
I Have A Problem With The Term 'Thought Leadership Ads'
Recently, I saw a webinar titled 'LinkedIn Thought Leadership Ads.' The name alone made my stomach churn.
For a moment, I thought I had misread it.
Surely, this wasn't real—surely, no one had decided to mash together the words 'thought leadership' and 'advertisement' into a serious marketing product.
But yes, it was true. LinkedIn now has a format called thought leadership ads, which lets companies sponsor posts from individuals—typically their own executives or employees—to promote thought leadership.
As someone who has spent the past decades studying, practicing, and teaching the art of writing, particularly for B2B companies, I can't help but feel that this development is not just a misstep. It's a fundamental misunderstanding of what thought leadership is and what it's meant to do.
Let me be clear: Thought leadership is not a campaign. It's not a post. It's not a shiny new format for marketers to test. It's a philosophy and a practice rooted in generosity.
At its best, thought leadership is the long game of building trust by offering something meaningful and valuable—ideas, perspectives, frameworks—for free, in service of your audience.
When I teach writing for thought leadership, I emphasize that thought leadership emerges when an expert becomes an idea guide. This person doesn't just share information—they serve their audience by helping them solve important problems. That's the price of admission: usefulness. Not visibility. Not virality. Admission requires relevance and usefulness.
What makes the thought leadership ad format so jarring is the contradiction at its core. Sponsoring someone's post and calling it 'thought leadership' undermines the entire premise of what we're trying to build in this space. Thought leadership isn't supposed to be transactional. You don't get to buy your way in. You earn it through creativity and critical thinking.
Thought Leadership Ads: From Individual Voice to Brand Megaphone
Let's look closer at what these ads actually do.
Companies can now promote posts from their executives' personal profiles—meaning, you're scrolling through LinkedIn and see a thoughtful update from someone who seems like an expert in their field. But look again. In small letters, you may notice: 'Promoted by [Company Name].'
The brand is paying for that message to reach you. The post hasn't organically pleased the LinkedIn algorithm. It's strategically distributed paid media—and the label is subtle enough that many users may not realize what they're seeing is an ad.
This kind of stealth branding muddies the waters between genuine expertise and corporate messaging.
Companies are right to be engaging their experts for their content, but I believe we need clearer labeling which gives us the ability to tell the difference between a hard-won idea and a boosted post. I'd like to see labeling as clear as the difference between a newspaper's opinion page and it's sponsored sections.
The Real Problem: Dilution of the Term Thought Leadership
In small ways, I've been working for higher standards in thought leadership for years. LinkedIn's ad format worries me because it pulls us in the opposite direction. Just as groups like the Global Thought Leadership Institute are working to define and professionalize this practice, LinkedIn's feature invites a flood of performative, pay-to-play content.
In an environment where the term thought leadership is stretched to include individuals' posts promoted with budget, thought leadership as a practice is diluted. And when a term loses its meaning, it loses its power.
That's not just a branding issue. It's a credibility issue.
How can professionals be expected to invest in their own deep thinking, original research, or courageous opinion writing when branded soundbites dressed up as fresh thinking are the norm?
Let's Call Thought Leadership Ads What They Are—Advertising
Let's face it. Thought leadership ads are not a clever evolution of thought leadership—they're just another kind of advertising. Such posts may actually contain expertise, but make no mistake: These are ads. They are bought. They are targeted. They are tracked. And I'd venture to say that they're engineered for engagement more than insight.
Let's stop confusing the medium with the message. Just because an idea is sponsored doesn't make it unworthy—but we must label it front and center for what it is. Thought leadership is a standard we should preserve, not a term we should co-opt for clicks.
Here are some ideas about how LinkedIn could rename the labels for the actual posts.
And here are some ideas about what the product could be called:
Any of these would be better than calling them thought leadership ads. More importantly, a new product name wouldn't hijack a phrase that many professionals have worked hard to live up to.
If we allow this blurring to continue, we risk undermining everything that real thought leadership is meant to stand for: courage, clarity, curiosity, and the willingness to give without asking for anything in return.
Why The Name Of Promoted Posts Matters
This isn't about semantics. It's about values.
Thought leadership, when practiced well, is about helping others. It's about taking risks with your thinking. It's about earning trust over time—not buying it in the moment. That distinction matters, especially when we're drowning in content and starving for substance.
It matters even more for the people doing this work—professionals who are putting in the effort to frame their ideas, test their hypotheses, research deeply and write with the reader in mind. If we tell them that the only way to be seen is to pay, we're telling them that the hard work doesn't matter. That the system rewards visibility over value.
That's a message I don't want to support.
