San Francisco's mayor is starting to unite fractured city
Voters embraced his promise to make government work again after years of San Francisco attracting national attention for its empty downtown, open-air drug use and sprawling tent encampments.
Earnest and affable, Lurie is often outside City Hall, talking to merchants and residents, both housed and unhoused. He's reached out to supervisors, including those who feuded with Breed, asking questions and inviting input on thorny topics.
In an interview marking 100 days in office, Lurie said San Francisco is cleaning up its act with safer streets. He brushed off concerns over the involvement of corporate executives in his administration and declined to talk about Republican President Donald Trump's potential impact on San Francisco. 'I was elected to turn this city around,' Lurie said. 'And I want everybody in San Francisco to know that their mayor is focused on getting results for San Franciscans.'
Some elected officials feel hopeful about working together again after years of gridlock. Connie Chan, a progressive supervisor, says she's already had more discussions with Lurie than she ever had with Breed. 'We feel cautiously optimistic despite a lot of attacks that we've seen from the federal government on San Francisco as a city and, of course, California as a state,' Chan said. Frustrations over car break-ins and retail theft have simmered for years, with voters ousting progressive District Attorney Chesa Boudin in June 2022, and approving measures last year to expand police powers.
Lurie has inherited a city where reported crime and the number of visible tents are down, thanks in part to inroads made under Breed for more housing. Lurie's policy goals are similar to his predecessor — more police and more shelter and treatment options. But he also has the advantage of being a new face with no stated aspirations for higher office, someone who can recruit business executives and fellow philanthropists for their time and money. His board-approved fentanyl legislation expedites hiring and contracting for new behavioral health initiatives and expanded shelter capacity. He wants to add 1,500 new shelter beds and has streamlined outreach programs.
And he's proposed rezoning to build more housing.
Lurie has taken to stopping the car to jump out and talk to people who appear to be in distress. He asks if they want help — even though it's not always available. And he wants to drive home the message that San Francisco will no longer let people do what they want in public at the expense of others. 'That behaviour just can't be tolerated any longer because families are scared,' Lurie said. Some leaders on the left have given him the benefit of the doubt, granting him powers they likely would not have given his predecessor. Chan, for instance, endorsed legislation ceding board oversight to Lurie to battle the fentanyl crisis, after seeing how committed he was to listening to and compromising with her office on the proposed legislation.
Lurie has announced new rules around distributing free drug use paraphernalia, going against the city's decades-old practice of promoting harm reduction. City-funded nonprofits will have to offer treatment options before giving out supplies; they will no longer be allowed to distribute smoking supplies, like tin foil and pipes, in parks and sidewalks. The changes will make it more difficult to engage drug users for whom abstinence is not an immediate option, advocates said.
Tyler TerMeer of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation, which provides assistance to people dealing with substance abuse, said he's disappointed in the policy shift but hopeful that Lurie will listen to experts who've been doing this work for decades. While overdose deaths were down last year from 2023, there were still roughly 630 that were recorded in the city.
Lurie founded the nonprofit Tipping Point Community in 2005, which has raised more than $400 million to house, employ and educate people living in poverty. Its work has won Lurie fans among advocates working to keep people off the city's streets. At the same time, he comes from a family that is deeply embedded in San Francisco's history and identity: He is an heir to the Levi Strauss & Co. fortune through his mother, Mimi Haas.
He's turned to that circle for two new boards stacked with Silicon Valley leaders and other business executives to address downtown's battered image and bring back tourists and tech workers. The boards include executives from Google and Gap as well as philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, crypto billionaire Chris Larsen and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Lurie's recruiting of rich CEOs has raised concerns among some who say the wealthy already have plenty of influence.
'I'm not one to trust billionaires all that much with the direction that they'll take our city, or our country as we're seeing right now,' said Anand Singh, president of Unite Here Local 2, which represents hotel workers. But, he added, 'the mayor has demonstrated that he does want to listen to working people.'
