Trump Commerce boss gets put on blast with ‘no pain' tariff claim
During a live interview with Axios's Mike Allen at the Building the Future event in Washington this week, Lutnick claimed that no one is feeling any pain right now from the tariffs.
'You go to the store now, are you feeling the pain of tariffs? No! Why not? Because there is no pain,' Lutnick said.
He then asked the crowd if they felt any pain because of the tariffs.
'Yes!' some audience members fired back as silence fell throughout the room.
Trump has been a longtime supporter of tariffs, believing they would help increase tax revenue, boost the growth of the U.S. economy, and increase manufacturing jobs throughout the country.
'The most beautiful word in the dictionary is tariff,' Trump told the Economic Club of Chicago in 2024. 'It's my favorite word.'
On April 2, Trump announced he was slapping more than 100 countries worldwide with the trade levies.
In the weeks following that announcement, however, Trump and his administration have walked back and cut tariffs.
This month, the administration announced it would cut its tariffs imposed on China from 145% to 30% for a temporary period, according to the New York Times.
China, in response, would lower its import duty on American goods from 125% to 10%, the New York Times reported.
During the Axios interview, Lutnick told the crowd that Trump felt 'horrible' about the impacts of the China tariffs but said they were necessary.
'You can't fix things in a day,' Lutnick said. 'But I would expect that prices in America would be unaffected.'
Lutnick's claim about prices runs counter to corporations that have warned they will have to raise prices because of the tariffs.
Walmart's Chief Financial Officer John David Rainey told CNBC in an interview that Trump's tariffs are still too high and that price hikes are likely to happen towards the end of the month.
'I'm concerned that [the] consumer is going to start seeing higher prices,' Rainey said. 'You'll begin to see that, likely towards the tail end of this month, and then certainly much more in June.'
Walmart CEO Doug McMillon said in an earnings call on Thursday that tariffs on China are raising the costs of electronics and toys, according to CNN.
He added that some food costs are also going up because of tariffs on Costa Rica, Peru and Colombia.
'We will do our best to keep our prices as low as possible. But given the magnitude of the tariffs, even at the reduced levels announced this week, we aren't able to absorb all the pressure given the reality of narrow retail margins,' McMillon said. 'Even at the reduced levels, the higher tariffs will result in higher prices.'
In response to these comments, Trump wrote on Truth Social, telling Walmart to 'EAT THE TARIFFS,' saying that the company should not blame tariffs for rising prices.
'Walmart should STOP trying to blame Tariffs as the reason for raising prices throughout the chain,' Trump wrote. 'Walmart made BILLIONS OF DOLLARS last year, far more than expected.'
Trump is continuing to threaten tariffs on companies and nations. On Friday, the president threatened Apple with a 25% tariff unless it starts making iPhones in the United States.
'I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,' Trump wrote Friday morning on Truth Social. 'If that is not the case, a Tariff of at least 25% must be paid by Apple to the U.S.'
Trump also recommended on Friday a 50% tariff on the European Union that would go into effect on June 1, citing stalled talks between the U.S. and the EU as the reason for the tariffs.
" Our discussions with them are going nowhere! Therefore, I am recommending a straight 50% Tariff on the European Union, starting on June 1, 2025," Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'There is no Tariff if the product is built or manufactured in the United States.'
Trump threatens Apple with 25% tariff if it doesn't make iPhones in the US
'Unlawful and unwarranted': Harvard opens 2nd lawsuit against the Trump admin
Mass. Senate passes dramatic liquor license overhaul. Will the House pass it?
MASS.-ive Impact: What Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill' means to you | John L. Micek
'Deeply scary': Legal experts reel over Trump's 'brazen act' against Harvard
Read the original article on MassLive.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump visits Iowa to kick off America's 250th anniversary, reassure farmers on trade
By Nandita Bose WASHINGTON (Reuters) -President Donald Trump travels to Iowa on Thursday to kick off celebrations marking America's 250th anniversary next year and to tout recent trade and legislative actions to heartland voters who helped propel his return to the White House. Trump will deliver a campaign-style speech at the Iowa State Fairgrounds in Des Moines, a familiar stop for presidential candidates in the early primary state. Trump won Iowa's 2024 Republican caucuses by a historically large margin and carried the state by 13 percentage points in the general election. His latest visit comes ahead of a Friday deadline he set for Congress to pass his sweeping tax and spending legislation, a cornerstone of his second-term domestic agenda that touches everything from immigration to energy policy. In remarks mixing patriotism and policy, Trump will aim to reassure Iowa's voters that his administration is defending their interests and delivering tangible results, according to a person with knowledge of the speech. Trump's trade policies have whipsawed agricultural communities in Iowa, creating economic uncertainty and testing loyalties. Iowa farmers have been hit hard, especially with China's retaliatory tariffs slashing soybean exports and prices. In a Truth Social post on Tuesday announcing his trip, Trump called Iowa "one of my favorite places in the world." "I'll also tell you some of the GREAT things I've already done on Trade, especially as it relates to Farmers. You are going to be very happy with what I say," Trump said. At recent Republican town halls in Iowa, tensions flared as farmers and constituents pressed congressional leaders, including Republican Senator Chuck Grassley, to push back against Trump's retaliatory tariffs. Some Republicans also worry that deep cuts to the Medicaid health program in their sweeping tax bill will hurt the party's prospects in the 2026 midterm elections. Trump has made several memorable trips to the Iowa State Fairgrounds. In 2015, the reality TV star and presidential candidate gave children rides on his personal helicopter as he aimed to overshadow Democratic rival Hillary Clinton. In 2023, Trump's private jet buzzed low over the crowds in another flashy power move, stealing the spotlight from primary rival Ron DeSantis as he campaigned on the ground below.
