
‘How can I help one of my grandchildren buy a house without making the others jealous?'
Dear Sam,
I want to help my granddaughter buy a house. She is in the police force, and is currently living in subsidised shared accommodation because it is too far for her to commute from home.
My financial adviser told me that I can afford to be generous with my family over the remainder of my life without running out of money. I even have a significant 'just in case' pot which would pay for care at home if I preferred that to selling the house and going residential. I feel very well provided for.
My granddaughter has found a place in Kent that makes the commute tolerable. If she can get a 20pc deposit organised, she can raise a mortgage for the rest. She has saved some, but needs another £25,000 to be sure she can cover the deposit and costs of buying her first home.
I can easily afford to give her this, but I do have two other grandchildren. They are younger, and not ready for homeownership.
I have two dilemmas. Firstly, is there a way I can treat them all equally? I don't know when the other two will buy homes, but the prices will be different, so I will probably need to give them more to achieve the same result.
The second dilemma is that I would want them to use the money to become homeowners. I am a strong believer in getting on the property ladder and securing their housing position, but I don't want them to end up with boyfriend/girlfriend who benefits from my money if they buy something together and then have a bust up.
How can I make sure I can help them all, encourage them to buy homes and ensure what I give my grandchildren can't be claimed by anyone else?
– Margaret
Dear Margaret,
I know your financial adviser, which is how you were encouraged to write in with your dilemma – and it doesn't surprise me that because of good planning and well-managed personal finances, you find you have the means, and the heart, to support your family in a deeply meaningful way.
Your granddaughter's determination, joining the police force and saving diligently, is also admirable. It's no wonder you feel moved to help her take that next step on to the property ladder. Your instincts are generous and wise, but I can see why you're feeling torn.
The first of your concerns – fairness – is one many grandparents share. You want to help now, but without disadvantaging your other grandchildren later.
The truth is, equality doesn't always mean sameness. Property prices will change, your grandchildren's lives will unfold at different paces, and needs will vary. Rather than trying to make identical gifts at different moments in time, it might help to shift focus toward the principle of 'equitable intention', offering similar opportunities to each grandchild, even if the financial outlay isn't exactly equal.
To manage this, you could keep a simple record of gifts made, clearly noting the purpose and value. If you give £25,000 now to your eldest granddaughter, record it as such with the understanding that, when the time is right, the younger grandchildren will receive a comparable leg-up, whether for property, education, or another major life goal.
If circumstances change, you'll still have the flexibility to adjust accordingly. Keeping a note like this in your will or letter of wishes (which is not legally binding, but can guide your executors) helps communicate your values and intentions without tying your hands or forcing premature decisions.
The second dilemma – protecting the gift from partners or relationship breakdowns – is trickier, but it can be approached sensibly.
If you were to gift the money outright and your granddaughter buys jointly with a partner, that partner could acquire a beneficial interest in the property, especially if they contribute financially or live there long-term. If the relationship were to end, your gifted money could be caught up in a dispute or division.
One way to reduce the risk of this outcome is to give the money on the understanding that it will be documented as a loan, even if it is never repaid. A formal declaration of trust or a loan agreement can establish your granddaughter as the sole legal owner of the money, protecting it in the event of a relationship breakdown.
This approach gives her full use of the money but creates a legal separation from her partner's financial rights. It also preserves some flexibility, allowing you to later forgive the loan if the circumstances still feel right, for example, once she's married or well-established.
However, there's a trade-off here that your financial adviser may already have highlighted. From an inheritance tax perspective, gifts rather than loans, begin the clock on the seven-year rule. Provided you survive for seven years after making the gift, the amount falls outside your estate for tax purposes.
Loans, by contrast, remain assets on your balance sheet and are counted in full, even if they are never repaid. So, if reducing a future inheritance tax bill is one of your objectives, a straightforward gift may be the more efficient route. Just be sure to keep good records and be open with your adviser about your intentions. As advisers we can be inclined to overweight the tax outcome in a decision-making process – forgive us.
Some grandparents prefer to buy a stake in the property as a way of protecting their contribution, but you've indicated that this doesn't appeal. That's entirely understandable. Another alternative is to place the money in a trust, but this can be complex and costly to manage, and is rarely necessary for modest sums.
Ultimately, the path forward may involve a combination of open communication and light-touch legal planning. Speak with your granddaughter, she will likely understand your desire to help all the grandchildren equally and to protect your gift from risk.
Working with a solicitor to draw up a simple loan agreement or deed of trust can keep things clear, fair, and future-proofed without casting any doubt over your generosity.
Your instincts to support your granddaughter now, to avoid unintentional unfairness later, and to encourage home ownership as a foundation for a secure life are deeply thoughtful. With some careful structuring and honest conversation, you can honour those instincts and give your granddaughter a wonderful start, while keeping options open for your other grandchildren too.
