logo
I was Palestinian activist Awdah Hathaleen's rabbi and friend. He was not killed in my name

I was Palestinian activist Awdah Hathaleen's rabbi and friend. He was not killed in my name

My friend, Awdah Hathaleen, was killed on Monday — supposedly in my name.
I was one of his rabbis; he was my teacher.
On Monday, unarmed and posing no danger to anyone, he was killed by an Israeli settler who believes that Palestinians have no right to live in the West Bank, or in any of Israel/Palestine, and that Judaism requires Jews to expel them from it. I disagree, and furthermore, claiming that my religion justifies Awdah's death is a sacrilege.
I had known Awdah for eight years, since I first visited to his village, Umm al-Khair. I came as a rabbi who was disturbed by the many reports of how the Palestinians were treated in the occupied West Bank by Jewish settlers. Maybe it was my Jewish ethics, or maybe it was a guilty conscience that called me to see the situation for myself.
Once I saw that degrading behavior, I could not turn away. What had been abstractions gleaned from daily news reports turned into real people trying to keep their children safe, to raise them with love even while living under a Damocles sword.
These Palestinians became people with names: Awdah, Eid, Tariq. The villagers were happy to have visitors who would, like me, inevitably join them in any way we could to help them in their nonviolent resistance to the encroachment of Carmel, the illegal Jewish settlement growing ever bigger every year that abuts the village and threatens its future existence.
When I met Awdah, I was so touched by what a good soul he had and what a creative organizer he was. He was diligently studying English. He wanted to communicate the plight of Palestinians under occupation. He believed that when people understood what was happening, they would become allies. That is why he was active in the creation of the acclaimed film 'No Other Land,' to let the world to know what was taking place in his neighborhood.
Piedmont's Kehilla Community Synagogue became allies when we formed Face-to-Face under the inspiration of our founder, Rabbi Burt Jacobson. Every month we would meet with Awdah on Zoom and get often-depressing updates from the village. We raised money for Umm al-Khair when its cars and equipment were destroyed by settlers or the Israeli military. We raised money for school books. It was the least that we could do.
In June, Face-to-Face worked with Awdah and Eid Suleiman to bring them to the Bay Area. After the many times they welcomed me in their village, I looked forward to greeting them at our shul. Finally, they would be face-to-face with our congregants and be able to talk to audiences at other places around the United States.
Phil Weintraub, a Kehilla member who worked on the lengthy effort to obtain visas for Awdah and Eid, went to pick them up at the airport. Hours passed after their plane landed, but they did not emerge from customs. We were finally told that they were being detained. We asked public officials to intervene, and demonstrated at the airport. All to no avail. After 26 hours the two men were put on a plane to return them home.
Despite their absence, we gathered that evening to share our anger and disappointment, and to affirm our conviction to keep supporting the village.
From my own interactions with him, I know that Awdah, who was just 31, was dedicated to the principles of nonviolent resistance to end the occupation. Yinon Levi, identified in videos shooting at the villagers and killing Awdah, is a settler famous for his zeal in terrorizing Palestinians. President Joe Biden had him sanctioned in 2024 for his alleged role in violence against Palestinian civilians. President Donald Trump lifted that sanction on the first day of his second term.
When the Israeli authorities finally showed up to the scene where Awdah had been murdered, Levi himself pointed out the people that he wanted arrested. Amazingly, his wishes were granted. Eid Suleiman and 13 others are in detention in Ofer prison as of this writing. Levi was briefly detained overnight and released to house arrest, but no one, not the villagers nor the settlers, expects him to suffer any serious consequences.
No consequences is what killed my friend. Israel won't impose them, nor the United States. Neither will our American Jewish legacy institutions, who, while claiming to support a two-state solution, have never seriously criticized the expansion of the occupation.
In my final in-person conversation with Awdah last August, he confided he was struggling with what to tell his children. 'I can't tell them that everything will be OK and I can't say that they'll be fine.'
I'd never seen sadness disrupt his optimism. And I never expected that his children would be fatherless within a year.
David J. Cooper is rabbi emeritus at Kehilla Community Synagogue, which he co-founded with Rabbi Burt Jacobson in 1984.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Growing number of Jewish American groups speak out over Gaza famine
Growing number of Jewish American groups speak out over Gaza famine

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Growing number of Jewish American groups speak out over Gaza famine