Lurie said criticism over the influence of tech and money in city politics 'divided San Francisco in the past' and that this is a new San Francisco. 'I want business to be here. I want those jobs here. I want that tax revenue here,' he said. 'And I want them to be part of rebuilding San Francisco.' Lurie's political honeymoon may soon end — he must figure out how to solve what is at least an $800 million gap in the city's budget over the next two years. He didn't say what might be cut but said he is ready to make tough decisions.
Supervisor Jackie Fielder, a progressive Democrat, said she appreciates Lurie's candidness and has been impressed with how he engages with constituents and supervisors. But Fielder introduced a proposal this week that could test the collaborative spirit. Her measure would grant children the right to shelter, which would upend Lurie's current policy of limiting homeless families to 90 days at a shelter.
She hopes Lurie remembers that tech companies may come and go but neighborhood businesses and communities will remain. 'He has done a good job of shaking as many hands as possible but when it comes to policy decisions, we will see in his budget what are his actual priorities,' she said.
Associated Press
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Gulf Today
8 hours ago
- Gulf Today
Difficult passage for budget in US Senate: 51-50
The US Senate passed President Donald Trump's controversial 'One Big Beautiful Bill', with cuts for social programmes like Medicaid, which will leave 11.8 million people with medical cover by 2030, and tax breaks for the rich. There was a long drawn-out 27-hour long to-and-fro with opposition coming from Republican senators. But Senate Majority leader John Thune had to run a tight ship as it were in support of a bill which went through the laborious process of umpteen amendments, which were rejected through a cumbersome legislative procedure. Three of the Republican senators refused to fall in line. Senators Thom Tillis of North Carolina, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Susan Collins of Maine held out. So the final voting score was 50-51, with Vice President casting his tie-breaker vote. The Vice President is also the head of the Senate. The bill now goes back to the House of Representatives for the final vote. Republican Senator from Alaska, Lisa Murkowski voted for the bill but she did not hold back from expressing her dissent to and, opposition to, the bill. She said, 'Let's not kid ourselves. This has been an awful process, a frantic rush to meet an artificial deadline, that has tested every limit of this institution.' She told American television news network NBC, 'Do I like this bill? No. I know that in many parts of the country, there are Americans who are not going to be advantaged by this bill. I don't like that.' Majority leader Thune claimed after the passing of the bill, 'It's been a long road to get to today. Now we're here, permanently extending tax relief for hard-working Americans.' Senate Minority leader and Democrat Chuck Schumer nailed his point. He said, 'In one fell swoop, Republicans passed the biggest tax break for billionaires ever seen, paid for by ripping away healthcare from millions of people.' There were many contentious provisions in the bill. One of them was the removal of subsidy to electric cars – a blow to his former confidante Elon Musk and his Tesla – and subsidy for solar and wind energy projects. This is going to hurt many entrepreneurs who had invested in the sunrise sector. Trump is firmly opposed to the climate change thesis, and he does not want to help in any way any measure to help the emergence of a green economy even as most other countries are adopting the mitigatory measures. Despite Republican majorities in the two Houses of the Congress, it has not ben easy for President Trump to push through his legislative agenda. And as has been witnessed in the Senate, the opposition to his measures was not coming from the Democrats alone, but from Republicans as well. It is indeed the case that the Republican majorities are narrow, and it is not easy to push through legislation without a second thought as it were. Trump does not have the political sagacity to negotiate with people who do not agree with his point-of-view, and make the necessary compromises to get the legislation through. Trump does not like any opposition. Second, he does not believe in talking over things, and stepping back a step or two to get his policies accepted. It is this that poses difficulties for him. His supporters have a tough task. They have to mow down the opposition. It is not always an easy thing to do. Senate Majority leader Thune had a tough time in getting the Budget passed in the Senate, and he is a relieved man more than a victorious leader. Trump did not seem to learn much from his experience in the first term as president.