Warm wishes,
– Sam
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
MP Peter Prinsley opens new parliamentary office in Stowmarket
An MP has opened a new parliamentary office in a market town after it felt "like the right thing to do".Dr Peter Prinsley, Labour MP for Bury St Edmunds and Stowmarket, opened the office about a year after being elected. The MP will hold surgeries at his new office in 4 Market Place, in Stowmarket. Dr Prinsley told the Local Democracy Reporting Service: "It did feel to me like putting the office in Stowmarket made sense. There had never previously been any parliamentary office here; it felt like the right thing to do." The MP officially opened the office by cutting a red ribbon with the help of his wife, Dr Marian Prinsley, on Friday."Stowmarket is a really lovely little town, and we are very pleased to be able to be here," he added. The MP and his staff had been using the space for several months but had to delay the opening date until security provisions could be Waterman, labour councillor and leader at West Suffolk Council, said the opening was great news for Bury St Edmunds. "He's saying 'here I am, come talk to me' and I think that's what an MP should be doing," he added. His office will employ four people regularly, in a mix of part-time and full-time roles, and will eventually offer internships and work experience Prinsley said: "I'm usually here at the end of the week – I hope people might spot me, we're definitely open to people coming to see us." Follow Suffolk news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


BBC News
33 minutes ago
- BBC News
Wellingborough's Warwicks menswear shuts down after 157 years
A men's clothing store described by customers as being a "foundation" of a town has closed down after 157 of Wellingborough in Northamptonshire shut down on Saturday following the retirement of its fifth-generation owner Neil Warwick, 61, said none of his family wanted to taker over the business, which he claimed was the oldest retailer in the about the closure, he said that the shop was still "profitable and successful, but that's life". Mr Warwick said the final week of trading had been "incredibly busy", with many customers coming in to share stories and memories of visiting."A lot of people just wanted to come in and say 'wow, I used to come here with my dad, grandad... so many people," said Mr Warwick. "People have travelled in from miles away."The shop was opened in 1868 by his great, great, grandfather Samuel Warwick and then passed down to five other Warwicks - Harry, Cyril, his father Alan, and then to Neil and his brother David. He said when David died in 2019 it made him realise he wanted a "new adventure" and there were "other things in life", adding he would "spend a bit more time enjoying life", starting by taking his wife on holiday."We've recently become grandparents and have lots of nice things to do. I'm sure I won't get bored," he said. 'Last bastion of town' The shop used to make its own suits but stopped in the 1960s when ready-made wear became popular. It also sold school uniforms until 15 years ago, when online retail really took before the store closed its doors for good, customers shared their sadness at the end of Warwicks. Barry Day travelled from Bozeat for one last visit."My relationship with the shop goes back over 25 years," the 67-year-old explained. "I would buy uniforms for my son. They've got really good quality men's clothes. It will be a sad loss."This is a foundation of Wellingborough... I don't think you'll get a quality shop like this ever again." Colin Gilmour, 76, lives in Earls Barton but grew up in said visiting the town used to be a "day out" for him in his youth."It [Warwicks] is one of the last bastions of Wellingborough. It's sad but things move on I suppose." Follow Northamptonshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.


Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Starmer faces fresh MP rebellion over farmers' inheritance tax
Sir Keir Starmer is facing a fresh rebellion from Labour MPs over his inheritance tax raid on farmers. The Telegraph understands that more than 40 MPs are considering mounting an attempt to water down the policy, which threatens to bankrupt family farms by landing them with large inheritance tax bills. Rebels have been emboldened after forcing the Prime Minister to climb down on welfare cuts this week, in the third about-turn for the Government in two months. The U-turns – on benefits, winter fuel payment cuts and a national inquiry into grooming gangs – have added to a £40 billion black hole Rachel Reeves, the Chancellor, needs to fill at the next Budget. In a sign of fraying party discipline, MPs are plotting further rebellions on immigration and the two-child benefit cap, alongside the farming revolt. A senior rebel told The Telegraph: 'It's obviously a Government in crisis and the back benches are feeling ignored. The whole strategy is not working and we've got to change direction.' The fresh threats to Sir Keir's authority come after more than 100 MPs publicly broke with the Government over its disability benefit cuts, leading to a Number 10 climbdown this week. Backbenchers are considering using rebel amendments to exempt small family farms from changes to inheritance tax announced in the October Budget. Farmers have historically been able to pass down their land tax-free. But from April 2026, full tax relief will be capped for estates at £1 million, above which just 50 per cent tax relief will be available. A so-called 'rural growth group' has proposed that ministers consider the impacts of substantially raising the planned £1 million cut-off point at which estates lose valuable tax reliefs. The back-bench group has suggested estates receive full tax relief on the value of agricultural properties up to £10 million, 50 per cent