
Commodities Weekly: Tariff-led recession pain triggers sharp reversal
This past week, we saw a justified meltdown in risky assets as markets absorbed the blow of Trump's far larger than expected tariffs on all its major counterparts, sparking threats of retaliation and a broad selloff around the world on concerns that a global trade war on this scale and magnitude will drive an economic slowdown—not least in the US, where inflation forecasts have spiked, and sentiment among consumers and businesses has fallen sharply during the past couple of months.
There is a general understanding of why Trump wants to reshape the global economy, with his primary goal being the reversal of a two-decade trend of US companies moving production overseas—especially to Asia—to capitalise on cheaper labour costs, which, in turn, has boosted their stock prices but contributed to domestic job losses and economic stagnation in certain sectors and parts of the nation. This shift has had significant impacts on American manufacturing and the broader economy, as well as its ability to be self-sufficient in key materials.
Economic implications: short-term pain, long-term uncertainty
What Trump delivered on this so-called 'Liberation Day' was an economic war declaration likely to cause chaos across global supply chains, while in the short term raising the risk of an economic fallout, hurting demand for key commodities, with energy and industrial metals being the sectors most at risk. While stock markets crumbled, investors sought shelter in secure government bonds, and for a change not in the US dollar, which normally acts as the go-to currency during times of heightened uncertainty. Instead, the euro, yen, and especially the Swiss franc have served as safe havens, while the US dollar weakened broadly. The narrative driving the US dollar lower is one of reduced portfolio allocations to the US as the policy will bring most disruption to the US economy in the near term.
BCOM's year-to-date gain cut in half The Bloomberg Commodity Total Return Index (BCOM) trades down 4% on the week, and following a brutal week the annual gain has been cut in half. As per the table below, the growth- and demand-dependent sectors of energy and industrial metals suffered the steepest losses; the precious metal loss was limited by gold's resilience while the agriculture sector traded mixed to lower.
On an individual level, major losses were recorded in crude oil and refined products, copper, silver, and cotton, while a handful of different commodities barely scraped even, led by natural gas, gold, corn, sugar, and not least wheat, the best performer benefiting from a weaker dollar.
Gold's safe haven credentials grow despite setback
Gold's safe-haven role temporarily received a setback with spiking volatility driving another burst of deleveraging similar to, but so far nowhere near the same scale seen during the early stages of pandemic panic back in 2020 when gold over a ten-day period slumped by 13% before recovering strongly as inflation worries and stimulus helped create fresh demand. Gold prices hit a record high on Thursday before the mentioned deleveraging helped drive a USD 100 correction.
However, the combination of heightened global economic tensions, the risk of stagflation, a weaker dollar combined with collapsing US real yields as nominal yields fall and inflation expectations rise, will in our opinion continue to support bullion, and we maintain our forecast for gold reaching USD 3,300 this year. Adding to this a market that is now aggressively positioning for the Fed to deliver more cuts this year—at current count a full 100 basis points of easing by year end. The recent transfer of gold from around the world to US warehouses monitored by the COMEX futures exchange in order to get supplies behind a potential tariff wall may now see a part reversal after bullion was made exempt, potentially weighing on prices in the short term.
Gold's correction from a fresh record has once again been relatively shallow with several key levels of support yet to be challenged. The most important in our opinion being an area around USD 2,950 which apart from being the February top also represents a 0.382 Fibonacci retracement of the run-up from late December. A rejection before and at this level would signal a very weak correction within a strong uptrend.
Silver slumps on rising recession fears and COMEX indigestion
Silver, meanwhile, was heading for an 8% weekly slump, with most of the damage being inflicted by economic growth concerns as silver derives around 50% of its demand from industrial applications. The weakness was led by selling in the New York futures market after a fact sheet distributed by the White House stated that bullion (gold) and 'other certain minerals that are not available in the United States' should not be subject to reciprocal tariffs.
With silver and platinum imports accounting for the bulk of US consumption, traders concluded that these two metals would not be impacted, and with that, the tariff premium on futures prices in New York compared with spot prices in London collapsed, hurting an already weakened sentiment. A 51% year-to-date increase in silver flows to COMEX-monitored vaults now faces the risk of a partial reversal, potentially adding supply to a market already weakened by short-term recession concerns.