As global outrage intensifies over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, a growing number of prominent Jewish American organizations, including some traditional defenders of Israel, are speaking out and imploring the country to ensure that humanitarian aid is allowed into Gaza. This week, a UN-backed food security group warned that a 'worst-case scenario of famine' is unfolding in Gaza and health authorities there report dozens of deaths from starvation. On Sunday, the American Jewish Committee, a prominent Jewish advocacy organization, released a statement affirming that it stands with Israel in what it described as 'its justified war to eliminate the threat posed by Hamas and secure the release of the remaining hostages'. At the same time, the group called for Israel to take steps to alleviate civilian suffering. 'We feel immense sorrow for the grave toll this war has taken on Palestinian civilians, and we are deeply concerned about worsening food insecurity in Gaza,' the statement read. 'We urge Israel, the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, the UN, and all responsible parties involved in aid distribution to increase cooperation and coordination in order to ensure that humanitarian aid reaches Palestinian civilians in Gaza.' The GHF is an Israel- and US-backed aid group that has attracted condemnation for the killings of hundreds of civilians seeking food at the hands of Israeli forces and private contractors. The AJC statement reflected a cautious critique of Israel's aid blockade echoed by other groups noteworthy for their typically staunch support of the country, even as their statements condemned Hamas for refusing to release the Israeli hostages it continues to hold. The Reform movement in North America, which represents the largest Jewish denomination in the US, also issued a lengthy statement: 'Neither escalating military pressure nor restricting humanitarian aid has brought Israel closer to securing a hostage deal or ending the war,' it read. 'Hamas has repeatedly demonstrated its willingness to sacrifice the Palestinian people in its pursuit of Israel's destruction, but Israel must not sacrifice its own moral standing in return. Starving Gazan civilians neither will bring Israel the 'total victory' over Hamas it seeks, nor can it be justified by Jewish values or humanitarian law.' The Rabbinical Assembly, a New York-based association of conservative rabbis, said last week that they were 'increasingly concerned about the worsening humanitarian crisis in Gaza' and called for 'urgent action to alleviate civilian suffering and ensure aid delivery'. 'Even as we believe Hamas could end this suffering immediately through the release of the hostages and care for its civilian population, the Israeli government must do everything in its power to ensure humanitarian aid reaches those in need,' it added. 'The Jewish tradition calls upon us to ensure the provision of food, water, and medical supplies as a top priority.' Jewish groups associated with the left have been prominent fixtures at protests against Israel's offensive since it began. On Tuesday, 27 rabbis and Jewish clergy affiliated with the group Jews for Food Aid for People in Gaza were arrested at a protest in the Washington office of the Senate majority leader, John Thune. But it appears clear that discomfort has significantly broadened outside the Jewish left. On Monday, eight rabbis were arrested outside the Israeli consulate in New York while protesting against the humanitarian crisis in Gaza – including clergy who had not been so outspoken before. 'The protests we've typically seen at the Israeli consulate in places like that are from the further left of the community,' Phylisa Wisdom, executive director of New York Jewish Agenda, told Gothamist. 'This represents an escalation from rabbis in this political lane.' More than 1,200 rabbis have signed a public letter calling on Israel to allow more humanitarian aid into Gaza. 'The Jewish people face a grave moral crisis, threatening the very basis of Judaism as the ethical voice that it has been since the age of Israel's prophets,' reads the letter. 'We cannot remain silent in confronting it.' The developments reflect shifting public support for Israel and the Israeli government within the US, which has accelerated as the war has gone on. A recent Gallup poll reported that support for Israel's military action in Gaza has precipitously declined among US adults, and is now at 32% – the lowest reading since Gallup first asked the question in November 2023. Support for Israel drops further among younger Americans – including US Jews. 'It's a tense time in the Jewish family group chats,' Ezra Klein wrote in a recent New York Times column. 'The consensus that held American Jewry together for generations is breaking down.' While emotional attachment to Israel is widespread among Jewish Americans, polling has consistently found that support for the state's current policies drops with age, a phenomenon perhaps best reflected in the community's support for the New York Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, whom opponents have sought to tar with accusations of antisemitism over his vocal support for Palestinian rights. Despite those accusations, however, a recent poll found him leading with 67% of the votes of American Jewish voters in New York under the age of 44. That figure dropped to 25% of voters over 45. 'Zohran Mamdani's triumph in New York City's Democratic primary for mayor has forced, among many Jews, a reckoning with how far they have drifted from one another,' Klein wrote. Organizers of an action planned for Monday in New York City hope that groups that have not turned out before will do so to protest under the banner 'Jews Say: No More'. 'Our tradition teaches us that if we can protest [against] our people's actions and we don't, we are responsible,' said IfNotNow's executive director, Morriah Kaplan, in a statement to the Guardian. The group is helping organize Monday's action. 'As Jews and as Americans, whose government is funding this atrocity, we all must choose whether we want to bear responsibility for a policy of forced mass starvation.' The shift is also playing out within institutions whose members want their leaders to take a tougher stance on a country many had long reflexively supported. More than 200 alumni from Young Judaea, a Zionist youth group, this week called on the organization in an open letter to depart from its pro-Israel line to speak out against starvation in Gaza and call for a permanent ceasefire, including a release of the hostages. 'We see our families and friends, colleagues and teachers, rabbis and Jewish institutions – in Israel and abroad – join a growing movement to stand courageously in opposition to these policies,' the letter reads. 'Young Judaea cannot remain silent in this moment and maintain any moral credibility.'