Khaleej Times
9 hours ago
- Khaleej Times
US House Republicans head towards final vote on Trump's sweeping tax-cut bill
Republicans in the US House of Representatives advanced President Donald Trump's massive tax-cut and spending bill towards a final yes-or-no vote early on Thursday morning, appearing to overcome internal party divisions over its cost. During a marathon overnight session, lawmakers cleared a final procedural hurdle needed to begin debate on the bill in a 219-213 vote around 3:30 a.m. ET (0730 GMT). It was not clear when they would hold a final vote. As dawn broke in Washington, the top House Democrat, Hakeem Jeffries, was well into what was turning into an hours-long speech, calling out Republican lawmakers by name as he blasted the package as a giveaway to the wealthiest Americans. "This one big, ugly bill — this reckless Republican budget — this disgusting abomination is not about improving the quality of life of the American people," he said, a scathing reference to Trump's name for his signature legislation: One Big Beautiful Bill. "The focus of this bill, the justification for all of the cuts that will hurt everyday Americans is to provide massive tax breaks for billionaires." His remarks had echoes of Democratic Senator Cory Booker's record-setting April speech that accused Trump of "recklessly" challenging the nation's democratic institutions. Democrats are united in opposition to the bill, but on their own lack the votes to stop the bill in the chamber, which is controlled 220-212 by Trump's Republicans. Republicans can afford no more than three defections to get a final bill passed. The past two weeks have shown deep Republican divides on the bill, which would add $3.4 trillion to the nation's $36.2 trillion in debt and make major cuts to social programmes, including Medicaid. Republican lawmakers have long railed against the growth of the debt, which has continued over the past two decades regardless of which party was in control in Washington. A handful of Republican holdouts have objected to the bill. One, Senator Thom Tillis, opted not to seek re-election after voting against it. Nonetheless, Trump has succeeded in getting the votes to advance the legislation at each step of the way. Votes in the House were held open for hours on Wednesday during the day and overnight as House Speaker Mike Johnson and the White House talked with reluctant members. Johnson expressed optimism on Wednesday night, saying lawmakers had a "long, productive day" discussing the issues. He praised Trump for making phone calls to the holdouts through the early hours of Thursday morning. "There couldn't be a more engaged and involved president," Johnson told reporters. The Senate passed the legislation by the narrowest possible margin on Tuesday after intense debate on the bill's hefty price tag and $900 million in cuts to the Medicaid healthcare programme for low-income Americans. Any changes made by the House would require another Senate vote, which would make it all but impossible to meet Trump's self-imposed deadline of getting the legislation approved by the July 4 holiday. The bill would raise the nation's debt ceiling by $5 trillion, a necessary step to avoid a devastating default later this summer. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office estimates that almost 12 million people could lose health insurance as a result of the bill. The legislation contains most of Trump's top domestic priorities. It would extend Trump's 2017 tax cuts, cut health and food safety net programmes, fund Trump's immigration crackdown, and zero out many green-energy incentives. It also includes a $5 trillion increase in the nation's debt ceiling, which lawmakers must address in the coming months or risk a devastating default.