Going Deep Instead of Going Wide
The best thought leadership doesn't come from amplification. It comes from intention. It comes from doing the deep work of identifying the real problems your audience faces and offering insights that help them move forward. No ad can manufacture that.
As the autor of Write Like a Thought Leader, I want to say, clearly and unequivocally: advertising is not thought leadership. Yes, thought leadership is in service of a product or service you're selling, but advertising language should not be part of it.
In my view, you can't buy trust with thought leadership ads. You can't promote your way to authority. And you can't call something 'leadership' if it doesn't begin with service.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel earnings, new-home sales, mortgage rates: What to Watch
Asking for a Trend host Josh Lipton outlines the top stories for investors to watch on Thursday, July 24. Fresh earnings will be posted in the morning from Honeywell (HON), Union Pacific (UNP), Blackstone (BX), and Keurig Dr. Pepper (KDP). In the afternoon, Intel (INTC) and Deckers (DECK) will report results. New-home sales data for June will be out in the morning. Economists are expecting an uptick to 650,000 from May's 623,000. Weekly mortgage rate data from Freddie Mac (FMCC) will be posted for the week starting July 17. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Asking for a Trend here. Time now for to watch Thursday, July 24th. We're going to start off on the earnings front here. Earning season raging on with some big names on Thursday. We got Honeywell, Keurig Dr. Pepper, and Intel. Now, Intel announced results for the second quarter that will be after the markets close. And it's expecting a solid second quarter for Intel, but tariff driven concerns, of course, loom for the rest of the year. Investors will be listening closely for any updates on the company's foundry business in the second half, especially progress on its new chip platform, Panther Lake. And checking in on the housing market, we're going to be getting new home sales data on Thursday. Economist forecasting sales to rise in June to 650,000 at an annualized pace, signaling that housing demand is picking up amid a challenging macro environment for home buyers. And sticking with housing, weekly mortgage rate data from Freddie Mac is coming out on Thursday. The current rate on that 30-year fixed is 6.75%. Rates have risen two consecutive weeks going into Thursday's new numbers, adding to an already difficult housing market. Related Videos White House Unveils 'AI Action Plan' to Spur Development Japan Proposed 'Innovative Solution' on Tariffs: Bessent Hasbro Q2 beat, MARA to raise $850M, Otis issues weak guidance South Africa's Ramaphosa Axes Education Minister Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Lamar Jackson declines to comment on the arbitration case that stemmed in part from his free agency
OWINGS MILLS, Md. (AP) — Lamar Jackson wasn't at all interested in discussing the arbitration case that's helped cause so much upheaval within the NFL Players Association. In January, arbitrator Christopher Droney ruled there wasn't sufficient evidence of collusion by owners in contract negotiations with quarterbacks after the Cleveland Browns gave QB Deshaun Watson a record $230 million fully guaranteed contract back in 2022. The union is appealing. Jackson's free agency a couple of years ago was a big part of that case. The Ravens gave him the non-exclusive franchise tag, meaning he had a chance to negotiate with other teams, but he ultimately signed a five-year deal with Baltimore. The 'Pablo Torre Finds Out' podcast first published the arbitrator's decision. When asked about the case Wednesday after practice, Jackson changed the subject. 'I'm focused on football right now. I'm not worried about that right now," Jackson said. "That happened. It is what it is. I'm focused on this right now.' The revelation that the NFLPA and the league had a confidentiality agreement to keep the arbitrator's ruling quiet has led to turmoil within the union. Lloyd Howell resigned as executive director of the NFLPA. Jackson wouldn't comment on what's happening within the NFLPA either, although it's obviously a significant topic around the league. 'Yeah, it's been kind of a mess. We've been meeting about it the past couple days, long meetings. That's also something that's been hanging over my head, too,' said tackle Zach Tom, player rep for the Green Bay Packers. 'I think it's an unfortunate situation. I'm really not sure how much I can say. I'll just leave it at that.' Watson received his deal in 2022, a year before Jackson had a limited chance to test the market. 'While the NFL Management Council encouraged the 32 member clubs of the NFL to reduce guarantees in future contracts with players at the March 2022 annual meeting of the club owners, the clubs did not join in such a collusive agreement and did not act in accordance with one as to the three quarterbacks named (Jackson, Russell Wilson and Kyler Murray) in the initial arbitration demand or to other veteran players,' the arbitrator's decision said. In the two seasons since, Jackson has finished first and second in the MVP vote, and the question now is whether he and the Ravens can agree on an extension beyond the three years left on his deal. Jackson certainly indicated that he's moved on from the 2023 negotiations, but that appears to have been a turning point after Watson's deal, and one that has continued to impact what quarterbacks can expect to be offered. 'I'm all for the players and I'm all for guys getting what they deserve," Las Vegas quarterback Geno Smith said. "Whenever a guy like Lamar — two-time MVP, perennial Pro Bowler — a lot of these other guys who are doing a great job, when there's a chance for them to really just get what they deserve, I think it's warranted. ... When you work hard and you earn something, you kind of just want your just due.' ___ AP Sports Writers Mark Anderson and Steve Megargee contributed to this report. ___ AP NFL:
