Today in History: 32 people killed in Virginia Tech shooting
Today in history:
On April 16, 2007, Seung-hui Cho, a 23-year-old Virginia Tech student, killed 32 people on the Virginia Tech campus before taking his own life. It remains the deadliest school history in US history.
Also on this date:
In 1945, a Soviet submarine in the Baltic Sea torpedoed the ship MV Goya, which Germany was using to transport civilian refugees and wounded soldiers. As many as 7,000 people died as the ship broke apart and sank minutes after being struck.
In 1947, the French cargo ship Grandcamp, carrying over 2,000 tons of ammonium nitrate, blew up in the harbor in Texas City, Texas. A nearby ship, the High Flyer, which was carrying ammonium nitrate and sulfur, caught fire and exploded the following day. The combined blasts and fires killed nearly 600 people and injured 5,000 in the worst industrial accident in U.S. history.
In 1963, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. wrote his 'Letter from Birmingham Jail' in which the civil rights activist responded to a group of local clergymen who had criticized him for leading street protests. King defended his tactics, writing, 'Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.'
In 1972, Apollo 16 blasted off for the moon with astronauts John Young, Charles Duke and Ken Mattingly on board.
In 2010, the U.S. government accused Wall Street's most powerful firm of fraud, saying Goldman Sachs & Co. had sold mortgage investments without telling buyers the securities were crafted with input from a client who was betting on them to fail. (In July 2010, Goldman agreed to pay $550 million in a settlement with the Securities and Exchange Commission, but it did not admit wrongdoing.)
In 2012, a trial began in Oslo, Norway, for Anders Breivik, charged with killing 77 people in a bomb and gun rampage in July 2011. (Breivik was found guilty of terrorism and premeditated murder and given a 21-year prison sentence.)
Today's Birthdays: Singer Bobby Vinton is 90. Basketball Hall of Famer Kareem Abdul-Jabbar is 78. Football coach Bill Belichick is 73. Actor Ellen Barkin is 71. Singer Jimmy Osmond is 62. Actor Jon Cryer is 60. Actor-comedian Martin Lawrence is 60. Actor Peter Billingsley is 54. Actor Lukas Haas is 49. Actor-singer Kelli O'Hara is 49. Actor Claire Foy (TV: 'The Crown') is 41. Rapper Chance the Rapper is 32. Actor Anya Taylor-Joy is 29. Actor Sadie Sink is 23.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
2 hours ago
- Business Insider
I ordered the cheapest breakfast combo at Denny's and IHOP. The food was similar, but the prices were not.
It turns out that, when it comes to breakfast, not all chains are created equally, especially if you're an early riser. In search of the best value and taste, I recently ordered the same affordable combo (two sausages, two pancakes, two eggs) at breakfast chains IHOP and Denny's. They've always seemed quite similar to me, but I found myself shocked when I paid dramatically different prices in each place for near-identical meals. I also learned a frustrating lesson about timing — it really is everything. I started at Denny's, where the pancakes were massive and the sausage links tiny I arrived at a Denny's in Queens, New York, at 7 a.m. on a weekday. I was the only customer aside from a small family. My order was the cheapest meal on the Denny's menu, which proved to be the Everyday Value Slam. It consists of two eggs cooked however you like, bacon or sausage, and a choice of two pancakes, two slices of French toast, or a biscuit and gravy. I chose pancakes, eggs over medium, and sausage. When my food arrived, I was immediately struck by two things: The pancakes were huge, and the sausages were not. Topped with whipped, airy butter, the pancakes were so big that they even had their own plate. They were fluffy and slightly spongy with more of a pleasant bready flavor than the sweetness I expected. I wish they'd come with a bit more butter, though. The sausages were quite small — I could easily have eaten both of them in one generous bite. They were tasty, with a good savory profile, albeit a bit too salty for me. As for the eggs, they were cooked perfectly, with a bit of browning on the whites but with the unbroken yolks still partially runny. I paid under $10 for my meal at Denny's — and that's with a 22% tip The Everyday Value Slam meal at Denny's was priced at $6.99. The tax was $0.62, and I tapped for a 22% tip for a total price of $9.28. I doubt I could've sourced the ingredients to make the breakfast at home for less than that. The satisfying meal felt so well-priced that I knew I would return to Denny's even if IHOP blew me away. The food at IHOP felt completely on par with Denny's, though the pancakes were smaller The day after I ate at the Denny's in Queens, I went to an IHOP in Long Island on a weekday morning. I got there at about 6:20 a.m. and was seated alongside four or five other tables of guests. Once again, I wanted the cheapest meal, the same one I'd had at Denny's: two pancakes, two eggs cooked over medium, and two sausages. Once served, I was surprised to find all of my food nestled onto one plate. At Denny's, the pancakes were large enough to merit their own. I was surprised that the pancakes at the International House of Pancakes were markedly smaller than the pair I'd been served the morning before. The good news was that the sausage links appeared to be at least 40% larger than those I'd received at Denny's. IHOP's pancakes were sweeter than those from Denny's and were served with twice as much fluffy butter. I appreciated the generous portion of butter, though I slightly preferred the taste of Denny's pancakes since I'm not much of a fan of sweet breakfast foods. That's a totally subjective thing — many people would surely hold the opposite opinion. The eggs at IHOP were also cooked perfectly over medium. The long, narrow sausage links didn't taste nearly as salty as the ones at Denny's. I was charged $15.20 for my IHOP breakfast — before tip Coming on the heels of my Denny's dining experience, I was genuinely shocked to be handed a $15 check covering two eggs, two pancakes, and two sausage links. I added $3 for a 20% tip, so the entire affair cost me $18.20. This means my meal at IHOP was almost twice as expensive as the breakfast from Denny's, despite the two being almost identical. In terms of value, Denny's was my clear winner — but my IHOP meal could've been half the price if I'd dined later In terms of food, the meals at IHOP and Denny's were very comparable and almost a perfect match. Price-wise? Not so much. The breakfast from Denny's was so cheap it almost felt like I was getting away with something — while the same meal at IHOP was so expensive (relatively speaking) that I almost felt like I was being swindled. My feelings were further complicated