logo
I Have A Problem With The Term 'Thought Leadership Ads'

I Have A Problem With The Term 'Thought Leadership Ads'

Forbes4 days ago
With LinkedIn's thought leadership ads, the line between genuine insight and paid promotion is ... More blurring—raising questions about what thought leadership really means.
Recently, I saw a webinar titled 'LinkedIn Thought Leadership Ads.' The name alone made my stomach churn.
For a moment, I thought I had misread it.
Surely, this wasn't real—surely, no one had decided to mash together the words 'thought leadership' and 'advertisement' into a serious marketing product.
But yes, it was true. LinkedIn now has a format called thought leadership ads, which lets companies sponsor posts from individuals—typically their own executives or employees—to promote thought leadership.
As someone who has spent the past decades studying, practicing, and teaching the art of writing, particularly for B2B companies, I can't help but feel that this development is not just a misstep. It's a fundamental misunderstanding of what thought leadership is and what it's meant to do.
Let me be clear: Thought leadership is not a campaign. It's not a post. It's not a shiny new format for marketers to test. It's a philosophy and a practice rooted in generosity.
At its best, thought leadership is the long game of building trust by offering something meaningful and valuable—ideas, perspectives, frameworks—for free, in service of your audience.
When I teach writing for thought leadership, I emphasize that thought leadership emerges when an expert becomes an idea guide. This person doesn't just share information—they serve their audience by helping them solve important problems. That's the price of admission: usefulness. Not visibility. Not virality. Admission requires relevance and usefulness.
What makes the thought leadership ad format so jarring is the contradiction at its core. Sponsoring someone's post and calling it 'thought leadership' undermines the entire premise of what we're trying to build in this space. Thought leadership isn't supposed to be transactional. You don't get to buy your way in. You earn it through creativity and critical thinking.
Thought Leadership Ads: From Individual Voice to Brand Megaphone
Let's look closer at what these ads actually do.
Companies can now promote posts from their executives' personal profiles—meaning, you're scrolling through LinkedIn and see a thoughtful update from someone who seems like an expert in their field. But look again. In small letters, you may notice: 'Promoted by [Company Name].'
The brand is paying for that message to reach you. The post hasn't organically pleased the LinkedIn algorithm. It's strategically distributed paid media—and the label is subtle enough that many users may not realize what they're seeing is an ad.
This kind of stealth branding muddies the waters between genuine expertise and corporate messaging.
Companies are right to be engaging their experts for their content, but I believe we need clearer labeling which gives us the ability to tell the difference between a hard-won idea and a boosted post. I'd like to see labeling as clear as the difference between a newspaper's opinion page and it's sponsored sections.
The Real Problem: Dilution of the Term Thought Leadership
In small ways, I've been working for higher standards in thought leadership for years. LinkedIn's ad format worries me because it pulls us in the opposite direction. Just as groups like the Global Thought Leadership Institute are working to define and professionalize this practice, LinkedIn's feature invites a flood of performative, pay-to-play content.
In an environment where the term thought leadership is stretched to include individuals' posts promoted with budget, thought leadership as a practice is diluted. And when a term loses its meaning, it loses its power.
That's not just a branding issue. It's a credibility issue.
How can professionals be expected to invest in their own deep thinking, original research, or courageous opinion writing when branded soundbites dressed up as fresh thinking are the norm?
Let's Call Thought Leadership Ads What They Are—Advertising
Let's face it. Thought leadership ads are not a clever evolution of thought leadership—they're just another kind of advertising. Such posts may actually contain expertise, but make no mistake: These are ads. They are bought. They are targeted. They are tracked. And I'd venture to say that they're engineered for engagement more than insight.
Let's stop confusing the medium with the message. Just because an idea is sponsored doesn't make it unworthy—but we must label it front and center for what it is. Thought leadership is a standard we should preserve, not a term we should co-opt for clicks.
Here are some ideas about how LinkedIn could rename the labels for the actual posts.
And here are some ideas about what the product could be called:
Any of these would be better than calling them thought leadership ads. More importantly, a new product name wouldn't hijack a phrase that many professionals have worked hard to live up to.
If we allow this blurring to continue, we risk undermining everything that real thought leadership is meant to stand for: courage, clarity, curiosity, and the willingness to give without asking for anything in return.
Why The Name Of Promoted Posts Matters
This isn't about semantics. It's about values.
Thought leadership, when practiced well, is about helping others. It's about taking risks with your thinking. It's about earning trust over time—not buying it in the moment. That distinction matters, especially when we're drowning in content and starving for substance.
It matters even more for the people doing this work—professionals who are putting in the effort to frame their ideas, test their hypotheses, research deeply and write with the reader in mind. If we tell them that the only way to be seen is to pay, we're telling them that the hard work doesn't matter. That the system rewards visibility over value.
That's a message I don't want to support.
Going Deep Instead of Going Wide
The best thought leadership doesn't come from amplification. It comes from intention. It comes from doing the deep work of identifying the real problems your audience faces and offering insights that help them move forward. No ad can manufacture that.
As the autor of Write Like a Thought Leader, I want to say, clearly and unequivocally: advertising is not thought leadership. Yes, thought leadership is in service of a product or service you're selling, but advertising language should not be part of it.
In my view, you can't buy trust with thought leadership ads. You can't promote your way to authority. And you can't call something 'leadership' if it doesn't begin with service.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

