleging wealthy people would simply leave the UK because of it.
'Wealth taxes don't work,' one cabinet minister said. 'Just look at what's happened in other countries that have introduced them. They just don't raise money, certainly not the kind of money that we're looking for.'
READ MORE: Labour launch review into raising retirement age
Another cabinet minister said a wealth tax was 'off the table'. They said: 'Wealthy people are mobile, they can move their assets to other more favourable jurisdictions.'
Another government source did say though that Reeves is reluctant to rule out a wealth tax publicly. They said that other options, such as increasing capital gains tax, remain under consideration.
Reeves is preparing to raise taxes in the Autumn Budget after the Government was forced by Labour MPs to abandon welfare cuts and partially reinstate the Winter Fuel Payment.
The U-turn on both policies is expected to cost more than £6 billion.
The Office for Budget Responsibility, the official forecaster, is also expected to downgrade Britain's growth prospects.
Earlier this month ex-Labour leader Neil Kinnock suggested Reeves should bring in a wealth tax, alongside ex-Welsh Labour leader Mark Drakeford.
Kinnock claimed it could bring in as much as £11bn for the Treasury.
READ MORE: Zarah Sultana calls out 'racist' cartoon in Observer
Eight nations have introduced wealth taxes but have subsequently scrapped them including Austria, Denmark, Germany, Finland, Iceland, Luxembourg, Sweden and France.
However, four countries have retained wealth taxes in Norway, Spain, Switzerland and Colombia.
The Chancellor has little wriggle room in the Autumn Budget because of Labour's manifesto pledge not to increase taxes on 'working people', encompassing income tax, VAT and National Insurance.
Reeves was accused of breaching the pledge last year when she increased employers' National Insurance contributions to raise £24 billion.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Khan seeks to build on more than 100 square miles of green belt
More than 100 square miles of green belt surrounding London are under threat from Sir Sadiq Khan 's development plans. Analysis by The Telegraph shows as much as 131 square miles of London's green space is at risk from Sir Sadiq's attempts to build more homes around the capital after repeatedly missing targets. The analysis, based on preparations ahead of the mayor's New London Plan – a document described by City Hall as a 'blueprint for development' – shows parks, green spaces and areas of 'limited biodiversity' are at risk of losing their protections. This means that housing developers could move in, buy the land and construct homes on it with little allowable opposition from residents. Much of the green belt land is found in Outer London, where voters are more likely to support the Conservatives. When it comes into force in 2027, the New London Plan, which removes areas of the green belt from protected status, could enable developers to concrete over parks, playing fields and other green spaces, critics say. Fields in Trust, the UK's only charity dedicated to protecting parks, playgrounds, sports fields, and green spaces, said there was 'a troubling pattern of policy decisions that put short-term financial pressures ahead of our children's long-term health and wellbeing'. Helen Griffiths, its chief executive, said: 'Planning reforms are already putting thousands of parks and green spaces at risk. These spaces are not surplus, they are vital to the future health and wellbeing of our children. Once lost, they are gone forever.' While much of the green belt is not under Sir Sadiq's direct control, as it falls outside of the London boundary, he has already pledged to go further than the Government on the release of green land. This action has been taken despite the existing planning permission for 300,000 homes in the city, not on protected land, that are yet to be constructed. A spokesman for the mayor confirmed the plans and said that 'in May, [Sadiq] announced the bold decision to actively explore releasing parts of London's green belt for development'. They added that Londoners 'are suffering the consequences of a perfect storm in housebuilding created by the last government – including a lack of national funding, high interest rates, spiralling building costs, delays from bodies like the building safety regulator and the lasting impact of Brexit'. Sir Sadiq's pledge means that green belt land within the boundary of Greater London is more at risk than in other parts of the country, such as Kent, Surrey and Sussex. Speaking to The Telegraph, David Simmonds, shadow minister for local government, accused Sir Sadiq and Labour of wanting to 'bulldoze the soul of London' with Angela Rayner, the Housing Secretary, 'cheering him on'. He warned that 'parks, outdoor sport and green spaces that define our neighbourhoods are now in Labour's crosshairs'. However, the mayor's office said that any release of land would have strict conditions to make the 'best use of land [and] increase the quality and accessibility of green spaces'. The green belt, which surrounds the city, makes up 22 per cent of the city's land, and some boroughs, such as Bromley, have more than half their area designated as protected green belt land. In the first quarter of this year, only 1,210 private homes were built, some 5.5 per cent of the target set by the Government for that quarter.
