FDA vaccine official restricted COVID vaccine approvals against the advice of agency staff
The new memos from the Food and Drug Administration show how the agency's vaccine chief, Dr. Vinay Prasad, personally intervened to place restrictions on COVID shots from vaccine makers Novavax and Moderna.
Both vaccines were approved by the FDA in May after months of analysis by rank-and-file FDA reviewers.
But internal correspondence show Prasad disagreed with staffers who planned to approve the shots for everyone 12 and older, similar to previous COVID vaccines. The scientists had concluded the benefit from the vaccines and the risk of COVID-19 outweighed the risk of possible side effects, which are rare.
Instead Prasad decided the shots should be limited to those who face special risks from the virus— seniors or children and adults with underlying medical issues.
Prasad explained that the COVID vaccine benefits must be reconsidered in light of falling rates of death and hospitalization and the possibility for vaccine side effects. It's the latest in a series of vaccine restrictions imposed by officials working under Kennedy, who has long questioned the benefits of vaccines.
'Even rare vaccination related harms both known and unknown now have higher chance of outweighing potential benefits' Prasad wrote in a five-page memo explaining his decision.
COVID-19 remains a public health threat, resulting in 32,000 to 51,000 U.S. deaths and more than 250,000 hospitalizations since last fall, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Most at risk for hospitalization are seniors and children under 2 — especially infants under 6 months.
Top FDA leaders are typically not involved in the review of individual products. Officials like Prasad can overrule staffers, but such cases are rare and often controversial.
News of the FDA documents was first reported by the New York Times.
Prasad was hired to lead the FDA's vaccine center in May, after the previous director, Dr. Peter Marks, was forced to resign over disagreements with Kennedy. An academic researcher specializing in cancer therapies, Prasad came to prominence during the pandemic for criticizing public health measures, including the FDA's approval of COVID boosters for healthy adults and children.
Since arriving at the agency he has worked with FDA Commissioner Mark Makary on new guidelines that will limit approvals of future COVID boosters to higher-risk Americans, mainly seniors and those with medical conditions like asthma and obesity.
Those limits match the terms FDA recently approved for Novavax's shot, Nuvaxovid and Moderna's mNexspike. Novavax's vaccine is the only protein-based coronavirus vaccine available in the U.S. Moderna's vaccine is an updated, lower-dose version of its existing mRNA-based vaccine.
The review team for the Novavax vaccine pointed to data from a study in 30,000 adults, concluding that 'the risk-benefit assessment for this vaccine technology remains favorable.'
FDA staff reached a similar conclusion for the Moderna vaccine, deeming it similar in safety and effectiveness to the company's original shot.
Last week, the FDA finalized new warning labeling about the risk of myocarditis, a rare form of heart inflammation, on shots from Moderna and Pfizer, the other maker of an mRNA-based shot for COVID.
In his 'override memo,' reversing FDA staff's decision on the Moderna shot, Prasad pointed to the ongoing risk of myocarditis and questions about its frequency. The agency ordered Moderna to conduct further studies of the risk as a condition for the approving its updated shot.
A spokesman for the administration said Prasad 'has raised serious concerns' about the issue.
'We will not ignore these risks and will ensure that the gold standard of science is used for any decisions,' said Andrew Nixon, in an emailed statement.
Outside researchers have noted that cases of the heart condition tend to resolve quickly and are less severe than those associated with COVID infection itself, which can also cause myocarditis.
___
The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Blueberry Recall Just Got More Serious—Here's What To Know
When the Fourth of July rolls around, there's nothing we love more than concocting the perfect, summery sweet treat. However, before you turn to the fruit aisle to grab fresh, seasonal strawberries and blueberries to bring to life that festive American flag cake that's every Pinterest lover's dream or that refreshing fruit salad, think twice. The FDA has issued a recall of hundreds of boxes of blueberries. Here, everything we know and what you ought to know ahead of the holiday weekend. Back in early June, a recall was issued by Georgia-based company Alma Pak International LLC for hundreds of boxes of organic blueberries. As stated by the initial report, the recall came to be when, during routine testing, the product tested positive for Listeria monocytogenes. In total, 400 30-pound boxes were part of this recall, identifiable by Lot numbers 13325 G1060 and 13325 G1096. The voluntary recall stated that these products were shipped to one customer in North Carolina. Though it was on June 9 that this recall was first issued, on July 1, the FDA elevated this situation to a Class I threat. As stated by their website, a Class I recall is 'a situation in which there is a reasonable probability that the use of or exposure to a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death.' While there have yet to be any reports of people falling ill after consuming this particular recalled product, vigilance is key when it comes to food safety. Over the last year, listeria is the word that's been circulating when it comes to recalls, and the symptoms can range from mild to severe. According to the FDA's website, the less severe version of the illness is non-invasive and usually will result in side effects like nausea, vomiting, fever, aches and diarrhea. On the contrary, the invasive version can be fatal. 'Symptoms may include headache, stiff neck, confusion, loss of balance, and convulsions,' says the FDA website. 'Invasive listeriosis is a potentially life-threatening event, especially for newborns, adults over the age of 65, and those with weakened immune systems.' If you think you might have consumed contaminated food, it's best to see your healthcare provider and monitor symptoms. If you start to feel any of the symptoms listed above, seek medical guidance. In a statement to Newsweek, the company revealed that the recall was issued before blueberries even hit shelves, meaning no customers consumed these contaminated products, and therefore, no one was at risk. They continued, 'The company worked in close coordination with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Georgia Department of Agriculture, and an independent food safety consultant to conduct a thorough investigation. Alma Pak International has implemented additional corrective actions and preventive controls to further strengthen its already rigorous food safety systems.' Looking for more trending stories? Click through below! Could '1969' Be the Next 'Yellowstone' Series? Rumors Fly About a Prequel Between '1944' and Today From Tax Breaks to Medicaid Cuts: What the 'Big Beautiful Bill' Means for Americans 50+ Paula Deen's 5 Favorite Fourth of July Recipes—Drinks, Desserts & Deviled Eggs, Oh My! (EXCLUSIVE)


