Researchers eye exit from Trump's America
In the halls of US universities and research labs, one question has become increasingly common as President Donald Trump tightens his grip on the field: whether to move abroad.
"Everybody is talking about it," JP Flores, a doctoral student in genetics at the University of North Carolina, said.
The discussion was thrust into the spotlight after Yale philosophy professor Jason Stanley, a specialist in fascism, announced he was taking a new post in Canada over the Trump administration's "authoritarian" bent.
"I made the decision when Columbia folded," he said. "I made it in a split second."
Columbia University, which the Trump administration has threatened with major funding cuts, said it agreed to take steps to rein in pro-Palestinian protests, among other actions.
"It is not the time to cower and fear," said Stanley, who added there was "absolutely no doubt that the United States is an authoritarian country."
With similar threats lodged by Trump against other universities, many researchers are worried about the future of academic freedom in the United States.
Coupled with the administration's broad cuts to federal funding, some fear the country's research field, once viewed as the envy of the world, may be losing its luster.
More than 75 per cent of scientists are now considering departing the country over Trump's policies, according to a survey of over 1,600 people published in late March by the journal Nature.
More than 75 per cent of scientists are now considering departing the country over Trump's policies.
"The trend was particularly pronounced among early-career researchers," the journal said.
"People are just so scared," Daniella Fodera, a Columbia PhD student whose research grant was cancelled, said.
Amid the uncertainty, several academic institutions in recent weeks have announced a hiring freeze and a reduction in the number of graduate student positions.
"That's definitely messing up the academic pipeline," said Fodera, a biomechanics student.
Karen Sfanos, head of a research lab at Johns Hopkins University, said: "It's kind of a surreal time for scientists because we just don't know what's going to happen with funding."
"There's not a lot of clarity, and things are changing day by day," she said, noting it is hitting the "youngest generation" relatively hard.
Fodera, who studies uterine fibroids -- benign tumours affecting many women -- said she has begun to "actively look at positions in Europe and abroad for continuing my post-doctoral training."
With mounting concerns among US researchers, several European and Canadian universities have launched initiatives to attract some of the talent, though they may not need to try too hard.
"I know researchers already that have dual citizenship, or who have family in Canada, in France, in Germany, are saying, 'I think I'm going to go live in Germany for the next, you know, five years and do research there,'" said Gwen Nichols.
The physician, a senior leader at a blood cancer research group, warned the possible exodus could make the United States "lose our dominance as the biopharmaceutical innovation leader of the world."
"We'll see the problem 10 years from now, when we don't have the innovation we need," she added.
Genetics researcher Flores agreed, saying "it has become quite clear that there's gonna be a major brain drain here in American research."
One young climate researcher, who requested to remain anonymous, said she had started the process of attaining EU citizenship and that colleagues in Europe "have all been extremely sympathetic to the situation."
But she noted that those with limited resources, like many recent graduates, would be the least likely to be taken on by European institutions and may decide to drop out of science altogether.
"This is a generational loss for science across all disciplines," she warned.