In addition, prices were hurt by a collapse in the COMEX futures premium on speculation silver, just like bullion, would be exempt from tariffs after a fact sheet from the White House potentially hurting industrial demand which accounts for around 50% of silver's total demand. Thursday's slump most certainly qualified for its worst since December 2023, driven by a double whammy of economic worries hurting its industrious credentials, and not least a complete deflation of the COMEX futures premium after a fact sheet provided by the White House raised doubts about silver being included in tariffs.
Silver's dramatic slump extended into Friday's session, and with gold holding steady around USD 3,100, supported by the dollar and yield slump, the gold-silver ratio has surged above 100 ounces of silver to one ounce of gold, the highest since 2020, potentially offering some relative value once the dust from this latest setback settles. In the short term, traders will focus on support just below USD 31, where we find the 0.618 retracement of the run-up since late December, as well as the 200-DMA and trendline from February last year.
Crude prices tumble on recession risks and accelerated OPEC+ production hike
Crude oil, meanwhile, was heading for its worst week in a year, with Brent crude tumbling more than 11%, in the process slumping through previous strong support in the USD 68 area. China's aggressive countermove to US tariffs, announcing their own 34% duties on US goods, with Europe likely to follow soon, all but confirms we are heading towards a global trade war—a war that has no winners, and which will hurt economic growth and, with that, demand for key commodities such as crude oil and refined products. At this stage, we have not only entered a demand destruction phase, but also supply destruction from high-cost producers, which over time will help cushion the fall.
The weakness was further accelerated by an OPEC+ surprise decision to accelerate planned production hikes starting in May. To understand this strategy, it's crucial to examine the WTI forward curve, which is showing prices below USD 60 from next January and onwards. A recent Dallas Fed survey of US producers revealed that an average price of USD 65 is needed to profitably drill a new well. With crude oil prices under pressure, US production risks stalling sooner than anticipated, potentially allowing key OPEC+ members to regain lost market share.
Partly or potentially fully offsetting this production increase are the impacts of sanctions and tariffs on countries like Venezuela, Iran, and Russia. These nations may struggle to maintain production in the coming months, providing an opportunity for GCC producers, particularly Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Kuwait, to increase output and reclaim market share both within OPEC and globally.
Copper increasingly exposed to a binary tariffs event
The New York-traded High Grade copper futures reached a record closing high on Thursday at USD 5.1120 a pound, marking a culmination of a month-long surge that has triggered a major dislocation between US prices and the rest of the world. A development driven, not by strong fundamental demand, but mostly by a phenomenal arbitrage window that has been opened due to Trump's push for tariffs on imports of the metal.
Ahead of a potential announcement of tariffs, a decision that could still be months away given the time an investigation carried out under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act normally takes, traders have been rushing copper to the US in order to log in premiums of up to 13% relative to prices in London, a move that has helped tighten the rest of the world where more than 90% of global demand is consumed. It's worth noting that holding a high-grade futures position at a 13% premium to London has raised binary risks in the market, meaning prices could suddenly drop by more than 10% if no tariffs are introduced or surge even higher if the level is 25%, in line with those applied on steel and aluminum.
Crude oil: Range-bound despite growth concerns
Crude prices have settled into a relatively tight range near the recent lows, weighed down by fears Trump's aggressive trade policies may trigger a global trade war that would negatively impact global growth and demand. In addition, the prospect of rising supply from OPEC+ next month has also been weighing on prices at a time when the US administration has been talking down oil prices, potentially, if successful, scoring a major own goal.
We believe these concerns are overstated, not least considering the risk of lower output due to sanctions and several of the OPEC+ members having pledged additional cutbacks to compensate for exceeding quotas, a move that if carried out would offset the planned increase. Iran is once again in the crosshairs of the US administration after Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent recently said the US would ramp up sanctions on Iran, a producer that despite sanctions in the past four years managed to increase production by around 1.1 million barrels a day. A clear sign of that threat was seen this week when the US penalised a Chinese refinery and its CEO for allegedly buying Iranian oil.
