‘No Boomers' Shares app now helping young Aussies crack the housing market'
Pearler, a share trading app moving into the superannuation space, has launched a product they are calling 'HomeSoon' with the aim of simplifying the steps needed to take advantage of the government's first home savers scheme (FHSS).
The company says it is also the first platform in Australia to allow customers to use open banking to track bank savings, FHSS savings, shares, and other assets in one place – regardless of whether those assets are held with Pearler.
Pearler co-founder Nick Nicolaides said house price growth is outpacing savings, meaning it is no longer sustainable for the average person to park their money in a bank account while they are saving for a deposit.
'Bank savings are no longer sustainable for a seven-eight year journey, and with that it adds complexity,' Mr Nicolaides told NewsWire.
'I don't think people really have a choice but to have their house deposit spread across bank accounts, probably some shares and the FHSS.
'It is more of a case of getting to the end goal of being wealthy enough to buy into the housing market, you now need to not only understand savings and budgeting, you now need to understand investing and this scheme,' he said.
Mr Nicolaides said ideation was simple – to help first home buyers get into the housing market by taking the complexity out of a current scheme.
'We've been talking to customers for a while with only a fraction of customers actually using the scheme,' he said.
'When we asked why, it was very clear that firstly the scheme was in super which people feel some nervousness about and if you then get your head around putting additional savings into super, tracking, knowing what you can withdraw and withdrawing it in time, it quickly layers up.
'So a combination of a complex superannuation system and a not very mainstream scheme really puts most people off.'
The latest PropTrack Home Price Index shows it has never been more expensive for first home buyers to get into the market.
National house prices hit a new peak in May, lifting by 0.39 per cent over the month for a 4.12 per cent year-on-year gain.
All capital cities saw home prices grow in May, with Melbourne leading the way up 0.79 per cent, followed by Adelaide up 0.52 per cent and then Sydney up 0.39 per cent.
Nationally, since the Covid falls starting in March 2020, house prices are up 50.1 per cent for a new median house price value of $809,000, while Australia's most expensive city, Sydney, will set the median buyer back $1,124,000.
Pearler's latest superannuation move follows launching a fund in late March saying it caters for younger members with a simple slogan 'for people born after 1970 (sorry, Boomers)'.
During the launch, Mr Nicolaides said the 'no Boomers' fund was more about solving a problem for younger Australians than a display of anti-Boomer rhetoric.
'If you take a casual interest in what is written about superannuation, most articles are written about how the superannuation industry can deal with retirement,' he said.
'It makes sense that it gets the most attention because it is an immediate problem now.
'But at the other end of the spectrum, the industry and the media recognise that engagement in super is lacking in younger people. If we don't fix that, then today's younger people will find themselves in the same boat in 20, 30 years time,' Mr Nicolaides said.
The FHSS allows people to contribute and access up to $15,000 of their voluntary contributions into super each financial year (up to a total cap of $50,000) for a home deposit.
The main benefit of saving for a home this way is super's lower tax rate – meaning Australians can potentially get to their deposit faster.
The scheme currently has a relatively low take up, with Pearler saying just 13.7 per cent of home buyers bought through the FHSS.
Mr Nicolaides said the onus was not on the government to market the product better but instead on the general financial advice sector to do a better job of educating people.
'The government got the ball rolling on a fantastic scheme but there is only so much that can be done,' Mr Nicolaides said.
'We have a situation in Australia where, whether generationally like it or not, most of our financial decisions are going to be self-directed for the average person on the average wage.
'It becomes our job as an industry to educate people by giving them the tools and the guidance in mediums people want to use.'
Mr Nicolaides says he hopes over time three in four Australians trying to buy a house will do so through the FHSS.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
News.com.au
22 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Aussie Amazon workers lagging behind in re-training as tech giant continues global automation rollout
Staff at Amazon Australia are not a priority for the massive upskilling happening across the e-commerce behemoth's global network. At a conference this week in Japan, Amazon announced its one millionth warehouse robot was now in use across the planet. The company says globally, 700,000 Amazon workers have been formally 'upskilled' to keep up with this wave of automation - but Australians account for a tiny fraction of these workers. Only one of Amazon Australia's eight 'fulfilment centre' warehouses have the company's patented product-shifting, AI-operated robots; as Amazon accelerates its AI and robotics goals, the company argues relatively few job losses will result, contending people doing repetitive manual tasks will be retrained and 'upskilled'. Compared to Amazon's warehouses in comparable countries, Australian facilities are a step behind the company's newest technology, meaning retraining Australian workers to fix and maintain Amazon's robots is lagging. Information from Amazon says the company has created 700 new categories of jobs globally since introducing robots. A proposed highly-robotised Melbourne warehouse will create more than 2000 jobs, requiring entry-level workers up to engineers and operations managers. 'Australia is one of our last countries to have launched … we're in the process of scaling-up the program.'