2022 © All right reserved for Oman Establishment for Press, Publication and Advertising (OEPPA) Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (Syndigate.info).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
25 minutes ago
- Gulf Today
One dead, hundreds arrested in US farm raid as judge orders pause to aggressive tactics
A California farm worker died on Friday after US immigration agents raided a cannabis nursery and arrested hundreds of workers, a worker advocacy group said, while a federal judge ordered the Trump administration to temporarily halt some of its most aggressive tactics in rounding up undocumented immigrants. Dozens of migrant-rights activists faced off with federal agents in rural Southern California on Thursday during the operation, the latest escalation of President Donald Trump's campaign for mass deportations of immigrants in the US illegally. A California judge on Friday blocked the Trump administration from racially profiling immigrants as it seeks deportation targets and from denying immigrants' right to access to lawyers during their detention. The Trump administration has made conflicting statements about whether immigration agents will target the farm labor workforce, about half of which is unauthorized to work in the US, according to government estimates. The Department of Homeland Security said approximately 200 people in the country illegally were arrested in the raid, which targeted two locations of the cannabis operation Glass House Farms. Agents also found 10 migrant minors at the farm, the department said in an emailed statement. The facility is under investigation for child labour violations, Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott posted on X. People attend a rally and march in Oxnard, California, on Friday. AFP The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The scene at the farm on Thursday was chaotic, with federal agents in helmets and face masks using tear gas and smoke canisters on angry protesters, according to photos and videos of the scene. Several farm workers were injured and one died on Friday from injuries sustained after a 30-foot (9-metre) fall from a building during the raid, said Elizabeth Strater, national vice president of the United Farm Workers. The worker who died was identified as Jaime Alanis on a verified GoFundMe page created by his family, who said they were raising money to help his family and for his burial in Mexico. "He was his family's provider. They took one of our family members. We need justice," Alanis' family wrote on the GoFundMe page. US citizens were detained during the raid and some are still unaccounted for, Strater said. DHS said its agents were not responsible for the man's death, saying that "although he was not being pursued by law enforcement, this individual climbed up to the roof of a green house and fell 30 feet." Agents immediately called for a medical evacuation, DHS said. The melee in southern California came as the Trump administration faces dozens of lawsuits across the country over its controversial tactics in tracking down undocumented immigrants for deportation. US District Court Judge Maame Frimpong granted two temporary restraining orders blocking the administration from detaining immigrants suspected of being in the country illegally based on racial profiling and from denying detained people the right to speak with a lawyer. The ruling, made in response to a lawsuit from immigration advocacy groups, says the administration is violating the Fourth and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution by conducting "roving patrols" to sweep up suspected undocumented immigrants based on their being Latinos, and then denying them access to lawyers. "What the federal government would have this Court believe -in the face of a mountain of evidence presented in this case - is that none of this is actually happening," Frimpong wrote in her ruling. Reuters
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
How Netanyahu's demented hubris could shatter the region
Despite an uneasy ceasefire in the US-Israeli war of aggression against Iran, there's no telling what will come next, particularly from a volatile US administration led by Donald Trump that has elevated self-contradiction, confusion and policy U-turns to an art of geostrategic chaos. Much will depend on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's next moves and Iran's reactions; less will hinge on the US itself. Since his re-election, President Trump has taken a back seat to Netanyahu. He has been largely reacting, often appearing unpleasantly surprised, to the latter's strategic moves and cynical manipulations - just as Russian President Vladimir Putin has for a long time been playing the US president. His recent bombing of Iran only aggravated the West's "Israel problem", by surrendering and sacrificing Washington's own national interests and professed values to an untrustworthy and purely self-interested Israeli "ally". Trump, who has portrayed himself as an anti-war president, proclaimed in 2019 that great nations do not start forever wars. He is uninterested in exporting liberalism or democracy abroad. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters But Netanyahu deliberately defeated Trump's stated non-interventionism by cornering him on Iran - a situation where he felt he had no choice but to intervene, if only to save face, at personal political risk. Relentlessly pushed by Netanyahu, Trump opted for limited "surgical" strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. He was careful to quickly declare that the bombing marked the end of the episode, and that he had no desire or intention to engage in further military actions against Iran. But will Netanyahu let him retreat in the longer term? Though still a decisive player in the Middle East, Trump's US is no longer the driving force of the bloody regional mutations under way. Israel, unfortunately, plays that role. Counterproductive war Despite the chaos that unfolded last month, it appears that few if any of the proclaimed objectives were reached with regards to removing the Iranian nuclear threat. And what unfolded will likely backfire against both Israel and the US in the long run, for several reasons. Firstly, it may indirectly solidify the Iranian regime by unifying the population around national defence in the face of Israeli-US aggression. Secondly, it may push Iran to accelerate its nuclear programme and ultimately develop the bomb as a means of self-protection. Finally, it may convince Iran to abandon the Non-Proliferation Treaty, which, unlike Israel, it has signed. Iran has now suspended cooperation with the International Atomic Energy Agency and banned its inspectors. All of that being said, there is no denying that with his war on Iran, Netanyahu masterfully killed several birds with one stone. The new world order sought by Netanyahu far exceeds the geographic limits of the Middle East. It includes domination over the US and Europe He at the very least delayed Iran's nuclear programme, if only for a limited period of time. He sabotaged both US-Iran diplomatic talks and a planned French-Saudi summit where European states might have formally recognised a Palestinian state. He also diverted international attention away from Gaza, thus making it easier for Israel to continue its ethnic cleansing and genocide of Palestinians in both Gaza and the occupied West Bank. Additionally, as most EU states were criticising Netanyahu harshly on Gaza and several, including Britain and Spain, had suspended commercial deals or trade talks with Israel, he silenced those critiques, recreating overnight a western consensus around Israel. Most importantly for Netanyahu, his approval rating soared thanks to the war on Iran, thus ameliorating his extremely precarious political standing within Israel. Last but not least, he finally managed to reach a major goal he had been working towards for decades: getting the US to bomb Iran. That in itself was a major foreign policy victory for Netanyahu. Larger goals From a broader geostrategic perspective, Netanyahu's war on Iran was just the latest development in his multi-fronted attacks on Tehran's allies. After targeting Hamas in Gaza, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Houthis in Yemen - the tentacles of the octopus - he went after the head of the "axis of resistance": Iran itself. While systematically presenting these operations as defensive, Netanyahu's real goal is to keep the entire region in a state of vulnerability, by destabilising regimes and spreading chaos. The evidence that Israel's predatory aggression is typically not motivated by self-defence was underscored by Netanyahu's attacks on post-Assad Syria. Through territorial incursions, strikes on Syrian military assets and land conquest, in addition to pitting minorities against the regime in classic divide-and-conquer tactics, Netanyahu aims to further weaken Syria - even though the new regime has displayed no intention to target Israel. After ceasefire, Iran is preparing for the long war with Israel Read More » Ultimately, Netanyahu's goal is to install a new regional order centred on unchallenged Israeli supremacy and domination. He is open about his "new Middle East" project, which - while sold as a pacification strategy - actually involves crushing all adversaries, especially the Palestinian people. On the map he brandished at the United Nations in September 2023, Palestine had disappeared, with both Gaza and the occupied West Bank displayed as part of Israel. Tel Aviv was portrayed as the new centre of gravity in a region reduced to a few Gulf states, along with Sudan, Jordan and Egypt; the rest of the neighbouring countries were not even labelled. This demented hubris is reminiscent of the ancient Pax Romana. And just like the fate of the recalcitrant populations who resisted then, it is not hard to figure out what could happen to any who reject this new hegemon. The new world order sought by Netanyahu far exceeds the geographic limits of the Middle East. It includes domination over the US and Europe, whose racist neocolonial states have themselves long used Israel as an attack dog to keep the Arab and Muslim populations of the region weak, divided and vulnerable. That fact, too, was admitted in a remarkable moment of candour and truth by German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, when during the latest G7 summit, he thanked Israel for "doing the dirty work for all of us". If anyone wants to know what the new face of a world dominated by Israel would look like, that's easy: just look at Gaza. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Donald Trump's disregard for realpolitik will have dire consequences
The problem with US President Donald Trump's political optimism lies in his use of rhetoric that evokes a sense of accomplishment while distracting from failures and obstacles. He and his inner circle appear to be repeating ungrounded promises or espousing optimism that is detached from realpolitik. Whether this communication strategy involves deliberate deception or is driven by sheer determination, its negative consequences are real. The Trump administration, its envoys and cabinet members alike, would do well to acknowledge them in order to correct course. The cornerstone of Mr Trump's Middle East strategy remains the 'Deal of the Century'. He's been developing it since his first term in office, as he seeks to refashion US relations with the region. While securing the support of key Arab states remains fundamental to achieving his goal of full normalisation between Israel and the Arab world, Mr Trump aims to expand this normalisation to include Turkey and Iran. Some may argue that Mr Trump's persistence in pushing