With this in mind, we see no major change in OPEC+ production in the coming months, instead a redistribution among its members with GCC producers being the main winners, allowing them to increase production without hurting prices. In addition, it has become increasingly clear that Trump's 'Drill, baby, drill' cannot be achieved without hurting output from high-cost producers, many of which are located in the US, and production growth will likely slow, thereby supporting prices while handing market share back to OPEC.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Watani
an hour ago
- Watani
Israel-Iran war: Lessons learned
June 2025 was witness to the Israel-Iran war that involved Israeli strikes aimed at eliminating Iran's military and nuclear prowess, and Iranian retaliatory attacks with the purpose of inflicting maximum possible destruction on Israel. The war involved lethal strikes by American weapons on Iranian nuclear reactor sites, followed by an Iranian strike against American bases in Qatar—a scenario coined up for Iran 'not to lose face'. Finally, Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire which we hope would prevail despite leaked news of both parties breaching the ceasefire. It is now time to contemplate and explore the events that led to the war, in an attempt to comprehend its magnitude and learn a few lessons. I believe that no one is better poised to do that than American political scientist and international relations scholar John Mearsheimer, 77, the R. Wendell Harrison Distinguished Service Professor at University of Chicago. Prof Mearsheimer was recently hosted on Youtube's Breaking Points, the podcast presented by Krystal and Saagar. Today I present excerpts of the views voiced by the Professor on Breaking Points. 'I think the argument that we have solved the nuclear problem with Iran is wrong, and if anything, it's more likely than ever that Iran will get nuclear weapons. Almost everybody I know argues that if Iran wants nuclear weapons there's nothing you can do to prevent them from getting nuclear weapon; they have so much capability, and even if we were to destroy all of the existing facilities, they could rebuild them underneath a bigger mountain and eventually have nuclear weapons. 'To talk about regime change is changing the objective. Trump initially said that this was simply about taking out Iran's nuclear capability; he probably now realises that we have not done that. So now we're talking about regime change on the assumption that if we put in a new regime, those new Iranian leaders are not going to want nuclear weapons. This too is delusional. What Iranian in his or her right mind doesn't want a nuclear deterrent at this point in time? Furthermore, we're not going to get regime change, in all likelihood if you look at what's happening inside Iran… People are coming together to support the regime… So I think this is not going to work to cause regime change any more than it's going to work to eliminate nuclear capability. 'I think this has done great damage to the nuclear proliferation regime with regard to our reputation around the world. I mean the United States is correctly seen as a rogue State. Even in East Asia today, allies like Japan and South Korea are basically condemning us for what we've done… First of all the duplicative diplomacy here, and then this idea that we have the right just to run around the world attacking countries whenever we see fit. Furthermore, let's not lose sight of the fact that the United States is supporting the Israeli genocide in Gaza… America's reputation is in tatters; sure we're the most powerful State on the planet, but I think almost everybody outside of Israel and the United States and a few European leaders understand that the United States is basically out of control. 'There's no question in my mind that the Israelis understood that if they started a war against Iran, the focus would be on Iran especially if they brought the Americans in, and that would leave them free to ramp up the genocide, and possibly drive the Palestinians out of Gaza. It's very clear that that is their goal… and it's quite clear to me that starting a major war with Iran goes a long way towards helping them cleanse Gaza. 'American policy makers believe that the principal threat that the United States faces today is from China; China is widely seen as a peer competitor, and the United States has been interested in pivoting to Asia since 2011 when Hillary Clinton who was then Secretary of State said 'We're going to pivot to Asia'. But we cannot pivot to Asia in any meaningful way in large part because of the Ukraine war and what's going on in the Middle East, and if you look at all the naval and air assets that we have in the Middle East now that should be in East Asia, you see that we have greatly weakened our strategic situation in East Asia and we are in a poor position at this point in time for purposes of containing China, this is not in our interest. 