San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
EPA puts on leave 139 employees who spoke out against policies under Trump
The Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday put on administrative leave 139 employees who signed a 'declaration of dissent' with its policies, accusing them of 'unlawfully undermining' the Trump administration's agenda. In a letter made public Monday, the employees wrote that the agency is no longer living up to its mission to protect human health and the environment. The letter represented rare public criticism from agency employees who knew they could face blowback for speaking out against a weakening of funding and federal support for climate, environmental and health science. In a statement Thursday, the EPA said it has a 'zero-tolerance policy for career bureaucrats unlawfully undermining, sabotaging and undercutting' the Trump administration's agenda. Employees were notified that they had been placed in a 'temporary, non-duty, paid status' for the next two weeks, pending an 'administrative investigation,' according to a copy of the email obtained by The Associated Press. 'It is important that you understand that this is not a disciplinary action,' the email read. More than 170 EPA employees put their names to the document, with about 100 more signing anonymously out of fear of retaliation, according to Jeremy Berg, a former editor-in-chief of Science magazine who is not an EPA employee but was among non-EPA scientists or academics to also sign. Scientists at the National Institutes of Health made a similar move in June, when nearly 100 employees signed a declaration that assailed Trump administration 'policies that undermine the NIH mission, waste public resources, and harm the health of Americans and people across the globe.' An additional 250 of their colleagues endorsed the declaration without using their names. But no one at NIH has been placed on administrative leave for signing the declaration and there has been no known retribution against them, Jenna Norton, a lead organizer of the statement, told AP on Thursday. Norton oversees health disparity research at the agency's National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases. NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, in his confirmation hearings, had pledged openness to views that might conflict with his own, saying dissent is the 'essence of science.' Under Administrator Lee Zeldin, EPA has cut funding for environmental improvements in minority communities, vowed to roll back federal regulations that lower air pollution in national parks and tribal reservations, wants to undo a ban on a type of asbestos and proposed repealing rules that limit planet-warming greenhouse gas emissions from power plants fueled by coal and natural gas. Zeldin began reorganizing the EPA's research and development office as part of his push to slash its budget and gut its study of climate change and environmental justice. And he's seeking to roll back pollution rules that an AP examination found were estimated to save 30,000 lives and $275 billion every year. The EPA responded to the employees' letter earlier this week by saying policy decisions 'are a result of a process where Administrator Zeldin is briefed on the latest research and science by EPA's career professionals, and the vast majority who are consummate professionals who take pride in the work this agency does day in and day out.' ___
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Theratechnologies shares surge 25% amid $254m Future Pak takeover
Contract manufacturer Future Pak will acquire Theratechnologies in a $254m deal, bringing an end to a drawn-out sale process of the Canadian HIV-specialist biopharma. Via its affiliate CB Biotechnology, US-headquartered Future Pak will purchase shares in Theratechnologies for $3.01 each plus a contingent value right (CVR) of $1.19 on the achievement of future milestones. Shares in Theratechnologies increased 25% at market open following the takeover announcement. The drugmaker has a market cap of $144.6m. The transaction, which will bring the currently Nasdaq-listed Theratechnologies back under private ownership, means Future Pak is paying a cash premium of 126% on the last closing share price for the biopharma. Theratechnologies has two products in the HIV arena that are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), namely Egrifta (tesamorelin F8) and Trogarzo (ibalizumab-uiyk). Egrifta is approved to reduce excess visceral abdominal fat in adults with HIV and lipodystrophy while Trogarzo is indicated for the treatment of HIV-1 infection in heavily treatment-experienced adults with multidrug resistance. Egrifta WR took over from Egrifta SV in March 2025, offering a more convenient formulation. Expected to close in Q4, the deal will close a sale process that has fluctuated over the past year. Future Pak's first attempt to acquire Theratechnologies was rebuffed in August 2024, with the biopharma deeming the $100m offer too low. Future Pak returned to the deal table in January 2025. Theratechnologies had already entered an exclusivity agreement with another potential acquirer, meaning Future Pak was once again turned away. Theratechnologies eventually opened the sale process to other parties, opening the door for a potential deal with the contract manufacturer. In April 2025, Future Pak tabled a $255 offer, which has now been accepted by the drugmaker. Theratechnologies reported 2024 revenue of $85.9m, a 5% increase from the $81.8m accumulated in 2023. Whilst the company reported a positive EBITDA for the year, it struggled with supply for Egrifta WR due to an issue with a contract manufacturer. Still, sales of the drug grew 12%, unlike Trogarzo, which dropped 8% due to 'competitive pressures' in the multidrug-resistant segment of the HIV market. 'This transaction is the result of a thorough and deliberate sale process aimed at maximising value for our shareholders,' stated Frank Holler, Theratechnologies' chair of the board of directors. 'Future Pak's interest in acquiring Theratechnologies represents a vote of confidence in the company we've built, recognising our achievements in bringing innovative medicines to patients and the outstanding contributions of our dedicated employees.' Last year, Future Pak also made multiple unsuccessful attempts to acquire Vanda Pharmaceuticals, the developer of sleep disorder drug Hetlioz. Cycle Therapeutics ultimately won out, acquiring in a $466m deal. "Theratechnologies shares surge 25% amid $254m Future Pak takeover" was originally created and published by Pharmaceutical Technology, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data