Michael Goodwin: The 2-state delusion must be scrapped — a ‘jihadist' state would solve nothing
Michael Goodwin: The 2-state delusion must be scrapped — a ‘jihadist' state would solve nothing

New York Post

timean hour ago

  • New York Post

Michael Goodwin: The 2-state delusion must be scrapped — a ‘jihadist' state would solve nothing

Just months after Adolf Hitler started World War II, Winston Churchill smartly summarized why Europe's hopes for peace had been shattered. 'An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last,' the new prime minister said in a speech. His stark imagery mocked the foolish efforts to head off war, infamously led by Churchill's predecessor, Neville Chamberlain, who insisted Hitler really wanted peace. Chamberlain was delusional and the global conflict that followed turned his name into a permanent warning about the wages of weakness. Yet here we go again, with the current leaders of Britain, France and Canada falling into the trap. Their delusion is that Palestinians, including Hamas and other terror groups, really want peace and will live in harmony with Israel once they have a nation of their own. The clamor for a Palestinian state is the appeasement of our times. It travels under the disguise of a 'two-state solution.' Who can be against a solution? 'River to the sea' Except a Palestinian state wouldn't solve anything. Quite the opposite, it would set the stage for another round of bloodletting. As such, think of it as the two-state delusion. That's what it is because too many Islamists, from Iran to Arab lands and around the world, remain committed to destroying the Jewish state. They don't want to live in peace with Israel. They want to eliminate it. That's the essence of the antisemitic chant heard on American college campuses: 'From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free.' Translation: Palestine will be free of Jews, and Israel will be no more. That isn't a problem at the Jew-hating United Nations, which held a two-day conference on the topic last week. Prime Minister Keir Starmer calls Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky from his office. It was little noted that Palestinians already have a state of their own. Instead of living in peace with their Jewish neighbors, they turned Gaza into a terror state. Nearly two years after their barbaric invasion of Israel, and while they continue to hold some of the 250 hostages they took on Oct. 7 of 2023, the push to give them a nation isn't just foolish — it's obscene. As President Trump correctly said last week, 'You're rewarding Hamas if you do that. I don't think they should be rewarded.' Thankfully, he added that the US is 'not in that camp,' referring to support for a Palestinian state by British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, French President Emmanuel Macron and Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney. Each is beset by radical Islamist immigrants, and so their pandering illustrates Churchill's observation about feeding the crocodile in hopes of being spared. They are aided and abetted by the Western media outlets that have fallen for the two-state ruse. 'A Hamas state' Typical is the nakedly anti-Israel coverage of The Associated Press, which described the UN conference as a serious bid 'to end one of the world's longest conflicts.' It claimed 'the plan would culminate with an independent, demilitarized Palestine living side by side peacefully with Israel.' That's a fairy tale, and at least deserves the caveat that it would be necessary to enforce a peaceful Palestinian state to guarantee Israel's security. British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. Getty Images Good luck persuading the Israelis that their security can be outsourced to the United Nations. Jews there and around the world have said for decades: 'If Palestinians lay down their guns, there will be peace. But if the Israelis lay down our guns, there will be no Israel.' The Jewish nation's Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar said last week that Israel would not cave in to the 'international pressure.' 'Establishing a Palestinian state today is establishing a Hamas state. A jihadist state,' said Sa'ar. 'It ain't gonna happen.' The only positive development to come out of the conference was that the Arab League, including Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Egypt, Jordan and Turkey, condemned for the first time Hamas' 2023 invasion and called on the terrorists to release all hostages, disarm and end their rule of Gaza. But even that progress was undercut by a tone of both-sideism that included outrageous attacks on Israel because of how it responded to the invasion. The final declaration also urges Israel to cooperate with UN agencies, including UNRWA, whose employees openly fanned the flames of Hamas terror. It also defends the Gazan Health Ministry, which acts as a Hamas mouthpiece in distorting Palestinian casualties. 'Right of return' farce Worse, the conference supported the Palestinians' so-called 'right of return' to places in Israel they left or were expelled from during the 1948 creation of Israel. That would undermine Israel's security and its existence as a Jewish state. My view about the push for a Palestinian state is informed by 25 years of covering the topic. In the summer of 2000, I was on my first trip to Israel just before its Prime Minister, Ehud Barak, and Palestinian chairman Yasser Arafat were scheduled to meet with President Bill Clinton at Camp David to iron out the terms and boundaries of such a state. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters The American Embassy had helped arrange an interview for me with a top aide to Arafat in Ramallah, the de facto capital of the West Bank. The night before the interview, the late Martin Indyk, then the US ambassador to Israel, suggested a question I might ask. It ran something like this: If Arafat can't accept the 92% of the West bank Barak's government is offering, how would Arafat feel when a more conservative government offers as little as 72% of the West Bank? When I asked the question, the Arafat aide responded with a phrase he'd used in response to other questions about Arab violence. 'Well, you know,' he said, 'there are these groups we can't control.' He didn't name names, but his meaning was clear: There will be violence against Israelis, but don't blame Arafat because he can't stop it. No partner in peace It was a convenient lie, but the terror leader obviously feared for his own life if he signed a deal. Much to the shock of Clinton and Barak, Arafat walked away from Camp David without accepting a Palestinian state. Since then, several Israeli governments have made similar offers of a Palestinian state. All have been rejected in part because of the Sadat example. Recall that Egypt's bold leader, Anwar-el Sadat, was assassinated in 1981 by Islamist extremists two years after signing a peace treaty with Israel's Prime Minister Menachem Begin in a process facilitated by President Jimmy Carter at Camp David. Sadat and Begin shared the 1978 Nobel Peace Prize. Yet 47 years later, there is still no Palestinian state because no Palestinian leader has felt safe enough to recognize Israel's right to exist in its own secure borders. Hamas has made it clear it will never accept Israel. Its leaders have promised that given the chance, the horrors of Oct. 7 will be repeated again and again. The threats prove that a point Israelis have made about Palestinians still prevails: We have no partner for peace.