News.com.au
32 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Aussie screwed by ‘horrendous' practice to bring bills down
The promise of cheaper power bills and a greener footprint saw Christine Hirchfield jump at a chance to install new solar panels but instead she said the move 'blew up in her face'. More than a year since they were placed on her Victorian rooftop, the solar panels remain unconnected to the grid and Ms Hirchfield has been through a nightmare experience that has involved disputes and debt collectors. Now, the 73-year-old is sharing her experience with as consumer groups call for a national ban on an alarming issue. Ms Hirchfield responded to an advertisement on Facebook before a salesperson from a company called GC Perfect Solar turned up at her door. She claims she was promised a great deal including an interest-free payment plan, free cleaning of the panels for 10 years and a generous 15-cent feed-in tariff for every kilowatt sent back into the grid. She claims her later inquiries found a tariff return of just 4.9 cents. While she insisted she needed to digest the information before signing up to anything, she was then told she would receive a free battery after a year, she claims. Given she lost power quite often – this final freebie convinced her to sign on for the solar panels. The retiree also describes the original document from GC Perfect Solar as quite light on details and expected a more formal contract – but then a few days later she was handing over her bank details for direct debits, she claimed. 'I am sorry the day I let that person into my house because it has been a nightmare and rollercoaster,' she said. 'Smell a rat' Ms Hirchfield was actually excited when the solar panels were put on her regional home in March last year but when the finance contract with Brighte, a finance provider specialising in renewable energy, dropped the next day she was shocked. The agreement she had signed with GC Perfect Solar was to pay $88 a fortnight. But the finance contract had payments of $95 plus fees, which as a pensioner she could not afford. 'That's not what was discussed and it snowballed from there,' she said. 'I got straight on to the bank and I thought I smell a rat. I cancelled my bank card and that's when everything started to go downhill.' She lodged complaints with Brighte, GC Perfect Solar and Consumer Affairs Victoria. Brighte investigated the matter and months later released her from the finance agreement with no payments taken. But the nightmare did not end there. Ms Hirchfield received a letter of demand from a debt collection agency on behalf of GC Perfect Solar for $2200 in September last year. Then she claims it later demanded the full amount of the contract worth $11,8000. Meanwhile, she had requested that the company remove the solar panels from her house. Do you have a story? Contact That's when the Consumer Action Law Centre got involved, with the group claiming Ms Hirchfield was subject to unsolicited selling – a practice it wants to see completely banned in Australia. The centre's lawyers, in a letter sent to the debt collection agency, claimed Ms Hirchfield had been subject to misleading and deceptive conduct under Australian consumer law and denied she was liable for the debt. It also outlined that if she was to experience humiliation or distress due to prohibited debt collection by GC Perfect Solar or its agents, she could seek damages up to $10,000. Since then, Ms Hirchfield has heard nothing but she is concerned that the dispute is effectively ongoing. She said the experience had made her far less trusting. 'It would have blown people who aren't as switched on. It would have been so demeaning and overawing and if I can spare one person from the pain then I hope I can,' she said. 'I know what it did to me mentally – it really rocked my world – and what started as great idea and affordable all blew up in my face.' GC Perfect Solar did not respond to request for comment. Chased by debt collectors, court action and bankruptcy Now the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has announced it's conducting a review into unsolicited selling and lead generation, and whether harmful conduct is adequately addressed by current laws. The review comes in response to Consumer Action Law Centre's (CALC) designated complaint, which argues harmful unsolicited sales practices are commonplace across Australia and need to be stamped out. It also argued lead generation is a grey area but occurs when a customer is drawn to an advertisement on the web or social media and agrees to further contact. CALC is one of three groups granted the special power to make a complaint where they can report an urgent issue directly to the ACCC for attention. It outlined that door-to-door sales and cold calling are a widespread issue causing serious financial and personal harm to individuals, while the use of lead generation marketing on social media is rife, particularly in the rooftop solar industry. It warns that consumers are being faced with being chased by debt collectors, court action and bankruptcy and even risk losing their homes. Consumer Action Law Centre CEO Steph Tonkin said unsolicited selling and doorknocking has been a 'horrific problem for such a long period of time'. CALC has been campaigning against the practice for the past 20 years. 'It impacts vulnerable consumers such as people with language barriers who don't say no and more than half of our clients have serious mental health issues and acquired brain injuries,' Ms Tonkin told 'Generally it's backpackers that companies bus out to regional centres and they see someone who is not 100 per cent with it and they sign them up to $10,000 and $15,000 solar panel contracts and do it because of buy now, pay later. It's often a dodgy salesperson meets dodgy installer and it's a hot mess as people are paying off these solar panels when they can't afford it.' 