to £20 million, and nil thereafter. This higher threshold would probably exempt almost all small family farms from inheritance tax, with only the richest paying the levy. The changes will be enacted in a Bill due to be voted on by MPs later this year, when they could be challenged by rebels. Sam Rushworth, Labour MP for Bishop Auckland, who is a member of the group, said they would 'consider what amendments to put down'. Mr Rushworth said: 'We are all keen to avoid amendments. I don't want it to get to that point. I am a Labour MP and I broadly support the Government, [but] I would like to see them bring forward different recommendations in the Bill.' A handful of Labour parliamentarians have publicly criticised the so-called 'tractor tax' plans. Markus Campbell-Savours, Labour MP for Penrith and Solway in Cumbria, a rural seat, said in December that he would vote against the Treasury's plans, telling the House of Commons: 'Let me be clear, if today was the real vote, I would vote against the Government's plans.' Sir Keir is also facing opposition to some of his new immigration rules which are expected to be voted on after the summer break, The Telegraph understands. Many of the immigration changes announced by the Prime Minister last month, including changes to visa routes, can be brought into effect without a vote in the House of Commons. However key parts of the proposals, including a new levy on international student fees, will require the endorsement of Labour MPs. A leading rebel told The Telegraph that the Government should spend the summer recess 'reflecting on an evidence-based approach as to how to build effective policies on immigration'. Another said: 'The leadership have to seriously look at their actions on this policy regarding the lack of consultation with backbench MPs.' A number of refugee charities have been lobbying parliamentarians over the changes after their repeated requests for meetings with Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, were turned down. 'Biggest mistake to date' MPs opposed to the changes were encouraged this week by the Prime Minister's apology for using the term 'island of strangers' in his speech announcing the immigration changes. One rebel Labour MP said: 'Of course it was right for the Prime Minister to apologise for the language that he used and understand the distress that it caused, but similarly, if the Government listened more on policy, this would be stronger'. This week Sir Keir apologised for the language in the speech, saying he had not read it properly before delivery because he had been distressed by an arson attack on his family home. But he gave no indication that the Government would U-turn on any of its immigration reforms. Nigel Farage, the Reform UK leader, said the apology was Sir Keir's 'biggest mistake to date'. He said: 'This is absolute proof that Keir Starmer has no beliefs, no principles and just reads from a script. 'Only a year into his premiership and he has already made his most fatal error. He has no intention of clamping down on immigration, both legal and illegal. 'This is his biggest mistake to date and one he will not be able to recover from – the public voted for change, instead they're being given more mass immigration and a spiralling crisis at the border. 'We need a leader that has vision and unwavering principles, that man is clearly not Keir Starmer.' Some Labour MPs on the party's Right wing were bewildered by the Prime Minister's sudden apology. One told The Telegraph 'that row-back is the most staggering of all' and said it would further erode discipline. Labour MPs are also bracing for a fight with the Government in the autumn over the two child benefit cap, which many want to see scrapped. The Prime Minister has reportedly committed to scrapping the cap but no announcement has yet been made. In a speech next week, Kemi Badenoch is set to mock Sir Keir's growing roster of U-turns. 'Now that his backbenchers smell blood, there's almost certainly another climbdown on the two-child benefit cap in the offing,' she is expected to tell the Local Government Association on Wednesday. 'Labour told us 'the adults were back in charge', but this is actually amateur hour. The Prime Minister is incapable of sticking to a decision.' A senior Labour party figure said that Downing Street's loss of control over MPs constituted 'an absolute s--- show'. The source said: 'This is an outburst beyond the welfare bill that has broken out. It is from loyal, moderate people who have defended the winter fuel cut for months and then had the rug pulled from under them with the U-turn. 'These are moderate MPs getting constant lobbying from disabled groups and constituents and now they've been told there is money available after all. Those frustrations are largely with Rachel. But they're also with No 10.' 'Now they have lost their patience. It's an absolute s--- show.' Labour MPs have described the past week as a 'deep crisis' with senior government figures forming 'circular firing squads'. One Labour MP said of the Chancellor: 'It's already clear that Rachel Reeves has lost because her whole economic and fiscal strategy is failing on numerous counts. The PM is reversing everything that she wanted to do.' A Government spokesman said: 'Our reforms to agricultural and business property relief are vital to fix the public services we all rely on. 'Three quarters of estates will continue to pay no inheritance tax at all, while the remaining quarter will pay half the inheritance tax that most people pay, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest-free. 'We're investing billions of pounds in sustainable food production and nature's recovery, slashing costs for food producers to export to the EU and have appointed former NFU president Baroness Minette Batters to advise on reforms to boost farmers profits.'