Trump administration not participating in UN two-state solution conference
Trump administration not participating in UN two-state solution conference

Yahoo

time6 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Trump administration not participating in UN two-state solution conference

The State Department said Monday it would not participate in an initiative from France and Saudi Arabia at the United Nations supporting a two-state solution to the Israeli and Palestinian conflict, criticizing the summit as harmful to ceasefire efforts between Israel and Hamas. State Department spokesperson Tammy Bruce said the U.N. two-state solution conference is an 'ill-advised stunt that will further embolden Hamas and undermine our serious diplomatic efforts to end the war.' 'The United States will not participate in the July UN two-state solution conference,' Bruce wrote on social platform X. 'We will continue to work with partners towards a resolution.' President Trump has held back from endorsing long-standing U.S. policy supporting a two-state solution to end the Israeli and Palestinian conflict, which aims to establish a Palestinian state in the territories of the West Bank and Gaza Strip while preserving Israel's security. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has for decades pushed policies aimed at undermining the establishment of a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza. During a meeting at the White House in July, Trump deferred to Netanyahu on whether the Israeli leader supports a two-state solution. Netanyahu answered that Palestinians could have self-government, but that Israel should maintain ultimate security control. Trump for the most part sides with Netanyahu and Israel, but the president has routinely shown he will act unilaterally on policies he views are in his interest. Trump has signaled he wants to be able to take credit for establishing ties between Israel and Saudi Arabia, but Riyadh's red line is no normalization with Israel absent a Palestinian state. Last week, Trump dispatched his ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, to meet with Palestinian Authority Vice President Hussein al-Sheikh. Part of negotiations to end the war between Israel and Hamas is finding an alternative governing body for the strip. While the Palestinian Authority is present in the strip, it is not viewed as the most credible actor or strongest political body to exercise control. And negotiations for a ceasefire to the war have stalled. The latest conflict began when Hamas launched a terrorist attack against Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, killing approximately 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages. The death toll in Gaza during the conflict is around 60,000 people, according to Gaza's Health Ministry, which doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians The Trump administration has put the blame on Hamas as being a barrier to peace, but international outrage over Israel's demolition of the Gaza Strip and the humanitarian crisis wrought on the Palestinians has isolated Jerusalem. Last week, French President Emanuel Macron announced that Paris would recognize a Palestinian state, a largely symbolic move but one that likely triggered alarm in Jerusalem over whether other major industrialized nations would follow suit and grant recognition of Palestinian statehood. Trump on Monday signaled a break with Netanyahu when he acknowledged there was 'real starvation' happening. Over the weekend, Israel announced it would open up additional humanitarian corridors to provide aide in Gaza, pause fighting to allow for distribution and carry out aid drops. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store