'Any policymaker or any politician or aspiring politician who criticises Israel will find out very quickly that that person has the lobby's gun sight on him or her…The lobby will go to great lengths to destroy that person's career and make sure that he or she never gets elected to office… If you support Israel hook, line and sinker, you'll get big-time support from the lobby… If you support Israel, if you back it, and you push the American military to do things that are said to be in Israel's interest, your job prospects once you retire will be much better. I could go on and on about this, but Israel lobby has enormous influence in the United States. 'I think that Obama fully understood that the lobby was powerful but nevertheless its policies were not good for the United States; he understood that Israel is an albatross around their neck. He would never say that publicly… But he understood that getting a deal with Iran made sense, and he worked overtime to fashion a deal, and had a number of European countries: the French, British and Germans, plus the Russians and Chinese on his side. He was able to barely push through the JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan Of Action), the nuclear agreement with Iran. But he took tremendous heat along the way from the Israelis and from the lobby. Then when Trump came to power in 2017, he made it clear that he was going to do away with the JCPOA, and of course in the summer of 2018, he walked away from it… Then the Trump administration started dealing with this issue again a few months ago, and Trump himself was talking about working out a deal that looked like JCPOA. Then the lobby moved in unsurprisingly and made it clear to Trump that there was not going to be a deal like JCPOA… In May again, the Trump administration was maintaining 'we're going to negotiate with Iran, we're going to curtail their nuclear weapons programme that's all we want'… Then they shifted to early June saying 'no nuclear enrichment'… Witkoff and Trump both did 180-degree turn, said the Iranians cannot have any nuclear enrichment at all which was allowed in the original JCPOA, and the Iranians said that was unacceptable and here we are today. Bottom line is that common sense won a victory during the Obama period, but that was quickly overturned by Trump, then it looked like Trump might win a victory for common sense this time, and it was quickly overturned by the lobby. So, you see the power of the lobby at every turn, it's almost impossible for a president to have any manoeuvre room when it comes to dealing with issues that are dear to Israel's heart.' Watani International 4 July 2025 Comments comments Tags: Israel and IranProblems on holdYoussef Sidhom


See - Sada Elbalad
6 hours ago
- See - Sada Elbalad
U.S. Treasury Secretary to Musk: 'Stay Out of Politics, Focus on Your Companies'
Taarek Refaat A day after tech mogul Elon Musk announced the formation of a new political party in a direct challenge to former President Donald Trump, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bissent issued a blunt public message: 'Stick to running your companies and leave politics to the politicians.' The remark comes amid growing concern from investors and board members over Musk's deepening political involvement. The announcement of Musk's 'America Party' over the weekend has already had immediate financial repercussions, including the postponement of a major investment initiative. Investor Backlash and Delayed Deals Azuria Partners, a private equity firm that had been planning to launch a Tesla-linked investment fund this week, said Sunday it would delay the project. In a statement, the firm cited 'an inherent conflict between Mr. Musk's executive responsibilities and the political ambitions he has now publicly declared.' James Fishback, CEO of Azuria Partners and a known Trump supporter, took to X (formerly Twitter) to voice his disapproval. 'Elon left us no choice,' Fishback posted, calling on Tesla's board to convene an emergency meeting and demanding clarity on Musk's political intentions. Musk vs. Trump: From Allies to Rivals The political clash marks a dramatic turn in the relationship between Musk and Trump. The two were once allies, with Musk playing a visible role during Trump's re-election campaign and even advising on tech-related issues during his first term. But the recently passed 'Big Beautiful Law'—Trump's sweeping tax-cut and defense spending package—proved to be the final straw. Musk blasted the law, warning it would "bankrupt the country" and disproportionately harm clean energy initiatives. His proposed party, the 'America Party,' aims to challenge pro-Trump Republicans in the upcoming midterms. Musk's sharp pivot has reportedly alarmed board members at both Tesla and SpaceX, according to Secretary Bissent. 