Gulf Today
a day ago
- Gulf Today
President Donald Trump's bill is big but far from beautiful
Carl P. Leubsdorf, Tribune News Service No one disputes that President Donald Trump's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' is big – hundreds of pages of significant tax and spending measures. But it's far from beautiful. Indeed, it will cause untold damage to the nation's economy and health system, reverse recent efforts to encourage alternative energy sources, widen the gap between the wealthiest and poorest citizens, and increase the federal deficit. Polls show it is increasingly unpopular with the public, prompting North Carolina Republican Sen. Thom Tillis to warn GOP colleagues it will likely prove a political albatross in next year's elections that could cost them control of Congress. Trump and his GOP allies have ignored such criticism in touting the bill, noting it would extend the 2017 tax cuts, reduce taxes on tipped income and add billions for immigration enforcement and defense. Without action, they warn, many Americans would face big tax hikes, though, in fact, there is time to prevent that in a separate, less costly bill. The administration also claims, unconvincingly, that a combination of the tax cuts and the benefits from the president's controversial increase in import tariffs will spur economic growth and reduce the deficit. But the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and other independent analysts note that past Republican tax cuts failed to provide predicted growth and predict that, instead, the bill will increase the deficit by several trillion dollars. At the same time, it would cut Medicaid, Obamacare and other benefit programs by more than $1 billion, costing millions their health insurance and weakening the nation's health systems, especially in rural areas that have been the nation's strongest Trump supporters. Conservative critics in both houses blamed insufficient cuts in those programs for the measure's anticipated $3 trillion increase in future deficits and likely hikes in interest rates. But independent analysts said the real cause is extending and augmenting Trump's 2017 tax cuts. Administration officials also argue that the bill won't cost individuals their Medicaid or Obamacare benefits. 'No one will lose coverage as a result of this bill,' Budget Director Russell Vought said on CNN. It's true the bill doesn't directly reduce per-person Medicaid payments. But its proposed work requirements and changes in enrollment procedures and eligibility will cost millions of poor families, CBO and other analysts say. And that's not only the case with Medicaid, it's also true for other federal benefit programs — the Affordable Care Act, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and the child tax credit. Some senators were especially concerned that the Medicaid cuts would force the closing of rural health centers. Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley – normally a Trump conservative – called the cuts 'both morally wrong and politically suicidal.' But that didn't stop him from joining his GOP colleagues in voting for those cuts, after Senate Republicans added a $25 billion fund to bolster rural hospitals. Overall, it cuts Medicaid costs by nearly $1 trillion, mostly by requiring states to implement new work requirements and change enrollment and eligibility procedures. The CBO and other analysts say the complexity of those rules changes and the prospect that states might make offsetting reductions could cost more than 8 million people their benefits without increasing the number of Medicaid recipients with jobs. Such dire forecasts are bolstered by the experience of states like Arkansas and Georgia, which discovered that work requirements reduced participation because so many poor and elderly people found them too onerous to meet. Another provision would complicate the enrollment process for more than one million disabled Medicare beneficiaries who get Medicaid help, according to The Bulwark's Jonathan Cohn, a leading health care analyst. As for the Affordable Care Act, analysts say 16 million Americans would either lose their Obamacare health insurance or become uninsured because of more than $300 billion in cost-cutting provisions and the expiration of Biden-era subsidies that helped many pay. In addition, estimates are that at least two million children would lose their access to the SNAP program. And though the bill would increase the annual child tax credit, poor families with a total of 20 million children may be blocked from getting it by added requirements like parents needing a Social Security number. Then, there's the anticipated fallout from these cuts. Until now, their trickle-down benefits – especially the expansion of state-run Medicaid programs through the Affordable Care Act — have bolstered rural health systems and kept financially struggling rural hospitals in business. 'Cuts to Medicaid . . . force decisions about whether we can keep our maternity ward open, retain emergency services, or offer mental health care,' Todd Patterson, CEO of Washington County (Iowa) Hospitals and Clinics, said in a letter to The Des Moines Register. And that was before the Senate Finance Committee made the anticipated impact worse by changing how states handle Medicaid reimbursements – and expanding proposed work requirements. The health provisions are not the only damaging ones. Besides ending subsidies for electric vehicles and speeding the phase-out of subsidies for wind and solar projects, a Senate addition would tax projects that can't prove they didn't use Chinese components. Another offers a new tax break for coal production. Recent polls showed the bill's main support comes from Trump's Republican supporters. Everyone else – including Republicans not aligned with the president – opposed it. The White House says Trump and other top officials will hit the road after enactment to tout its benefits. But Democrats are gearing up too, and they may have the better argument.