JP Morgan Says Apple's Set To Beat Q3 Estimates
JP Morgan Says Apple's Set To Beat Q3 Estimates

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

JP Morgan Says Apple's Set To Beat Q3 Estimates

Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) looks set to beat when it reports Q3 fiscal 2025 on Thursday July 31 despite headwinds from cooling iPhone demand and modest Services growth. J.P. Morgan's Samik Chatterjee says the near?term setup is stronger than imagined given H1 pull?forward benefits, App Store link?outs in the US and the looming DOJ versus Google lawsuit in Services. The bank forecasts revenue of $89.6 billion, with iPhone at $39.9 billion, iPad at $7.7 billion, Mac at $7.4 billion and Services at $26.7 billion, some $600 million above the $88.96 billion consensus and sees EPS of $1.43. The firm keeps an Overweight rating and $250 price target after Apple has beaten revenue and EPS estimates for seven straight quarters. Services growth has remained healthy but lackluster, and the iPhone 17 rollout is failing to excite an install base used to major feature leaps. Apple's installed device base tops 2 B active units, giving it a cushion if upgrade cycles slow. Analysts will also watch for any updates on Siri enhancements and Vision Pro traction as Apple leans into AI amid peers. J.P. Morgan's Overweight thesis hinges on this resilience amid a tougher macro backdrop. Production headwinds have eased versus 90 days ago, hinting at smoother supply chains. Why it matters: A beat on July 31 could give AAPL shares a lift and set the stage for the iPhone 17 launch. Investors will be watching the Q3 result live and tracking early demand signals for Apple's next phone. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Sign in to access your portfolio

Wedbush Calls AI Microsoft's Shining Moment
Wedbush Calls AI Microsoft's Shining Moment

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Wedbush Calls AI Microsoft's Shining Moment

Microsoft (NASDAQ:MSFT) executive aren't losing any sleep over Q4, with Wedbush just stuck with its Outperform call and $600 target ahead of the July 30 report. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Sign with MSFT. Daniel Ives and the team reckon the AI revolution is in full swing, with enterprise deals accelerating across finance, government and retail. They see Azure and Office AI features driving Microsoft toward a $4 trillion market capand even $5 trillion in the next 18 months. Over the next three years, more than 70% of its installed base should be running AI tools, and early Copilot rollouts could tack on about $25 billion by FY 26. Wedbush calls this Redmond's shining moment, pointing out stronger cloud wins against Amazon (AMZN) and Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) and smoother supply chains compared to 90 days ago. They're clear that while FY 25 looks solid, FY 26 is when AI really kicks inand they don't think the Street has fully caught on yet. Investors will be watching the July 30 print for proof. This article first appeared on GuruFocus.

Why Solana Is Sinking Today
Why Solana Is Sinking Today

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why Solana Is Sinking Today

Key Points Valuations for Solana and other top cryptocurrencies are dipping today following new information in Tesla's quarterly report. Tesla sold 75% of its Bitcoin holdings in the second quarter. Despite some recent pullbacks, the crypto market has been on an impressive run -- and it's got a big test coming up at the end of this month. 10 stocks we like better than Solana › Solana (CRYPTO: SOL) is selling off Friday amid valuation pressures impacting the broader cryptocurrency market. The token was down 2% over the past 24 hours as of 5:20 p.m. ET. Meanwhile, Bitcoin was down 1.3%, and Ethereum was down 0.3%. Top cryptocurrencies are seeing sell-offs today following Tesla's disclosure that it had sold 75% of its Bitcoin holdings in the second quarter. The crypto market has seen a significant recovery since the morning trading hours, but Solana is still in the red. Solana slips as Tesla discloses Bitcoin sale With the Q2 report Tesla issued yesterday, the company showed that it had sold 75% of its Bitcoin holdings in Q2. The news has caused investors to become more cautious about valuations in the crypto market today, and Solana is seeing a moderate valuation pullback in conjunction with the trend. The cryptocurrency market has generally been on an impressive bull run, with Bitcoin's march above $123,000 per token and favorable political developments helping to power strong gains. On the heels of the rally, investors are taking profits, easing off on purchases, and waiting for indicators about where valuations might be heading next. What's next for Solana? Solana has climbed roughly 20% over the last three months, but it's still down 4% across this year's trading. The token now has a market capitalization of roughly $99 billion, and it ranks as the sixth-largest cryptocurrency by valuation. The Federal Reserve's Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) will meet on July 28 and July 29 and make a determination about whether to cut interest rates. Expectations that the FOMC will cut rates multiple times before the year is over have likely already factored in to gains for Solana and other cryptocurrencies over the last several months, but the upcoming Fed meeting still looks like the next big catalyst for the crypto market. Should you invest $1,000 in Solana right now? Before you buy stock in Solana, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Solana wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,774!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,942!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,040% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Keith Noonan has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Why Solana Is Sinking Today was originally published by The Motley Fool

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store