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
Reeves abandons inheritance tax raid on grieving military families
Rachel Reeves has abandoned plans to impose new inheritance tax changes on the grieving families of military personnel. The Chancellor has dropped a proposal to tax death in service payments, which are tax-free lump sums given to the families of deceased Armed Forces members. Changes unveiled in the October Budget would have made off-duty death in service payments subject to inheritance tax for the first time, if not going to a spouse or civil partner. It would have meant that children or partners of unmarried servicemen and women would have had to pay death duties on the benefit from April 2027. The Treasury has been forced to abandon the proposals after pressure from Armed Forces organisations, which said the move would have a 'corrosive' effect on trust among servicemen. The Government said that following its consultation, it had decided not to go ahead with the reform. 'Another U-turn' by Labour Mark Francois, the shadow Armed Forces minister, told The Telegraph that he welcomed the decision, 'even though it represents another U-turn by this Labour Government'. He added: 'It was always unfair that married partners of service personnel would be exempted from these changes to inheritance tax liabilities, while unmarried partners, in long-term relationships, would not. 'We highlighted this to ministers, on behalf of service families on multiple occasions and I am pleased for their sake, that common sense has now finally prevailed.' It comes after Ms Reeves's department had to water down proposals to scrap the universal winter fuel payment and reforms to the welfare system. The Government said: 'From 6 April 2027 all death in service benefits payable from registered pension schemes will be out of scope of Inheritance Tax, regardless of whether the scheme is discretionary or non-discretionary.' The HMRC document said that the new plans were 'in line with the broader policy objective of removing inconsistencies in the Inheritance Tax treatment of different types of pension benefits'. Labour 'standing up' for service personnel? Death in service payments are usually a lump sum paid to named beneficiaries of a worker who dies while on the company payroll. It is typically the equivalent of four-times the late individual's salary. For members of the Armed Forces, these are paid whether or not the individual was 'on duty' at the time of their death. Those who die 'on duty' were to continue to benefit from a separate tax-free arrangement on their death in service payments from 2027. But a military worker who dies while technically 'off duty', such as by sudden illness or accident, would have been stung by the proposed inheritance tax rules. Maj Gen Neil Marshall, the chief executive of the Forces Pension Society, told The Telegraph in January that military servicemen and women are unable to put the payment into trust, because they are part of the Armed Forces pension scheme. Labour sought to shore up support from the Armed Forces community at last year's general election, declaring the party would be 'standing up' for service personnel and veterans. The party was successful in winning over voters from military backgrounds, most notably winning in Aldershot, the site of a major garrison, for the first time in more than a century.