Washington Post
27 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump showed moral clarity on Iran. He should do the same for Ukraine.
On June 19, facing pressure to join in Israel's bombing campaign against Iran, President Donald Trump announced, 'I will make my decision whether or not to go within the next two weeks.' Cynics assumed this was yet another example of the president putting off a difficult decision indefinitely. 'TACO,' some said, employing a popular acronym for 'Trump Always Chickens Out.' The doubters were wrong. Two days later, U.S. bombs and missiles hit three Iranian nuclear sites. Though there has been much debate over just how much damage the Iranian nuclear program suffered, at least one thing now seems clear: Trump meant it went he said that Iran, a state sponsor of terrorism that has vowed 'death to Israel,' would not be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons. If only the president had the same moral clarity about stopping the barbaric war being waged in Ukraine by Iran's despotic ally, Russia. When it comes to that conflict, however, Trump appears to be engaged in exactly the kind of irresolute policy that many (wrongly) suspected he was pursuing with Iran. On May 28, Trump was asked by a reporter whether Russian dictator Vladimir Putin wants to end the war. He replied: 'I can't tell you that, but I'll let you know in about two weeks. … We're going to find out whether or not he's tapping us along or not, and if he is, we'll respond a little bit differently.' More than a month later, Trump isn't doing anything differently even as Russia shows no sign of ending its aggression. Every week seems to bring fresh reports of Russian airstrikes on Ukrainian cities that are described as the largest since the war began. Over the weekend, Russia fired 537 aerial weapons, including 60 missiles, at Ukraine, primarily at civilian targets. Some Ukrainians are now going to sleep with whistles around their necks to make it easier to find them if they are buried under rubble by a Russian attack. Trump has repeatedly insisted that, if he had been president in 2022, Putin would never have invaded Ukraine. But since Trump returned to office this year, Putin's attacks have surged — and Trump hasn't done anything about it. Russia's summer offensive appears stalled, despite the country's large numerical advantage in troops, but Ukrainian cities are suffering more damage from Russian drone and missile strikes amid fears that Ukrainian air defenses are being depleted. In April, Trump beseeched Putin: 'Vladimir, STOP!' Vladimir hasn't stopped, yet Trump does not appear to be applying pressure to back up his words. Instead, at the Group of Seven summit in Canada recently, Trump complained about Russia's expulsion from the group. He apparently continues to speak regularly and cordially with Putin, who has been indicted as a war criminal by the International Criminal Court and is a pariah throughout the West. And the Trump administration continues to block legislation, with more than 80 sponsors, that would impose tariffs of 500 percent on any nations that buy Russia's energy products. Admittedly, there is a case to be made, as Post columnist Jim Geraghty recently noted, that this well-intentioned bill is impractical: Are we really willing to cut off all U.S. trade (which is what a 500 percent tariff would mean) with important international partners, including India, Turkey, Brazil, the European Union and South Korea, if they don't stop buying Russian energy? But it isn't as if Trump is doing anything else to turn up the heat on the Kremlin; since returning to office, he has not imposed any additional sanctions on Russia, thereby allowing existing sanctions to become less effective. Two other possible courses of action would be more effective and produce less collateral damage: providing Ukraine with badly needed air defense ammunition and other munitions while pressuring European countries to release to Ukraine the $300 billion in frozen Russian assets. Ukraine already produces about 40 percent of the weapons it uses on the front lines. With that influx of Russian funds, Ukraine could dramatically expand defense production and become more self-sufficient with weapons. That would send a strong signal to Putin that he might as well make a deal, because he is never going to achieve his objective of turning Ukraine into a Kremlin satrapy. Of even greater immediate impact would be additional deliveries of Patriot air defense interceptors. The Patriot is the most advanced air defense system in Ukraine and the Ukrainians' only effective means of shooting down ballistic missiles, but, more than a year after the last U.S. aid package was approved, Ukrainian stockpiles are dwindling. Last week, Trump said, 'We're going to see if we can make some available,' but there is no indication that his administration is doing so. Instead, the Pentagon this week halted further military aid, supposedly because U.S. stockpiles were running low. President Volodymyr Zelensky in recent months has done everything Trump wanted, from supporting an immediate ceasefire to signing a minerals deal with Washington. Putin would not even agree to a temporary ceasefire. And yet Trump is essentially punishing Ukraine and rewarding Russia. Having failed to end the Ukraine war in 24 hours — as he repeatedly promised on the campaign trail — Trump now seems ready to wash his hands of the conflict. He has hinted that he might step back from the frustrating peace talks, which would mean allowing Putin to wage war without repercussions. Trump has even compared the two sides to 'two young children fighting like crazy': 'Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.' Such comments suggest Trump is guilty of moral myopia about the war in Ukraine — quite a contrast to the moral clarity he displayed about the Iranian nuclear program. Ukraine and Russia are not toddlers squabbling on the playground over inconsequential stakes. Ukraine is a pro-Western democracy that is the victim of an unprovoked war of aggression launched by an anti-American dictator. There is no moral equivalence between the sides; the war is as pure an example of good vs. evil as the modern world has seen. If Russia wins, all of Europe will be endangered, and other aggressors such as China will be emboldened. That makes aid to Ukraine — leading to a peace settlement that safeguards its sovereignty — a moral and strategic imperative for the United States. Trump just doesn't get it, and Ukraine could wind up paying a heavy price for his shortsightedness.