forward his political objectives is more than mere political optimism; rather it is a coherent strategy grounded in patience and resolve, bordering on what could be called strategic stubbornness. And that he is determined to find a way out of the impasse created by Israel's categorical rejection of the two-state solution in its traditional form. Following multiple meetings between the US President and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu – after which Mr Netanyahu left Washington with financial aid, weapons, and political and logistical support for any track Israel desired – hints emerged that Israel might accept a quasi-state for Palestinians in Gaza, on the condition that Israel retains full security control over the territory. Mr Netanyahu made clear that he was unconcerned with whether the world would view such an arrangement as a 'real state' but that what mattered to him was the appearance of a solution. Mr Netanyahu insisted that Hamas must disarm, or else face continued Israeli military operations, regardless of the planned 60-day ceasefire. Steve Witkoff, Mr Trump's Middle East envoy, has been tasked with the Gaza and Iran files. Yet the man working to implement the Deal of the Century from behind the scenes is Mr Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner. But these are men known for dealmaking in real estate ventures, hence the idea of transforming Gaza into a Riviera – as Mr Trump proposed earlier this year – resurfaced again during Mr Netanyahu's recent visit to Washington. This may explain why Mr Trump insisted that a ceasefire is imminent in Gaza, why Mr Witkoff is working on achieving a 60-day truce, and why Mr Kushner is working on the Deal of the Century. The victims of this open-ended optimism are ordinary Gazans, caught between Israel's determination to annihilate them, America's readiness to displace them and Hamas's use of them as a bargaining chip to advance its own interests. Meanwhile, Thomas Barrack, the US ambassador to Turkey, is playing an active role in implementing the Syrian component vital to the Deal of the Century. This component is being openly broadcasted in direct and indirect negotiations between Syria and Israel to settle their border disputes with eventual diplomatic normalisation in mind. While much of the Arab world is making progress towards normalising relations with Israel, Iran is preventing progress. It has prohibited its proxy Hezbollah in Lebanon from surrendering its weapons to the state or agreeing to border demarcation between Lebanon and Israel. It also opposes border demarcation between Syria and Israel, as keeping borders open facilitates its land bridge with Hezbollah. The Trump-Witkoff duo is working to reformulate US-Iran relations, and they don't want the issue of Tehran's proxies to derail their nuclear-focused agenda. Political optimism towards Iran is leading Mr Trump's team to overlook Iran's dangerous entanglements with its regional clients. This Trump administration has also avoided confronting Iran over its differences with the International Atomic Energy Agency, which Tehran has blocked from operating within Iran pending guarantees regarding the safety of its nuclear facilities. This is because Iran is pressing ahead with restoring its nuclear programme. The victims of this open-ended optimism are ordinary Gazans Tehran is taking advantage of Mr Witkoff's eagerness to resume negotiations, setting astonishing conditions simply to return to the table. It is doing this to delay talks that might tie its hands or force it to allow inspectors to observe past and present activities. Iran's goal remains to buy time while it puts its house in order on the nuclear, missile, proxy and domestic fronts. It needs time, and Mr Trump's political optimism suits it perfectly. Tehran is now embracing an old Russian proposal – a compromise between Moscow's insistence on Iran's sovereign right to enrich highly enriched uranium on its soil and its acknowledgment of American, Israeli and European anxieties over Iran stockpiling this uranium. Russia's offer is to transfer the excess uranium to its territory. Mr Witkoff, also tasked with the Russia file, may find it appealing to let Moscow use the Iran nuclear issue as leverage to improve its standing with the US. But European powers won't agree to Russia's role in the matter, given the bitter fallout from Russian-Iranian co-operation in the Ukraine war. It won't be easy for Mr Trump to abandon his strategy of political optimism, particularly because realpolitik doesn't favour him. He prefers making lofty promises over conceding that his policies have yet to yield striking success anywhere. Even when he sent B-2 bombers to destroy Iran's nuclear infrastructure, he still ended up offering Tehran concessions to secure a ceasefire. Indeed, Iran got Mr Trump to withdraw his demand for unconditional surrender. It secured American guarantees that its establishment would remain in power, in exchange for co-ordinating its retaliatory attacks in such a way as to ensure no harm would come to US soldiers stationed in the region. It now holds the upper hand in its dealings with the Trump administration, setting the terms for negotiations – or the lack thereof – while preventing any international monitoring of its nuclear or missile programmes and dictating terms to its proxies. None of this changes the fact that Iran remains weak, and that it still fears military operations or targeted assassinations at Israel's hands. Moreover, Mr Netanyahu has secured from Mr Trump an implicit green light for Israel to resume operations against Iran should its intelligence services conclude that Tehran has restarted its nuclear activities. Nonetheless, Mr Trump's political optimism isn't working. It would be better for him to revert to his trademark blunt rhetoric, if only because it is clearer and less cloaked in fig leaves.