Yahoo
10 minutes ago
- Yahoo
UgenticAI Raises $4M to Scale Portfolio of Agentic AI Companies Aimed at Transforming Small Business Operations
ROCKVILLE, MD, July 23, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- UgenticAI, an AI holding company, has closed $4 million in funding to expand its growing portfolio of agentic AI companies, businesses that use AI to autonomously execute complex business functions such as sales, content creation, and customer support. With four acquisitions already completed and multiple additional deals in progress, UgenticAI is focused on building an AI ecosystem designed for real business impact, not just automation for its own company's mission is distinct: identify or develop agentic AI companies, not just tools, and bring them under one umbrella to scale. Agentic AI refers to systems that can act independently, make decisions, and complete workflows with minimal human oversight. This differs from traditional AI applications, which often require user prompting and manual oversight to function effectively. Filling a Critical Gap in AI Adoption While artificial intelligence continues to dominate headlines, a significant portion of the market remains underserved. According to UgenticAI's analysis of data from Gartner and McKinsey, there are over 450 million small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) worldwide, and 76% of them still haven't meaningfully adopted AI tools. That's even though global SMB software spend has surpassed $1.6 trillion and continues to grow. 'Most AI startups are not solving full business problems; they're building features. We believe the real opportunity lies in building or acquiring agentic AI companies that serve entire business functions,' said Anik Singal, CEO of UgenticAI. The reality is stark: nearly 90% of AI startups fail, often because they lack distribution, a viable business model, or don't go beyond single-use capabilities. UgenticAI's strategy is to change that narrative by acquiring companies with established traction or building new ones from scratch, always with a focus on delivering tangible results to businesses. A Holding Company Model for the Agentic AI Era UgenticAI operates as a holding company, meaning it doesn't just invest in AI; it owns and operates a portfolio of AI-driven businesses. This structure enables centralized resources, shared infrastructure, and unified strategic direction, while allowing each subsidiary to grow independently. The company currently has four companies under its umbrella, with two more software launches in development. Each entity focuses on a specific function, such as automating outreach for sales teams or deploying autonomous chat solutions for customer support. These are not experimental concepts but operational businesses with growing customer bases and measurable impact. By integrating these companies, UgenticAI aims to offer SMBs a full-stack suite of agentic AI services that can operate cohesively saving time, reducing labor costs, and enabling scalability. Investment Through Diversification Rather than backing a single AI idea, UgenticAI offers accredited investors access to a broader portfolio, effectively spreading risk across multiple ventures. This approach mirrors traditional investment models in real estate or venture capital, but with a focused theme: operational AI companies. The $4 million raised to date has enabled acquisitions, team expansion, and infrastructure development. The company reports that three additional deals are in negotiation, signaling further portfolio expansion in 2025. An IPO target of $350 million within 2.5 years is in motion, with a longer-term vision of building a $3 billion-plus AI conglomerate. Educating the Market on Agentic AI A key part of UgenticAI's mission is to shift how businesses, particularly SMBs, understand and adopt AI. While many AI tools on the market serve as assistants or single-task enhancers, agentic AI solutions go further. They are built to replace full-time roles with autonomous software agents that learn, adapt, and act without constant oversight. This form of AI, while still emerging, is quickly gaining traction as businesses face rising labor costs, scaling challenges, and increasing pressure to do more with less. 'Agentic AI isn't about eliminating jobs for the sake of it,' Singal emphasized. 'It's about enabling businesses to do things they simply couldn't afford or scale before.' By focusing on usability, accessibility, and direct business value, UgenticAI's portfolio companies are designed specifically for the needs of SMBs, a demographic often left behind in major tech shifts. Further details about UgenticAI and its development roadmap are available at About UgenticAI UgenticAI is a Maryland-based holding company focused on acquiring and launching agentic AI companies. Its portfolio-driven approach enables small and medium-sized businesses to access scalable AI solutions that replace core business functions, not just assist with tasks. Backed by $4M in funding, the company is actively building toward a $350M IPO, offering accredited investors diversified exposure to operational AI Contact Company Name: UgenticAI Contact Person: Anik Singal Email: anik@ Phone: 240-200-4222 Country: United States Website: CONTACT: Media Contact Company Name: UgenticAI Contact Person: Anik Singal Email: anik@ Phone: 240-200-4222 Country: United States Website: while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data