CNBC
27 minutes ago
- CNBC
Guard against market volatility in the second half with ‘boring' stocks, investor Jeff Kilburg says
Investors may find "boring" stocks a safer bet heading into the second half of the year, according to Jeff Kilburg, founder and CEO of KKM Financial. Markets were plagued by heightened volatility at the end of the first quarter and the start of the second, as fear and uncertainty stemming from President Donald Trump's trade war spread. Stocks reached their lows of the year in early April, shortly after Trump announced his universal tariff policies. While stocks have recovered their losses since then — with the S & P 500 closing Wednesday 25% above its April closing low — Kilburg warned that volatility may not ease up for the reminder of 2025. In fact, he believes that the market is entering a new volatility regime and may continue to be sensitive to any type of geopolitical tensions. Kilburg pointed to the market's knee-jerk reaction to the Israel-Iran conflict as proof. "I think investor attention and needing to monitor your investments has never been more needed," he told CNBC in a recent interview. With volatility lingering at elevated levels, Kilburg believes that now is the time for investors to reposition themselves into the more defensive, blue-chip stocks that were sold off in April. "Some of these names that get no love on CNBC air waves, those are blue-chip industrial names that we've seen people tilt back into," he said. "The ripple effect that has happened after that really tumultuous couple of weeks is that people really want to own names that they know. They want to own names that they can touch and feel, and those are kind of the boring names." These more "boring," blue-chip stalwarts could help hedge against any upcoming uncertainty, Kilburg added, and may be why investors are again favoring industrial stocks. "That's why people have gotten a little more defensive, because honestly, we don't know what President Trump is going to say next. We don't know what his policy or ambition is next," he said. "Investors being uncertain of what shoe could potentially drop next, that has kind of made portfolios tilt more industrial, more defensive." Kilburg's top stock picks One name Kilburg likes that belongs to this category is Duke Energy . The electric and power stock has rallied nearly 9% this year, not including its 3.5% yield. Last week, Goldman Sachs upgraded its rating on Duke. "We raise Duke Energy from Neutral to Buy as the stock has lagged more defensive peers YTD and is making regulatory progress towards building significant generation that is not captured at current levels in our view," wrote analyst Carly Davenport. The bank's new price target of $132, lifted from $125, represents upside of approximately 13% from Duke Energy's Wednesday close. Another name Kilburg highlighted was Waste Management , which has gained 11% in 2025. Last month, Melius Research analyst Rob Wertheimer initiated coverage of the stock with a buy rating, highlighting its "stable growth in a chaotic world." "Despite the market's growing appreciation for the quality of these industry leaders, we think there's more outperformance to come in both the short and long run, from lower risk, less downside to earnings, and higher growth," he wrote. "While relative multiples are roughly in line with historical levels, we think the premium deserved now is larger than in the past." Kilburg also mentioned Visa , up TK% this year. In June, Mizuho upgraded the credit card issuer to an outperform rating from neutral. "We see more reason for optimism as the remaining cash-to-card runway in the U.S. is longer than previously expected (we est. true U.S. card penetration at ~75% vs. 80-90% consensus). This leaves room for another decade of solid top-line growth domestically," wrote Mizuho analyst Dan Dolev. "Plus, V's performance in Canada & Nordics offers evidence of above-PCE growth, even when card penetration is > 90%." In the same note, Dolev lifted his price target to $425 per share from $359. This updated forecast represents a TK% upside from Visa's Wednesday closing price. Other names Kilburg highlighted include Costco , Verizon , JPMorgan , Masco , CVS , Comcast , Nutrien and Sysco .