Telegraph
a few seconds ago
- Telegraph
My dying father was dragged through the courts after serving in the Troubles. It has to stop
The son of an elderly Troubles veteran has demanded Labour keep a law protecting former servicemen from prosecution. John Hutchings warned planned changes to the Legacy Act would mean 'taking dying people through the courts' like his father had been for actions taken decades ago in the line of duty. He urged the Government to 'stop persecuting soldiers who were trying to defend Britain', adding that 'these guys are far too old to prosecute'. Dennis Hutchings, from Cornwall, died in 2021 aged 80 while on trial over the death of John Patrick Cunningham, a 27-year-old man with learning difficulties, in County Tyrone in 1974. The veteran of the Life Guards regiment was determined to clear his name, despite suffering from kidney failure and requiring dialysis several times a week. He died alone after contracting Covid in Belfast and the trial collapsed, six years after Mr Hutchings was arrested in 2015. The 2023 Legacy Act put an end to fresh historical inquests into deaths that occurred in Northern Ireland during the Troubles, as well as civil actions. It was launched by Boris Johnson, who said the law would 'draw a line under the Troubles', and supporters said it remedied an imbalance in the treatment of both sides of the conflict. But Labour is pressing ahead with repealing elements of the Act that protected veterans from prosecution, arguing it is incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. Hilary Benn, the Northern Ireland Secretary, has argued that the legislation cannot remain in place in its current form, as it is unpopular with victims groups and political parties there. In his first major intervention on the proposals, Mr Hutchings said allowing further inquests would be 'ridiculous', and described to The Telegraph the toll of the trial on his father. He described seeing his father in court in the final week of the trial: 'I thought 'he's got a week to live'. He was literally, physically drained. He was drawn, thin in the face.' The veteran's son said: 'He would have probably done that court case, finished it, got acquitted, put his arm in the air as a celebration and then probably would have died within a few days anyway. I think he was that ill, that frail at the end.' Mr Hutchings warned: 'You're dragging people through the courts like this. That's what they're doing. They're taking dying people through the courts. It's ridiculous.' Dennis Hutchings was arrested at home in 2015 over the death of Mr Cunningham, who had been running away from an Army patrol when he was shot in the back and killed in 1974. He claimed he shot high over Mr Cunningham's head just to get him to stop and that another soldier – known only as Soldier B, who had since died – told him that it was he who had fired the fatal shot. No ballistics evidence exists to prove who fired the fatal shot. Mr Hutchings was investigated at the time and subsequently cleared of all wrongdoing. His son recalled to The Telegraph flying back home to Britain from Belfast on the Friday before his father died, intending to travel back in time for proceedings to restart the following Monday. 'I got a phone call on the Sunday, just saying don't come back,' he said, as his father had contracted Covid. His father died in hospital the following Tuesday. 'What he should have been doing at his age of life is probably sitting at home reading his books, being in his lovely house, enjoying time with his friends, not fighting in court in Northern Ireland,' Mr Hutchings added. One of the more controversial elements of the 1998 Good Friday Agreement was the offering of pardons to IRA terrorists in jail and comfort letters who were on the run. The Government's Northern Ireland's veterans' tsar told The Telegraph last month that up to 70 former soldiers could face court if Labour presses ahead with its plans. In a parliamentary debate earlier this month, Labour MPs were supportive of the plans to repeal the Act, which had been part of the manifesto. But some backbenchers urged ministers to provide clarity about what it would be replaced with, and what protections veterans would receive under new laws. Mr Hutchings, 61, warned that veterans who are emotionally or mentally vulnerable 'will struggle to cope', something that his defiant father was all too aware of. 'I think because he knew he was really ill, he was basically doing it for the other soldiers that were coming behind him.' He said of his father's case: 'I don't think he thought it was going to take three or four years, I don't think he knew he was going to be so ill at the end that he was on dialysis. 'But I think originally, when we used to go to London for the demonstrations and all the other stuff, I think it gave him at his age in life something to fight for, to stay alive for.' Dennis Hutchings was supported by Johnny Mercer, a former veterans minister, who accompanied him to Belfast and helped to enact the 2023 legislation. The former minister and ex-Army captain spoke at the veteran's funeral, which took place on Armistice Day in 2021 and was attended by thousands of veterans from across the country. Mr Mercer delivered a eulogy, in which he condemned 'grotesque spectacle of what happened to Dennis in a Belfast court', describing him as 'the quintessential British non-commissioned officer'. Asked if he had a message for the Government about their plans to reverse the Act, Mr Hutchings said: 'These guys were young boys sent out there to do a very tough job. 'Most of them are fantastic guys. Stop prosecuting them and just look at the rest of the problems that this country has and try and deal with that first instead of wasting money on this. These guys are old and frail. Leave them alone.' Dennis Hutchings had been a familiar face at veterans' protests up until his death, but with the prospect of the Legacy Act being undone, the demonstrations started again without him. But his son said: 'I think my Dad, even though he would have been found not guilty in court, would be beside them now, still fighting for every single one of them.' He added: 'I think he would just carry on doing that until he did pass away. I think he would be up in London, in court with the guys behind him fighting their cases as well.'