'I imagine the boards were not thrilled with yesterday's announcement,' Bissent said during a Sunday CNN interview. 'They'll likely encourage Elon to refocus on the business side.' Trump Responds with Threats President Trump, never one to leave a slight unanswered, claimed Musk's outrage was rooted in the removal of electric vehicle tax incentives from the new law—an indirect blow to Tesla's profit margins. Speaking to supporters at a rally in Ohio, Trump warned he might revoke billions of dollars in federal contracts and subsidies currently flowing to Musk's companies. 'Tesla and SpaceX have made fortunes off the government,' Trump said. 'If Elon wants to play politics, he better be ready to lose the perks.' A Popular Department, An Unpopular Founder Interestingly, despite the political turbulence, Musk's earlier government initiative— the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), established during Trump's administration—remains widely popular. But as Bissent noted, 'Voters liked DOGE. They didn't necessarily like Elon.' Recent polling supports Bissent's view, showing lukewarm public support for Musk as a political figure, despite his towering influence in the tech and automotive sectors. What's Next for Musk? While the White House has not issued an official response, Trump's chief economic advisor Stephen Miran defended the controversial law during a separate interview with ABC. 'The Big Beautiful Law will unleash economic growth,' he said. Meanwhile, calls are growing within Tesla's shareholder community for clarity and accountability. Whether Musk will double down on his political crusade or heed calls to step back remains unclear. But as markets react and political tensions rise, one thing is certain: Elon Musk's entry into politics has rattled not just Washington—but Wall Street, too. read more CBE: Deposits in Local Currency Hit EGP 5.25 Trillion Morocco Plans to Spend $1 Billion to Mitigate Drought Effect Gov't Approves Final Version of State Ownership Policy Document Egypt's Economy Expected to Grow 5% by the end of 2022/23- Minister Qatar Agrees to Supply Germany with LNG for 15 Years Business Oil Prices Descend amid Anticipation of Additional US Strategic Petroleum Reserves Business Suez Canal Records $704 Million, Historically Highest Monthly Revenue Business Egypt's Stock Exchange Earns EGP 4.9 Billion on Tuesday Business Wheat delivery season commences on April 15 News Israeli-Linked Hadassah Clinic in Moscow Treats Wounded Iranian IRGC Fighters News China Launches Largest Ever Aircraft Carrier Sports Former Al Zamalek Player Ibrahim Shika Passes away after Long Battle with Cancer Videos & Features Tragedy Overshadows MC Alger Championship Celebration: One Fan Dead, 11 Injured After Stadium Fall Lifestyle Get to Know 2025 Eid Al Adha Prayer Times in Egypt Business Fear & Greed Index Plummets to Lowest Level Ever Recorded amid Global Trade War News Flights suspended at Port Sudan Airport after Drone Attacks News "Tensions Escalate: Iran Probes Allegations of Indian Tech Collaboration with Israeli Intelligence" Videos & Features Video: Trending Lifestyle TikToker Valeria Márquez Shot Dead during Live Stream Technology 50-Year Soviet Spacecraft 'Kosmos 482' Crashes into Indian Ocean


Middle East
9 hours ago
- Middle East
OPEN// FM engages with US-based Egyptian expats, urges their participation in upcoming elections
CAIRO, July 6 (MENA) – Foreign Affairs, Emigration and Expatriates Minister Badr Abdelatty held a virtual meeting on Sunday with Egyptian expatriates in Washington and New York, alongside senior diplomats including Egyptian Ambassador to the US Motaz Zahran and Consul General in New York Howaida Essam. Abdelatty praised the diaspora's role in boosting Egypt-US relations and contributing to the national economy. He highlighted Egyptian-American business participation in the Egypt-US Economic Forum in May and reaffirmed Egypt's commitment to improving consular services, including digital transformation and new state-led initiatives. He urged Egyptians abroad to vote in upcoming elections. Also, he advised them to abide by US residency laws, warning of legal consequences for violations. Deputy Foreign Minister Nabil Habashi outlined during the meeting new incentives for expatriates, such as streamlined remittance services, overseas bank account access, and preferential housing and education benefits. He also discussed preparations for the sixth annual expatriate conference in August 2025 and encouraged ongoing dialogue with the diaspora. (MENA) R E E/