'Horrendous stories' Vulnerable cohorts such as older people, people living in regional areas and those on low incomes, with disabilities or mental health issues, in particular fall victim, according to CALC's complaint which features 23 cases, including Christine Hirchfield, as examples. But it's not only the solar power industry that CALC alleges is problematic, but also the sales of things such as airconditioning units or vacuum cleaners, recliner chairs, roller shutters, photography packages and services like education courses. The ACCC is calling on the public to make submissions on their experiences of unsolicited selling by July 31. Ms Tonkin said the organisation had heard 'horrendous stories' about high pressure sales tactics applied to people who are often obviously mentally unwell, salespeople crossing out the legal 10 day cooling off period in a contract or walking past a person into their loungeroom even when asked to leave. 'The solar panels of today are the encyclopedias of yesterday,' she noted. 'But it's also recliner chairs that don't meet the description and don't work or education courses that don't exist. It's full businesses that are shut down and pop up again — it's this underbelly.' Spotlight on solar More than four million Australian households have installed rooftop solar and the use of unsolicited selling is likely to have made a proportion of these households aware of the availability of government subsidies and rebates, the ACCC found a report into the complaint. But the sectors interaction with government rebates, subsidies and loans is complex and consumers attempting to navigate this area may rely primarily on the information provided by salespeople, the watchdog added. The CALC complaint asserts that the use of unscrupulous unsolicited selling practices in the rooftop solar industry may have eroded trust and undermined the drive to Net Zero. A spokesperson for finance company Brighte said it is disappointing when a customer's experience of a third-party solar retailer does not meet its expectations. 'We expect all third-party solar retailers referring our finance products to uphold the highest standards of integrity and customer care,' they said. 'When concerns are raised with us, we act to protect customers, engage with the retailers and recommend customers contact their relevant state consumer protection authority if the issue cannot be resolved. 'In this case, after considering the customer's concerns, we took no payments from the customer and they have no further obligations to Brighte. We also ended our relationship with the sales agent.' Overall, the consumer watchdog notes there some protections for consumers when it comes to unsolicited selling, but CALC said they aren't enough to prevent the alarming practice. The ACCC has received approximately 250 consumer reports from January 2024 to March 2025 relating to unsolicited selling across a broad range of industries, although it acknowledged those impacted may not come forward. CALC also alleges that some businesses are circumventing the requirements for unsolicited consumer agreements by using lead generation tactics to obtain an invitation from consumers to come to their home, or to obtain consent from consumers to be contacted over the phone.
Daily Telegraph
43 minutes ago
- Daily Telegraph
Australia's most expensive home sold for $142m
With no registered mortgage required, Chinese-born company director Yan Zhang paid $141.55m last week for Australia's most expensive penthouse overlooking Sydney Harbour at Barangaroo. Zhang now owns the top three floors of the One Sydney Harbour development, ending some of the mystery since its off-the-plan exchange in 2019 by Lendlease. The strata fees for the 1980sq m holding will be sky-high because the two-level penthouse has 4794 of the 100,000 unit entitlements and the secondary apartment has 2109. RELATED: $1.1bn bonanza, top sales of 2025 revealed The Sell's quick back-of-an envelope calculation puts the combined quarterly strata at a staggering $107,000 given the building's $6.2m annual levies. Little is known about 37-year-old Zhang, who recently set up shelf company Yry Family Pty Ltd, which gives its address as the 88/88 Barangaroo Ave penthouse. Zhang directs only one other company, Zicheng Australia, which was set up in 2007 and co-directed with Wei Ling Zhang, 63, who was born in Shanghai, China. MORE: Huge promise Hemsworths made about Byron Bay Both have given their address as the 52-floor Pitt St, Century Tower sub-penthouse that they bought mortgage-free for $1.33m in 2004 when Zhang was just 16. It was a good buy because it had previously sold for $1,443,000 in 1997. Lendlease will be hoping their One Sydney Harbour prices do not fall back. MORE: Wild reason Aussie has 300 homes In 2019 on its exchange, it was reported the mystery buyer of the three-level penthouse was a local Australian resident from mainland China so there no pesky Foreign Investment Review Board requirements. Construction of the 89-storey Renzo Piano-designed tower was initially scheduled for a late 2023 completion, with Lendlease registering the slightly-delayed strata plan in February last year. The highest previously registered purchase had been $38.95m to the Zhong family for the entire 76th floor that settled seamlessly in May last year. MORE: Aus pub's $500m collapse, staff owed $7m