when I realized this meal is part of IHOP's House Faves deal, which runs on weekdays from 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. With it, popular combos at the chain cost just $6 or $7. In fact, I ordered a meal almost identical to this one for $7 when reviewing the deals at this very location a few months ago. So, had I arrived 40 minutes later, I would've paid half the price for my IHOP breakfast. At certain times, I expect to pay a premium for food — the room-service cheeseburger at a five-star hotel, beer at a baseball game, or even popcorn at Disney World. In those instances with limited choices or added convenience, elevated costs feel acceptable to me. However, it's frustrating to know how much less the chain could've charged me if I'd eaten during what I'd argue are more popular dining hours. In terms of just taste and quality, I can't say I prefer one chain over the other. Denny's had smaller sausages but bigger pancakes. My eggs at both chains were cooked perfectly, and I enjoyed all that I ate. However, if I'm planning to get a basic breakfast before 7 a.m., my money will go much further at Denny's.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why QuantumScape Stock Plummeted This Week
Key Points QuantumScape stock saw big sell-offs this week in response to bearish coverage from Goldman Sachs. Unfavorable macroeconomic news also played a role in pushing QuantumScape stock lower this week. The solid-state battery specialist's share price could remain highly volatile in the near term. 10 stocks we like better than QuantumScape › QuantumScape (NYSE: QS) stock got hit with a massive pullback over the last week of trading. The company's share price ended this Friday's session down 31% from the previous week's market close. QuantumScape started this week's trading with strong bearish momentum connected to new analyst coverage from Goldman Sachs. The company's share price saw another big negative catalyst at the end of the week after new macroeconomic developments prompted big valuation pullbacks for speculative growth stocks. QuantumScape stock sank in response to negative analyst coverage Last Sunday, Goldman Sachs published new coverage on QuantumScape and reiterated a sell rating on the stock. While Goldman's lead analyst on the stock raised the investment firm's one-year price target from $2 per share to $3 per share, the new valuation target was still strongly bearish. Even after a big sell-off this week, Goldman's updated target suggests potential downside of roughly 64% for the stock. The negative coverage on QuantumScape kicked off strong selling pressures early in the week, and shares took another step back on Friday in response to developments suggesting a less favorable macroeconomic outlook. Will macroeconomic developments keep pressuring QuantumScape? QuantumScape and other growth stocks saw significant pullbacks Friday in response to a worse-than-expected July jobs report and the announcement of new tariffs from President Donald Trump. The Federal Reserve announced earlier in the week that it was not lowering the benchmark interest rate, and the combination of unfavorable macroeconomic news prompted a big sell-off for stocks at the end of the week. While QuantumScape has recently scored wins with new manufacturing processes and an expanded contract with Volkswagen's PowerCo subsidiary, it remains a highly speculative stock with an uncertain outlook. If macroeconomic conditions broadly shift in less favorable directions, QuantumScape stock could be at risk of significant downside volatility in the near term. Should you buy stock in QuantumScape right now? Before you buy stock in QuantumScape, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and QuantumScape wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Goldman Sachs Group. The Motley Fool recommends Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why QuantumScape Stock Plummeted This Week was originally published by The Motley Fool
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why QuantumScape Stock Plummeted This Week
Key Points QuantumScape stock saw big sell-offs this week in response to bearish coverage from Goldman Sachs. Unfavorable macroeconomic news also played a role in pushing QuantumScape stock lower this week. The solid-state battery specialist's share price could remain highly volatile in the near term. 10 stocks we like better than QuantumScape › QuantumScape (NYSE: QS) stock got hit with a massive pullback over the last week of trading. The company's share price ended this Friday's session down 31% from the previous week's market close. QuantumScape started this week's trading with strong bearish momentum connected to new analyst coverage from Goldman Sachs. The company's share price saw another big negative catalyst at the end of the week after new macroeconomic developments prompted big valuation pullbacks for speculative growth stocks. QuantumScape stock sank in response to negative analyst coverage Last Sunday, Goldman Sachs published new coverage on QuantumScape and reiterated a sell rating on the stock. While Goldman's lead analyst on the stock raised the investment firm's one-year price target from $2 per share to $3 per share, the new valuation target was still strongly bearish. Even after a big sell-off this week, Goldman's updated target suggests potential downside of roughly 64% for the stock. The negative coverage on QuantumScape kicked off strong selling pressures early in the week, and shares took another step back on Friday in response to developments suggesting a less favorable macroeconomic outlook. Will macroeconomic developments keep pressuring QuantumScape? QuantumScape and other growth stocks saw significant pullbacks Friday in response to a worse-than-expected July jobs report and the announcement of new tariffs from President Donald Trump. The Federal Reserve announced earlier in the week that it was not lowering the benchmark interest rate, and the combination of unfavorable macroeconomic news prompted a big sell-off for stocks at the end of the week. While QuantumScape has recently scored wins with new manufacturing processes and an expanded contract with Volkswagen's PowerCo subsidiary, it remains a highly speculative stock with an uncertain outlook. If macroeconomic conditions broadly shift in less favorable directions, QuantumScape stock could be at risk of significant downside volatility in the near term. Should you buy stock in QuantumScape right now? Before you buy stock in QuantumScape, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and QuantumScape wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Goldman Sachs Group. The Motley Fool recommends Volkswagen Ag. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why QuantumScape Stock Plummeted This Week was originally published by The Motley Fool
